Skip to main content

Coalition Of The Killing

Part of the 30 billion dollar F-15 US deal to Saudi Arabia, with a 64 billion deal to follow.

When the worlds richest nations like the US and UK provide intelligence, surveillance and arms to another of the worlds richest nations, Saudi Arabia, to butcher the regions poorest nation, Yemen, that is not a coalition of the willing, that is a coalition of the killing.  It's a wholesale butcher party and everyone wants to profit on the action.  There is fresh insult to the injury considering Obama's recent crocodile tears, every-time he "Thinks of those Kids" involving recent US mass shootings.  Well what about your drone murders in Africa, Yemen, Pakistan, Iraq etc?  What about the thousands of innocents you killed while your coked up jockeys pushed the "kill" button for you, be you never shed any tears then?
The True horrors of the drone assassination program is outlined here

O'bomber suddenly finds his heart when the cameras roll.

Yemen Aftermath in Aden

As well as the F-15s, the larger $60bn package includes Apache attack helicopters, Black Hawk helicopters, and a range of missiles, bombs and delivery systems.

Searching for survivors in Yemen After Saudi Bombs

Lockheed Martin Corp. (LMT Analyst Report) has been awarded a $262.8 million contract by the U.S. Air Force to provide F-15 sniper targeting system and radars for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. - See more at:

Oil Rich Saudi Arabia

Amnesty International reckons the UK is breaching international law by fueling the Yemen slaughter and selling arms to the Saudi's.

But there is heartening news. The Saudi's appear weak and unable to suppress the Houti's in Yemen and after rounding up the balance of the Petrodollar gulf-whore monarchies against Iran, are appearing desperate and ever more the loose cannon.

For all the horrors the Western powers are backing in the middle east, especially in Yemen and Syria, there is hope on the horizon and a sensible Russian presence in the region, which is no doubt sending the Saudi's into panic mode.

Popular posts from this blog

Scientific Consensus is that Consensus is overturned 100% of the time

Everything you know is wrong. There is a very good reason why science succeeds more often than politics does.  Unlike politics, It's not a consensus or a vote,  it's actually method.  The scientific method. Anyone who has read this blog before probably knows I'm a lifelong science junkie as well as someone who spends thousands of hours breaking down the the political and economic agendas behind the special interest groups that guide public policy.  In many ways I'm actually uniquely qualified to tie these angles together in ways not well understood by the overwhelming majority of people.  That actually includes scientists. Scientists are notoriously naive in the political and economic forces that drive the human world.

First and foremost,  what is this so called 'consensus' anyway.  You will be horrified to find out,  it's not specifically that global warming is man made.  It's simply that humans contribute to climate change in an unknowable way and to…

CO2 is not a pollutant, it is greening the earth!

Whatever your persuasion is on CO² and AGW, nobody disagrees on the tremendous benefit it provides plant life. Many of the past famine disasters and desertification has CO² decline listed as a contributor.

I feel I've already blown the notion that humans are the main cause of climate change out of the water. Or rather I've used the reasoning of others and put it together in a convenient outline. See my previous post above for starters.  However, I recognize that humans do increase CO² levels, no matter how tiny. Increases are likely to be very short lived because the earth has an effective feedback mechanism, but we can apparently get small increases, and it's been put forward on very poor science that this is a bad thing. That assertion hinges completely on bad models. More on that in the bottom most link.  Model's and the measurement sample dates are dubious at best.

Furthermore, the main increase in CO²  as…

You Don't Know What Capitalism Is So Stop Using The Word!

I am writing this for one purpose, to be able to post it every time the issue comes up in conversation to prevent myself from dying of boredom on a few key issues with label intellectuals, you know, the sort who drop labels for the singular purpose of demonstrating their talent at dodging real issues by posing as someone who knows the definition of a word.

When it comes right down to it, I personally think most economic and, for that matter, socio-economic systems across the entire capitalism/ socialism spectrum could work if corruption could just be reasonably controlled.  Many forget that Socialism still runs on the capitalism economics system and the finer points actually come down to policy and regulations. This is often missed.  That being said, I am fairly sure that many of the criticisms of communism for example are valid, and views that it does not work especially well because it tends to kill the inventiveness and passion of the human spirit do stand, but not for the reasons…