I have received a bit of feedback on various forums regarding disbelief as to the scope and extent of the "divide and rule / divide and conquer" strategy used to both build empire and socially engineer home societies. I use that term as a generic reference for all the precedent strategies leading to the school of thought that advocates modern globalisation as an engineered process designed to centralise the operational functionality and concentrate influence/ wealth in the hands of special interests. In this context history must be viewed in terms of financial transaction and detective work centered around re-evaluating motives around who stood to gain what.
As a reminder, this globalist engineered society reveals maliceand misdirection as standard practice when special interests seek to influence the playing field outside the purview of democratically elected representative government. this myth has governent accountable to public oversight, these power structures are an illusion, reality stands in stark contrast to the global village school of thought which perceives large multinational conglomerates, complex shareholder arrangements, mergers, acquisitions, share buybacks, boom and bust cycles and technocracy as the way humans react organically to a world being made smaller by technology. Using this cognitively aware perspective, a self understood "confirmation bias" is implicitly called for when reevaluating conventional wisdom. Once done we should then set about falsifying our own interpretation which realistically factors in human nature. It is from that perspective that history must be rejected even last weeks history in the form of the TV news, where ideological reasoning, overthrow of "brutal dictators", reasons for fighting wars, role of religion, partisanship and ethnic strife must be rejected as a matter of policy owing to unforgivable naivety.
Whether it's the Arab Spring, Vietnam, The First World War, The Russian Revolution, the Crusades, The Inquisitions, The Imperial wars of Rome, The Peloponesion Wars or the Conquests of Alexander The Great it matters not. The historical accounts must always be considered to have been sanitised as some or other form of propaganda or spin in need of a critical eye. It is on this basis that I do not spend time squabbling with the one-eyed kings in the land of the blind, those trained or educated formally by tertiary educational institutions in the Neoliberal Globalist institutions. If I wanted the wrong, establishment sanctioned account of how we ended up in such a mess I would simply consult the Encyclopedia Britannica or even Wikipedia. I refer to this post, which must be read to appreciate this follow up:
https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2018/06/how-to-defeat-most-effective-social.html This is a must read!
The biggest point of contest I encounter is the fact that this strategy is not presented as such a package in either mainstream quick-check sources (Wikipedia) or in the involved courses of history as taught in the Neoliberal, globalist captured universities of today. Well, I have news for those that simply accept narratives and resist postponing understanding until the story makes sense commensurate with our understanding of human nature... and the old adage "money makes the world go [a]round".
Broaden your gaze, you will not get it spelled out for you in such a fashion and you cannot rely on such conclusions being spoon-fed to you. History, much of science, economics and many other things are taught in narratives. That is PRECISELY what got us into this mess. If manufacturing consent were not an agenda these subjects would not each cotemporary consensus, they would present competing hypothesis to students and allow them to major WITHIN a subject and still graduate by allowing a reasonable variance of divergent interpretation instead of conflating successful grades with how closely ones knowledge conforms with the narrative of the status quo. This is logical apart from anything else because we all know consensus is ultimately overturned 100% of the time.
Narratives include historical narratives including the history of art and specialist studies centered around motive, Egyptology, theoretical physics and all publically funded sciences and political science, economics and even philosophy and psychology.
This would not include historically verifiable source documents or archaeological evidence (which must always be subject to review with new methods and technology). It would obviously not include languages, mathematics and science or technical studies based on engineering or industry which are self correcting by the self evident premise that faulty design does not produce results. In other words:
- Cars internal combustion engines work to highly specified standards stemming from principles of thermodynamics and chemistry.
- The power grid is functional thanks to electrical engineering stemming from Maxwell's Equations, the work of Faraday, Gauss, Tesla and others
- Planes fly, probes explore mars and the outer solar system and rocket capsules reach the moon based on aeronaughtical engineering, orbital mechanics and classical mechanics dating back to the classical physics of Newton and Galileo.
- You are reading this on a functional device, its therefore not feasible to teach a competing hypothesis that doesn't work unless it somehow adds value to know where and why past thinking produced which dead ends, possibly with a view to revive old ideas with new perspectives.
Examples of historical resources from different angles:
It is very likely that these tactics go back much further and the elites behind them (or just the tactics themselves) hop from empire to empire. They hopped from the version of Rome they modelled on the ancient Greeks and stole from the Etruscan's, to the Christian Rome, the Byzantine, or Holy Roman Empire. Far earlier than that the mysterious figure of Phillip II of Macedonia is the earliest modern globalist I can trace, with his League of Corinth. His son Alexander (The Great) great surely had the quickest success in a world not yet ready to resist such a nuanced and multifaceted assault. The financial tricks were likely developed fully when Alexander made it to Babylon. This would become "Babylonian money magic" somewhat related to usury, or the "money renting" practised by the Knights Templar. The financial aspect is vital and I cover it in depth here in this post. Ultimately it translates more into a globalist tool against sovereign entities through deficit spending, starting in the temples, the Mints and now central banks.
The history of Macedonia before Phillip II and Alexander The Great.
The supranational and supernational diplomatic genius of Philip II of Macedonia was ahead of any of the other civilational powers of the time, along with his much more sophisticated use of military.
