Bottom right image: Spencer Welling Left: Antonio Solano |
Distance to Earth: 25 640 light years
Radius: 22 million km
Discovered: 13 February 1974
Distance: 26673±42 ly; (8178±13 pc)
Coordinates: RA 17h 45m 40s | Dec -29° 0′ 28″
Discoverers: Reinhard Genzel, Andrea M. Ghez, Robert Brown, Bruce Balick
Above: The G2 story
Due to staggering amount of public funding going into researching known fake pseudoscience unicorns invented by mathemagicians in cosmology and astrophysics, this has been hidden from the public, images have been retouched, descent has been silenced and careers ruined all for greed at the expense of science and your taxation. But they are mobilising to begin the cover up, and have come up with the usual but bag of tricks.
Recently they have decided to use another thing that doesn't exist to substitute for a black hole. A hypothesised form of hypothethical dark matter. A "Fluffy ball of darkinos" to quote them. This may seem farcical on the face of it, which it is, but its becoming more common.
Chandra X Ray observatory: Still making
the prettiest pics of Sagittarius A
and perhaps more necessary because since by now pretty much everyone knows there is no "dark matter", so paradoxically its even more useful since they will then have some licence to be able to define its behaviour and adapt it to the anomalies that will happen to be observed, such as adding magnetic fields, adding plasma attractive qualities, electrons and charged particles and eventually just changing the properties of dark matter until its properties match those of ionised plasma. Plasma Cosmology through the back door. First they ignore, then they ridicule, and finally they act as if they have known all along https://www.livescience.com/fluffy-ball-darkinos-center-milky-way.html
And https://www.popularmechanics.com/space/deep-space/a36530817/the-center-of-the-milky-way-might-not-be-a-black-hole-after-all/
Dark matter, a known fudge factor, is becoming a really dark matter in astrophysics.
Dark matter, a known fudge factor, is becoming a really dark matter in astrophysics.
https://phys.org/news/2021-06-black-hole-center-milky-mass.html
Sometimes, they do get a bit warmer:
"New research by University of Massachusetts Amherst astronomer Daniel Wang reveals, with unprecedented clarity, details of violent phenomena in the center of our galaxy. The images, published recently in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, document an X-ray thread, G0.17-0.41, which hints at a previously unknown interstellar mechanism that may govern the energy flow and potentially the evolution of the Milky Way." It irks me to hear so much talk of filaments and magnetic fields with no mention of moving charge, but its progress.
Sometimes, they do get a bit warmer:
"New research by University of Massachusetts Amherst astronomer Daniel Wang reveals, with unprecedented clarity, details of violent phenomena in the center of our galaxy. The images, published recently in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, document an X-ray thread, G0.17-0.41, which hints at a previously unknown interstellar mechanism that may govern the energy flow and potentially the evolution of the Milky Way." It irks me to hear so much talk of filaments and magnetic fields with no mention of moving charge, but its progress.
The paper will be under this post as usual.
Read more here:
The real Story
If you want and in depth look at what really drives galactic rotation and resides at the centre of every galaxy, read this post taking a more detailed look at every aspect of the issue where we can draw reasonable conclusions.
- It is NOT dark matter
- It is NOT a black hole
Above: Black hole jets, just like we do not ever observe black holes, we arnt always able to resolve the jets, but a combination of observations measns we can be sure they exist. We usually observe bright radio spots in X-Ray, same with cosmic jets attributed to black holes, sometimes we can even resolve the jets optically.
No Gravitational Lensing from Sagittarius A.
From TheRealVerbz excellent YouTube channel
Plot from the Late E. Dowdye, ohysisist and NASA engineer, has produced data for 14 years, with absolutely no gravitational lensing around our supposed black hole, Sagittarius A. This is another intractable conflict like gas cloud G2. Either the black hole attracts and lenses always, or its falsified.
Optical refraction in galactic/stellar atmospheres or the ionised plasma interstellar medium remains the most likely candidate where we do see lensing, because this accounts for why we sometimes see it and sometimes selectively don't, and why the colours prism out when we do see it (gravitational lensing predicts the entire spectrum should be equally affected) It also accounts for why light should be gravitationally affected at all, being massless. Doctor Dowdye's work below can be found directly HERE
Sagittarius A* Astrophysical Orbital Data for S2 & S14 | ||||||
Star Label | Impact Parameter ξ | Gravitational Deflection α | ||||
(light time) | (meters) | (AU) | (radians) | (degrees) | (arcsec) | |
S14 | 6 Lhours* | 6.47553E+12 | 43.29 | 3.64949E-03 | 0.209100573 | 752.762062 |
S2 | 17 Lhours* | 1.83473E+13 | 122.65 | 1.28806E-03 | 0.073800202 | 265.680728 |
S2 | 5.5 Ldays | 1.42462E+14 | 952.30 | 1.65886E-04 | 0.009504571 | 34.2164573 |
S2 | 10 Ldays | 2.59021E+14 | 1731.46 | 9.12373E-05 | 0.005227514 | 18.8190515 |
* Nearest Point of Approach to supposed Black Hole
Table: Gravitational Deflection as function of Impact Parameter o
as Predicted by the Light Bending Rule of General Relativity
Click HERE for the homepage
Sources/Citations
(Full source's HERE Astronomy: Astrophysics/cosmology)
Reference: “Chandra large-scale mapping of the Galactic center: Probing high-energy structures around the central molecular zone” by Q. Daniel Wang, 27 April 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab801
arXiv: 2010.02932
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab801
arXiv: 2010.02932
Refereed Papers
"Time resolved images from the center of the Galaxy appear to counter General Relativity", Dowdye, Jr., E.H., Astronomische Nachrichten, Volume 328, Issue 2, Date: February 2007, Pages: 186-191. Published on-line at: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/search/allsearch Search under author: Dowdye
"Extinction Shift Principle: A Pure Classical Alternative to General and Special Relativity", Dowdye, Jr., E.H., Physics Essays, Volume 20, 56 (2007) (11 pages); DOI: 10.4006/1.3073809