Whats up with Sagittarius A?

Bottom right image: Spencer Welling   Left: Antonio Solano

Sagittarius A* is a bright and very compact astronomical radio source at the Galactic Center of the Milky Way. It is located near the border of the constellations Sagittarius and Scorpius, about 5.6° south of the ecliptic. Wikipedia

Distance to Earth: 25 640 light years

Radius: 22 million km

Discovered: 13 February 1974

Distance: 26673±42 ly; (8178±13 pc)

Coordinates: RA 17h 45m 40s | Dec -29° 0′ 28″

Discoverers: Reinhard Genzel, Andrea M. Ghez, Robert Brown, Bruce Balick

Since gas cloud G2 passed through the center of our galaxy unconsumed back in 2014, cosmologists have been making excuses after taking some heavy hits (including from me every chance I got) and justifiably so. Its not just problematic for the black hole at Sagittarius A hypothesis, its a death blow. The questions have not died down and even though many of the mainstream guys may even suspect that what is at the heart of Sagittarius A, and every galaxy, isn't a hypothetical black hole but a physically real plasma magnetic entity known as a plasmoid. Such plasmoids are able to be created in labs on earth.

Above: The G2 story

Due to staggering amount of public funding going into researching known fake pseudoscience unicorns invented by mathemagicians in cosmology and astrophysics, this has been hidden from the public, images have been retouched, descent has been silenced and careers ruined all for greed at the expense of science and your taxation. But they are mobilizing to begin the cover up and have come up with the usual but bag of tricks. 

Recently they have decided to use another thing that doesn't exist to substitute for a black hole. A hypothesized form of hypothetical dark matter. A "Fluffy ball of darkinos" to quote them. This may seem farcical on the face of it, which it is, but its becoming more common.

Chandra X Ray observatory: Still making 

the prettiest pics of Sagittarius A

and perhaps more necessary because since by now pretty much everyone knows there is no "dark matter", so paradoxically its even more useful since they will then have some license to be able to define its behavior and adapt it to the anomalies that will happen to be observed, such as adding magnetic fields, adding plasma attractive qualities, electrons and charged particles and eventually just changing the properties of dark matter until its properties match those of ionised plasma. Plasma Cosmology through the back door. First they ignore, then they ridicule, and finally they act as if they have known all along https://www.livescience.com/fluffy-ball-darkinos-center-milky-way.html

And https://www.popularmechanics.com/space/deep-space/a36530817/the-center-of-the-milky-way-might-not-be-a-black-hole-after-all/

Dark matter, a known fudge factor, is becoming a really dark matter in astrophysics.

https://phys.org/news/2021-06-black-hole-center-milky-mass.html


Sometimes, they do get a bit warmer: 
"New research by University of Massachusetts Amherst astronomer Daniel Wang reveals, with unprecedented clarity, details of violent phenomena in the center of our galaxy. The images, published recently in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, document an X-ray thread, G0.17-0.41, which hints at a previously unknown interstellar mechanism that may govern the energy flow and potentially the evolution of the Milky Way." It irks me to hear so much talk of filaments and magnetic fields with no mention of moving charge, but its progress.

The paper will be under this post as usual.

Read more here:

https://scitechdaily.com/stunning-new-image-of-the-center-of-our-galaxy-hints-at-previously-unknown-interstellar-energy-source/

The real Story

If you want and in depth look at what really drives galactic rotation and resides at the centre of every galaxy, read this post taking a more detailed look at every aspect of the issue where we can draw reasonable conclusions.

• It is NOT dark matter
• It is NOT a black hole

Above: Black hole jets, just like we do not ever observe black holes, we arnt always able to resolve the jets, but a combination of observations measns we can be sure they exist. We usually observe bright radio spots in X-Ray, same with cosmic jets attributed to black holes, sometimes we  can even resolve the jets optically.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

Fig. 1.

X-ray images of 3C 273 as seen by the ROSAT (left) and Chandra (insert to the right) telescopes. Images are to the same scale, and registered top (N) to bottom. East is to the left. Even though the ROSAT resolution was 5′′ compared to the extension of the jet from 10′′ to 20′′ from the quasar, only the end of the jet is clearly distinguished from the bright quasar. The Chandra image, which is to the same scale, clearly resolves the length of the radio and optical jet, and also shows a faint x-ray jet connecting to the nucleus. (The streak SE to NW in the Chandra image is the CCD readout artifact). Image Courtesy: NASA/SAO/D. Schwartz

Plot from the Late E. Dowdye, physicist and NASA engineer, has produced data for 14 years, with absolutely no gravitational lensing around our supposed black hole, Sagittarius A. This is another intractable conflict like gas cloud G2. Either the black hole attracts and lenses always, or its falsified. 

