Skip to main content

50 years of failed apocalyptic predictions






If you a hardcore refuter of doomsday predictions, you can click in THIS LINK and you can explore a collection of Tony's climate alarmism lies going back 80 YEARS!!

I have put the more climate focused predictions that give more attention to recent fails here at THIS LINK

The latest addition to the list of apocolyptic predictions is the Covid19 "plandemic" hype-job. I will cover it it properly on an ongoing basis and include it on my next list of failed predictions once the hysteria is over. Hindsight always has a way of introducing perspective into the equation.


SUMMARY
Modern doomsayers have been predicting climate and environmental disaster since the 1960s. They continue to do so today.
None of the apocalyptic predictions with due dates as of today have come true.
What follows is a collection of notably wild predictions from notable people in government and science.
More than merely spotlighting the failed predictions, this collection shows that the makers of failed apocalyptic predictions often are individuals holding respected positions in government and science.
While such predictions have been and continue to be enthusiastically reported by a media eager for sensational headlines, the failures are typically not revisited.

I have even taken the liberty of projecting forward one single anticipated failed future apocalyptic prediction, a comet strike, which I believe you will find usefull to put on the back burner when they eventually try to pull it. 

List:


Proof:

1967: ‘Dire famine by 1975.’
1969: ‘Everyone will disappear in a cloud of blue steam by 1989.’
1970: Ice age by 2000
1970: ‘America subject to water rationing by 1974 and food rationing by 1980.’
1971: ‘New Ice Age Coming’
1972: New ice age by 2070
1974: ‘New Ice Age Coming Fast’
Source: The Guardian, January 29, 1974
1974: ‘Another Ice Age?’

Source: TIME, June 24, 1974
1974: Ozone Depletion a ‘Great Peril to Life’

But no such ‘great peril to life’ has been observed as the so-called ‘ozone hole’ remains:


Sources: Headline
NASA Data | Graph
1976: ‘The Cooling’

Source: New York Times Book Review, July 18, 1976
1980: ‘Acid Rain Kills Life in Lakes’

Noblesville Ledger (Noblesville, IN) April 9, 1980
But 10 years later, the US government program formed to study acid rain concluded:

Associated Press, September 6, 1990
1978: ‘No End in Sight’ to 30-Year Cooling Trend

Source: New York Times, January 5, 1978
But according to NASA satellite data there is a slight warming trend since 1979.

Source: DrRoySpencer.com
1988: James Hansen forecasts increase regional drought in 1990s

But the last really dry year in the Midwest was 1988, and recent years have been record wet.

Source: RealClimateScience.com
1988: Washington DC days over 90F to from 35 to 85

But the number of hot days in the DC area peaked in 1911, and have been declining ever since.

Source: RealClimateScience.com
1988: Maldives completely under water in 30 years

Source: Agence France Press, September 26, 1988
1989: Rising seas to ‘obliterate’ nations by 2000

Source: Associated Press, June 30, 1989
1989: New York City’s West Side Highway underwater by 2019

Source: Salon.com, October 23, 2001
1995 to Present: Climate Model Failure

Source: CEI.org
2000: ‘Children won’t know what snow is.’


Source: The Independent, March 20, 2000
2002: Famine in 10 years

Source: The Guardian, December 23, 2002
2004: Britain to have Siberian climate by 2020

Source: The Guardian, February 21, 2004
2008: Arctic will be ice-free by 2018

Source: Associated Press, June 24, 2008
2008: Al Gore warns of ice-free Arctic by 2013

But… it’s still there:

Source: WattsUpWithThat.com, December 16, 2018
2009: Prince Charles says only 8 years to save the planet

Source: The Independent, July 9, 2009
2009: UK prime minister says 50 days to ‘save the planet from catastrophe’

Source: The Independent: October 20, 2009
2009: Arctic ice-free by 2014

Source: USA Today, December 14, 2009
2013: Arctic ice-free by 2015

Source: The Guardian, July 24, 2013
The paper: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-017-02550-9 (open access)
Gas hydrate dissociation off Svalbard induced by isostatic rebound rather than global warming
Abstract
Methane seepage from the upper continental slopes of Western Svalbard has previously been attributed to gas hydrate dissociation induced by anthropogenic warming of ambient bottom waters. Here we show that sediment cores drilled off Prins Karls Foreland contain freshwater from dissociating hydrates. However, our modeling indicates that the observed pore water freshening began around 8 ka BP when the rate of isostatic uplift outpaced eustatic sea-level rise. The resultant local shallowing and lowering of hydrostatic pressure forced gas hydrate dissociation and dissolved chloride depletions consistent with our geochemical analysis. Hence, we propose that hydrate dissociation was triggered by postglacial isostatic rebound rather than anthropogenic warming. Furthermore, we show that methane fluxes from dissociating hydrates were considerably smaller than present methane seepage rates implying that gas hydrates were not a major source of methane to the oceans, but rather acted as a dynamic seal, regulating methane release from deep geological reservoirs.

