Showing posts with label Wallace Thornhill. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wallace Thornhill. Show all posts

It's too late for The LAMBDA-CDM establishment or the Petrodollar globalist cabal to surpress the SAFIRE PROJECT.


I have written about the inner workings of  most important scientific project in the world before, and recognized years back when I heard the the Electric Sun model was finally going to be given the clout it needed. They were going to test (audit) the Electric Sun Model. And they were going to do it on a laboratory on earth. What was to follow could scarcely be imagined. 


A short featurette on the origins of SAFIRE, the "Star in a jar on earth" 

I'll tell you what was to follow. A project so remarkable that it can use harmful radioactive nuclear waste AS FUEL and produce its own harmless non toxic "waste" out of stuff that would normally be radioctive for a million years if just buried in the ground. A project that can turn common hydrogen gas into a whole suite of other elements including metals at low energy levels. There is much more they can do, but we have to wait for patents before we find out. But how many of you realize the biggest disruption will probably be felt in GEOPOLITICS!?



Before I expand upon the utterly amazing results coming from SAFIRE, I want to first give a little bit of the realities of international geoplitics, globalization and the powerful special interests with unimaginable power and money that dictate proceedings, largely from the shadows. 

SAFIRE : Stellar Atmosphere Function In Regulation Experiment. 

Its not so much about the Hydrocarbons monopolies, NATO etc but also the non profit think tanks like the Council On Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, Rockerfeller and Carnegie Foundations, Brookings Institute, Rand Institute, Center For American Progress etc (list is 50 deep). Almost all of these had their origins an offshoot of the warmongering dynastic central banker cabal and their legacy of, well, lets face it... death! 



They are always steering the ship even when directives appear to come from the Pentagon, DOD, AIPAC, or big oil corporates and appear to be "spontaneously" reported on by the talking heads at MSM news media. Its less about hydrocarbons (inaccurately called 'fossil feuls') as it is about Petrodollar economics itself.





Wind and solar farms are just window dressing for a tolerated green energy sector, tolerated because the globalist are currently using climate change to internationalize taxation and control sovereign energy policies at their internationalist climate conference's, plus it will NEVER be be threat. #SAFIRE is different, SAFIRE flew under the radar and became a privately funded near billion dollar plasma fusion reactor that is energy super efficient due to transmutation profile (elemental alchemy almost) that came from the ELECTRIC SUN model. This not only vindicated the outsider Thunderbolts Project movement, the championions of the Electric Universe paradigm that currently overturning the establishment in Cosmology, Geology, Weather, Mythology, and the inner workings of the planet.


This is the penalty the globalist cabal must pay for not taking this cosmological model seriously, this monopoly prone cabal, whose scientific investments have been LAMBDA-CDM focused, have been surpressing (among other things) electric cars since 1930, other innovative energy as well, and they have been delighted that the Thermonuclear Fusion Model of the sun has lead scientists on an 80 year wild goose chase. As it turns out, stars are NOT POWERED Internally by thermonuclear fusion, but externally by birkeland currents in ionised plasma,  resulting in fusion reactions in the photosphere. That is why you never get a "star in a jar" based on the thermonuclear fusion model of the sun the way we have with the Electric Sun model. 


They scorned this ELECTRIC UNIVERSE model and other Plasma Cosmology models such as LPP Fusion, Eric Lerners Focused Plasmoid Fusion, and now they are too big to stop. 
To be fair there is another project that may be interesting, but I don't yet know enough about it to comment and I will do a folliw up at a future date:
https://phys.org/news/2019-07-recreate-sun-solar-plasma-burps.amp

Safire is under Aureon Energy running what will soon amount to a billion dollar reactor that is privately funded and has scientific advice from EU Cheif Science advisor, Wallace Thornhill and a great corporate board of directors and commercial energy innovators. They flew completely under the radar, soon they will BE the radar...

Above: How does the electrodynamic environment of the sun work and the quiete revolution in cosmology. 