Optical refraction in galactic/stellar atmospheres or the ionised plasma interstellar medium remains the most likely candidate where we do see lensing, because this accounts for why we sometimes see it and sometimes selectively don't, and why the colours prism out when we do see it (gravitational lensing predicts the entire spectrum should be equally affected) It also accounts for why light should be gravitationally affected at all, being massless. Doctor Dowdye's work below can be found directly HERE

Sagittarius A* Astrophysical Orbital Data for S2 & S14
Star Label	Impact Parameter ξ			Gravitational Deflection α
	(light time)	(meters)	(AU)	(radians)	(degrees)	(arcsec)
S14	6 Lhours*	6.47553E+12	43.29	3.64949E-03	0.209100573	752.762062
S2	17 Lhours*	1.83473E+13	122.65	1.28806E-03	0.073800202	265.680728
S2	5.5 Ldays	1.42462E+14	952.30	1.65886E-04	0.009504571	34.2164573
S2	10 Ldays	2.59021E+14	1731.46	9.12373E-05	0.005227514	18.8190515

* Nearest Point of Approach to supposed Black Hole

Table: Gravitational Deflection as function of Impact Parameter o

as Predicted by the Light Bending Rule of General Relativity 

Figures above: Animation of a Textbook Depiction of Gravitational Lensing at Sagittarius A*(Note: This is a textbook depiction that is not yet observed in all modern Astrophysics.)The astrophysical events taking place at Sagittarius A* might appear as such if the Light Bending rule of General Relativity actually applied (showing time resolved images from 1998.8 to 2003.2)

For a gravitation mass of 4 million times Msun (the galactic mass of Sagittarius A*) at the same impact parameter, a gravitational deflection for the light ray would be α = (1.75/214) x 4*10^6 = 32710 arcsec or α = 9.08 degrees. This would be a very noticeable lensing effect for modern astronomical means.  It is also interesting to note that the orbiting stars denoted as S2 and S14 have highly elliptical orbits with orbital periods of 15.24 and 38 years respectively. Also note that the nearest point of approach in the orbits of S2 and S14 to the perceived black hole occurred at 2002.315 and 2000.156 respectively. This double event occurred to within 2.159 years apart from one another; a back-to-back event. This will not occur again for another 76 years and 152 years, when the nearest point of approach is predicted to occur to within 3 years of one another, assuming correctness of the orbital periods of these stars. Either a missed opportunity occurred during the observation of this back-to-back gravitational lensing event or this gravitational lensing effect, as is predicted by the light bending rule of General Relativity, simply does not occur. To date there has been no evidence of a gravitational lensing effect as can be detected from the broad band emissions of electromagnetic waves coming from the stellar objects orbiting about Sagittarius A*. The emissions that permit the astrophysicists to track these stellar objects, moving strictly according to Kepler's laws about Sagittarius A*, lie predominantly in the ultraviolet, x-ray and gamma-ray regions of the electromagnetic spectrum. All these emissions, however, are theoretically subjected to the very same light bending rule of General Relativity.  An evidence of gravitational light bending at the site of Sagittarius A*, as is predicted by the light bending rule of General Relativity, is yet to be observed; an area under intense observations by modern Astrophysics since its discovery in 1992.

Click HERE for the homepage

Sources/Citations 

(Full source's HERE Astronomy: Astrophysics/cosmology)

Reference: “Chandra large-scale mapping of the Galactic center: Probing high-energy structures around the central molecular zone” by Q. Daniel Wang, 27 April 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab801
arXiv: 2010.02932

Refereed Papers

"Time resolved images from the center of the Galaxy appear to counter General Relativity", Dowdye, Jr., E.H.,  Astronomische Nachrichten, Volume 328, Issue 2, Date: February 2007, Pages: 186-191.  Published on-line at: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/search/allsearch Search under author: Dowdye

"Extinction Shift Principle: A Pure Classical Alternative to General and Special Relativity", Dowdye, Jr., E.H.,  Physics Essays, Volume 20, 56 (2007) (11 pages); DOI: 10.4006/1.3073809

Chandra enables study of x-ray jets
Daniel Schwartz

Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge, MA

PNAS April 20, 2010 107 (16) 7190-7195; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0913890107
Edited by Neta A. Bahcall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and approved February 2, 2010 (received for review December 3, 2009)

1. Lebach, D. E. et al.,  "Measurement of the Solar Gravitational Deflection of Radio Waves Using Very-Long-Baseline Interferometry ", Phys.Rev.Lett, 75 (1995), pp. 1439-1442

2. Counselman, C.C. et al., "Solar Gravitational Deflection of Radio Waves Measured by Very-Long-Baseline Interferometry",  Phys.Rev.Lett. 33 (1974) 1621-1623

3. Fomalont, E. B., et al., "Measurements of the Solar Gravitational Deflection of Radio Waves in Agreement with General Relativity", Phys.Rev.Lett. 36 (1976) 1475-1MeerKAT