Compilation of media lies about Russia's SMO in Ukraine.
Courtesy Matt Orfalea.
IT'S ALL PERCEPTION *GLOBALISATION*(CON)SENSUS SCIENCE*GEOPOLITICS*SPIN*HISTORY*ECONOMICS*
In times of universal deceit, truth is a crime. Censorship should be banned.
Who and what are you not able to openly criticise? Thats who Id like to hear about. Fact checking is propaganda by the very nature of the act.
As happy as I am to host the Hunter Biden Laptop, all the instructional videos Hunter made on how to smoke crack in the shower, hookers 'n Blow, Hookers that Blow, how to smoke crack from a crack, how to blow crack and how to have a crack at a blow on blow.....
Well that kind of salacious gossip has been covered by the likes of "The Sun".
This is a very serious blog about very serious things and I am more interested on what we can mine from this with some clever detective work.
......besides, I already checked and someone has already redacted/blacked out every picture featuring genitals, including genitals garnished with narcotics.
Here are 128k emails from the Biden Laptop, which is a modern Rosetta Stone of white and blue collar crime under the patina of “the Delaware Way.” Prior to the discovery of the Rosetta Stone, a number of ancient languages were mere gibberish and hash marks. Similarly, the emails on the Biden Laptop illuminated previously convoluted webs of the people you see leading the charge for global governance; truly, the emails can be considered a translation tool for Open-Source Intelligence (OSINT) gathering.

Apple iPhone 6_20160428_194634.jpg
Legalese: Having seen the lengths that the FBI and other entities in the apparatus have gone to harass citizens who expose corruption, and pursuant to 18 USC § 119, Marco Polo testifies that the contents of the Biden Laptop were abandoned property. Furthermore, Marco Polo unequivocally disclaims any intention to cause any threat, intimidating action, or incitement of harm to any person covered by 18 USC § 119 and we do not condone, encourage, intend, or have any knowledge that any other person will or may use the information herein for any unlawful purpose. Marco Polo’s motive is to see justice delivered—to all criminals—by those whose responsibility it is to carry out that duty.
In times of universal deceit, truth is a crime. Censorship should be banned.
Who and what are you not able to openly criticise? Thats who Id like to hear about. Fact checking is propaganda by the very nature of the act.
I don't usually like to frame any serious discussion in such a completely subjective dipolar context as "right vs wrong", but given the puerile, Disney world view of political analysts these days I have chosen just this once to engage on the established ground.
Usually I prefer looking at the interests of each party and establishing motive and agenda based on that.
I'm not bothering with those that suggest this entire invasion, SMO, or whatever, was an unprovoked attack by Russia, that's absurd on its face and I've been writing about this build up since 2015 pointing out all the antagonism and corruption, including the Hunter Biden saga, years before the mainstream picked up on it. I've also warned of problems in Moldova and the greater Russian plan for winning the economic war, which they clearly are doing.
What must be pointed out upfront is that not a single one of the supposed critics of the US role in Ukraine, the ones who open with the provisor "I think what Russia did was wrong, but..." and then go on to rightly criticize the US, none of them has ever been able to say why Russia was wrong, they only state "war is wrong". That is not a specific position here, it is a generalization that makes anyone who challenges your need to say it instantly appear suspicious. The the tactical aspect of such an approach cannot be lost on anyone using it. If Russia is wrong too then why can't any of them come up with an alternative?
What alternative do any of them put forward that was able to stop the ongoing Genocide in Donbass and positioning to eliminate the Russian state? As president of Russia your number 1 mandate is the security of the Russian state. Every other duty falls away once that is threatened, and no case can be made that placing nukes 8 minutes missile time from Moscow is not a threat, that building a vast military on your border not a threat, that biolabs where Slavic gene based gain of function virology is tested is not a threat.
Is banning your language is not a threat? Is surrounding your borders with a hostile mitary alliance (ask Serbia, Libya and the middle east) not a threat?
Why is any measure you take to counter such aggressive postering hysterically described a "Russian aggression" What would they, as NATO member states or US citizens of a nation wich has destroyed 47 nations post WW2, have done differently after 8 years of trying everything as Russia has?