Instruments

real-time, post experimental, supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA)

Existing

Plasma potential probes
IR camera
UV camera
Optical Spectroscopy
Pressure
Mass Spec
Chamber Voltage
Chamber Current
Thermocouples
RF antennas
Gas Composition & Flow

Coming Soon

Raman Spectroscopy
Neutron detectors
Neutrino Detectors
Laser Thompson Scattering
3-axis magnetometer

The investment phase. Escaping the public funding where purse strings are dominated by the Globalist Cabal that captured the US State and directs all public money into the climate change agenda and LAMBDA-CDM science, is what allowed the team to break new ground. 

The above video clip contains many visuals of the beautiful "star in a jar" on earth. The fact that this little man-made star is so beautiful is often ignored because we get so excited by the results. 

At this juncture for various reasons any investment opportunities that have closed will open up when the tech is taken to development. The clean energy and nuclear waste remediation industries alone are trillion dollar industries.
There are opportunities from $25 thousand dollars minimum for small investors, but I am not invested in the project, everything I write purely because it is such an exciting interplay of all the themes I write about on this blog. 

The yellow highlighted partners below SAFIRE assures are national security formalities only, Don Scott of the Thunderbolts Project who developed the first scientific model of the Birkeland Current that power the sun, was (along with others in the community) close friends with the Lockheed Director who is recently deceased, and he was a huge supporter of the Electric Universe Paradigm before the reactor was built and when the Electric Sun model was mocked by the soon-to-be-out-of-a-career LAMDA-CDM establishment. The DOD is only involved due to security concerns that come wirh all nuclear reactors of any form. 
  • Vantage Machine Ltd.
  • Lockheed Martin
  • Los Alomos National Labs
  • US Department of Defense
  • Space Propulsion Consultants 
  • DMI Precision Ltd.
  • Fogler Rubinoff LLP
  • University of Toronto
  • Princeton Instruments
  • Delta Photonics
  • Brooks Automation
  • Intlvac
  • Fluke Corporation
  • Plasus
  • Computer Elite
  • Orillia Tool & CNC
  • SAS Institute
  • Red Cage Solutions
  • Swagelok Company
  • Kurt J. Lesker Company
  • Hathaway Consulting Services
  • Paradigm Creative Group
  • Silver Wolf Productions
  • Spectragryph
Some Aureon.ca / SAFIRE partners above.

Who is Monty Childs and why is there still secrecy on some of results that SAFIRE have produced? Rumours abound that they have transmuted Gold or Uranium, or that the military has captured the project, but this hour long interview below allows Monty to set the record straight. 




A short video feature on the Safire Sun in a laboratory on earth. 



More on the science that replaced the LAMBDA-CDM Cosmology? 




WHAT THE CURRENT REACTOR IS CAPABLE OF:

  • Stable self-organizing plasma double layer shells
  • Stable plasma tufts analogous to stellar plasma tufting in the photosphere
  • Trapping of ions, electrons and molecules within Double Layers
  • Energy densities analogous to the Sun
  • Electromagnetic confinement of matter
  • Steep voltage drop just off the surface of the anode
  • Acceleration of ions from the SAFIRE core 
  • Spectral line broadening showing higher energies in plasma corona
  • Uniform thermal radiation emission – low thermal buoyancy
  • Creation of concurrent collisional and non-collisional plasma
  • Eruptive discharges analogous to Solar CME’s
  • Chemistry as a catalyst to Double Layer formation
  • Slowing the speed of UV light by 5,000x
  • Analogous transformer / capacitor behavior
  • Continuous spectrum from plasma double layers

 

NEWEST DISCOVERIES


  • Dark mode plasma electromagnetic structures
  • Sequestering of heavy elements to the SAFIRE core
  • New elements confirmed by Mass & Optical spectra, SEM & EDAX
  • Extreme atmospheric pressure changes – response to high energy plasma discharges (may be analogous to the changes in the velocity of the Solar wind due to CME’s)



Who is Wallace Thornhill? To succeed with fusion the SAFIRE team had to defacto finally reject the LAMBDA-CDM cosmological model,  which incorporates the thermonuclear fusion model of the sun. THE ^CDM model which has been the biggest failure of any model in any scientific doscipline in the history of science, and thats INCLUDING the flopped climate change models such as the Hockey Stick Graph based "runaway catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming", a failure of note. 

