Showing posts with label Pentagon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pentagon. Show all posts

They Went Too Far

Trillions spent on military intel produce mistake after mistake

The recent airstrikes the US (and the "Coalition Of The Killing") made against the Syrian army are indefensible. They have gone too far because nobody believes this could possibly be another mistake by those who posses the worlds best military intelligence. Another mistake that supports ISIS and other terrorists, another mistake that supports the mantra "Assad must go", their one true goal.

They have gone to far because even the MSM is struggling to do damage control over this one, and with recent polls showing the declining public trust in the MSM (especially after the US election coverage) they seem just a tad less eager to lie to quite the same extent:
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2016/09/17/us-halts-air-raid-after-learning-syrian-forces-may-have-been-hit.html
http://edition.cnn.com/2016/09/17/middleeast/syria-claims-coalition-airstrike-hit-regime-forces/

Regular readers of this blog will be used to seemingly outrageous claims I make being vindicated after the passage of time, from Libya to the Ukraine Coup, and now regarding ISIS.  I have long been providing in depth insight into exactly how the Western/Gulf Coalition backs, arms and funds not just terrorist rebel groups, but ISIS as well.  If you take the time to read right to the end of this previous post of mine you will have your "Ahaa" moment.
http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2016/03/fear-mongering-manufactured-consent-for.html


And now the media and the diplomats on the Russian side (who have all along known the truth but waited for an obvious act such as yesterdays)  are becoming a little less afraid of saying what I have been saying all along: Washington is behind ISIS. They formed them and they support them.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-17/syria-accuses-us-airstrike-killing-62-soldiers-serious-and-blatant-aggression
https://sputniknews.com/middleeast/20160918/1045440479/us-bombs-syrian-army.html

This position is supported by SouthFront, the premier source of military and strategic intel analysis:
https://southfront.org/moscow-us-strike-on-syrian-army-is-assistance-to-islamic-state/

Regarding the pro-Western media, I eagerly await their deconstruction of events to see how they deal with this hot potato.

Regarding the pro-Moscow, the below is an episode of Crosstalk.  It is the flagship program of RT International which packages the Russian case very well in a Western friendly format.  In the past it already had a viewpoint that is critical of US action but has always stopped short of going that one step further, of accusing Washington of deliberate action instead of constant errors.  This episode represents to me what a critical milestone we have just reached because of a subtle change in perspective of a few very important angles raised (more in the first half of the show)

  • They finally seriously entertain the possibility that Washington is behind Daesh/ISIS but then pull back.
  • They realize that Rothschild/Israel Schill, Ashton Carter of the Pentagon, runs military action and, in fact, Obama and Kerry have no real power.
  • They accept that there will be no change of policy and that no negotiating is possible with Washington, which more than anything else is irreparably fragmented.


This all goes to demonstrate my case, which follows from the title of this post.  The Anglo American Zionist Globalists are desperate, they have gone too far, their actions have become too difficult to defend (even at times for MSM).  In Addition the globalized central bank ponzi scheme that funds the war effort is coming apart at the seams and political disunity characterizes the West both in Europe and the US.  It follows logically that their action will become more provocative.  Now is the time to keep your ear to the ground, shit is getting real.

The US Dept Of Clowns Part 2, The Department Of Excuses & PR For The Pentagon War Machine.


Image courtesy Front Page Mag


For background and part 1 see the link below for the U.S. Department Of Clowns, including some classic foot in mouth moments from John Kirby & Jen Psaki http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2016/01/the-us-department-of-clowns.html. Of course, not much has changed because The US State Department continues to function as a PR Machine for the Pentagon.  This apologist department seems to have little function in the public eye concerning matters of State, and is more and more of an excuse generating unit.

A great assesment from RPI http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/peace-and-prosperity/2016/april/25/state-department-jokesman-obama-never-said-no-boots-on-ground-in-syria/

State Dept flatly Rejects claims Obama said "No boots on the ground in Syria"


But riddle me this, how do we reconcile John Kirby's flat out denials with his president?  The whole thing is just an enigma, wrapped in a mystery....

"Again, I repeat: We’re not considering any open-ended commitment. We’re not considering any boots-on-the-ground approach."
-Obama at a press conference at the White House with Baltic leaders on
"And in no event are we considering any kind of military action that would involve boots on the ground; that would involve a long-term campaign."
-Obama in remarks with the presidents of Estonia, Lithuania, and Latvia at the White House
"Now, after careful deliberation, I have decided that the United States should take military action against Syrian regime targets.  This would not be an open-ended intervention. We would not put boots on the ground."
-Obama in a statement on Syria at the White House
"What we’re talking about is not an open-ended intervention.  This would not be another Iraq or Afghanistan.  There would be no American boots on the ground."
-Obama in his weekly address
"This will not be Iraq or Afghanistan. There will be no American boots on the ground — period."
-National Security Advisor Susan Rice
"I will not put American boots on the ground in Syria."
-Obama in a televised national address from the White House
 More recently, in 2014, Obama talked less about "no boots on the ground" and more about those hypothetical troops not having a "combat" mission or be actually fighting — a distinction the White House keyed on Friday.
"With respect to the situation on the ground in Syria, we will not be placing U.S. ground troops to try to control the areas that are part of the conflict inside of Syria."
-Obama in remarks at a NATO conference
"I want the American people to understand how this effort will be different from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. It will not involve American combat troops fighting on foreign soil."
-Obama in his plan to destroy the Islamic State
"The president has ruled out the option of deploying American boots on the ground in Iraq and in Syria in a combat role."
-Earnest in a press briefing
"I won’t commit our troops to fighting another ground war in Iraq, or in Syria."
-Obama in his weekly address
Image courtesy The Blaze

Labels

Search This Blog

Your Feedback

Name

Email *

Message *