There
are rough seas ahead.
Initially it will
not be so apparent, not while I make few connections essential to make clear my
intended basic premise, always open to moderation. It will also not be so apparent right now, while I establish principles
that can be applied universally, and to which I can refer back to later on if a
valid need to reference or challenge them arises.
As themes develop and interconnect there will likely be increasingly provocative claims made and questions asked. When emotions run high human beings tend to defend their statements because with the push of a button their words are suddenly cast into existence in the digital realm of cyberspace. It’s so easy these days to put yourself out there, to put your image and reputation on the line, your public identity. I don’t like my comments ripped apart by others especially for others to so easily witness. This will interfere with free processing of information because it invites in a sort of ego based agenda, like a vampire into your house that will suck the life blood from the process and leave only a shriveled husk of personal pride lying dead on the floor.
As themes develop and interconnect there will likely be increasingly provocative claims made and questions asked. When emotions run high human beings tend to defend their statements because with the push of a button their words are suddenly cast into existence in the digital realm of cyberspace. It’s so easy these days to put yourself out there, to put your image and reputation on the line, your public identity. I don’t like my comments ripped apart by others especially for others to so easily witness. This will interfere with free processing of information because it invites in a sort of ego based agenda, like a vampire into your house that will suck the life blood from the process and leave only a shriveled husk of personal pride lying dead on the floor.
Now
before I get into the really contentious stuff we need to set up a M.O. or define
with reasonable fairness a few ground rules of engagement. This will really be the only vaguely closed
or defined aspect of the blog and I've designed them to make the content manageable,
focused enough, and to remain clear enough so as to understandable by all. I welcome suggestions are how to improve the
method, I initially included the following text in red but have decided due to to feedback that it is not useful:but I really don’t see the usefulness
of long and rambling philosophical utterings involving metaphysical
perspectives on themes that achieve precisely nothing useful or practical.
As
Carl Sagan so sagely cautions, I don’t want my mind to be so open that my brain
falls out. This kind of intellectual posturing
seems by design to be more useful as marketing tool for one’s brilliance and less
useful for achieving set goals, especially if they are to be commonly understood.
There
is also a very good case to be made about the clear meanings of words. For example, I don’t think that, if after
a long debate when possibly cornered by a sequence of logic, one should make a
case about how “To me, when I say that I believe in god, I mean that god is
nature, and the laws of physics”. That
is a subjective association and I put forward that it is not a useful connection
to make in a shared forum unless clarified upfront. Even then I see it
belonging more in the metaphysics realm; I question its communicative
usefulness when there is already a very loaded understanding of a word such a “God”. The phrase “The laws of physics” already exists
and the word “nature” can have very general connotations if used incorrectly in
specific context, such as in defining the nature of a deity, …. See what I
mean?
Even
more importantly for my objectives to be realized I think subjective
evaluations should only be made in that context, IE as opinions qualified
accordingly. The statement “That is wrong” is a useless judgment unless
qualified, IE “That would be considered wrong by society/my mother/church/the
judge”. Even better might be “That is
currently illegal”.
I
think this depersonalized approach will put the focus on the content rather
than the agenda’s of the individual. I
will do my best to abide by this code and I would relish being exposed for any
conduct contrary to this commitment.