To appreciate how revolutionary the science is, Wallace Thornhill gives a two part interview that is short, to the point, entertaining (even witty). He basically overturned the entire body of science that has lead us into the crises in Cosmology in one interview. Thornhill, who is an Australian physicist and chief science advisor to the Thunderbolts Project (a SAFIRE consulting group and movement for interdisciplinary cooperation in science) basically rewrites the physics that lost 96% of the universe for us. Suddenly we realize what a massive waste of time and energy it has all been, and how fast we are about to progress after dumping it. Before these ideas were being proved and validated, it was not that long ago that these ideas were scorned by mainstream science. Who is laughing now? 

Part 1

Part 2


Theories and Models of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions


It is important to note that there is no accepted theory for the observed results in the SAFIRE chamber. This page presents several reasonable theories and models for nuclear transmutations and energy production. The SAFIRE team does not endorse or support any particular theory or model. We welcome proponents of theories to design experiments that will test the validity of their model.
For the sake of brevity, we will consider a physical "theory" and "model" to be interchangeable terms. Some rightly argue that a "theory" is very general and broadly encompassing, such as the theory that all atoms have a nucleus. In contrast, there might be several different "models" that could be constructed to embody a theory. There are currently more than a dozen different models for the nucleus, and these models are selected depending upon their usefulness in a given situation. As stated above, the SAFIRE team does not endorse or support any particular atomic theory or atomic model for what is happening inside the chamber, or inside other group's chambers. We focus on refining our process to achieve predictable results. 
That being said, we present several theories for low energy transmutation and energy production. The reader can find much material on all these and other theories by searching scientific articles. This webpage is not intended to be a thorough review of the subject.

 

Slow Neutrons

The Widom-Larsen theory is based on weak interactions and are consistent with existing physics. The theory explains how nuclear reactions can occur at or near room temperature through the creation of ultra-low-momentum neutrons and subsequent neutron-capture processes. Such neutrons, according to the theory, have a very large DeBroglie wavelength and therefore have a huge capture cross-section, explaining why so few neutrons are detected. Many-body collective quantum and electromagnetic effects are fundamental to Widom and Larsen's explanation for the energy required to create neutrons in LENR cells. Crucially, such reaction-rate calculations are based not on few-body interactions but on many-body interactions.
This is a subpage of Widom-Larsen theory/Reactions

 

Low Energy Neutrinos

Alexander Parkhomov has published extensive work on low energy transmutations. Although the results stand on their own without introducing any theories, Parkhomov's model of low energy neutrinos does make testable predictions. The model works on standard physics, with the requirement that the neutrinos be very low energy. For clear descriptions of the experimental and theoretical work, we suggest the book https://www.amazon.com/SPACE-EARTH-HUMAN-Views-Science/dp/171122121X
Neutrinos are known to enter into nuclear reactions. In the formula below, (A,Z) is an element with proton number Z and atomic mass A. When an electron neutrino interacts with this atom, the proton number of the atom increases by one, and an electron is ejected from the nucleus.
Slow neutrinos can stimulate beta decay, which will raise the atomic number of the starting element by one, like Mn to Fe. 
The other direction lowers the atomic number, like Fe to Mn.

 

Hydrinos

The Hydrino theory states that Hydrogen can exist in states that have lower energy than the traditionally believed ground state. Mr Mills has published ample experimental evidence supporting this theory. Mr Mills has also published ample experimental evidence that his reactions produce energy. Three references are provided below.
Results. Energy production from short pulses of 1000 amp, 50V. Some tests ran for 60 days. 

