Whatever your persuasion is on CO² and AGW, nobody disagrees on the tremendous benefit it provides plant life. Many of the past famine disasters and desertification has CO² decline listed as a contributor.
I feel I've already blown the notion that humans are the main cause of climate change out of the water. Or rather I've used the reasoning of others and put it together in a convenient outline. See my previous post above for starters. However, I recognize that humans do increase CO² levels, no matter how tiny. Increases are likely to be very short lived because the earth has an effective feedback mechanism, but we can apparently get small increases, and it's been put forward on very poor science that this is a bad thing. That assertion hinges completely on bad models. More on that in the bottom most link. Model's and the measurement sample dates are dubious at best.
Furthermore, the main increase in CO² as we warm out of the last mini ice age is warming oceans, because CO² as we know trails warming, it does not cause it. This is well documented.
Whatever the cause there seem to measurably evidenced benefits, not only in my country in a draught year, but globally.
Here is a website dedicated to basic science, the unrefuted basic science of the benefit of CO² to plants: https://hydroloop.org/co2/
We could go on and on, but nobody contests this. The real areas of interest are who stands to gain from stopping green spending on Mercury, Lead, Solvents, Nuclear Waste, Toxic chemicals etc and redirecting them to chasing CO² ghosts?
We can no longer, in good conscience, keep defending models we know are not only false, but purposefully fraudulent. There is a difference between an error and a crime.
I recently did a broadly cast takedown of the whole phenomenon where I debunk the science, the politics, the business, media and link all these elements together historically in a way that should finally make sense to the casual reader. At least this was my aim. I STRONGLY ADVISE FIRST READING THIS: http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2018/03/scientific-consensus-is-that-consensus.html?m=1
Everything you know is wrong. There is a very good reason why science succeeds more often than politics does. Unlike politics, It's not a consensus or a vote, it's actually method. The scientific method. Anyone who has read this blog before probably knows I'm a lifelong science junkie as well as someone who spends thousands of hours breaking down the the political and economic agendas behind the special interest groups that guide public policy. In many ways I'm actually uniquely qualified to tie these angles together in ways not well understood by the overwhelming majority of people. That actually includes scientists. Scientists are notoriously naive in the political and economic forces that drive the human world.
Youwill be horrified to find out, it's not specifically that global warming is man made. It's simply that humans contribute to climate change in an unknowable way and to an uncertain extent! Here a former member of the consensus establishment turns whistle blower and tells us about the coercion behind the scenes.
(play embedded video)
If you're already surprised, hang in there, because it gets far, far worse!
But first, let's take a step back for a moment. Long before our modern consent manufacturing establishment existed, consensus was manufactured by the church which was the establishment of its time. Anyone who went against gods word was considered a heretic, aka a 'deniar' in the accepted contemporary world view of good people. To be a 'deniar' was to be a bad person. The absolute settled truth, (in those days God's word) was the equivalent of today's settled science back then. The big issue back then was not climate change, it was that the sun revolved around the earth. Galileo, and other questioning minds who chose to challenge the status quo were subject to public scorn and often even criminal charges.
But we've come a long way, right?
Actually no. Not a single thing in essence has changed, apart from the window dressing and the fact that we are not quite so draconian.
Let me qualify my rationale briefly. Between the 50's and 70's there was an overwhelming leaning towards the view the earth was cooling, that in itself was something approaching a consensus.
Settled science? Wrong again! Not even Newtonian gravity, Biochemistry or precice disciplines such as Quantum Physics are 'Settled Science'. The models are always revised or improved. No scientist worth his salt should ever use the term settled science, when they do it obviously smacks of political speak.
Do you really think the fledgling science of Climatology, involving combining the earth's history, its oceans, atmosphere, poles, ice trends. geological landscape, solar activity and other cosmic factors from deep space, and puting them all together, could possibly be SETTLED SCIENCE??!! Give me a break!
