Skip to main content

Assad Did NOT Gas His Own People! US funded rebels did! The Ghouta Chemical Sarin Gas Attacks.


Propaganda is as easy as the photos you choose and the narratives you spin. Whoever owns the most media, wins.

Don't make it so easy for them. Be discerning.

Certainly, those who have previously caused 54 regime changes and coups, and destroyed whole nations, most recently Libya and Iraq, with Syria and Iran on the shopping list, those Nations DO NOT GET TO LECTURE OTHER NATIONS ON MORALS.

Turkish MP implicates Erdogan administration live on Russian television in sarin gas smuggling to Daesh
https://www.rt.com/news/326084-erdem-rt-interview-treason/

The above follows the recent scandal connecting Turkey and the ISIS oil trade.

THE US FUNDED REBELS, NOT ASSAD DID THE GASSING ACCORDING TO THE OPCW REPORT http://www.almasdarnews.com/article/assad-never-used-chemical-weapons-islamist-rebels-did/


https://www.opcw.org/news/article/director-general-circulates-opcw-ffm-reports-to-states-parties/

https://www.opcw.org/news/article/destruction-of-syrian-chemical-weapons-completed/

http://www.mintpressnews.com/witnesses-of-gas-attack-say-saudis-supplied-rebels-with-chemical-weapons/168135/




http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/08/syria-chemical-weapons-not-assad-bild



http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/sep/9/german-intel-assad-did-not-order-syria-gas-attack/



http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/syriabovine.php#axzz3oWSirVbX

http://www.globalresearch.ca/syria-gas-attack-assad-wrongfully-blamed/5350350

http://russia-insider.com/en/politics/assad-did-not-gas-civilians-ghouta-2013/ri10282

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghouta_chemical_attack



Popular posts from this blog

Scientific Consensus is that Consensus is overturned 100% of the time

Everything you know is wrong. There is a very good reason why science succeeds more often than politics does.  Unlike politics, It's not a consensus or a vote,  it's actually method.  The scientific method. Anyone who has read this blog before probably knows I'm a lifelong science junkie as well as someone who spends thousands of hours breaking down the the political and economic agendas behind the special interest groups that guide public policy.  In many ways I'm actually uniquely qualified to tie these angles together in ways not well understood by the overwhelming majority of people.  That actually includes scientists. Scientists are notoriously naive in the political and economic forces that drive the human world.

For example if you are of the opinion that the earth has one moon, the earth revolves around the sun etc you are already wrong. Well sort of. The politicpl world is black and white, the scientific world is nuanced, see http://dwahts.blogspot.com/2018/06…

CO2 is not a pollutant, it is greening the earth!

Whatever your persuasion is on CO² and AGW, nobody disagrees on the tremendous benefit it provides plant life. Many of the past famine disasters and desertification has CO² decline listed as a contributor.

http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2018/04/sheep-science.html?m=1

I feel I've already blown the notion that humans are the main cause of climate change out of the water. Or rather I've used the reasoning of others and put it together in a convenient outline. See my previous post above for starters.  However, I recognize that humans do increase CO² levels, no matter how tiny. Increases are likely to be very short lived because the earth has an effective feedback mechanism, but we can apparently get small increases, and it's been put forward on very poor science that this is a bad thing. That assertion hinges completely on bad models. More on that in the bottom most link.  Model's and the measurement sample dates are dubious at best.


Furthermore, the main increase in CO²  as…

Dīvide et imperā: How To Defeat The Most Effective Social Control Weapon In Human History

Many different empires, cultures and nations have existed in history and while the details, styles, values and aesthetics keep changing, the core structure remains unchanged. In order to benefit from social coperation and steal reward in excess of the labour and value you invest, you cannot take it by brute force for extended periods of time without facing the wrath of the crowds. The crowds need to give it to you willingly or unknowingly. There was one exception to this synopsis, the Feudal System  but there is more to that than people realise, it's a post for a later day and deserves full scrutiny and parrellels do manifest. The support of the home crowd is also needed to win wars. No army has ever been effective fighting under duress, they would assemble, arm  and immediatly turn on you.


Before the current reigning Judeo-Christian Anglo American Empire of today there were other more monolithic empires that the loosely ideologically aligned old money banking dynasties, globalis…