Theory: Hydrogen jumps to a “lower than ground state”, referred to as H(1/p), and gives the excess energy to create water. The excess energy goes into soft X-rays, UV, kinetic energy of the products. 



Click here for the homepage of this blog

🔵 Plasma Cosmology, The Electric Universe & The Thunderbolts Project - Difference/ Background/ Basic Tutorials (Pt 1)

PART 1

Plasma Cosmology:  
Modern Plasma Cosmology has evolved from but is inspired by what was once known as the "Plasma Universe" It puts forward that gravity is not the dominant force in the universe, and that electrodynamic forces are as important or more important (depending on the order of magnitude).  It is centered around a connected universe where charge separation is prevalent, but its scope and focus remain rooted in astronomy including Cosmology and Astrophysics. Not every Plasma Cosmology devotee has the same position, but it generally retains the thermonuclear core star principle from the Standard Model despite radically different views on star formation.

Electric Universe Paradigm:
Uses the principles above in all astronomical matters but goes further by invoking the Electric Sun Model, which has a variety of possibilities rooted in self-contained plasma magnetic entities, double-layers and arc discharge anode-cathode heliosphere principles that will be explained later on.  The EU paradigm goes significantly further by making the case that the principles defining Plasma Cosmology must therefore be in play in fields such as Geology, Archaeology, Biology, Weather and more since the plasma state of matter is the state we find in over 99℅ of the matter in existence. The Electric Universe highlights how an "overall universal charge" is not needed.  Neither is a "source for all the electrons". This is simply because of the clear and pervasive influence of many forms of charge separation on all scales.  That means the principles should apply broadly throughout our reality since this would be an inescapable logical consequence of the laws of Classical Physics.

The Thunderbolts Project: 
TBP is one movement within the EU community, without doubt the leading influencer.  It goes further yet in scope by reinvestigation of historical events through the EU prism. TBP introduces the potent angle of a spirit of cross disciplinary co-operation as an antidote to the over specialisation that we see in science today. Thunderbolts is also known for its novel view of placing value in the vast libraries of resources available to researchers in ancient mythology. This becomes valuable not by subjective speculation but by using a system where the archetypes of global myths are extracted, and it follows logically that the common themes must regarded as a source of historical value commensurate with how widely proliferated they are, especially when understood through Electric Universe principles.

NB: Foreword

If you are like me, someone with a keen interest all things science, you may feel a certain degree of resistance to these ideas after so much exposure to the science of "Big-Bang" cosmology (The LAMBDA-CDM concordance model) and all the spin that comes with it.  I would urge you to overcome those feelings if your sense of certainty gives you the need to dismiss this science out of hand.  That would be an unfortunate error in judgement that will cost you a rich source of the most elegant and powerfully predictive science currently available.

If you are indeed willing to open your mind to these findings you will open yourself up to the extraordinary explanatory powers of Plasma Cosmology and The Electric Universe. At this point a remarkable thing happens: 

You will find that most of the dead ends in the space sciences will suddenly seem like new horizons.  

Pay no mind to those "debunking" videos on YouTube or other mainstream platforms.  I will get to why they are so weak.  Better still, I will place you in a position to have enough of a grasp of the fundamentals that you will not take them seriously and may even be able start spotting the agendas behind the attacks.  Usually, they are out of a sense of feeling threatened. Unbeknown to some this is actually an extremely well backed up set of disciplines experimentally and is not as much at the mercy of the musings of the more theoretical physics as the standard model is, nor to the projections or modelling mathmagicians (in cases where they conflict with observations) either. As with anything, it's not immune to errors or hypotheses and has a healthy appetite for reviewing its own body of work. It's vital to keep in mind at all times that The Electric Universe now has many voices and no one voice speaks on behalf of all. It encourages speculation but always seems perfectly clear on the boundary of where there are proven principles based on such fundamentals as Maxwells equations and alternatively when there is speculating.  Compared to Theoretical Physics of standard models it speculates in increments instead of compounding layers of assumption on top of each other creating a house of cards. Such speculation is very sensible and as such it is very healthy.  

