Skip to main content

China Enters The Fray

Image Courtesy

Syria is proving to be one of the most important proxy battlefields in modern history. For the first time in the modern era since before the Cold War we are seeing a genuine shift in global power from the banksters that were once behind colonialism, now behind the US MIC/Oil empire, to a new multi-polar world of East and West. The moral high-ground that used to lie with the West against the Soviet Union now lies with the emerging Eastern alliance whose military inventions only happen at the request of governments instead of to overthrow them. The shift in global balance of power is snowballing at an unbelievable rate, we are experiencing a very important time right now.  With the Iraqi border on the mid term shopping list after Turkey is secured, the Eastern allies are now rapidly eyeballing control in the long term of all major borders to the Syria except a tiny sliver belonging to Israel and (more importantly) in the short term closing in for the death-blow to the US funded rebels and the terrorists.

If you want to get the heads up on the astonishing scandal that is the US black oil trade in Iraq (the real reason behind the Iraq war), and the ISIS and Peshmerga forces that protect it, check out this previous post of mine for a detailed look at the shocking facts:

This latest development with China throwing it's hat into the ring is reported on below, as taken from that excellent website for military and intelligence analysis, SouthFront:

Syria and China have made an agreement that the Chinese military will provide humanitarian aid to Syria, Director of the Office for International Military Cooperation of China’s Central Military Commission, Guan Youfei said on August 16, Chinese Xinhua news agency reported. Youfei also noted that a trainining of the Syrian army personnel by Chinese military instructors has been discussed.
Youfei arrived in Damascus for talks with Syrian Defense Minister Fahad Jassim al-Freij in order to find a political solution to the Syrian crisis and set closer military ties with Damascus.
“The Chinese and Syrian militaries traditionally have a friendly relationship, and the Chinese military is willing to keep strengthening exchanges and cooperation with the Syrian military,” he said.
Xinhua has not provided detailes about the agreed Chinese humanitarian aid mission in Syria. There are constant rumors taht China sent or is going to send military advisers to Syria to assist the country’s anti-terrorism efforts. However, there is no clear evidence that China has been invoved into the conflict.
The report said that the high-ranking Chinese officer also met with an unknown Russian general during his visit to Damascus. It’s important to note that Youfei’s visit came amid crucial military developmest in and around Syria (learn more about Russian military build up).
The spate of Moscow’s military actions in the region could push Beijing to follow its partner in the region to set the ground for gaining diplomatic and financial revenue before the Syrian conflict turned into its final stage.
It’s clear that if China offers assistance after the long-awaited liberation of Aleppo city by the Syrian-Russian-Iranian coalition, it will not have a lack of chances to become a major player in Syria.

Popular posts from this blog

Dīvide et imperā: How To Defeat The Most Effective Social Control Weapon In Human History

Many different empires, cultures and nations have existed in history and while the details, styles, values and aesthetics keep changing, the core structure remains unchanged. In order to benefit from social coperation and steal reward in excess of the labour and value you invest, you cannot take it by brute  for extended periods of time without facing the wrath of the crowds. The crowds need to give it to you willingly or unknowingly. There was one exception to this synopsis, the Feudal System  but there is more to that than people realise, it's a post for a later day and deserves full scrutiny and parrellels do manifest. The support of the home crowd is also needed to win wars. No army has ever been effective fighting under duress, they would assemble, arm  and immediatly turn on you.

Before the current reigning Judeo-Christian Anglo American Empire of today there were other more monolithic empires that the loosely ideologically aligned old money banking dynasties, globalists an…

Scientific Consensus is that Consensus is overturned 100% of the time

Everything you know is wrong. There is a very good reason why science succeeds more often than politics does.  Unlike politics, It's not a consensus or a vote,  it's actually method.  The scientific method. Anyone who has read this blog before probably knows I'm a lifelong science junkie as well as someone who spends thousands of hours breaking down the the political and economic agendas behind the special interest groups that guide public policy.  In many ways I'm actually uniquely qualified to tie these angles together in ways not well understood by the overwhelming majority of people.  That actually includes scientists. Scientists are notoriously naive in the political and economic forces that drive the human world.

For example if you are of the opinion that the earth has one moon, the earth revolves around the sun etc you are already wrong. Well sort of. The politicpl world is black and white, the scientific world is nuanced, see…

CO2 is not a pollutant, it is greening the earth!

Whatever your persuasion is on CO² and AGW, nobody disagrees on the tremendous benefit it provides plant life. Many of the past famine disasters and desertification has CO² decline listed as a contributor.

I feel I've already blown the notion that humans are the main cause of climate change out of the water. Or rather I've used the reasoning of others and put it together in a convenient outline. See my previous post above for starters.  However, I recognize that humans do increase CO² levels, no matter how tiny. Increases are likely to be very short lived because the earth has an effective feedback mechanism, but we can apparently get small increases, and it's been put forward on very poor science that this is a bad thing. That assertion hinges completely on bad models. More on that in the bottom most link.  Model's and the measurement sample dates are dubious at best.

Furthermore, the main increase in CO²  as…