Elsewhere Genghis Khan would a thousand years later rule supreme, possibly (and this is not well known) the richest man in history, with yet another form of globalism/ empire more similar outwardly to Alexander than the Romans. Yet Philip prepared Alexander, who preparwd Ghengis? The Mongols were who exactly? The only other empire to have been officially larger, the British Empire, seemed vastly different.
In reality these empires were more similar fundamentally than represented purely on the basis of concentrating wealth and power. This is accomplished by demanding men for armies, having the colonisation logistics and militaries used for plunder financed by the same people exploited in its sevice or vitims of its conquests or obligatory tribute and slavery. What differs is how it represented. Is it open conquest, declared in the name of the Crown/ nationalism etc? Or ... or is it a secretive empire like the empire of today'.
How the tactics of empire formed the Mongol Horde is the begining days.
All 3 of these approaches were, however, already combined by the time the Roman empire practised it not too after Alexander but before the Mongol Horde. What relics of Rome were spread far and wide Before a shadowy cult (The Imperial Cult) hijacked Rome they were a republic, but a republic has its military focused on defence. An Empire is much better to focus on conquest to support the imperial system (now globalism is starting to resemble this). They were a new kind of king suited for multiple conquest lands rather than just one, an emperor, and ruled supreme (or at least those behind these figureheads did) .
Back to the Romans
In terms of actual evidence we are left scratching our heads. Titus Flavian set the time of Jesus to the previous dynasty 40 years earlier to allow for prophecy to be fulfilled, which he was doing, such as destroying the temple and then destroyed all other competing texts. That is why the dead sea scrolls are so important, they were hidden when the Romans took back Roman Palestine from the Rebellion, the only example of writings from the time.
Not too much later in history the Vatican sought control over most sovereign nations and this then persisted with the Knights Templar and the Jesuits. The globalist versus sovereign struggle is almost as old as civilization itself. This is as clear as it can possibly get but history can NEVER reflect this narrative since the interests behind it are still in operation today. The Vatican has deleted so much of our history that it should count as a crime against humanity. I suspect that much of this evidence is still partly recoverable, hidden somewhere in the Vatican or in the vaults the very highest echelons of today's elite. This may even explain the extensive fraud permeating archaeology and Egyptology today although that is just speculation.
The roman Psychological Operation to invent Jesus for purposes of divide and conquer over the Jews in Judea / Roman Palestine would later be used domestically by Constantine who would turn the cross into an upside sword and use it for divide and rule at home and for empire building. The Romans were ruthless and effective at this and no trace of similar operations or societies survives as they obliterated Carthage (spawned by the trade of the Phoenicians , modern day Tunisia but they had a trade-based empire all over the Mediterranean basin and had to go). They also obliterated the Greek City State of Corinth, where globalization was possibly born under Phillips ll, and left no record whatsoever of the Druids of England. Under Titus Flavian they had similar success in some ways in Palestine, massacaring the Jews mercilessly as punishment for an earlier rebelian. They waited until passover and committed the attack, destroying the temple and fulfilling a backdated prophesy. Titus had Josephus, one of the Jewish rebellion leaders and now a turncoat, along with the Herods and the Alexanders write and set the books of the New Testament. In the end giving rise to both Christianity and Rabinical Judaism which is another story.
Later empires swallowed what is left of the original Hebrews and Israelite's of the bible, such as the Assyrians invading Sumer in the north and the 10 lost tribes. The Romans took one hundred thousand slaves from Jerusalem. The only Jews left are the later European converts from the Ottoman Turkish regions and the steppes of Russia where the descendants were not from the Tribe of Judah. These groups make up the largely European/Eurasian descended Ashkenazi population of Israel today.
They took the first great agricultural societies farming myth based on the rising of the sun, the months of the year, the zodiac and the seasons which had become anthropomorphized into a literal story by dozens of societies who already had a Christ figure rising from the dead for purposes of redemption. There was no actual person called Jesus, history only reflects certain Christ like cult leaders, of which there were many. Here is comprehensive evidence of this archetypal myth.
Later empires swallowed what is left of the original Hebrews and Israelite's of the bible, such as the Assyrians invading Sumer in the north and the 10 lost tribes. The Romans took one hundred thousand slaves from Jerusalem. The only Jews left are the later European converts from the Ottoman Turkish regions and the steppes of Russia where the descendants were not from the Tribe of Judah. These groups make up the largely European/Eurasian descended Ashkenazi population of Israel today.
They took the first great agricultural societies farming myth based on the rising of the sun, the months of the year, the zodiac and the seasons which had become anthropomorphized into a literal story by dozens of societies who already had a Christ figure rising from the dead for purposes of redemption. There was no actual person called Jesus, history only reflects certain Christ like cult leaders, of which there were many. Here is comprehensive evidence of this archetypal myth.
Caesars Messiah
The Flavian dynasty was a Roman imperial dynasty, which ruled the Roman Empire between 69 AD and 96 AD, encompassing the reigns of Vespasian (69–79), and his two sons Titus (79–81) and Domitian (81–96). The Flavians rose to power during the civil war of 69, known as the Year of the Four Emperors.The creators of this PsyOp were the Flavians, who filled out the the core structure of the above myth, which would have made a lousy PsyOp, with all the finer points of a brilliant psychological manipulation as well as the narcissism of a Caesar and the drama and construct of great theater.
