It is almost self evident that explosions of all kinds fling matter outwards in all directions. They do not send matter snaking along filaments forming large web structures. Even though the Big-Bang was not an explosion as such, it's movement was charted in such terms Similarly, Gravity based movement and kinetic forces do not result in webs and filaments. Gravity is known to form large spheres and interactive movement between bodies is described in terms of orbital relationships based on mutual attraction between massive bodies.
How then did the Lambda CDM Model claim predictive success when on the largest scales the cosmos was resolved as a gigantic web-like structure?
This structure is seen arranging all the plasma, condensed matter, matter and its associated fields together in gigantic filaments. Such filaments were supposedly sheparded together (as such) by conveniently positioned dark matter,
Just like we have seen with Cosmological Redshift and the Cosmic Microwave Background radiation, once we scratch beneath the surface we find that no such evidence is actually there. In fact it becomes yet another example of spectacular failure in predictive success for ^CDM, which has a 4.6 ℅ predictive success rate, the worst in science, even worse than the PS rate of the climate change models.
"But the models predict it" This is what I am often told...
Well I have news for you, there is nothing in the Friedman Equations of any of the simulations done for the big bang which produces such a result. This result has been baked-in to the expansion in a more fundamental way than the inflation period was but for the sane purpose of retro-fitting from real world observations rather than projecting from theory.
It's all here in this episode of "See The Pattern".