And, lets face it, the real inconvenient truth is that things have not really gotten any better with the abysmal and mischievous models, notably the failure of the emergence of the catastrophic feedback loop by 2005, the melting of the poles and the expected catastrophic sea level rise coming from scientists and celebrities alike, usually just after they land on the runway nearest their beach front properties in their gas guzzling private jets. No names mentioned. I'll give you a clue, its Al Gore and Leo DiCaprio! https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/22289-climate-alarmists-have-been-wrong-about-virtually-everything
But how can this be? Isn't all of that big oil money famously behind all of the propaganda, and conversely isn't it government funding that lies behind good science, especially when spending our tax dollars? Since I happen to much spend my time attacking the big banks and big oil, because of the geopolitics of globalization, I can tell you for sure, NO, THAT'S NOT HOW it WORKS. Governments, especially governments catering for the neoliberal establishment, typically will cater for special interests just as much as they do for the neoconservative establishment, they all cut Healthcare, education, welfare, and social services. The evidence clearly shows us that they all overwhelmingly increase MILITARY spending most of all and seldom follow through on tax breaks to match their campaign promises. And no, they don't bail out the people who lose everything in an economic crises, they instead bail out the very same Big Banks that cause them. Here is a link to the precise figures: http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2018/02/facts-how-much-taxpayer-money-has-us.html?m=1
The reality that mainstream media presents to us is very much different to the reality that the figures That MATTER speak to. Do not for one moment be so naive as to think that science can operate in a vacuum, public science is no different to corporate science. Whomever funds the science controls the science. If you control the scientific matters surrounding public enterprise then its becoming increasingly clear that you can control the perception of a public who are increasingly impressed with science. You will be surprised to know therefore, that 100% OF THE R&D GRANT FUNDING ON THIS ISSUE, FROM GOVERNMENT, FOR OVER 20 YEARS HAS BASICALLY EXCLUSIVELY BEEN TO PROVE THAT GLOBAL WARMING IS MAN MADE.
Here is the EPA govt public disclosure.
Link. https://yosemite.epa.gov/oarm/igms_egf.nsf/AllGrantsNarrow?OpenView
Few know that NASA's best kept secret is interplanetary climate change, the little known fact that the planets are synchronized in the same pattern as our Earth, and you would surely immediately think that solar activity would do that. When all the planets in the solar system heat and cool at the same time, tossing out the sun as a factor, (in my mind the ONLY one), is pure stupidity! But this is what they are doing. That type of behavior cannot possibly be an oversight, it can only be deliberate chicanery!
Embedded Video. NASA ICC
The more interesting question is why would they lie? Why indeed. This is where things start to get interesting. Why have the old money dynasties of Europe, and American oil Barons, such as the Rockefeller clan, divested from oil? Is it social responsibility? That would be a first. And why all the paradoxes?
I"ve actually dealt with those issues in previous posts which you should read, this is is where the penny starts to drop because the information is very well hidden.
Penny starting to drop? But what about all those statistics you Googled, and all the good folk over at MSM giving us all those damning figures on looming Armageddon? Well, by now you probably realize, those are not what they seem.
Welcome to the rabbit hole my friends: This is the story of lies, half truths and misinformation, all in the era of the Algorithm, and big data, which, when put together, manufacturer nothing more than consent.
Link to embedded video on IPCC and N.O.A. climate data manipulation.
Isn't this shocking? Don't you feel as if you've been played? And that collusion can produce suspicious looking graphs like this this graph showing temperature anomalies.
Anomalies ARE NOT MEASUREMENTS, THEY ARE PRODUCTS.
There is a broader game afoot though, here are steps to protect yourself:. Link.
DO NOT USE GOOGLE FOR THIS TOPIC! Google YEILDS 99% PROPAGANDA.
Another lie Is that this year is the hottest year in recorded history. What is "Global Average Temperature"?. And is every year always the new hottest on record? What's the real situation here? Let's go further down the rabbit hole, let's shatter cognitive dissonance and actually open our eyes for the first time, let's take that red pill.
Link to this year's temperature reality, click embedded video below.
But don't fear, things are changing, just look at point number 2 on the website for Weather Action. Weather Action is notable long range forecasters utility with an unquestionable pedigree.
Including this fantastic related interview interview below.