Rod Blackhirst, PhD, analyst of the Flavian/Jesus connection using the lens of modern geopolitics and realpolitik.
Here is an excellent documentary which I was delighted to find, and never knew existed until this week. Surprisingly, it uses more traditional forms of historical interpretation yet it affirms everything I have come to suspect and more. Claims it has been "debunked" are weak and ignore the obvious impossibility of wholesale narrative rejection. Its well worth the watch. Since it is over an hour long I will post the YouTube link below.
The Roman destruction of Carthage: An Insight into the Roman origins based around a suspiciously fast rise around its shadowy cults and merchant geneses of today's multinationals.
The Collapse of the Roman Empire was a controlled destruction based around deficit spending, just as is being done by globalists today who have not changed strategy.
https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2018/11/empires-only-collapse-for-one-reason.html
Sources/Citations
Historical Context
Caesars Timeline
27 BCE - 14 CE- 18 Sep 14 CE - 16 Mar 37 CEReign of Roman Emperor Tiberius.
- 18 Mar 37 CE - 24 Jan 41 CEReign of Roman Emperor Caligula.
- 25 Jan 41 CE - 13 Oct 54 CEReign of Roman Emperor Claudius.
- 13 Oct 54 CE - 11 Jun 68 CEReign of Roman Emperor Nero.
- 8 Jun 68 CE - 15 Jan 69 CEReign of Roman Emperor Galba.
- 15 Jan 69 CE - 16 Apr 69 CEReign of Roman Emperor Otho.
- 17 Apr 69 CE - 20 Dec 69 CEReign of Roman Emperor Vitellius.
- 26 Dec 69 CE - 23 Jun 79 CEReign of Roman emperor Vespasian.
- 24 Jun 79 CE - 13 Sep 81 CEReign of Roman Emperor Titus.
- 14 Sep 81 CE - 18 Sep 96 CEReign of Roman Emperor Domitian.
- 18 Sep 96 CE - 27 Jan 98 CEReign of Roman Emperor Nerva.
- 28 Jan 98 CE - 7 Aug 117 CEReign of Roman Emperor Trajan.
- 11 Aug 117 CE - 10 Jul 138 CEReign of Roman Emperor Hadrian.
- 10 Jul 138 CE - 7 Mar 161 CEReign of Roman Emperor Antonius Pius.
- 10 Jul 138 CE - 9 Mar 161 CEReign of Roman Emperor Antoninus Pius.
- 7 Mar 161 CE - 17 Mar 180 CEReign of Roman Emperor Marcus Aurelius.
- 9 Mar 161 CE - Mar 169 CEMarcus Aurelius rules with Lucius Verus.
- Mar 169 CE - 177 CEMarcus Aurelius rules alone.
- 177 CE - 17 Mar 180 CEMarcus Aurelius rules with Commodus.
- 17 Mar 180 CE - 31 Dec 192 CECommodus rules alone.
- 9 Apr 193 CE - 4 Feb 211 CEReign of Roman Emperor Septimius Severus.
- 1 Jan 193 CE - 28 Mar 193 CEReign of Roman Emperor Pertinax.
- 28 Mar 193 CE - 1 Jun 193 CEReign of Roman Emperor Didius Julianus.
- 198 CE - 209 CEReign of Caracalla with his father Septimius Severus.
- 209 CE - Dec 211 CEReign of Caracalla with his father Septimius Severus and his brother Geta (Feb - Dec 211 only with Geta).
- 209 CE - 26 Dec 211 CEReign of Roman Emperor Geta.
- Dec 211 CE - 8 Apr 217 CEReign of Roman Emperor Caracalla.
- 8 Jun 218 CE - 11 Mar 222 CEReign of Roman Emperor Elagabalus.
- 13 Mar 222 CE - 18 Mar 235 CEReign of Roman Emperor Severus Alexander.
- Mar 235 CE - May 238 CEReign of Roman Emperor Maximinus Thrax.
- 22 Mar 238 CE - 12 Apr 238 CEReign of Gordian I and Gordian II in Rome.
- 238 CE - 244 CEReign of Gordian III in Rome.
- 244 CE - 249 CEReign of Philip the Arab in Rome.
- 22 Dec 245 CEBirth of Emperor Diocletian.
- 253 CE - 260 CEReign of Roman emperor Valerian with his son Gallienus as co-emperor.
- 253 CEReign of Aemilianus in Rome.
- Sep 270 CE - c. Sep 275 CEReign of Roman Emperor Aurelian.
- 284 CE - 305 CEReign of Roman Emperor Diocletian.
- 306 CE - 337 CEReign of Roman Emperor Constantine I.
*Source Material where possible has been located if presented with enough freedom from narrative baggage) in the form of easily digestible and widely accessible multimedia and embedded in my synopsis above at that point where it lends itself to context. This is not always possible so here are the most important sources to scrutinise when assessing my angles and conclusions: