Skip to main content

The Wicked Witch Of The West.

THE SCANDALS: Let's get one thing straight, both Benghazi and the Hillary Emails Scandal are witch-hunts, but only because THERE IS A WITCH!
These political commentators, even the comedy guys on the left that I enjoy (and are actually usually quite insightful) have missed the boat here. These guys want leave Hillary alone over the scandals. Don't forget they are typically pro-Dem and are either contractually obliged by media bosses or duped into thinking there is a difference between corporate owners of DEM/GOP, they suggest its just political ammunition.  Well.., sure, but to suggest its time to leave Hillary alone.... NO! 
No No No. That's just NOT good enough. The truth is they don't mean harm, they just don't realize what they are saying. With the possible exception of bloodthirsty psychopath John McCain, Hillary is the absolute worst choice available on the planet. 

The New Year’s Eve release of over 3000 new Hillary Clinton emails from the State Department has CNN abuzz over gossipy text messages, the “who gets to ride with Hillary” selection process set up by her staff, and how a “cute” Hillary photo fared on Facebook. 
I have one thing to say: "Vomit!"
But historians of the 2011 NATO war in Libya will be sure to notice a few of the truly explosive confirmations contained in the new emails: admissions of rebel war crimes, special ops trainers inside Libya from nearly the start of protests, Al Qaeda embedded in the U.S. backed opposition, Western nations jockeying for access to Libyan oil, the nefarious origins of the absurd Viagra mass rape claim, and concern over Gaddafi’s gold and silver reserves threatening European currency.
Hillary’s Death Squads
A March 27, 2011 intelligence brief on Libya, sent by long time close adviser to the Clinton's and Hillary’s unofficial intelligence gatherer, Sidney Blumenthal, contains clear evidence of war crimes on the  part of NATO-backed rebels. Citing a rebel commander source “speaking in strict confidence” Blumenthal reports to Hillary [emphasis mine]:
Under attack from allied Air and Naval forces, the Libyan Army troops have begun to desert to the rebel side in increasing numbers. The rebels are making an effort to greet these troops as fellow Libyans, in an effort to encourage additional defections.
(Source Comment: Speaking in strict confidence, one rebel commander stated that his troops continue to summarily execute all foreign mercenaries captured in the fighting…). READ MORE HERE

Rand Paul tears Hillary a new one.



Hillary bizarrely links her massive wall street funding throughout her career to 9/11

The front page of Hillary's donors lists look like a veritable "who's who" of banksterism and media.

We can sleep sound, knowing that they will not give her any special treatment...
Citigroup Inc$824,402$816,402$8,000
Goldman Sachs$760,740$750,740$10,000
DLA Piper$700,530$673,530$27,000
JPMorgan Chase & Co$696,456$693,456$3,000
Morgan Stanley$636,564$631,564$5,000
EMILY's List$609,684$605,764$3,920
Time Warner$501,831$476,831$25,000
Skadden, Arps et al$469,290$464,790$4,500
University of California$417,327$417,327$0
Sullivan & Cromwell$369,150$369,150$0
Akin, Gump et al$364,478$360,978$3,500
Lehman Brothers$362,853$359,853$3,000
21st Century Fox$340,936$340,936$0
Cablevision Systems$336,613$307,225$29,388
Kirkland & Ellis$329,141$312,141$17,000
National Amusements Inc$328,312$325,312$3,000
Squire Patton Boggs$328,306$322,868$5,438
Greenberg Traurig LLP$327,890$319,790$8,100
Corning Inc$322,450$304,450$18,000
Credit Suisse Group$318,120$308,120$10,000
This table lists the top donors to this candidate in 1999-2016. Source check here at this useful site:

Show me the money!


Whatever else happens we should keep the idiot feminist vote out of an important decision involving Monetary policy, War and Foreign policy, IE the U.S. presidency.  It seems that they would rather use the opportunity to make it just another gender issue, an important issue in society for sure but clearly one that not come into this decision for THIS AWFUL WARMONGERING CANDIDATE.  All cannot be forgiven on account of aforementioned vagina belonging to her.

This is no theory, they have warned us that they will proudly use their vaginas to vote.  I urge you to resist this tempting easy way out and use your brain instead.

That is all!

Deliberate Anti Hillary Propaganda selected by me, the writer of this blog, because let's face it, some things are just impossible to resist.

Popular posts from this blog

Dīvide et imperā: How To Defeat The Most Effective Social Control Weapon In Human History

Many different empires, cultures and nations have existed in history and while the details, styles, values and aesthetics keep changing, the core structure remains unchanged. In order to benefit from social coperation and steal reward in excess of the labour and value you invest, you cannot take it by brute  for extended periods of time without facing the wrath of the crowds. The crowds need to give it to you willingly or unknowingly. There was one exception to this synopsis, the Feudal System  but there is more to that than people realise, it's a post for a later day and deserves full scrutiny and parrellels do manifest. The support of the home crowd is also needed to win wars. No army has ever been effective fighting under duress, they would assemble, arm  and immediatly turn on you.

Before the current reigning Judeo-Christian Anglo American Empire of today there were other more monolithic empires that the loosely ideologically aligned old money banking dynasties, globalists an…

Scientific Consensus is that Consensus is overturned 100% of the time

Everything you know is wrong. There is a very good reason why science succeeds more often than politics does.  Unlike politics, It's not a consensus or a vote,  it's actually method.  The scientific method. Anyone who has read this blog before probably knows I'm a lifelong science junkie as well as someone who spends thousands of hours breaking down the the political and economic agendas behind the special interest groups that guide public policy.  In many ways I'm actually uniquely qualified to tie these angles together in ways not well understood by the overwhelming majority of people.  That actually includes scientists. Scientists are notoriously naive in the political and economic forces that drive the human world.

For example if you are of the opinion that the earth has one moon, the earth revolves around the sun etc you are already wrong. Well sort of. The politicpl world is black and white, the scientific world is nuanced, see…

CO2 is not a pollutant, it is greening the earth!

Whatever your persuasion is on CO² and AGW, nobody disagrees on the tremendous benefit it provides plant life. Many of the past famine disasters and desertification has CO² decline listed as a contributor.

I feel I've already blown the notion that humans are the main cause of climate change out of the water. Or rather I've used the reasoning of others and put it together in a convenient outline. See my previous post above for starters.  However, I recognize that humans do increase CO² levels, no matter how tiny. Increases are likely to be very short lived because the earth has an effective feedback mechanism, but we can apparently get small increases, and it's been put forward on very poor science that this is a bad thing. That assertion hinges completely on bad models. More on that in the bottom most link.  Model's and the measurement sample dates are dubious at best.

Furthermore, the main increase in CO²  as…