Despite the headaches I may cause the astronomical community, there is a star named after this blog, DWAHTS26 (2026 being the year it was named).
It is visible from where I live.
This site has a star named after it!
In times of universal deceit, truth is a crime. Censorship should be banned.
Who and what are you not able to openly criticise? Thats who Id like to hear about. Fact checking is propaganda by the very nature of the act.
Power Mapping Corporations & Other Organisations
From LittleSis.Org
What We’re Looking for and Where to Find it
————————————
Once you’ve identified your power research target, there is a lot of information you can find about it! The graphic below shows different categories of information you might want to know about a powerful corporation or other organization. Depending on the context for your research, some of this information might be more important and relevant than others. Use your instincts and talk to other activists you’re working with to prioritize what information to look for. This guide is meant to be a starting place.
_______________________
Others doing good work include Global Justice, and Stop Corporate Impunity
In times of universal deceit, truth is a crime. Censorship should be banned.
Who and what are you not able to openly criticise? Thats who Id like to hear about. Fact checking is propaganda by the very nature of the act.
The Cosmic Web Is Evidence AGAINST The Big Bang!
It is almost self evident that explosions of all kinds fling matter outwards in all directions. They do not send matter snaking along filaments forming large web structures. Even though the Big-Bang was not an explosion as such, it's movement was charted in such terms Similarly, Gravity based movement and kinetic forces do not result in webs and filaments. Gravity is known to form large spheres and interactive movement between bodies is described in terms of orbital relationships based on mutual attraction between massive bodies.
How then did the Lambda CDM Model claim predictive success when on the largest scales the cosmos was resolved as a gigantic web-like structure?
This structure is seen arranging all the plasma, condensed matter, matter and its associated fields together in gigantic filaments. Such filaments were supposedly sheparded together (as such) by conveniently positioned dark matter,
Just like we have seen with Cosmological Redshift and the Cosmic Microwave Background radiation, once we scratch beneath the surface we find that no such evidence is actually there. In fact it becomes yet another example of spectacular failure in predictive success for ^CDM, which has a 4.6 ℅ predictive success rate, the worst in science, even worse than the PS rate of the climate change models.
"But the models predict it" This is what I am often told...
Well I have news for you, there is nothing in the Friedman Equations of any of the simulations done for the big bang which produces such a result. This result has been baked-in to the expansion in a more fundamental way than the inflation period was but for the sane purpose of retro-fitting from real world observations rather than projecting from theory.
It's all here in this episode of "See The Pattern".
In times of universal deceit, truth is a crime. Censorship should be banned.
Who and what are you not able to openly criticise? Thats who Id like to hear about. Fact checking is propaganda by the very nature of the act.
Finally, SOUTH AFRICA comes out of the closet as a BRICS nation in direction, not just in name.
 |
| dwahts.blogspot.com |
GEOPOLITICS
Preface: It is vital to note that BRICS has emerged principally as a consequence of geopolitical maneuvering.
It is the emergence of great power's in the east that has altered the balance of power. That means ending the post WW2 hegemonic dominance of the Anglo American Western Empire (The US and its Capital Finance Petrodollar establishment of former colonial powers turned Western vassals).
To put it another way, United States and its reserve currency (USD) unipolar world is today already widely recognised as a multipolar world. While it has been former cold war rival of the US, the then Soviet Union, todays Russian Federation, that has made the boldest and most sensational geostrategic and military advances, most notably the strategic defeat of the entirety of NATO through their proxy, Ukraine, the real momentum has actually been more gradually building quietly through China and India. In this way, many of the former Western vassals, the Petrodollar gulf monarchies and Iran, Brazil, Egypt and others have redefined global powers from OPEC, the G7 and The United Nations system and SWIFT financial instrument, to one taking shape and only recently finding actual implrmentation, around a BRICS structure.
Russia and China have sought to urgently diversify from their US Treasury holdings and found great success using gold and their own currency. Russias oil for gold and oil for Rubles program's along with outstanding diplomacy have allowed them to defy weaponising of propaganda and such through the post Bretton Woods USD institution's. This includes sanctions and measures by the US Departments of State and Pentagon, The UN, WEF, World Bank, EU, NATO to weaken their global standing. Moreover, it has only resulted in stronger alliance's in BRICS as the emerging great powers know that they are stronger together and that each needs the other.