Bear in mind the fact that Russia has a far different international intervention recird prior to this. She has only previously intervened twice in foreign military ops (Those times were stopping Syria from becoming another Libya and Crimea another Ukraine, both times BY INVITATION). Now let's hear their explaination of why Russia was wrong, because outside that context their contribution is nothing more than virtue signaling and parading a fake demonstration of their ability to read nuance I'm a situation, by ignoring nuance. Rather shut up, you are not advancing the issue by introducing "right and wrong" moral judgements.
How it works is first you establish:
1) Understanding of context and lead up
2) Interests, threats & incentive, then you
3) Evaluate options, you assess the risk, benefits and consequences of actions, AND then
4) evaluate the successes and failure which puts you in a position to stray from the observable outcomes and enter into to territory of subjective opinion of good and bad.
Moral judgements signal the content of your character, I am not saying that is not input I want, but what are you signalling making judgements when your approach betrays the fact that despite having no real understanding of what transpired, you are willing to make judgements publicly with conviction?
What that signals to me is that no matter how nice or fair those people sound, they are the ones that ultimately will roll out witch trials and inquisition. Those who think in absolutes and make judgements based on virtue are by far the most dangerous people in history because any evil ultimately becomes justifiable once you take that path.
In times of universal deceit, truth is a crime. Censorship should be banned.
Who and what are you not able to openly criticise? Thats who Id like to hear about. Fact checking is propaganda by the very nature of the act.
With Covid suddenly disappearing from the headlines, it's been interesting reading the perspectives of varying merit on social media. We will Segway back to Covid briefly at the end but let's take a look at the justification of these perspectives and reconcile which of them have been consistent in gaining understanding of why things have played out the way they have and whether anyone should be surprised.
Those perspectives are without doubt swayed by the absolute nonsense narrative of the MSM featuring their usual patronising "Good vs Evil" narrative. Features of this clown show which can scarcely be believed include journalists suggesting that Russia's main objective is Kiev (which makes no sense) and ridiculous casualties on the Russian side. This same presstitute express only silence on the Russian primary goal which is no doubt the Lugansk and Donetsk areas.
One of those perspectives I didn't mind included this epic rant from George Galloway where he covers everything from hypocrisy to the startling biomedical labs the US was funding in Ukraine, as Putin had claimed. (Below)
I am, however, curious about the basis of some conclusions which (like good doggies barking for their biscuit have been overwhelmingly adopting the #BlamePutin position. Do you think it is reasonable to wonder about whether in making those conclusions a person knows about the history of Putin in his the Yeltsin years, as the darling of the West. It was the West who all along wanted a sober version of Yeltsin in power. Putin was very helpful and and friendly to the West before his struggles with NATO expansion. How many understand what changed his outlook before and after the WEF young leaders program during the 80s, or his perspective before being vetted by Bill Clinton, George Soros and Boris Yeltsin and his perspective during the neoliberal capital finance plunder of former Soviet republics which he feels he regrettably aided and must atone for. How many know the extremes he has gone to in his efforts to hold NATO to their promises made to Gorbachev, Yesltzin, Medvedev and Putin himself? I'd put forward that he has demonstrated far too much restraint already.
What of Putin's turnaround of Russia from near collapse to bring Russian average household yearly incomes up from $800 per year to $30 000? That is something no "Make America Great Again" campaign will ever touch. This while under crippling sanctions. Regularly, his thwarting of the internationalist order by dedollarising Russia and reducing its US Treasury bond holdings wasn't popular in bankster circles. He was also behind building up her gold reserves to buy value rather than debt (represented by US treasury bonds: especially traded in a rigged market. By turning Russias deficit into a surplus, Putin put the Federation in an elite club of around 10 nations without any real sovereign debt to speak of, depending on how you slice the role central bank debt. Nations without any sovereign debt to speak of usually involve an entire debt spread. Even still, overall with mixed debt, even under years of sanctions, Russia's debt spread looks good.
