Skip to main content

50 years of failed apocalyptic predictions






If you a hardcore refuter of doomsday predictions, you can click in THIS LINK and you can explore a collection of Tony's climate alarmism lies going back 80 YEARS!!

I have put the more climate focused predictions that give more attention to recent fails here at THIS LINK

The latest addition to the list of apocolyptic predictions is the Covid19 "plandemic" hype-job. I will cover it it properly on an ongoing basis and include it on my next list of failed predictions once the hysteria is over. Hindsight always has a way of introducing perspective into the equation.


SUMMARY
Modern doomsayers have been predicting climate and environmental disaster since the 1960s. They continue to do so today.
None of the apocalyptic predictions with due dates as of today have come true.
What follows is a collection of notably wild predictions from notable people in government and science.
More than merely spotlighting the failed predictions, this collection shows that the makers of failed apocalyptic predictions often are individuals holding respected positions in government and science.
While such predictions have been and continue to be enthusiastically reported by a media eager for sensational headlines, the failures are typically not revisited.

I have even taken the liberty of projecting forward one single anticipated failed future apocalyptic prediction, a comet strike, which I believe you will find usefull to put on the back burner when they eventually try to pull it. 

List:


Proof:

1967: ‘Dire famine by 1975.’
1969: ‘Everyone will disappear in a cloud of blue steam by 1989.’
1970: Ice age by 2000
1970: ‘America subject to water rationing by 1974 and food rationing by 1980.’
1971: ‘New Ice Age Coming’
1972: New ice age by 2070
1974: ‘New Ice Age Coming Fast’
Source: The Guardian, January 29, 1974
1974: ‘Another Ice Age?’

Source: TIME, June 24, 1974
1974: Ozone Depletion a ‘Great Peril to Life’

But no such ‘great peril to life’ has been observed as the so-called ‘ozone hole’ remains:


Sources: Headline
NASA Data | Graph
1976: ‘The Cooling’

Source: New York Times Book Review, July 18, 1976
1980: ‘Acid Rain Kills Life in Lakes’

Noblesville Ledger (Noblesville, IN) April 9, 1980
But 10 years later, the US government program formed to study acid rain concluded:

Associated Press, September 6, 1990
1978: ‘No End in Sight’ to 30-Year Cooling Trend

Source: New York Times, January 5, 1978
But according to NASA satellite data there is a slight warming trend since 1979.

Source: DrRoySpencer.com
1988: James Hansen forecasts increase regional drought in 1990s

But the last really dry year in the Midwest was 1988, and recent years have been record wet.

Source: RealClimateScience.com
1988: Washington DC days over 90F to from 35 to 85

But the number of hot days in the DC area peaked in 1911, and have been declining ever since.

Source: RealClimateScience.com
1988: Maldives completely under water in 30 years

Source: Agence France Press, September 26, 1988
1989: Rising seas to ‘obliterate’ nations by 2000

Source: Associated Press, June 30, 1989
1989: New York City’s West Side Highway underwater by 2019

Source: Salon.com, October 23, 2001
1995 to Present: Climate Model Failure

Source: CEI.org
2000: ‘Children won’t know what snow is.’


Source: The Independent, March 20, 2000
2002: Famine in 10 years

Source: The Guardian, December 23, 2002
2004: Britain to have Siberian climate by 2020

Source: The Guardian, February 21, 2004
2008: Arctic will be ice-free by 2018

Source: Associated Press, June 24, 2008
2008: Al Gore warns of ice-free Arctic by 2013

But… it’s still there:

Source: WattsUpWithThat.com, December 16, 2018
2009: Prince Charles says only 8 years to save the planet

Source: The Independent, July 9, 2009
2009: UK prime minister says 50 days to ‘save the planet from catastrophe’

Source: The Independent: October 20, 2009
2009: Arctic ice-free by 2014

Source: USA Today, December 14, 2009
2013: Arctic ice-free by 2015

Source: The Guardian, July 24, 2013
The paper: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-017-02550-9 (open access)
Gas hydrate dissociation off Svalbard induced by isostatic rebound rather than global warming
Abstract
Methane seepage from the upper continental slopes of Western Svalbard has previously been attributed to gas hydrate dissociation induced by anthropogenic warming of ambient bottom waters. Here we show that sediment cores drilled off Prins Karls Foreland contain freshwater from dissociating hydrates. However, our modeling indicates that the observed pore water freshening began around 8 ka BP when the rate of isostatic uplift outpaced eustatic sea-level rise. The resultant local shallowing and lowering of hydrostatic pressure forced gas hydrate dissociation and dissolved chloride depletions consistent with our geochemical analysis. Hence, we propose that hydrate dissociation was triggered by postglacial isostatic rebound rather than anthropogenic warming. Furthermore, we show that methane fluxes from dissociating hydrates were considerably smaller than present methane seepage rates implying that gas hydrates were not a major source of methane to the oceans, but rather acted as a dynamic seal, regulating methane release from deep geological reservoirs.

2013: Arctic ice-free by 2016

Source: The Guardian, December 9, 2013
2014: Only 500 days before ‘climate chaos’

But…

Sources: Washington Examiner

Click HERE for the home page of this blog



Popular Recent Posts

Bumper collection of "climate change" FAILS. Its all here: lies; fraud; censorship; bogus predictions; failed models & even doomsday cultism.

Index 1) Misleading "Greenhouse" model 2) Fraud and data fudging 3) Failed Predictions going back over 50 years 4) Failed science &  models 5) Fundamental flaw in the premise 1) Misleading "Greenhouse" model  Note: The graphs below illustrate at a glance that whatever the actual role of CO2 (by correlation between temperature and CO2) it is certainly not consistent with a gas making up 0.04% of the atmosphere functioning like a glass roof. This is a pity because Mars (96% CO2) would probably be a bit warmer if it were. The graphs come from a single excellent recent paper (details below) which is well worth a read. It is less about CO2 in isolation and more about CO2 with respect to THE GREENHOUSE EFFECT itself.  You can also find it  here  where you can download a PDF. It does a perfectly good job of dispatching the nonsense science used by Climate Change movement to strongarm their way into the various avenues of social influence both scientifically and politic

Climate Science overtakes Cosmology with the worst predictive success rate in science

  Figure 1  Success of Cosmology: 4.6%  Climatology: 1.47% CLIMATOLOGY In the interests of fairness and full disclosure, it is not the entire climatology discipline on trial here, but the core of it which to some extent has been politically captured to form the basis of the hypothesis that CO2 produced by humans will produce a runaway greenhouse effect (But that CO2, the vast majority without humans will not).  There was a successful push to conflate the broad strokes field of the Environmental Sciences, which always  covered a number of  disciplines ( climatology being one, oceanography, atmospheric sciences, meteorology, and ecology) with the term " Climate Science" in an effort to make it less empirical  and more  political.  In some form or other, they now all hinge on policies shaped by presupposing the assertion that the human produced portion of CO2 is causing any warming measured last century and arguably the first couple of years of this century. It projects climate

⏪ A stunning revision of the past which could be as unbelievable as any science fiction blockbuster (Part 1)

"What if the defining catastrophe of the  human part of world history has no observable equivalent occurrences today? Surely we would entirely leave it out of our picture?" According to Wikipedia, which represents the establishment view of most matters, the substance and starting point of our history is as follows: Quote "The  history of the world , in common parlance, is the   history of humanity   (or   human history ), as determined from   archaeology ,   anthropology ,   genetics ,   linguistics , and other disciplines; and, for periods since the   invention of writing , from   recorded history   and from   secondary sources   and studies. Humanity's written history was preceded by its  prehistory , beginning with the  Palaeolithic Era  ("Early Stone Age"), followed by the  Neolithic Era  ("New Stone Age"). The Neolithic saw the  Agricultural Revolution  begin, between 8000 and 5000  BCE , in the  Near East 's  Fertile Cres

Robust consensus for Global Cooling existed in the 60's and 70's, here is the evidence.

Thanks to and in reference to THIS ARTICLE by Kenneth Richard way back in 2016   Here are the papers    1.   Kukla, 1972      Climatic changes result from variables in planetary orbits which modulate solar energy emission and change seasonal and latitudinal distribution of heat received by the Earth. Small insolation changes are multiplied by the albedo effect of the winter snow fields of the Northern Hemisphere, by ocean-atmosphere feedbacks, and, probably, by the stratospheric ozone layer. The role of volcanic explosions and other aperiodic phenomena is secondary. The immediate climate response to insolation trends permits astronomic dating of Pleistocene events.  A new glacial insolation regime, expected to last 8000 years, began just recently. Mean global temperatures may eventually drop about 1 ° C in the next hundred years . A refinement of the Milankovitch theory in terms of the lunar orbit and more data on solar periodicities are needed for reliable long range predictions. 2

Robust consensus for Global Cooling (Part 3)

 Part 3 out of 4 in what should end up being close to 300 papers from the 1960's and 70's (and a few interesting publications from before,... and hec, even perhaps 1 or 2 from the 80's themselves). This assortment was intended to demonstrate that the myth of just 7 papers existing pre 1980 reflecting the claimed robust support cooling had. The forums and dungeons of Social Media are rife with denisons of prevailing dogma in the sciences.  Some very basic established conventional wisdom has been forgotten. In its place the tailored schemings of tax exempt foundations and think tanks have found their way (basically unchallenged) into the arsenal of the powerful internationalist cabal of dynastic blue bloods and the puppet neoliberal political class their blue and white flag UN globalist structures have vetted. Many scientists see it as self evident that AGW cannot be a v alid hypothesis, as did the science community once as these pages illustrate. In fact it was a very preval

What is the Globalist Agenda? SYNOPSIS

Most of the blue and white flag bureaucracy organizations fall in some way under the UN. I'm fully aware the UN itself is a lame sack of damp  bureaucrats and pedophiles, but its absolutely key (for those scheming in the background) in administering affairs through its institutions of internationalist affairs, usually on behalf of its globalist partners in the direction of centralizing everything.  Under the UN we have various sub structures or ideological partners, particularly in the World Economic Forum (WEF).   They handle the more creative financial issues, such as the upcoming "great reset" of the global financial system, which (despite incredulity from sceptics) is the "NWO" coordination conspiracy to subvert sovereignty and the rule of law by elected governments accountable by democracy and oversight to the taxpayer. This is tacit confession that the "centralized" One World Government coordinators are poised to unleash their economic plot on us