South Africa has been a slow starter and has only recently been making bold gestures of overt inclination towards the East as its economic destiny.
While SA's Manufacturing base has not been as supercharged as other BRICS nations and its trade balance is a deficit with BRICS partners, meaning it is still an import heavy nation, opportunities exist with commodities, energy and certain local niches such as the Rooibos tea grown only near the table mountain part of the globe. These are products whose success in BRICS is already ordained and only the absence of a gobal marketing apperatus has left them unrealised.
This is what is missing from SA, and is the next step to take now that SA has been bolder it admitting publicly its BRICS aspirations and in some cases even openly defied the US attempts to them to heel.
Watch this space!
TRADE
There is no single formal "BRICS trade agreement," but rather a framework for economic cooperation with agreements on specific areas like customs and energy efficiency, supported by institutions like the New Development Bank. South Africa's trade with other BRICS nations is growing significantly, but it also faces a persistent trade deficit. The BRICS Business Council serves as a platform for the private sector to facilitate trade and investment, with a goal to create a more business-friendly environment.
What is the BRICS Framework?
- BRICS began as an informal alliance of economic powers and has evolved into an association that supports economic cooperation and the Strategy for BRICS Economic Partnership.
- The group has established the New Development Bank (NDB) for financing infrastructure projects and the BRICS Business Council to connect the business communities of member nation
- While focused on trade and investment, BRICS is not a formal trade bloc with a comprehensive, legally binding agreement.
South Africa's Trade with BRICS Nations
- BRICS nations are significant trading partners for South Africa, with substantial growth in both exports and imports since 2016.
- South Africa has continuously recorded a growing deficit in its balance of trade with other BRICS economies, which has more than quadrupled since 2010, according to Business Tech.
- Significant growth in South African exports to China has been a primary contributor to the overall trade increase.
Opportunities for Trade and Investment
- The BRICS framework aims to develop market access opportunities and inter-linkages between member countries.
- The South African agricultural sector is particularly interested in leveraging BRICS to boost exports of products like fruits, wine, wool, and beef to China and India.
- South Africa's developed infrastructure, including ports, railways, and logistics networks, positions it to act as a conduit for trade and investment into the wider African continent.
In times of universal deceit, truth is a crime. Censorship should be banned.
Who and what are you not able to openly criticise? Thats who Id like to hear about. Fact checking is propaganda by the very nature of the act.
The US Gave Clear And Explicit Assurances To Russia That NATO's Membership Would Not Be Expanded To Include Nations To It's East
I felt it necessary to make a few documents available from the National Security Archive at George Washington University at Washington DC.
The reason should be self evident to anyone keeping up with international affairs. Both NATO and the US Foreign Policy elite reject such a proposal. This dishonest way of characterising recent geopolitical developments is perpetuated throughout Western influenced media, pop-culture and the internet thanks to the dominance of the crown jewel of the US Security State which is (of course) Google. The usual tactic is to avoid the direct and falsifiable little lies and to create a great a big lie through omission, gaming of search results and (see screenshot below) a net assessment by AI that is intended to prejudice anyone with curiosity before they get a chance to even go through the direct evidence.
 |
| Google Assessments made by its AI reflect the conclusion expected from its gaming of the system. |
Here above is just an example of the AI assessment problem produced by Google's decision to prioritise chosen propaganda outlets such as CIA run Wikipedia and a host of think-tank sponsored quasi-statal institutions.
Now compare such a conclusion with direct evidence in documents I have linked to in the National Security Archive with respect to NATOs eastward expansion. I have chosen documents in the context of German Reunification since this required the express permission of the Soviet Union leadership just prior to the end of the Cold War. It includes formal documents sanctioned by official apparatus of state and concerns top diplomats such as James Baker and Russia leaders from Gorbechov to Yeltsin.
In times of universal deceit, truth is a crime. Censorship should be banned.
Who and what are you not able to openly criticise? Thats who Id like to hear about. Fact checking is propaganda by the very nature of the act.
The Double Slit Illusion/ Lie
A guest post I wanted to host because I find it so worthwhile.
This is an introduction to a chapter in my book series
There are 4 completely different double slit experiments which yield 4 different results thay have absolutely nothing to do with each other.
There are 16 possible combinations of outcomes for the double slit experiment(s) and none of them depend on a particle-wave duality or a literal mass to energy interchange.
In Book 1 on Light, I go into great detail on all the different combinations of results and how they are produced.
There is no real-world observer in the experiment at all like how cartoons and textbooks depict. There is no human looking at the experiment and flipping the patterns from observation.
They either send a spherical wavefront through the slits to produce 2 bands of light.
Or they send a plane wavefront through the slits to produce an interference pattern.
But that interference pattern only shows up with they have the 2 slits within the diameter of the laser beam, so the beam of the laser shines through both slits simultaneously. And that causes secondary re-emissions of light with overlap the initial light. Primary light from the laser shines on the slits. But the edges of the slits themselves will re-emit new light which then overlaps to make the pattern.
The slits are about 2μ to 5μ apart.
Then you have the particle patterns.
They use a tungsten filament like a light bulb. The filament glows red hot at 4000˚F. That is inside of a black box that sits on a table top.
The tungsten filament gets so hot that it starts shooting off electrons wildly. The filament becomes a "thermionic heat source". It shoots off particles wildly like how a nuclear material shoots off particles. Just not as dangerous. But the particles that are shot off of the filament... they fly through the 2 tiny slits inside that closed box. It's like marbles shooting out of a cannon at a constant. And that produces 2 bands of particles on the detector screen inside the closed box.
Then you have the particle interference pattern.
That is made from focusing those wildly shooting particles from the 4000˚ filament using a magnetic lens. It's an electromagnet that focuses the charged particles into a beam just like the laser. But this is a particle beam. And again... the 2 slits need to fit within the diameter of that beam which is about 100 nm apart.
The electrons from the collimated beam shoot through both slits at the same time... but those primary electrons hit the edges of the slits. And the slits are made of atoms. So it induces secondary electron emissions from the edges of the slits themselves. And those secondary electron emissions overlap the primaries and they create the particle interference pattern on the detector screen.
But then they have a sensor inside the closed box. And all they do is remotely block 1 of the slits with the detector which then prevents the secondary electron emissions from making it to the screen.... and THAT is what they say is the "observer"..... All they do is block the damn slit and it changes the pattern distribution over time as the particles accumulate.
NONE of that has ANYTHING to do with some mythical particle-wave duality. There is no observer!!
All they do is fabricate and lie in What the Bleep Do We Know, Flatland and Down The Rabbit Hole.
They claim the observer is just an "oversimplification."
But there is no observer! They just block the slit itself with a detector and sensor. That's it.
And then they claim the patterns of light shift back and forth with particles.
It's FOUR different experiments!! And then you can do the experiments in combinations if you have a sophisticated enough set up (which has never been done!)
But there are a total of 16 possible combinations of particle pattern and light pattern distributions.
Actually 15 combinations, but the 16th is not performing the experiment at all.
At what point does an "oversimplification" just become a flat out lie and fraud?
People are allowed to continue to believe a mythical flipping of particles and waves, or that mass is bundles of energy beyond the Planck scale... or that observation manifests reality.
It's junk "Psyence" all based from relativity insisting the speed of light is the same to everyone no matter what.
So they invented the concept of the 4th dimension, space-time, particle wave dualities, that mass literally increases with acceleration or velocity...a literal interchange of mass to energy/ vice versa ... and QED was born from those fallacies.
The same observations and results can be explained using ONLY classical physics, Hamiltonian and Newtonian Mechanics... but under "a new light"... literally.
In times of universal deceit, truth is a crime. Censorship should be banned.
Who and what are you not able to openly criticise? Thats who Id like to hear about. Fact checking is propaganda by the very nature of the act.
The Fundamental & Elementary Flaws With The Reasoning Behind Gravitational Lensing In Cosmology
I think it is only fitting to point out that when gazing into the heavens through a telescope lens, it is the refraction of light that makes everything seem so much larger and clearer. Refraction occurs anytime light passes from a medium to another another medium of differing density. Space is filled with ionised plasma filaments, galaxies and other assortments of dust, matter and charged particles contained in defined shapes by magnetic fields. IE space is more than just space, it's an environment with potential to refract light when the conditions are right.
Do not let the irony escape you, it is a lesson waiting to be learned.
Note too that the various rings, crosses and supposed mirrored deep field galaxies are prone to prisming of light at times, and there is no given reason put forward by proponents of gravitational Lensing to account for any part of the spectrum to be affected differently to the rest of the spectrum. All frequencies should be equally affected.
Bear in mind that there are now too many examples to count with my fingers of instances where we are told that supermassive black holes interact with each other, neutron stars, their own jets, wandering gas clouds etc where no lensing whatsoever is observed. Sagittarius A is a notable example of this. All I will say on that is "black swans are quite trendy pets to own these days.
But let's take a deeper dive. Thanks to Taking Fukatsu for pointing out the problems that are to follow. You can find more of his important articles at his blog xxx in both English and Japanese.
By Takaaki Fukatu
In correct optical lens theory, all gravitational lenses are concave lenses.
The mistake made by Einstein and Lord Eddington was that they misunderstood gravitational lenses to be convex lenses in the first place.
My conclusion is the following:
"Gravitational lenses are biconcave lenses that gradually increases in curvature toward the center, and Einstein rings do not form. And gravitational lenses only form blurred images.
In this case, an electromagnetic lens is more likely, since the electromagnetic force is 39 orders of magnitude stronger than gravity. A gravitational field that is 39 orders of magnitude weaker has almost no ability to bend light rays.
This means that Lord Eddington's prediction that light rays would bend due to a gravitational field is invalid, since light rays would be scattered in a gravitational field and would not form an image.
However, such a phenomenon is actually hypothetical, and as Dr. Dowdye pointed out and as observed by the Japanese artificial satellite Akatsuki, light rays are observed to be refracted by the atmospheric medium or diffraction by the edge of the atmosphere layers, or the edge of a rocky surface.
The reason is that light rays hardly ever slow down, whether by gravitational lensing or electromagnetic lensing."
These conclusions obviously have stunning implications for Cosmology and even for the broader field of physics in general.
Takaaki cites the following as most noteworthy in particular:
The motion of the stars that Arthur Eddington observed during a solar eclipse☆ could not have been observed with gravitational lensing. A faint ring-shaped virtual image of a halo would be observed. If a shift in the position of the stars were observed, it would be due to another optical cause. All that would be expected from gravitational lensing from the star behind during a solar eclipse is a slight increase in brightness around the Sun. If gravitational lensing exists, the star should "disappear before and after" being hidden by the Sun. Electromagnetic lensing is much stronger than gravitational lensing, and the effect of gravitational lensing would be almost invisible.
The prediction of the entire scientific community at the time about gravitational lensing, "a shift in the position of the stars," is itself incorrect.
In times of universal deceit, truth is a crime. Censorship should be banned.
Who and what are you not able to openly criticise? Thats who Id like to hear about. Fact checking is propaganda by the very nature of the act.
A resources post. SI Units And Constants In Physics.
Regarding standardised physics: The effort to make precise and unambiguous the task of quantifying nature (matter, numbers and material properties) and establishing the inherent relationships (+-√÷×% etc) we need SI Units.
SI units, or the International System of Units, are the modern metric system and the global standard for measurement, consisting of seven base units: the meter (length), kilogram (mass), second (time), ampere (electric current), kelvin (thermodynamic temperature), mole (amount of substance), and candela (luminous intensity).
The NIST reference on constants, units and uncertainty is HERE
- See also
- Wall Chart and Wallet Card of the 2022 constants
- Background information related to the constants
- Links to selected scientific data
- Previous Values (2018) (2014) (2010) (2006) (2002) (1998) (1986) (1973) (1969)
Find the correlation coefficient between any pair of constants
In times of universal deceit, truth is a crime. Censorship should be banned.
Who and what are you not able to openly criticise? Thats who Id like to hear about. Fact checking is propaganda by the very nature of the act.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)