| Mmmm? Just wait until Hunter Biden eventually gets linked to those biolabs... |
The capital finance globalist banksters have not done damage they hoped for. Neither has the Permanent Security State ("Deep State"). Putin's liberation of Syria from US, Saudi, Turkish, Israeli, Qatari and Kurdish supported regime change crime was epic and brought the nation back from the precipice of doom. The paramilitary units parading as rebels were covered by Western MSM as "moderate rebels" instead of terrorists. Russia smoked by them out when she rolled into Syria (search "Syria"tag on drop down menu on top-right of screen). It was a turning point in their quest in securing financial and military hegemony. By preventing Syria from being another Libya and Crimea another Ukraine Putin indicated he was no longer prepared to stand by and fail in his most fundamental task as president, secure national borders.
![]() |
| Syrian leader Bashar Al Assad sincerely thanks the Russian leader for essentially rescuing the nation from certain destruction |
If you were among those adopting a critical position, are you aware of the overt pain he has inflicted on the blue and white flag neoliberal globalist world order? Are you aware of his banning of arch globalist George Soros (very busy in the US too) activities inside Russia, and of his efforts since 2014 to halt the Genocide in Donbass? Or his efforts to implement the Minsk agreement? The death toll of Russian speaking Slavs, Jews and Muslims (at the hands of a largely neo-Nazi military) in the east is approaching 15000. Russia has sent aid and arranged several emergency evacuations for those victims due to historical ties to Russia.
If you do know this, please reconcile this resume with your assertion. If you contest these claims please state which and why, I would very much like to hear such a case being made.
If you don't want the details to bog you down and simply believe war causes death and you support the Ukrainian people then reconcile this with your support of the innocent:
Zelezny could end the war TODAY by agreeing to stop the genocide in the east and stick to the Minsk agreement of 2015 by remaining neutral and not joining NATO allowing Javelin & Stinger missiles to be moved to Russian borders pointed at Moscow. It was in fact Russian Intel's information of a large Ukraine army gathering for a final cleanup of the seperatists Donbass Republics that actually galvanised Putin into action. Dont underestimate the importance of that.
Does Putin's red line sound unreasonable to you? No, of course not. Perhaps you were not aware of this and contest my assertions? Then do your own research and check the facts, but not with MSM unless you want to hear the sort of nonsense they have been reporting. The Western media are seriously putting forward that Ukraine has the upper and that Russia's primary target is Kiev, not the East. This is barely two weeks into the conflict and we are already getting 180 digression from the truth!
| Part 1 |
I have been saying this for some time, please see the background to this situation by reading part 1 of this saga which is one of the first posts I wrote on this blog back in 2015 which you can find HERE.
This plot is only just unfolding. The neferious affairs Russian intelligence has obtained is extensive. They claim they have access to all US Intel operations involving Ukraine and the list is extensive. First on the list is WMDs. I don't mean nukes, both the US and Russia are stockpiled with nukes, everyone knows that. This involves the serious and illegal biological warfare facilities Putin claimed had been established in Ukraine with the backing of the US, involving pathogens and even pathogens of infectious disease of "Particularly lethal varieties". These facilities contain biological warfare weapons illegally developed which if used in a false flag in the manner in which chemical weapons were allegedly used in Syria, could provide pretext for WW3. Here's where it gets interesting and unsettling, watch....
In times of universal deceit, truth is a crime. Censorship should be banned.
Who and what are you not able to openly criticise? Thats who Id like to hear about. Fact checking is propaganda by the very nature of the act.
In times of universal deceit, truth is a crime. Censorship should be banned.
Who and what are you not able to openly criticise? Thats who Id like to hear about. Fact checking is propaganda by the very nature of the act.
| Putin & Berlusconi were good friends. | |||||||||
| American tax dollars at work. | |||||||||
| The girl on the left appears to be pointing an imaginary gun at the worshippers. | |||||||||
| The demented little whores seem happy about going to jail! | |||||||||
In times of universal deceit, truth is a crime. Censorship should be banned.
Who and what are you not able to openly criticise? Thats who Id like to hear about. Fact checking is propaganda by the very nature of the act.