Showing posts with label Jason Verbelli. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jason Verbelli. Show all posts

The Double Slit Illusion/ Lie

 

A guest post I wanted to host because I find it so worthwhile.

By Jason Verbelli  

This is an introduction to a chapter in my book series

There are 4 completely different double slit experiments which yield 4 different results thay have absolutely nothing to do with each other.

There are 16 possible combinations of outcomes for the double slit experiment(s) and none of them depend on a particle-wave duality or a literal mass to energy interchange.

In Book 1 on Light, I go into great detail on all the different combinations of results and how they are produced.

There is no real-world observer in the experiment at all like how cartoons and textbooks depict. There is no human looking at the experiment and flipping the patterns from observation.

They either send a spherical wavefront through the slits to produce 2 bands of light.

Or they send a plane wavefront through the slits to produce an interference pattern. 

But that interference pattern only shows up with they have the 2 slits within the diameter of the laser beam, so the beam of the laser shines through both slits simultaneously. And that causes secondary re-emissions of light with overlap the initial light. Primary light from the laser shines on the slits. But the edges of the slits themselves will re-emit new light which then overlaps to make the pattern.

The slits are about 2μ to 5μ apart.

Then you have the particle patterns.

They use a tungsten filament like a light bulb. The filament glows red hot at 4000˚F. That is inside of a black box that sits on a table top.

The tungsten filament gets so hot that it starts shooting off electrons wildly. The filament becomes a "thermionic heat source". It shoots off particles wildly like how a nuclear material shoots off particles. Just not as dangerous. But the particles that are shot off of the filament... they fly through the 2 tiny slits inside that closed box. It's like marbles shooting out of a cannon at a constant. And that produces 2 bands of particles on the detector screen inside the closed box.




Then you have the particle interference pattern.

That is made from focusing those wildly shooting particles from the 4000˚ filament using a magnetic lens. It's an electromagnet that focuses the charged particles into a beam just like the laser. But this is a particle beam. And again... the 2 slits need to fit within the diameter of that beam which is about 100 nm apart.

The electrons from the collimated beam shoot through both slits at the same time... but those primary electrons hit the edges of the slits. And the slits are made of atoms. So it induces secondary electron emissions from the edges of the slits themselves. And those secondary electron emissions overlap the primaries and they create the particle interference pattern on the detector screen.

But then they have a sensor inside the closed box. And all they do is remotely block 1 of the slits with the detector which then prevents the secondary electron emissions from making it to the screen.... and THAT is what they say is the "observer"..... All they do is block the damn slit and it changes the pattern distribution over time as the particles accumulate.

NONE of that has ANYTHING to do with some mythical particle-wave duality. There is no observer!! 

All they do is fabricate and lie in What the Bleep Do We Know, Flatland and Down The Rabbit Hole.

They claim the observer is just an "oversimplification."

But there is no observer! They just block the slit itself with a detector and sensor. That's it.

And then they claim the patterns of light shift back and forth with particles.

It's FOUR different experiments!! And then you can do the experiments in combinations if you have a sophisticated enough set up (which has never been done!) 

But there are a total of 16 possible combinations of particle pattern and light pattern distributions. 

Actually 15 combinations, but the 16th is not performing the experiment at all.


At what point does an "oversimplification" just become a flat out lie and fraud? 

People are allowed to continue to believe a mythical flipping of particles and waves, or that mass is bundles of energy beyond the Planck scale... or that observation manifests reality.

It's junk "Psyence" all based from relativity insisting the speed of light is the same to everyone no matter what. 

So they invented the concept of the 4th dimension, space-time, particle wave dualities, that mass literally increases with acceleration or velocity...a literal interchange of mass to energy/ vice versa ... and QED was born from those fallacies.

The same observations and results can be explained using ONLY classical physics, Hamiltonian and Newtonian Mechanics... but under "a new light"... literally.



Time, Light and Gravity: The rebirth of classical physics.



By Jason Verbelli (from his  May 29th presentation).

   


Classical Physics VS Relativity



Courtesy of Jason Verbelli and his TheRealVerbz YouTube channel, details at the bottom of the post. 
There are two parts to his outstanding synopsis 
The Huygens–Fresnel principle (named after Dutch physicist Christiaan Huygens and French physicist Augustin-Jean Fresnel) is a method of analysis applied to problems of wave propagation both in the far-field limit and in near-field diffraction and also reflection. It states that every point on a wavefront is itself the source of spherical wavelets, and the secondary wavelets emanating from different points mutually interfere.[1] The sum of these spherical wavelets forms the wavefront.