However:


What you will not find...

You will not find speculation that "reality is a two-dimensional hologram projected onto the surface of a three-dimensional sphere" here.  Nothing real exists in two dimensions, it boggles the mind that String Theorists could overlook that obvious fact!  Neither will you learn that reality exists in eleven or more spatial dimensions as the mathematics of trendy theoretical physics requires. 

This is because there are only three spatial dimensions.  A "dimension" in mathematics merely represents a degree of freedom and should never substitute for real world representation, relatability, ability to communicate in principle what concept means and most importantly the one thing modern astrophysics repeatedly ask you to disregard in a form of brainwashing.  That thing is common sense.  Place value in it. 

Observation must be explainable in cause/ effect terms as was always done in classical physics. These should all be self-evident, and it goes without saying that they are all critical aspects of what the new cosmology must be.  I am here to tell you that this is possible, it's already been achieved!  There are very important consequences. In this regard you will not find that over 80% of the universe is mysterious invisible "dark matter" here, or that (together with the equally fantastical "dark energy") almost all of the universe has turned out to be "missing".

What are the main space sciences?

Astronomy is the broad strokes science of all celestial bodies., planets, moons etc in the night sky. It's involved with the physics somewhat, but also mapping, charting, practical application of telescope and observatory resources and incorporates under it both Astrophysics & Cosmology.  The institutions under the current establishment do not teach competing hypotheses and despite heavy competition for funding interally it must be said that overall the status quo has the monopoly on public funding and the public understanding of science.

Astrophysics involves itself principally with the actual physics involved with these bodies. It's become increasingly mathematically reliant and as an example it would attempt to deal with the problematic physics of the thermonuclear fusion model of the sun, or the infinities laden black hole physics as well as interface with such things as String Theory etc. Cosmology is tasked with the ultimate quest. The big picture questions. What is the origin and fate of the universe. Should we persist with the failing LAMBDA-CDM standard cosmological model or look at contenders to the throne such as Plasma Cosmology. Despite an overlap with Astrophysics, it is Cosmology that will ultimately be discipline that we use as our arena for questions beyond the overall model, such as:
  • Was there a big bang?
  • How old is the universe?
  • What are space and time? 
  • How many dimensions are they set in?
  • What is the Cosmic Web? 
  • What is the origin of comets etc.
  • What is "embedded space" and is it a consequence of or setting for space and time?

Its Cosmology that was once referred to as the "queen of the sciences".


And may I cordially welcome you to the rabbit hole! 

 An introduction to the Electric Universe by the founders of The Thunderbolts Project. 




 Getting a sense of the current landscape in Astronomy, Cosmology and Astrophysics:  

Below: The nature of the current insurgency, why it's so critical it must happen, and a succinct overview of the sun's electrical environment. The embedded clip below includes a quick overview of how exactly it works. This is an important fundamental aspect of understanding what is to follow. 

NB* Watch me! 

An overview of Plasma Cosmology is HERE

Explaining the motivation for corruption in science



There are many theories accounting for the high level of corruption in science, at the bottom of this post I will list links to previous posts related to the subject.  Some say that that it has to do with suppressing free energy and relates back to Nikolai Tesla and beyond.  Some say that it has to do with justifying the billions spent on taxpayer-funded initiatives from CERN to the large hadron collider.  Others say it has more to do with the guardians of the outdated standard model justifying their positions politically.  I really don't know to be honest, but Wallace Thornhill does a bang-up job explaining it in the clip below and I'm inclined to agree with him until a better circumstantial case of motive comes along.  We must remember that the evidence is already in for the corruption regarding the fraudulent standard model being outdated, but does the establishment dogmatically stick by it because they are slow on the uptake?  unlikely if you ask me. They are scientists after all so we must go with the likelihood that they are not stupid.  It really appears to me that it must be corruption at some or other level.  The only speculation I am engaged in is substantiating the motive.