Which brings us to that secret weapon I eluded to. The use of the word 'SUSTAINABILITY'. The clip below points it all out, along with the difference between United Nations Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030
Here are some assorted links that are starting to reflect a change in MSM thinking as the overwhelming evidence pours in. I think they are looking to cover themselves, because the writing is on the wall for the AGW hoax.
Patrick Woods discusses what it all boils down to in the embedded video above. He goes into more detail discussing The United Nations #AGENDA2030 plan with Open Source investigative journalist, James Corbett, of The Corbett Report.
In 1987, Edmund de Rothschild creates the World Conservation Bank which is designed to transfer debts from Third World countries to this bank, and in return, those countries would give land to this bank.
The idea is for the IMF to create more and more SDR’s backed by nothing, in order for struggling nations to borrow them.
"These nations will then gradually come under the control of the IMF as they struggle to pay the interest, and have to borrow more and more. The IMF will then decide which nations can borrow more and which will starve. They can also use this as leverage to take state owned assets like utilities as payment against the debt until they eventually own the nation states.
"1988: The World Central Bank has three arms, the World Bank, the BIS and the IMF. 2000: How the World bank and the IMF took over Argentina, Tanzania and Bolivia. Terrible reading.
The IMF is closely interwoven and here with Rothschild's BIS Bank, and the BIS, IMF and the World Bankhave a common external website."
Established in 1991, the GEF is today the largest funder of projects to improve the global environment.
The GEF has allocated $8.8 billion, supplemented by more than $38.7 billion in co-financing, for more than 2,400 projects in more than 165 developing countries.
The GEF partnership includes 10 agencies:
The United Nations Development Program (David Rothschild consultant/Nigeria)
The UN Environment Program (UNEP)
The UN Food and Agriculture Organization (A Rockefeller-partner organization)
The UN Industrial Development Organization
The African Development Bank
The Asian Development Bank
The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
The Inter-American Development Bank (David Rothschild consultant)
The International Fund for Agricultural Development
Israeli currency 500 Shekels banknote 1982 Baron Edmond de Rothschild, Bank of Israel
The Globalist/Bankster connections that hijacked the Green Movement was a strategically brilliant series of events going back to the 90's but the roots go back much further than that. I'll be addressing these connections in a series of posts over the next few months.
Before getting into this consider a look at the overview first:
Here is a broadly cast post I wrote completely deconstructing and exposing how and why the lie that all warming and cooling is man-made was perpetuated. It does so in a clear and easy to follow way: http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2018/03/scientific-consensus-is-that-consensus.html?m=1
Some obscure history first. The relevance will become apparent as this issue progresses, but this puzzle piece is needed early on despite how much changed from the original aspirations. Don't poo-poo this as containing tired old conspiracy elements, facts don't care about our feelings.
By the time President Nixon was forced to understand the sobering realities of the post Bretton-Woods world, US debt to the banking dynasty brokered treasury bond holders at point where the nations gold holdings were going to have to be collateralized, the gold standard for the US Dollar, the world's reserve currency, would be abandoned on favour of a US Dollar backed by Saudi Oil, interest bearing debt and WAR. Ultimately the debt built up through deficit spending would not be serviceable, even with the nations taxation on the line as collateral surety, public land would need to back public funding in readiness for such a moment. It would take years to collateralize public land, in the form of State Parks, forrestry and fishery wilderness reserves and national heritage sites, to private interests. To do so would require a cause percieved to be so vital for the well being of humanity that nobody would question it. Before "Global Warming" was finally decided as the horse to back, other contenders by the globalist think tanks to being considered for massive fear campaigns. These were Global Cooling and the hole in the Ozone layer among several other equally ginned-up lies which had just enough elements of truth to them to persuede the peasants using the media establishment available to the globalist dynastic banking houses. But first some context on the mobilization for such a strategy. The Rockefeller clan as well as the robber-baron backed think tanks and foundations all signalled willingness to devote resources of their tax exempt entities, from the Rockerfeller foundation, the Gugenheim Foundation, the Ford Foundation, The Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign foundations and literally dozens of others.