PART 1


A post of mine involving redshift which is relevant to critics of emissions theory is HERE


Extinction Shift Principle (under the electrodynamics of Galilean Transformations) highly technical PDF download:



It just so happens I have a different idea of what makes a galaxy rotate and one or two other points but its not critical, sharing ideas is.

                          PART 2







25.1K subscribers

SUBSCRIBED

Classic Physics vs Relativity - History, Examples and Alternatives https://youtu.be/GmOyhzZs2Nc Credibile Challenges to Relativity and more from Dr. Edward Dowdye. Dr. Dowdye Bio, some background and qualifications: http://www.extinctionshift.com/author... The brilliant work of Dr. Edward Dowdye: http://www.ExtinctionShift.com Why Should We Question Relativity? (FAQs) http://www.extinctionshift.com/FAQ.htm Optics, Electrodynamics & Gravitation based from classic physics: http://www.extinctionshift.com/short_... Extinction Shift Principle (Full Book) https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WZ2e... Double Slit Re-Emission Explanation: https://tinyurl.com/yc3jomoo A gravitational potential gradient within a plasma atmosphere has nothing to do with relativity or space curvature. Here is more info about the misconception of atomic clocks: http://www.extinctionshift.com/Signif... Gravitational Potential Gradients & Refraction in Space: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koa8u... Stars Bend Light by Refraction, Not Gravity: https://youtu.be/HQYVf9I-ncg More background for Dr. Dowdye: https://sciencewoke.org/scientist/dr-... Inelastic collision and Conservation of Kinetic Energy http://www.extinctionshift.com/Signif... More regarding collisions and center of gravity. http://www.extinctionshift.com/detail... Propagation and Re-Emission of Light: https://tinyurl.com/y82jl7ta Challenges to Gravitational Lensing & More: https://tinyurl.com/ydb8v54o Re-Emissions, Lensing and FTL Propagation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tt5zk... Credible challenges based on plasma physics, optics, Galilean transformations, classic equations, 3D Euclidean geometry and Occam's Razor. https://tinyurl.com/y8jtrb5t List of credible challenges to Dark Matter, Big Bang, Relativity and More: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eSVD... Relativity - The Fools Gold of Physics‬ https://steemit.com/science/@verbz/re... Plasma Physics in Space: http://www.plasmacosmology.net/tech.html Eddington Errors: https://medium.com/@GatotSoedarto/the... APS Article - Eddington's 2nd Team https://www.aps.org/publications/apsn... 10 Questions about the Cosmos from Nobel Laureate Hannes Alfven https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/10-quest... Ron Hatch - GPS Co-Inventor Disputes Relativity: https://www.gps.gov/governance/adviso... Dr. Louis Essen Rejects Relativity: https://tinyurl.com/ya8pfp94 GPS, Relativity & PopScience Mythology: http://www.alternativephysics.org/boo... Peer-Reviewed Papers https://www.electricuniverse.info/pee... Everything wrong with the Standard Solar Model (SkyScholar) https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCL7Q... Sun is Not A Gaseous Plasma: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_A7VF... Over 60 Papers by Dr. Pierre Robitaille: http://vixra.org/author/pierre-marie_... Scientific Articles & Links Addressing Mainstream Inconsistencies: https://tinyurl.com/yvfwuq University of Michigan - Parker Satellite Mystery - Alfven Waves: https://tinyurl.com/y9wnkhut Evolution of the SAFIRE Project: https://tinyurl.com/y9nr2csr SAFIRE stands for Stellar Atmospheric Function in Regulation Experiment. REAL Science and experimental results. Not math based on Simulations and computer graphics. No CGI, No Photoshop. Based on the discoveries of the last 6 years, the SAFIRE team is currently developing a nuclear-plasma reactor which will have the capacity to both generate electrical power and to remediate radioactive waste. THE SAFIRE SUN is an 11-minute film designed to give potential collaborators a quick overview of the project. Displaying how the sun operates with transmutation of elements, Alfven wave heating, double layers of plasma, etc. Nobel Prizes in the Future? https://youtu.be/ZBInhPFFVog SAFIRE Project 2018 Results: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DeVdz... Producing energy equal to the sun. The surface of the electrode is 1000˚K. Outside the plasma shells is 500˚K... But trapped in the layers of plasma are temperatures equal to about 3,000,000˚K. (Like creating stable energy equal to a nuclear bomb but without the radiation) Each concentric shell independently rotates and also alternates in polarity.

Labels

Search This Blog

Your Feedback

Name

Email *

Message *