Footage from the Pentagon Parking lot from September 11, 2001, finally released. Frames have without doubt been removed; this is clear despite the poor quality of the recording. Despite all of this chicanery, it still seems clear that whatever hit the Pentagon was not a commercial airliner.
This outstanding synopsis was put out by Michael Rivero himself on his radio show a few years back and put to video by Zane Henry Productions for those that require some visual cues that are quite well done. Michaels website comes highly recomended: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/#axzz5hyle9j3Y
If I could make one video compulsary viewing it would be this one.
There are one or two minor points of contention I have factually, but this synopsis is so insightful, grasps the context of which fits into which so well, that it would feel like splitting hairs to bring them up now. I'll go over them on a later post.
Never before have I heard someone explain the true connection between central banks, war, the petrodollar, the national debt and climate change so brilliantly and so succintly before. He does this monumental task in 40 minutes and does it well.
Here are the posts that re-cap the relevant information on the 9/11 False Flag operation which I have recently compiled. It includes the latest developments. I have done this because I still consider this the most important issue in the world today. It's resolution would mean a de-facto coup on the criminal wars of regime change and mass murder in the Middle East and elsewhere. It would send the scum from the mainstream media and political establishment running like rats from a sinking ship and embarrass the arrogant defenders of the establishment, the good dogs barking for their biscuits that have been such an obstacle to the global proliferation of truth, justice, liberty and decency worldwide.
I have an upcoming post on operation Talpiot. A Mossad operation to which all the breadcrumbs lead. It's not Chinese spies, It's Mossad spies that the US Deep State already shares tech with. Trump either doesn't know it or is being wilfully deceitful. Even a casual Google search of this and it will become plain to you. I've posted some examples in links at the bottom of this post. Hang in for a post I'm preparing on operation Talpiot which will place this in context. For further context see the excellent open source investigation which I believe has come close to solving the 9/11 false flag operation.
Here it is: http://dwahts.blogspot.com/2018/09/911-anniversary-has-open-source.html?m=1
In this sense even fringe media censored gloryhound Alex Jones has a point, and I'm staying neutral on this just seeing how it turns out.
Remember Jones, before he was gotten to, used to be spot on, he's become increasingly right wing and terrified of Israel. See below his predictions of an upcoming false flag just before the main World Trade Centre attack, including his assertion regarding the first World Trade Center bombing and Oacklahoma.
He's dropped many clues for those who have been listening.
Trump is another person whose been gotten to. It's obvious, cast your mind back:
Here is a video from 28/6/2001 which had to keep being uploaded from VHS, and explained at the time everything that was about to go down, and gets increasingly harder to believe as it progresses.
Incredulous as you may be, if you are on the fence and are on the fence, this is the right time to keep an open mind. This affects everyone, and everyone's voice is needed.
Just like former CIA spy Robert David Steel, who is involved in the investigation, puts it "Mr President, I've run false flag operations, I know what they look like, I know what they smell like"
Public Intelligence Blog Updates. What has been presented to the president and what is available for you? See below:
Memoranda for the President on 9/11: Time for the Truth — False Flag Deep State Truth! UPDATE Adds Videos of Authors
God Bless America. On 15 February 2016, our President, speaking to a wildly enthusiastic crowd in Bluffton, South Carolina, promised that he would find out — and inform the American public — “who really knocked down the World Trade Center.”
As all engaged and informed citizens now know, the 9/11 Commission was a controlled cover-up at the same level of atrocity as 9/11 itself, and totally comparable to the Warren Commission controlled cover-up on the assassination of John F. Kennedy by Lyndon Baines Johnson, Allen Dulles, J. Edgard Hoover, and varied private sector participants as well as the government of Israel, which sent two witnesses to Dallas.
This collection of twenty-eight memoranda, most one page but a few two pages and one four pages, provide the President all he needs to know to do three big things when he gives his planned speech on 9/11 on 11 September 2018:
01 Direct the Attorney General, Jefferson Sessions, to direct the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Geoffrey S. Berman, to act on the petition for a Grand Jury and criminal investigation into 9/11 as delivered on 10 April 2018 from the Lawyer’s Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, a 54-page petition with 57 categories of evidence about 9/11 crimes.
02 Support and call on Congress to pass — prior to the November 2018 elections — the Bobby Mcllvaine World Trade Center Investigation Act, to be completed and reported out to the President and the Public by 4 July 2019.
03 Utilize the information in this collection to inspire the expelling of the fake news media from the White House, the creation of a two-way truth channel engaging all 200 million US voters, the passage of #UNRIG Election Reform Act to give all #WalkAway voters a fair shake in a broader political system that terminates the two-party tyranny; and an end, for once and for all, of Deep State and Zionist control of the Shadow Government including the secret intelligence community that persists in advancing lies inciting assassination, defamation, and impeachment proceedings against the President.
Authors represented in this volume, each of whom created an original work of public intelligence, include, in alphabetical order:
Kevin Barrett; Scott Bennett; Christopher Bollyn; Fred Burks; Steve De’ak; A. K. Dewdney; Gordon Duff; Aero Engineer; Greg Felton; James Fetzer; Richard Gage; Tom-Scott Gordon; David Ray Griffin; Sander Hicks; T. Mark Hightower; Barbara Honegger; Eric Hufschmid; Ed Jewett; Nicholas Kollerstrom; John Lear; Susan Lindauer; Joe Olson; Peter Dale Scott; Robert David Steele; and indirectly, Victor Thorn and Judy Wood. Contact information for all authors is available to alternative and conventional media outlets desiring to do interviews.
Below is the Table of Contents in Abbreviated Form:
Donald Trump Makes A Promise Letter of Transmittal Overview & Call for A Presidential Truth Summit Who Did It? Why? How? Epilogue References Index
The two most shocking memoranda reveal that the WTC was condemned by 1989 and all parties including the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and the Mayor of New York City knew the buildings would have to be brought down at a cost of $2B — this provides the commercial insurance fraud motivation and the foundation for the planning of a political false flag operation years in advance; and that 9/11 was used to launder $240 billion dollars used from 1998 to 2001 for a Gold War against Russia — an economic covert war not authorized by Congress or declared to the public, in which Buzzy Krongard, John Brennan, and William Browder appear to have been the principal actors, under the direction of George H. W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and George Tenet.
All of those named are innocent until proven guilty. What this collection does is make it crystal clear to the public who has not been investigated, and why they should be.
Includes 15 minute video (the one embedded above) for the President that ends with two asks; several individual authors speaking for up to 3 minutes each with an opening and closing by editor and publisher Robert David Steele; and a long (1.5 hrs) video of everyone that includes some important testimony but uneven delivery (all at the link above).
UPDATE 3
A couple of the authors are uncomfortable with the proximity of this volume to the new volume on Sandy Hook as well as other elements of this volume with which they are not in full agreement. No author has liability in relation to the words of other contributors, front or back matter, where and how the volume is published or distributed, or how the volume is publicized. That is solely and exclusively the responsibility and authority of Robert David Steele, editor and publisher. Each author’s contribution should be appreciated in isolation, as their unique and valuable contribution to our understanding of 9/11 specifically. This volume asks the questions that have not been answered.
ROBERT STEELE: The matter of 9/11 Truth is now on the table at the White House, the National Rifle Asscoation (NRA) and the Republican National Council (RNC). Below are the three cover letters that accompanied the work shown and linked below.
The future course of America cannot be charted if we continue to tolerate the high crimes and lies of the Deep State and its Shadow Government. ENOUGH!
Here bulleted below I quote from the NATO website.
Collective defence means that an attack against one Ally is considered as an attack against all Allies.
The principle of collective defence is enshrined in Article 5 of the Washington Treaty.
NATO invoked Article 5 for the first time in its history after the 9/11 terrorist attacks against the United States
Basically, through Article 5 it's the basis of 18 years of military action starting with the occupation of Afghanistan.
It was declassified in 2008 in what I believe was the only oversight by US government conspiritors in their effort to lie to the US people. It appeared on Intel Files in 2009 and only recently has the critical importance of the document has been understood. It was danish Professor Niels Harrit (Associate Professor of Chemistry for Copenhagen University for 37 years) who first made the connection. The esteemed Professor tasted the sting of organised Deep State public smear campaign after doing nothing more than report his expert findings on the use of nanothermite in the demolition World Trade Centre 7. The resulting backlash subsequently caused him to join the 9/11 truth movement. https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Niels_Harrit
Why exactly is it so important? Let's go back to time the decisions were made.
Lord Robertson, NATO's general secretary gives the legal justification required for getting all 19 countries on board for military action, citing the Frank Taylor reports compelling EVIDENCE.
The above clip was taken from NATO'S official YouTube channel.
Here is a great synopsis from the Corbett Report of the events at the time, and why it took so many years for the penny to drop. It all comes down to dates which make the story impossible, and "cut and paste" repetitions being where they shouldn't, and the fact that THE REPORT CONTAINS NO EVIDENCE.
How can this scenario not be a candidate for one of the greatest historical oversights? Of course it is, we just aren't allowed the faculty of critical thought required to think it.
As for all those academics at US institutions still towing the line, all those good dogs barking for their biscuits in internet "skeptics" forums defending the governments official 9/11 conspiracy theory (the most crackpot of all the crackpot theories) and all those MSM presstitute talking heads, just remember this. The time is coming to choose which side of history to be on.
The thin veneer of decency is nearly gone, soon we will all be confronted with the fact that we have no effect on the Orwellian Cabal than lurks behind the curtain.
How will we react? No idea.
All I know is this: To name a thing for what it is, is to take its power.
In a moment of ireverant stupidity and before realising it would be impossible to rig explosive devices in WT7 in under 2 weeks, let alone in under 2 hours following the Chaos of the 9/11 attacks. LS made this stunning attempt at explaining the clear controlled demolition of the tower that fell without being hit by a plane.
We Are Change (https://wearechange.org) some actual Journalism at work here in a time of universal media selling out, with the balls to confront him on his stunning admission above.
Let's get a few things straight upfront. Anti-Israel is being against the state of Israel. Anti-Zionism is being against the Jewish state based on destiny by virtue of divine providence. Anti-semitism etymologically is hatred of all Semitic prople, including Arabs, Assyrians, Ethiopians and Jews. Colloquially, just Jews. The commonly accepted understanding has come to mean aversion to religious Jews even Israel's Ashkenazi Jews despite no genetic lineage to the Israelites of the Bible. Anti-goverment of Israel (or simplyopposition, if in Israel) is being against the current Israeli government.
Not all Anti-goverment are Anti-Israel. Not all Anti-Israel are Anti-Zionists. Not all Anti-Zionists are Anti-semites. All Anti-semites are racist.
Here is my more detailed position on the Issue because I won't be wasting any effort replying to the usual crowd who lack the intellectual fortitude to process this issue beyond the infantile chant of "anti-Semite". I will never be shut down by the PC police until I hear a persuasive argument. Up til now quite frankly those arguments don't impress me very much. http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2018/03/looking-for-jews-under-every-rock.html?m=1
I want to draw your attention to an article written by Adam Garrie of Eurasian Future. You will find it in the recommended sites section in the WEB VERSION of this blog but not the Mobile for some reason.
It's a broadly cast and impressive synopsis of the Israeli chicanery in geopolitics and it's "wag the dog" relationship with the United States.
You can find it here. I am linking externally because rather than host it I'd like to push traffic to the site. It's offers a wealth of refreshing angles and it's well researched. The regional nuances are well understood and it lends legitimacy to the term "Journalism".
Adam Garrie is a geo-political expert who can be frequently seen on Nedka Babliku’s weekly discussion show Digital Divides, RT’s flagship debate show CrossTalk, Press-TV’s flagship programme ‘The Debate’ and radio Sputnik.
A global specialist with an emphasis on Eurasian integration, Garrie’s articles have been published in the Oriental Review, Asia Times, Geopolitica Russia, the Tasnim News Agency, Global Research, RT’s Op-Edge, Global Village Space and others
“Although people like to talk about ‘just’ metadata, metadata is extraordinarily intrusive. As an analyst, I’d prefer to be looking at metadata rather than content because it’s quicker and it’s easier and it doesn’t lie.”
This documentary by James Corbett of Corbett Report, the follow up to "How Big Oil Conquered the World" is the best I've ever seen at unpacking the globalist interests and history behind our establishment and institutions. Almost nobody talks about these things. It expands on the issues I touched on in this post :
Considering that the "War on Terror" began (supposedly) when 15 Saudis and one or two other chaps somehow hijacked planes and managed to pilot them dead-on target into buildings, and bring one building down with voodoo and a couple small office fires (WT7), then attacking Afghanistan and Iraq, who we now know had no WMD's or ties to Al Qaeda, was a MAJOR FAIL based on that alone. But who does have ties to Al Qaeda (Al Nusra)?? The United States, that's who does. They fund them and other rebels in Syria against Assad to the tune of billions. But hang on, wasn't that the whole point of the War on Terror? Find Al Qaeda? Nobody mentioned that they were only looking for them to give them arms and fund them to bring democracy to all Middle Eastern States not run by Washington's puppets? So lets look at outcomes, it's cost trillions to destroy 5 nations in the Middle East, ISIS flourished in the vacuum, they create a new record for terror attacks in Europe while those in the US are more likely to be shot by their own police? Plus there is a refugee crises in Europe due to Washingtons wars and US taxpayers are expected to fork out for more of Washingtons wars??? Wow, you have to be some kind of sad, stupid individual to believe that unbelievable steaming pile of crap!
The Neocon Agenda during this century (which is possibly the primary focus of this blog) was pretty much facilitated by this event. It shouldn't have been, looking back, since it made perpetual war justifiable by an isolated band of mavericks welding box cutters, we're told, loosely affiliated by mere assertion to the boogyman of the time, Al Qaeda.
Even worse than that, uninvolved parties like Sadam had less to do with 9/11 it seems than (once again by assertion) he did with WMDS. But it is what it is. The farce started with this event.
The perpetrators of the worst terror attack in recent times may have died in the planes that hit WT1 and WT2, but it has now emerged that the support structure of liaison's, safehouses etc in the US and their admin points of contact all appear to have been very well organized , these guys that eventually boarded the aircrafts did NOT keep entirely to themselves as we were lead to believe.
The Coverage of the film showing the first plane hitting the towers was not aired until Sept 12. Nobody can fathom why Bush told this lie, but it tells us how to position him on the issue.
But something very weird happened, the story from the first few hours of the planes hitting the World Trade Centre, pretty much stayed the story, almost as if it was scripted, and no discernable progress was made. A redacted, practical joke of a report emerged, and Al Qaeda, the US funded parters who are in the good books these days (in their Al Nusra and Al Qaeda guises) backed to overthrow, amongst others, Assad in Syria, were blamed.
But as we know, they went after Sadam Hussein instead. Let's face it, that's simply A strategy which we simply cannot accept they really believed in Washington, especially for their given reasoning. The details mattered little it seems, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz were relying on a mixture of ignorance and bigotry from the voting majority.
And, even worse, it didn't make sense to have such an obviously slack investigation for the crime of the century did it?
The Conspiracy Theorists have lots of Ideas, I have only questions, starting with the clearest inconsistency, the fact that WT7 went down later that evening without being hit, in what I can only understand to be a controlled detonation.
They deny this for some reason, but its the only real certainty requiring no investigation because only a mental patient won't be able to tell. You don't need to know buildings dont fall from fire, or that it was hardly on fire, hardly hit by any rubble etc, you look. You just look, it is there if your mind is open, it really is within all our abilities to see it!
Take a good look....
Its just not good enough to pretend it isnt 100‰ clear! This alone raises many questions. But without investigation we cannot get answers, how unsatisfactory in every possible way!
But let's get stuck in should we?
Resource Guide to 9/11 organisations wanting answers, and presenting their cases:
Below is The Youtube Channel Compiled Indirectly By The Community and Members of the Thousands Of Proffessional Architects & Engineer's Who Call Bullshit On The Official Report https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCL-c_zvZ3lhlU7NU1ikxgmQ
The Bizarre Reporting: Reports from the BBC reporting WT7 collapsed more than 20 minutes too early. This one featured the building still standing in the background!
I mean, how weird is this? This sort of thing really gets my ones attention no? And the cut out at the end. Its almost like conspiracy bait, and in this case I'm biting!
Even Weirder than the actual broadcast are all the Youtube reactions to this event, which actually happened.
Some dont know that the occurance is not contested and cite it fake, but the crew and presenteras discuss it often so those are a waste of time.
Look for "Debunked" and "Explained" versions that sprung up to explain the possible rationale. They are even more bizarre because they explain absolutely nothing!
It's the clearest instance I can think of revealing the unscientific community based need to believe. The sceptic possesing critical thought faculties is much better positioned to avoid these traps, in this case you simply need to look for posts showing the interview's with the reporters concerned trying to provide some sort of reasoning or understanding, which is simirlarly unconvincing, but hard to understand as it is, it happened, and it shouldn't be quite so easy to brush aside.
A very interesting broader perspective short, well worth a view, less on direct evidence on the actual day, more about linking some basic, prudent, unsensational detective work to events surrounding 9/11. The sort of basic policework we HAVEN'T seen from the authorities.
The Bush Administration were wrong about Sadam, but Canadian Economics Professor Michel Chussodovsky is always right, here he raises the issues we all are already thinking...
This from the Author of the defining book on Globalization, "The Globalization of War" needs to be taken VERY seriously, this is not a man in the habit of being wrong.
It Appears the investigation has been on ice for a decade.
An outline of what was to become the 9/11 Commission Report was produced before the investigation began. The outline was kept secret from the Commission’s staff and appears to have determined the outcome of the investigation.
The 9/11 Commission claimed sixty-three (63) times in its Report that it could find “no evidence” related to important aspects of the crimes.
One person, Shayna Steinger, issued 12 visas to the alleged hijackers in Saudi Arabia. Steiger issued some of the visas without interviewing the applicants and fought with another employee at the embassy who tried to prevent her lax approach.
Before 9/11, the nation’s leading counter-terrorism expert repeatedly notified his friends in the United Arab Emirates of top-secret U.S. plans to capture Osama bin Laden. These treasonous leaks prevented Bin Laden’s capture on at least two separate occasions.
Former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger was caught stealing documentsfrom the National Archives that had been requested by the 9/11 Commission. The Commission had previously been denied access to the documents but the White House reluctantly agreed to turn them over just as Berger was trying to steal them.
The official story of the failed air defenses on 9/11 was changed several times and, in the end, paradoxically exonerated the military by saying that the military had lied many times about its response. The man who was behind several of the changing accounts was a specialist in political warfare (i.e. propaganda).
Military exercises being conducted on the day of 9/11 mimicked the attacks as they were occurring and obstructed the response. NORAD commander Ralph Eberhart sponsored those exercises, failed to do his job that day, and later lied to Congress about it (if the 9/11 Commission account is true).
A third skyscraper collapsed late in the afternoon on 9/11. This was WTC 7, a 47-story building that the government’s final report says fell into its own footprint due to office fires. The building’s tenants included U.S. intelligence agencies and a company led in part by Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney. Meetings were scheduled there to discuss terrorism and explosives on the morning of 9/11.
News agencies, including BBC and CNN, announced the destruction of WTC 7 long before it happened. One BBC reporter announced the collapse while viewers could see the still-standing building right behind her in the video. Years later, after claiming that it had lost the tapes and then found them again, BBC’s answer to this astonishing report was that everything was just “confusing and chaotic” that day. Of course, one problem with this is that the news agencies predicted the exact building, of the many damaged in the area, that would collapse. Another big problem is that no one could have possibly predicted the collapse of WTC 7 given the unprecedented and unbelievable official account for how that happened.
Construction of the new, 52-story WTC 7 was completed two years before the government knew what happened to the first WTC 7. In fact, when the new building was completed in 2006, the spokesman for the government investigation said, “We’ve had trouble getting a handle on building No. 7.” The construction of the new building, without regard for how the first one was destroyed, indicates that building construction professionals in New York City did not believe it could ever happen again.
Ultimately, building construction codes were not changed as a result of the root causes cited by the National Institute for Standards and Technology for destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) buildings. This fact shows that the international building construction community does not believe that the WTC buildings were destroyed as stated in the official account.
AMEC, the company that just finished rebuilding the exact spot where Flight 77 was said to hit, was put in charge of cleanup at the WTC and the Pentagon. The man who ran the company, Peter Janson, was a long-time business associate of Donald Rumsfeld.
The response of the U.S. Secret Service to the 9/11 attacks suggests foreknowledge of the events in that the agency failed to protect the president from the obvious danger posed by terrorists.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission notified the FBI of suspected 9/11 insider trading transactions. That evidence was ignored and the suspects were not even questioned by the FBI or the 9/11 Commission.
There are, of course, many more incredible facts about 9/11 that continue to be ignored by authorities and much of the media. Let’s hope that the next major terrorist attack results in legitimate reporting and unified calls for truth before fourteen years have passed.
.png)