There is no such thing as #GravitationalLensing there is no #HiggsBoson and there is no #DarkMatter . While we are at it, reality is not a #2DHologram projected onto a #3DSphere either, along with whatever other nonsense #Stringtheory wants us to swallow as a mathematical parody of science and observation. For these matters and more see the below links from this blog or this great post from Thunderbolts.info https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/2019/05/06/seeing-through-dirty-lenses-2/


And very importantly!
https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/02/the-crises-of-science.html

Related:

https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/04/science-falls-apart-as-technology.html

https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/01/science-fails.html


More from Thornhill if you enjoyed his logic.


Science Falls Apart As Technology Surges Ahead



The title of this post may seem contradictary at first, but I assure you it is not.  The Picture above in my mind marks the end of science in the sense that the big questions were all considered answered and only the search for a unified theory of gravity uniting quantum physics and relativity seemed to persist.  This is a futile task in my mind but we will get there later.  By 1969 a man had walked on the moon and the seeds of the computing revolution were already planted.  Since then all that has happened is that the engineering and technical refinement of already understood science.  In fact, I am dismayed that physics and cosmology are run by mathematicians and the thinking has no bearing on reality.

I am no fan of string theory, it is everything that is wrong with science.  The notion of 11 dimensions is quite patently rubbish.  There are only 3 spatial dimensions.  Reality cannot be a two-dimensional projection around a three-dimensional sphere, and cause cannot be divorced from effect.  These are not solutions, the channel below is worth exploring because it explores the electromagnetic theory of the universe which I personally feel has actually solved most of the puzzles but the establishment dogmatically refuses to adjust their certainties.  The aim of this post is to point out which of the big science questions have fallen apart which you may not know about, and I'll post a few links to previous posts relating to this theme.  You will find some of these facts hard to accept so if you have any questions or disputes, please email me on glenn.swart@gmail.com and I'll send you more specific material from reputable sources confirming what I have said.



Crumbling theories are dealt with in the above clip.

Obsolete Science As Of Today 4th April:

Dark Matter.  Still no evidence after all these years and the electromagnetic model of the universe accounts for it with no need for the missing matter being invisible and accounting for the vast majority of all matter in the universe.  In reality, it is plasma that makes up the majority of the matter in the universe.
Red Shift.  Red Shift cannot be an indicator of expanding space between matter because high redshift cosmic bodies have been discovered in front of low redshift bodies.
The Big Bang.  Yes, you read correctly.  The failure of the redshift hypothesis means that the big bang is no longer certain.
Gravitational lensing.  This is simply electromagnetic lensing.
Gravity causing the galactic manifestation of matter.  Gravity is not a fundamental force but in fact seems likely to be an expression of the electromagnetic forces (See below)  Electromagnetism crafts the universe right up to the cosmic web as plasma filaments extend not only between stars but between galaxies.
Dark Energy.  The rethink of the above will impact on this non-existent form of energy.  Neither energy of mass is understood in any case.
Climate Change. You will need to spend some time reading this blog, start with the posts below.

Highly Dubious "Discoveries" I predict will unravel because of how persuasive the case against them has been by the sceptical scientists I've read up on, listened to and even interacted with on social media or their websites.

The Higgs Boson: Obvious Bullshit.  Let's be serious for a moment here.
Gravitational Waves: Let's call it intuition, for now, you get a nose for a scam if you dig at them for a while, this is a post for another day.

All of modern cosmology had fallen apart.

