14 Apr 2018

Israel the rogue state.

Let's get a few things straight upfront.
Anti-Israel is being against the state of Israel.
Anti-Zionism is being against the Jewish state based on destiny by virtue of divine providence.
Anti-semitism etymologically is hatred of all Semitic prople, including Arabs, Assyrians, Ethiopians and Jews. Colloquially, just Jews. The commonly accepted understanding has come to mean aversion to religious Jews even Israel's Ashkenazi Jews despite no genetic lineage to the Israelites of the Bible.
Anti-goverment of Israel (or simplyopposition, if in Israel) is being against the current Israeli government.

Not all Anti-goverment are Anti-Israel.
Not all Anti-Israel are Anti-Zionists.
Not all Anti-Zionists are Anti-semites.
All Anti-semites are racist.

Here is my more detailed position on the Issue because I won't be wasting any effort replying to the usual crowd who lack the intellectual fortitude to process this issue beyond the infantile chant of "anti-Semite". I will never be shut down by the PC police until I hear a persuasive argument. Up til now quite frankly those arguments don't impress me very much.

I want to draw your attention to an article written by Adam Garrie of Eurasian Future. You will find it in the recommended sites section in the WEB VERSION of this blog but not the Mobile for some reason.

It's a broadly cast and impressive synopsis of the Israeli chicanery in geopolitics and it's "wag the dog" relationship with the United States.

You can find it here. I am linking externally because rather than host it I'd like to push traffic to the site.  It's offers a wealth of refreshing angles and it's well researched. The regional nuances are well understood and it lends legitimacy to the term "Journalism".


Adam Garrie – Director

Adam Garrie is a geo-political expert who can be frequently seen on Nedka Babliku’s weekly discussion show Digital Divides, RT’s flagship debate show CrossTalk,  Press-TV’s flagship programme ‘The Debate’ and radio Sputnik.
A global specialist with an emphasis on Eurasian integration, Garrie’s articles have been published in the Oriental Review, Asia Times, Geopolitica Russia, the Tasnim News Agency, Global Research, RT’s Op-Edge, Global Village Space and others

10 Apr 2018

CO2 is not a pollutant, it is greening the earth!

Whatever your persuasion is on CO² and AGW, nobody disagrees on the tremendous benefit it provides plant life. Many of the past famine disasters and desertification has CO² decline listed as a contributor.


I feel I've already blown the notion that humans are the main cause of climate change out of the water. Or rather I've used the reasoning of others and put it together in a convenient outline. See my previous post above for starters.  However, I recognize that humans do increase CO² levels, no matter how tiny. Increases are likely to be very short lived because the earth has an effective feedback mechanism, but we can apparently get small increases, and it's been put forward on very poor science that this is a bad thing. That assertion hinges completely on bad models. More on that in the bottom most link.  Model's and the measurement sample dates are dubious at best.

Furthermore, the main increase in CO²  as we warm out of the last mini ice age is warming oceans, because CO² as we know trails warming, it does not cause it. This is well documented.

Whatever the cause there seem to measurably evidenced benefits, not only in my country in a draught year, but globally.

Here are some case studies:




And this article which raises the point that plant increases will actually absorb more CO² and thereby regulate modest increases but ensure no runaway increases happen. It's a natural buffer, but even so that is the smallest of many natural atmospheric, oceanic and terrestrial buffers which are known to exist.

Here is a website dedicated to basic science, the unrefuted basic science of the benefit of CO² to plants:

We could go on and on, but nobody contests this. The real areas of interest are who stands to gain from stopping green spending on Mercury, Lead, Solvents, Nuclear Waste, Toxic chemicals etc and redirecting them to chasing CO² ghosts?

Well fortunately I've already covered that in great detail here, I strongly suggest taking a look because I took great care to address every aspect in detail:

9 Apr 2018

Dark Matter does not exist.

This has the paw print of a huge money wasting scam all over it. The search for dark matter, that non baryonic form of matter than we detect from gravitational effect alone, has cost untold billions and as yet has yielded nothing.

