Skip to main content

A Bad Week For The Empire

Well the month of August appears to be ending as badly as it started for the Empire.  Their meddling in the Turkish state of affairs has blown up badly in their face as Turkey defects and jumps ship.  The Brash Erdogan, in typical fashion, struts his stuff without delay by launching a military assault in Syria, this time in line with what Putin and Assad hope to achieve, rather than what the US hopes to achieve (as evidenced by the mad US diplomatic scramble and PR emergency rush job they are pulling by backing Turkeys assault on the US's own Kurdish partners). It seems the US influence in the region is destined to wane even further.

If you have any doubts about the seemingly paradoxical links to the YPG in Syria and Peshmerga in Iraq with Daesh/ISIS then read my article here which should clarify things for you:

Things are not always what they seem....

Meanwhile, Dr. Drew got cancelled suspiciously soon after pointing out Hillary Clinton's health issues:
And Hillary herself has now not only been found to be lying under oath, committing perjury and a whole host of other serious offences that would have seen herthrown promptly in jail if she were not so untouchable, but now she has been shown to have actively tried to hamper the process to cover her own ass:

While this all goes on domestically in the US, back in the Middle East it seems like every day more and more evidence emerges to prove beyond all reasonable doubt that all the illegal gas attacks that have gone on in Aleppo lately have been committed by US backed rebels:
Just as the original attacks in Ghouta,m the source of all the Anti-Assad propaganda, are now known also to be the work of US backed rebels:

Oh my, how the mighty have fallen.

Popular posts from this blog

Scientific Consensus is that Consensus is overturned 100% of the time

Everything you know is wrong. There is a very good reason why science succeeds more often than politics does.  Unlike politics, It's not a consensus or a vote,  it's actually method.  The scientific method. Anyone who has read this blog before probably knows I'm a lifelong science junkie as well as someone who spends thousands of hours breaking down the the political and economic agendas behind the special interest groups that guide public policy.  In many ways I'm actually uniquely qualified to tie these angles together in ways not well understood by the overwhelming majority of people.  That actually includes scientists. Scientists are notoriously naive in the political and economic forces that drive the human world.

First and foremost,  what is this so called 'consensus' anyway.  You will be horrified to find out,  it's not specifically that global warming is man made.  It's simply that humans contribute to climate change in an unknowable way and to…

CO2 is not a pollutant, it is greening the earth!

Whatever your persuasion is on CO² and AGW, nobody disagrees on the tremendous benefit it provides plant life. Many of the past famine disasters and desertification has CO² decline listed as a contributor.

I feel I've already blown the notion that humans are the main cause of climate change out of the water. Or rather I've used the reasoning of others and put it together in a convenient outline. See my previous post above for starters.  However, I recognize that humans do increase CO² levels, no matter how tiny. Increases are likely to be very short lived because the earth has an effective feedback mechanism, but we can apparently get small increases, and it's been put forward on very poor science that this is a bad thing. That assertion hinges completely on bad models. More on that in the bottom most link.  Model's and the measurement sample dates are dubious at best.

Furthermore, the main increase in CO²  as…

You Don't Know What Capitalism Is So Stop Using The Word!

I am writing this for one purpose, to be able to post it every time the issue comes up in conversation to prevent myself from dying of boredom on a few key issues with label intellectuals, you know, the sort who drop labels for the singular purpose of demonstrating their talent at dodging real issues by posing as someone who knows the definition of a word.

When it comes right down to it, I personally think most economic and, for that matter, socio-economic systems across the entire capitalism/ socialism spectrum could work if corruption could just be reasonably controlled.  Many forget that Socialism still runs on the capitalism economics system and the finer points actually come down to policy and regulations. This is often missed.  That being said, I am fairly sure that many of the criticisms of communism for example are valid, and views that it does not work especially well because it tends to kill the inventiveness and passion of the human spirit do stand, but not for the reasons…