Find out more here:

https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/02/the-crises-of-science.html

https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/01/science-fails.html

https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/01/is-structural-nature-of-universe.html

https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2018/04/dark-matter-does-not-exist.html

https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/01/assumptions-in-science-2-thermonuclear.html

https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2018/12/reliable-collection-of-various-climate.html

https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2018/06/30-years-of-failed-climate-predictions.html

A  note on the electromagnetic relationship to gravity:

In1850, Faraday performed experiments trying to link gravity with electromagnetism that were unsuccessful. However, his conviction remained:
“The long and constant persuasion that all the forces of nature are mutually dependent, having one common origin, or rather being different manifestations of one fundamental power, has often made me think on the possibility of establishing, by experiment, a connection between gravity and electricity …no terms could exaggerate the value of the relation they would establish.” [12]
Faraday’s estimate of the importance of such a connection still stands. Today, there are a number of scholars pursuing this obvious line of inquiry. After all, the electrical and gravitational forces share fundamental characteristics—they both diminish with the inverse square of the distance; they are both proportional to the product of the interacting masses or charges; and both forces act along the line between them.

Science Fails.


More fails from the standard model of Cosmology by the brilliant Wallace Thornhill.



Is the structural nature of the universe dictated by gravity or electromagnetism?

Image courtesy www.nasa.gov

This may seem like a question of scientific detail, but actually its a fundamentally disputed scientific worldview.  I say "worldview" because even when there is agreement on the scientific points which are often already proven, there is a vast gulf in interpretation between the two theories of a more established gravity dominated universe, and a universe dominated by electromagnetism.  Walt Thornhill's website www.holoscience.com suggests that the term "Electric Universe" has already registered with a patent office so somebody has big plans.  I will give his synopsis although there is some variation in some of the theories I've looked up, I'll give an assortment of links at the end which you can look up yourself. 

Introduction
In the wake of recent discoveries, a new way of seeing the physical universe is emerging. The new vantage point emphasizes the role of electricity in space and shows the negligible contribution of gravity in cosmic events.
Images returned by high-powered telescopes and recent space probes have challenged astronomers’ long-standing assumptions about galaxies and their constituent stars, about the evolution of our solar system, and about the nature and history of Earth.
The new discoveries also suggest that our early ancestors may have witnessed awe-inspiring electrical events in the heavens—the source of myths and symbols around the world.

Cosmology

Today, magnetic fields are detected everywhere, even in the “empty” depths of intergalactic space. Magnetic fields cannot exist without causative electric currents. The naked electric force is 39 orders of magnitude (a thousand billion billion billion billion times) stronger than gravity. The visible universe is constituted almost entirely of electrically active plasma.
In the twentieth century, the pioneers of plasma science inspired a new school of investigation called plasma cosmology. Plasma cosmologists suggest that electricity is the primary force organizing spiral galaxies and the astonishing galactic clusters now seen in deep space.
Plasma cosmology has achieved surprising success in predicting major discoveries of the space age. This new perspective does not require purely theoretical inventions based on mathematical assumptions like the Big Bang, dark matter, dark energy, neutron stars, or Black Holes.

Stars

An Electric Universe extends the findings of plasma cosmology to the formation and evolution of stars and their planetary satellites. Stars are formed at the intersections of galactic current filaments in dusty space plasma. The size of a star and its colour are determined electrically and may change suddenly. Novae and supernovae are the explosive response of stars to a power surge in their galactic circuit.
Proponents of the Electric Universe suggest that there are no isolated islands in the universe. All objects in space, from subatomic particles to galactic clusters, are connected by manifestations of the electric force acting in real-time.
The Standard Model of the Sun proposes that pressure at the core of the Sun provokes a thermonuclear reaction. Proponents of this model say that this thermonuclear furnace causes the Sun to shine.
The Electric Sun Model, on the other hand, envisions thermonuclear reactions and neutrino production at or close to the surface of the Sun where the maximum exchange between the Sun and its external environment occurs.
It is electricity that energizes the stars, including the Sun, in a form of glow discharge. This external power source explains why the temperature of the Sun increases above the photosphere to coronal temperatures of 2 million degrees. Powerful plasma feedback effects maintain a steady output of visible solar radiation while variations in power input show up in the familiar sunspot cycle.
It is in the nature of a glow discharge that all stars possess a weak electric field beyond the corona. As charged particles of the solar wind move away from the Sun, they continue to be accelerated due to the Sun’s electric field, which extends to the heliopause.
Watch  Scientists Claim Discovery “Confirms” Standard Solar Model  for more information on the differences between the two stellar models.
Comets
Comets are electrically charged bodies moving on elliptical orbits through the Sun’s interplanetary electric field. As it approaches the Sun, the comet’s swift radial movement develops arcing on the nucleus. The arcs produce jets of dust and ions that form the coma and visible tails.
Many comets are solid rocks with dry surfaces. The sharply defined features of comet nuclei make clear that they are not “dirty snowballs” sublimating in the Sun. Due to the electric force, a comet can entrain a mass of hydrogen from the Sun greater than the mass of the comet’s nucleus. The unexpected X-rays of a cometary discharge can reach 2 million degrees.
Cometary nuclei reveal deeply cratered and blackened surfaces due to electric arcing. Since comet nuclei are eroded electrically, they could not survive across aeons of solar system history and may have been produced much more recently than proposed in the Standard Model.
For more information on the Electric Comet model click here.