What's more its clear those in charge of the investigation and science have done the maths right and nothing else.

It took me a while to find the right articles, and I though I was a few weeks from posting about this. but I stumbled accross a clip on youtube that covered all the ground and shared the same sense of frustration, and it's only 10 minutes long. See below, I have nothing more to add

8 Apr 2018

Sheep Science

I did a broadly cast takedown of the lie of consensus science recently where I unpack exactly what the so-called consensus is, why it's a fraud and include:

*The historical record of EXCLUSIVELY bad climate "science" that has never even made one single prediction of the calibre required for a true scientific model.
*That climate change is the same in all planets, they all heat and cool at the same time.
*How data is manipulated.
*WHY data is manipulated
*The obviously untrue stretch that each year is the hottest on record
*The political forces driving the lie and the misconception of who stands to gain and why.

Here is the post:
The written post is rich with reputable sources, data libraries, links, references and interviews.

And the Audio file:
The audio file will suit you if you want to listen to the overview.

Atmospheric scientist professor Richard Lindtzen, lead IPCC scientist in the earlier years who resigned in disgust gives a talk outlining the problems and how the introduction of politics meant abandonment of all real science.

Here is a paper worth checking out showing the (gasp) crazy 'deniar logic that maybe, just maybe, nature has all along caused changes in climate?

And by now, after more than a decade long pause, the anticipated cooling period has kicked in:

But despite this information being out there, it does not make it to people, usually because of the sort of problems we have with our media and special interests, which is well known. Here is the latest shocker:

The knee jerk talking heads in climate cult echo-chamber is no different. They keep championing their graphs of anomalies rather than data, usually truncated at the x-axis, all chanting in unison "no scientist worth his salt disagrees" before quoting non specialists like Bill Nye (twat) or MSM darlings that know nothing about Climatology but rely on the fortitude of integrity by colleagues, like Neil Degrasse Tyson, Brian Cox and David Attenborough (all 3 of whom I will continue to love and will always forgive for this one little mistake which is totally understandable when you consider the circles they move in and MSM programming they are doing)

So let's call them on it.

Let's be serious for s moment here. Real scientifically RELEVANT researchers, academics actually published IN THE REATED FIELD, don't play that game.

Here are a few:

David Bellamy, botanist.[19][20][21][22]
Lennart Bengtsson, meteorologist, Reading University.[23][24]
Judith Curry, Professor and former chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology.[25][26][27][28]
Freeman Dyson, professor emeritus of the School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study; Fellow of the Royal Society.[29][30]
Ivar Giaever, Norwegian–American physicist and Nobel laureate in physics (1973).[31]
Steven E. Koonin, theoretical physicist and director of the Center for Urban Science and Progress at New York University.[32][33]
Richard Lindzen, Alfred P. Sloan emeritus professor of atmospheric science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and member of the National Academy of Sciences.[30][34][35][36]
Craig Loehle, ecologist and chief scientist at the National Council for Air and Stream Improvement.[37][38][39][40][41][42][43]
Ross McKitrick, Professor of Economics and CBE Chair in Sustainable Commerce, University of Guelph.[44][45]
Patrick Moore, former president of Greenpeace Canada.[46][47][48]
Nils-Axel Mörner, retired head of the Paleogeophysics and Geodynamics Department at Stockholm University, former chairman of the INQUA Commission on Sea Level Changes and Coastal Evolution (1999–2003).[49][50]
Garth Paltridge, retired chief research scientist, CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research and retired director of the Institute of the Antarctic Cooperative Research Centre, visiting fellow Australian National University.[51][52]
Roger A. Pielke, Jr., professor of environmental studies at the Center for Science and Technology Policy Research at the University of Colorado at Boulder.[53][54]
Denis Rancourt, former professor of physics at University of Ottawa, research scientist in condensed matter physics, and in environmental and soil science.[55][56][57][58]
Harrison Schmitt, geologist, Apollo 17 Astronaut, former U.S. Senator.[59][60]
Peter Stilbs, professor of physical chemistry at Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.[61][62]
Philip Stott, professor emeritus of biogeography at the University of London.[63][64]
Hendrik Tennekes, retired director of research, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute.[65][66]
Anastasios Tsonis, distinguished professor of atmospheric science at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.[67][68]
Fritz Vahrenholt, German politician and energy executive with a doctorate in chemistry.[69][70]

Scientists arguing that global warming is primarily caused by natural processes

Graph showing the ability with which a global climate model is able to reconstruct the historical temperature record, and the degree to which those temperature changes can be decomposed into various forcing factors. It shows the effects of five forcing factors: greenhouse gases, man-made sulfate emissions, solar variability, ozone changes, and volcanic emissions.[71]
These scientists have said that the observed warming is more likely to be attributable to natural causes than to human activities. Their views on climate change are usually described in more detail in their biographical articles.

Khabibullo Abdusamatov, astrophysicist at Pulkovo Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences.[72][73]
Sallie Baliunas, retired astrophysicist,Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.[74][75][76]
Timothy Ball, historical climatologist, and retired professor of geography at the University of Winnipeg.[77][78][79]
Ian Clark, hydrogeologist, professor, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa.[80][81]
Vincent Courtillot, geophysicist, member of the French Academy of Sciences.[82]
Chris de Freitas, associate professor, School of Geography, Geology and Environmental Science, University of Auckland.[83][84]
David Douglass, solid-state physicist, professor, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester.[85][86]
Don Easterbrook, emeritus professor of geology, Western Washington University.[87][88]
William Happer, physicist specializing in optics and spectroscopy; emeritus professor, Princeton University.[30][89]
Ole Humlum, professor of geology at the University of Oslo.[90][91]
Wibjörn Karlén, professor emeritus of geography and geology at the University of Stockholm.[92][93]
William Kininmonth, meteorologist, former Australian delegate to World Meteorological Organization Commission for Climatology.[94][95]
David Legates, associate professor of geography and director of the Center for Climatic Research, University of Delaware.[96][97]
Anthony Lupo, professor of atmospheric science at the University of Missouri.[98][99]
Tad Murty, oceanographer; adjunct professor, Departments of Civil Engineering and Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa.[100][101]
Tim Patterson, paleoclimatologist and professor of geology at Carleton University in Canada.[102][103]
Ian Plimer, professor emeritus of mining geology, the University of Adelaide.[104][105]
Arthur B. Robinson, American politician, biochemist and former faculty member at the University of California, San Diego.[106][107]
Murry Salby, atmospheric scientist, former professor at Macquarie University and University of Colorado.[108][109]
Nicola Scafetta, research scientist in the physics department at Duke University.[110][111][112]
Tom Segalstad, geologist; associate professor at University of Oslo.[113][114]
Nir Shaviv, professor of physics focusing on astrophysics and climate science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.[115][116]
Fred Singer, professor emeritus of environmental sciences at the University of Virginia.[117][118][119][120]
Willie Soon, astrophysicist, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.[121][122]
Roy Spencer, meteorologist; principal research scientist, University of Alabama in Huntsville.[123][124]
Henrik Svensmark, physicist, Danish National Space Center.[125][126]
George H. Taylor, retired director of the Oregon Climate Service at Oregon State University.[127][128]
Jan Veizer, environmental geochemist, professor emeritus from University of Ottawa.[129][130]

Scientists arguing that the cause of global warming is unknown
These scientists have said that no principal cause can be ascribed to the observed rising temperatures, whether man-made or natural.

Syun-Ichi Akasofu, retired professor of geophysics and founding director of the International Arctic Research Center of the University of Alaska Fairbanks.[131][132]
Claude Allègre, French politician; geochemist, emeritus professor at Institute of Geophysics (Paris).[133][134]
Robert Balling, a professor of geography at Arizona State University.[135][136]
Pål Brekke, solar astrophycisist, senior advisor Norwegian Space Centre.[137][138]
John Christy, professor of atmospheric science and director of the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, contributor to several IPCC reports.[139][140][141]
Petr Chylek, space and remote sensing sciences researcher, Los Alamos National Laboratory.[142][143]
David Deming, geology professor at the University of Oklahoma.[144][145]
Stanley B. Goldenberg a meteorologist with NOAA/AOML's Hurricane Research Division.[146][147]
Vincent R. Gray, New Zealand physical chemist with expertise in coal ashes.[148][149]
Keith E. Idso, botanist, former adjunct professor of biology at Maricopa County Community College District and the vice president of the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change.[150][151]
Kary Mullis, 1993 Nobel Laureate in Chemistry, inventor of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method.[152][153][154]
Antonino Zichichi, emeritus professor of nuclear physics at the University of Bologna and president of the World Federation of Scientists.[155][156]

Scientists arguing that global warming will have few negative consequences
These scientists have said that projected rising temperatures will be of little impact or a net positive for society or the environment.

Indur M. Goklany, science and technology policy analyst for the United States Department of the Interior.[157][158][159]
Craig D. Idso, faculty researcher, Office of Climatology, Arizona State University and founder of the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change.[160][161]
Sherwood B. Idso, former research physicist, USDA Water Conservation Laboratory, and adjnct professor, Arizona State University.[162][163]
Patrick Michaels, senior fellow at the Cato Institute and retired research professor of environmental science at the University of Virginia.[164][165]

7 Apr 2018

Apartheid South Africa, a nuclear state armed by Israel

Bomb casings at South Africa’s abandoned Circle nuclear bomb production facility near Pretoria (Source: Wikipedia)

Before reading this I would like to suggest watching the story of Mordecai Vanunu, the Israeli nuclear scientist that was kidnapped by Mossad and narrowly escaped the death penalty before his expose of Israel's worst kept secret (their nuclear weapons program). I assure you that this is no chore because this is a real life spy era story with more intrigue than an Ian Fleming spy novel. Espionage, honey traps, collusion with France & Britain, kidnapping, state secrets, secret agents and hush jobs, its all here!

Includes interviews with all of the people and journalists who were involved when it was going down. The one big take-away from all this is that there is one nation that absolutely is prepared to use its nuclear weapons if (like a petulant child it does not get it's way), and it's not Russia or the United States. It's Israel.

For where I sourced this article below, IE this article placed in the greater context of nuclear scandal involving South Africa, David Cameron, Intel regarding WMD's in Iraq, cover ups and political slush funds (and other surprises), you absolutely must read this full article:


South Africa – A nuclear state armed by Israel 

Although UN Security Council Resolution 418 of 4 November 1977 introduced a mandatory arms embargo against South Africa, requiring all states to refrain from “any co-operation with South Africa in the manufacture and development of nuclear weapons”, it was with the help of the Israelis that the apartheid regime designed and built a total of 10 fully operational nuclear weapons.[1]
One device was successfully tested in 1979, which left 9 nuclear weapons in South Africa’s stockpile.[2][3] In August 1988, foreign ministerPik Botha announced that South Africa had “the capability to make one [a nuclear weapon]” should it want to do so. A month later, in September 1988, South Africa sent a letter to IAEA Director-General Hans Blix expressing willingness to accede to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) if certain conditions were met, primarily that South Africa be allowed to market its uranium subject to IAEA safeguards. 

In summary, South Africa operated a covert nuclear ballistic missile program. The United Nations introduced a mandatory arms embargo against South Africa in the development and manufacture of such weapons. Israel assisted anyway. The result was that nine nuclear weapons were left after testing. The purpose was to prove to international markets it had that capability and was willing to sell that capability to willing buyers.

27 Mar 2018

Audio: Podcast on perspective when criticizing capitalism.

Embedded Audio for the written article given at the link below. Sources are referenced as usual and links to those sources can be found in the original article here.


Embedded Audio Podcast.

26 Mar 2018

Audio: Scientific consensus is that consensus is overturned... 100% of the time.

Here is an embedded audio file for listening to this post. I was requested to generate this version for a third party. When I get time I'll link podcasts again but I'll use a speech engine and have it generated automatically when this not possible.

Click on the embedded file above

Due to the contentious nature of this topic I was forced to include over a dozen source links which are critical and reputable. The audio file loses this aspect. It's particularly important on this topic though so all the links, sources and references are on the transcribed version below (click link)

Written Article:

23 Mar 2018


The subtle attempt by MSM and asshole pseudo-whistleblower Christopher Wylie to deflect the Cambridge Analitica from being about Facebook and their ilk, to make it a Partisan issue is disingenuous.

Here is a list of the propaganda

Rather explore the themes this way:

Here is the real story

Documentary: A glitch in the matrix

David Fullers  'watershed moment'  documentary on Jordan Peterson,  the shifting Zeitgeist, Political Correctness &  mainstream media.

Privacies we've already lost but just don't know about yet

Although people like to talk about ‘just’ metadata, metadata is extraordinarily intrusive. As an analyst, I’d prefer to be looking at metadata rather than content because it’s quicker and it’s easier and it doesn’t lie.”
Edward Snowden
5 Privacies you didn't know you lost, Interesting video from The Corbett Report that manages this serious issue in his usual entertaining fashion. 

22 Mar 2018

Fake News, Fake Wars, Fake Money, Fake Reality TV, Fake food, Fake Causes, Fake Celebrity & Fake Democracy. .

Liberal Snowflakes live in a world where all that ever drives anything is Climate Change,  Sexism,  Racism and various other PC issues where the way we solve issues is not uncovering their causes,  it's focusing on the window dressing and expanding upon the list of what the wrong offensive words are.  This is the manufactured consent generation with no real understanding of the world and such a strident lack of nuance and ability to explore the real underlying root causes of issues  that we are seeing a new phenomenon emerge.  The cause driven psychotic episode.

This psychological crises appears to stem from being in a state of conflict about strongly held beliefs clashing with clear evidence,  producing detachment from reality because,  just like with religion,   when your identity is tied into your beliefs,  and your beliefs are threatened,  the person you believe you are is threatened,  producing either crises or delusion.  Delusion is how our mind protects us against crises.

Let's look at a few issues of 'Snowflake Meltdown'

The title picture of the Syrian revolution being linked to climate change.  
This is perverse.  We know neither climate or the propaganda alleging government abuse drives the exodus. A complex story of human tragedy,  of a people pulling together under tremendous odds attacked by powerful external  forces,  being cheapened to a snowflake issue.

Here is the reality behind the refugees issue in Syria,  very few of whom are farmers .  Don't let them cheapen it.
Drive around Ghouta with President Bashar Al Assad and see destruction.  Or below get an aerial view of Homs by drone footage (courtesy AFP News Agency and RT) to utter see utter devastation.

Climate Change is sexism,  Hillary Clinton :
I don't even know where to start:

Text link:

Stop using the word 'Man'  (Courtesy Fox News)  disingenuous balancing act between satire and the down right infuriating and entirely focally misplaced movement to crush 'gender bias'.  There surely is a better way to campaign for gender equality?

But more insidious is what's happening in Delaware where primarily schools can override parents with children's gender Identity or race and keep it secret from parents.

The BBC does not believe they should be holding power to account stopping their government selling arms to let the Saudis Butcher the Yemeni people,  but rather they have their finger on the pulse of the nation. MANSPLAINING., MANTERUPTING The real issues are given a shot in the arm with new vocabulary.  Clip courtesy BBC.  The BBC tries to strike an awkward balance with humour,  but fails as things always do when there is serious  contention proposed.

If you ask me,  this is yet more divide and conquer rhetoric,  only now the damage on the mental health of the Western society is being turned into some kind of perverse Borat satire.

But for all the Liberal Snowflakes out there,  don't fear,  can get yourself an experts Political Analysis Set for under $15.00