2013: Arctic ice-free by 2016

Source: The Guardian, December 9, 2013
2014: Only 500 days before ‘climate chaos’

But…

Sources: Washington Examiner

Click HERE for the home page of this blog



Popular Recent Posts

Climate Science overtakes Cosmology with the worst predictive success rate in science

  Figure 1  Success of Cosmology: 4.6%  Climatology: 1.47% CLIMATOLOGY In the interests of fairness and full disclosure, it is not the entire climatology discipline on trial here, but the core of it which to some extent has been politically captured to form the basis of the hypothesis that CO2 produced by humans will produce a runaway greenhouse effect (But that CO2, the vast majority without humans will not).  There was a successful push to conflate the broad strokes field of the Environmental Sciences, which always  covered a number of  disciplines ( climatology being one, oceanography, atmospheric sciences, meteorology, and ecology) with the term " Climate Science" in an effort to make it less empirical  and more  political.  In some form or other, they now all hinge on policies shaped by presupposing the assertion that the human produced portion of CO2 is causing any warming measured last century and arguably the first couple of years of this century. It projects climate

⏪ A stunning revision of the past which could be as unbelievable as any science fiction blockbuster (Part 1)

"What if the defining catastrophe of the  human part of world history has no observable equivalent occurrences today? Surely we would entirely leave it out of our picture?" According to Wikipedia, which represents the establishment view of most matters, the substance and starting point of our history is as follows: Quote "The  history of the world , in common parlance, is the   history of humanity   (or   human history ), as determined from   archaeology ,   anthropology ,   genetics ,   linguistics , and other disciplines; and, for periods since the   invention of writing , from   recorded history   and from   secondary sources   and studies. Humanity's written history was preceded by its  prehistory , beginning with the  Palaeolithic Era  ("Early Stone Age"), followed by the  Neolithic Era  ("New Stone Age"). The Neolithic saw the  Agricultural Revolution  begin, between 8000 and 5000  BCE , in the  Near East 's  Fertile Cres

Bumper collection of "climate change" FAILS. Its all here: lies; fraud; censorship; bogus predictions; failed models & even doomsday cultism.

Index 1) Misleading "Greenhouse" model 2) Fraud and data fudging 3) Failed Predictions going back over 50 years 4) Failed science &  models 5) Fundamental flaw in the premise 1) Misleading "Greenhouse" model  Note: The graphs below illustrate at a glance that whatever the actual role of CO2 (by correlation between temperature and CO2) it is certainly not consistent with a gas making up 0.04% of the atmosphere functioning like a glass roof. This is a pity because Mars (96% CO2) would probably be a bit warmer if it were. The graphs come from a single excellent recent paper (details below) which is well worth a read. It is less about CO2 in isolation and more about CO2 with respect to THE GREENHOUSE EFFECT itself.  You can also find it  here  where you can download a PDF. It does a perfectly good job of dispatching the nonsense science used by Climate Change movement to strongarm their way into the various avenues of social influence both scientifically and politic

Is the temperature of Venus determined more by atmospheric composition or pressure?

  Is the temperature of Venus determined more by atmosphere composition or pressure? Its an important question to ask because Venus is often cited as an example of the hypothetical "runaway greenhouse effect" by the climate change movement.  There are a number of problems with this assumption. Firstly it works by assuming that Venus and Earth are sister planets that have been orbiting the sun for a similar length of time. There are a number of theories which better account for why Venus has anomalies with its magnetic field, orbit and unusual dense atmosphere. The atmosphere density is only unusual if we work on the assumption its been in orbit for billions of years. If, like is credibly put forward, Venus was a recent arrival, possibly in the form of a giant comet, it would be expected to have those characteristics. For those that are interested see the clip below and links. Otherwise my conclusion doesn't factor any of that in and is just below the clip and links. https

Fraudulent Data Epidemic: Provable Widespread Climate Data Fudging

I am about to demonstrate that data fraud surrounding all aspects of "Climate Change" has penetrated every aspect of every publicly funded institution, almost every syndicated media conglomeration and even many privately funded scientific enterprises. Despite this crime, it has STILL turned into a collective with the worst predictive success rate in all of science I think it is important to remember that the science of "Global Warming" does not, and cannot exist by definition in that it presupposes a conclusion. Also  there is no such thing as a singular, overarching "Climate science". It is a broad strokes term for various disciplines including Climatology: Climate Types : Types of Climate | Climatology Tropical/Mega-Thermal Climates: ... Dry (Arid and Semi-Arid) Climates: ... Temperate/Meso-Thermal Climates: ... Continental/Micro-Thermal Climate : ... Polar Climates: ... Alpine Climates: There is a push to conflate Environmental Science, which

COVI-PASS™, AGENDA21 & AGENDA2030 / Deadlines not guidelines

  Covipass Covipass, is a private sector initiative that just so happens to mirror the globalist solution for the Gestapo "papers please" dystopian smart grid. This initiative may or may not be the genesis for the Technocratic social access passport. I have been anticipating such a system because for the social engineers the various nation's constitutions/ bills of rights will not be neutralized by 2030. They won't go the legal route, they will use their media and influencial institutions to sway the various private company policies or ROARs to effectively shut you out of meaningful social partipation. That means promotion at work, access to flights, restaurant's, being served at grocery stores and other such liberties we take for granted in a supposedly free society. This initiative, which may not be their grid, is already passed development and ready for roll out. I would advise scepticism and a watchful eye. https://www.covipass.com/ The Agenda 21 The specif