The Brilliant Electric Universe YouTube Channell by Thunderbolts Project:


Overview:



The Thunderbolts Project Website: www.thunderbolts.info


SAFire Project:





Other Related Websites

One of the premiere sites dedicated to the Electric Universe and plasma cosmology. Developed and managed by Wallace Thornhill, the site contains all of his Holoscience articles over the past 12 years.

Electric Cosmos   http://electric-cosmos.org/

Don Scott’s site that is currently announcing his book, The Electric Sky.

Plasma Universe    http://plasmauniverse.info/

The nature of space plasma according to Anthony Peratt. A long-time proponent of plasma cosmology, Peratt is an associate director of Los Alamos National Laboratories and one of the leading experts on high-energy plasma discharge.

Plasma Mythology  http://www.mythopedia.info/

Mythopedia.info: “Our objective is to study historical information regarding the structure, workings and origins of nature, with special emphasis on transient events. As scientists now recognise plasma as the dominant state of matter in the universe, the subject is conveniently referred to as plasma mythology. This eye-catching term serves to distinguish the present approach from more traditional schools of ‘nature mythology’, that did not acknowledge the significant role of transient events in human traditions.”

Plasma Resources      http://www.plasmaresources.com/

Your one-stop-non-shop for exploring plasma cosmology, our electric universe and almost anything else even remotely related to the electrical nature of space, climatology and our Earth.

Click on the below titles for links

Plasma Cosmology

This site offers a straightforward introduction to the Plasma Universe. An excellent source for newcomers.

Plasma Universe Wiki

A Wiki about the Plasma Universe, a model of the universe in which electromagnetic forces dominate since 99.999% of the universe is plasma (charged particles). Although the equal numbers of charged particles tend to cancel, the tendency results in “quasi-neutrality”, and charge separation may occur.

Electric Universe Wiki

The Electric Universe theory highlights the importance of electricity throughout the Universe. It is based on the recognition of existing natural electrical phenomena (eg. lightning, St Elmo’s Fire), and the known properties of plasmas (ionized “gases”) which make up 99.999% of the visible universe, and react strongly to electro-magnetic fields.

Society for Interdisciplinary Studies

The SIS was formed in 1974 to consider the role global cosmic catastrophes may have played in our history, and even recorded by cultures worldwide in their oral and written ancient traditions.

Maverick Science

The present web site offers a generous sampling of my previously published articles as well as the latest findings from ongoing researches.  Included are several chapters from Martian Metamorphoses: The Planet Mars in Ancient Myth and Religion and the companion volume The Many Faces of Venus: The Planet Venus in Ancient Myth and Religion.  Also included are a number of monographs on a variety of subjects, ranging from the origins of rock art and writing to cosmography.

Labels

Search This Blog

Your Feedback

Name

Email *

Message *