In 1987, the 4TH WORLD CONSERVATION SUMMIT was held to discuss the implementation of a World Conservation Bank using the WILDERNESS LANDS of the world as the supposed collateral. The sole purpose of this fraud was to save the wealth and power of the elite. All funds were to be housed in the Royal Bank of Canada (that strategy was changed) . Now as the globalist EU crumbles, and NAFTA stalls, historical events like the ending of the cold war forced several plans to abandoned and new strategies forced focus on sorting out the Middle East, we all know that a plan to have multiple dictators over sovereign nations will probably never happen in currency and customs unions as soon as they hoped , but in the process they may well ruin everything known to the people of the world, especially in the ME, continue with endless wars and waste the entirety of the green budget and all R&D Grant funding chasing CO² ghosts, using the GLOBAL LIE thatGLOBAL WARMING Is MAN MADE. Read more here on the least known aspect. Just ignore the little religious overtones here or there on the embedded video if you watch it, it's still. Worthwhile because in reality sometimes Priests and Rabbis can also be whistlblowers http://www.americaismyname.org/world-conservation-bank.html
Dont be fooled by Edmonde de Rothschild's naming of the Conservation Bank which they have since renamed, they have full scope to do as they please as usual. http://www.edmond-de-rothschild.com/site/Luxembourg/en/private- banking/terms-and-conditions
(below a quick synopsis of what would one day emerge out of these strategies and how they would be presented for public consumption so as to disguise their intentions)
End poverty in all its forms everywhere
Translation: Centralized banks, IMF, World Bank, Fed to control all finances, digital one world currency that is BANK controlled rather than Cryptocurrency, in a cashless society, using Hashgraph instead of Blockchain.
Feed the world
Translation: Control the worlds food supply.
Efficient agriculture, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable farming.
Translation: GMO
Secure Society
Translation: Prison Planet
Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
Translation: Mass vaccination of proven or unproven products, big pharma lobby and pvt medi care, Codex Alimentarius
Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all
Translation: UN propaganda, brainwashing through compulsory education from cradle to grave.
Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all
Translation: Privatize all water sources, don’t forget to add fluoride
Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all
Translation: Smart grid with smart meters on everything, peak pricing
Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all
Translation: TPP, NAFTA, free trade zones that favor mega-corporate interests and franchise operations over entrpreneurs, McJobs over careers.
Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation
With the vast fortunes spent by large multinationals on PR "think tanks", benevolent sounding "foundations" and advertising spin doctors (with the express purpose of sanitizing their projects/products) it's little wonder we find ourselves out in the wilderness regarding who can be trusted. At the level of lobbied multinational interests public sentiment is critical for political potency. Too much outrage can sabotage the slickest corporate outfit. Consent must be manufactured at all costs.
Don't fall for 'sustainability'
With this in mind I would like to suggest a method that may be useful. Use this (admittedly) cynical translator, which aims to translate corporate lingo and catchphrases into plain English but assuming the worst. This provides a scale of two extremes. Look at the stated goal VS my worst case translated scenario, then look at the organisation in question and decide for yourself where their interests lie, and somewhere in between you will likely get a sense of where they are truly pitched.
End poverty in all its forms everywhere
Translation: Centralized banks, IMF, World Bank, Fed to control all finances, digital one world currency that is BANK controlled rather than Cryptocurrency, in a cashless society, using Hashgraph instead of Blockchain.
Feed the world
Translation: Control the worlds food supply.
Efficient agriculture, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable farming.
Translation: GMO
Secure Society
Translation: Prison Planet
Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
Translation: Mass vaccination of proven or unproven products, big pharma lobby and pvt medi care, Codex Alimentarius
Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all
Translation: UN propaganda, brainwashing through compulsory education from cradle to grave.
Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all
Translation: Privatize all water sources, don’t forget to add fluoride
Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all
Translation: Smart grid with smart meters on everything, peak pricing
Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all
Translation: TPP, NAFTA, free trade zones that favor mega-corporate interests and franchise operations over entrpreneurs, McJobs over careers.
Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation
Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development
Translation: Environmental restrictions, control all oceans including mineral rights from ocean floors
Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss
Translation: More environmental restrictions, more controlling resources and mineral rights
Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels
Translation: UN “peacekeeping” missions, the International Court of (blind) Justice, force people together via fake refugee crises and then mediate with more “UN peacekeeping” when tension breaks out to gain more control over a region, remove 2nd Amendment in USA
Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development
Translation: Remove national sovereignty worldwide, promote globalism under the “authority” and bloated, Orwellian bureaucracy of the UN
Last century green activists, or anyone who cares about the planet mostly cared about issues that actually affected planet earth insofar as human damage was concerned. Plastic in the sea, pollution, species going extinct and commercial development over national heritage sites or sensitive ecosystems by large multinationals who placed profit above the environment. The climate change movement is a political movement designed to help the globalist elite, it is not the green movement which is about protecting the planet. We have seen the globalists Neocons hijack US foreign policy and the US constitution, the media, they hijacked Judaism with Zionism, they hijacked science and medicine with funding grants, R&D grants and profit centered models being linked to funding and there are many other examples, I wrote the following post as a guide against the disinformation http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2016/05/4-point-guide-to-understanding.html The worst offender in this political campaign is the IPCC and most of the propaganda usually is traceable to this source, but I will devote a post to them shortly in detail.
Since the last Ice Age the earth has been warming and cooling at various times. The variance is sometimes many degrees per year, sometimes only 1.6 degree per century like recently. In the 14th to the 18th century the Thames was at times frozen over, it was known as the "Little Ice Age" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ice_Age and naturally we are warming out of it. Right now we are not at the warmest since the last ice age. The periods between Ice Ages are called Interglacials, this one we are currently in is called the holocene and the Holocene Maximum period between 6 and 9 thousand years ago was much warmer The issue over whether man is causing the now slower increase than thousands of year ago is illogical, and the conclusion that man is causing all global-warming is therefore impossible. Here the issue is debated and the true mischief of the establishments unscientific method is exposed.
The illusion of the "scientific" conclusions of weather phenomena is called into question below.
The issues of polluting and poisoning our planet destroys eco-systems, they are the issues that matter, but they have been swept under the rug and now the only legislation that matters revolves around climate change. As long as you have "greenwashed" your products you can continue selling and damaging the environment, and only the large Multinationals can afford to greenwash. Nobody focuses on the separates anymore, it's all been made a "wash" into the climate change witch-hunt and the corporations have gone back to destroying the planet unchallenged. Mission accomplished by the think tanks! We all lose and so do our children. CO2 level is a fraction of what it used to be, CO2 stabilizes weather and is not pollution or poison, and the big businesses that pollute and poison have pulled a cunning switch and bait move.
The CO2 link is misrepresented in an unforgivable way
Every aspect of the climate hustle broken down by category here, in brilliant and humerous video clips, well researched and well presented: http://www.climatehustle.org/climate-hustle-clips/ The UN and big oil are mobilizing to take over half the world, the oceans, funded by George Soros, The Carnegie Foundation and hedge fund billionaires , under the cover of the green movement., climate change and sustainable development. This is a massive push and we need to be smarter to stop this globalization parading as environmentalism.
It is not the science that sways public sentiment, it's the science that MAKES IT VIA THE MEDIA FOR PUBLIC CONSUMPTION, and we know who owns the media. This includes the google search results so heavily leveraged in their algorithms to show search results listed on their acceptable sources list, which get more hits add to their hit count and it turn move them higher in a never-ending cycle designed to proliferate selected propaganda.
Polar Bear numbers are increasing, Antarctic Ice is increasing and Al Gore was just plain dead wrong about everything. http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/business/alatheia-larsen/2015/11/12/antarctic-ice-growing-even-hit-record-evening-news-shows What does that mean, that we should become oil industry apologists? No, of course not, I am the biggest opponent of multinational globalization and the oil industry I know of in my entire social circle. I do however, care about what is true, and greenwashing hurts what I care about, my planet. Lets pull our heads out of our asses and start fighting for our planet again and stop being derailed by the NWO!
All the biggest globalists like the Rockerfellors, Unilever, the Rothschilds and Prince Charles are throwing their weight behind sustainable development by making the issue a "wash" of real issues mixed with globalization control strategies via the public sympathy that the green movement garners.
The documentary below is outstanding and covers so much more than I have, I challenge anyone who sees it not to seriously reconsider their perspective.
