Technocracy!

TECHNOCRACY will replace capitalism, socialism and even democracy. In globalist one world supernation there will no need for armies since there will be no nations to fight. There will only be police to fight the real battle, the battle between the rulers and ruled. Until such a time, the rulers will use "Divide & Rule" tactics to create such a society run by unelected, dynastic bureaucrats. 

Includes a review of the most important website on planet earth, broken down below and archived by important themes from this blog. website is owned, operated and curated by Patrick Wood, author of Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation, Technocracy: The Hard Road to World Order and co-author of Trilaterals Over Washington with the late Antony C. Sutton.

Their plans involving the fake Corona virus pandemic are clear: 

https://www.technocracy.news/club-of-rome-calls-for-green-reboot-after-pandemic/

https://www.technocracy.news/category/corrupt-data/

https://www.technocracy.news/category/censorship/

https://www.technocracy.news/category/carbon-currency/

https://www.technocracy.news/category/agenda-21/

https://www.technocracy.news/category/2030-agenda/

The globalists will not even require "Green New Deals" if 5G/6G rollout occurs in manner they hope it does. https://www.technocracy.news/category/5g/

That website is not about bashing technology. It is about Technocracy. They love technology when it serves us and just so happen to resist all those who would use technology to control us against our will.  but it cannot be resisted until it is understood. Please read this entire technocracy filtered and archived website  to kick-start your journey and allow it's editor/author PATRICK WOODS, to take you there. 

Technocracy was a Big Movement in the 1930s. It will not only replace economic systems like capitalism and socialism but also to replace political systems (democracy etc) and sociological sytems, ideological systems, bureaucratic systems and even educational and industrial systems. 

Technocracy was originally designed as a replacement economic system for Capitalism and Free Enterprise, masterminded by prominent engineers and scientists at Columbia University in 1932. It was to be a resource-based economic system that used energy credits as its accounting system, rather than currency as we know it today.

The Technocracy ideology turned into a movement when Technocracy, Inc. was founded in 1934 by Howard Scott and M. King Hubbert. Together, they wrote the Technocracy Study Course that became their go-to bible for all the meetings they held throughout the U.S. and Canada. At the peak, this membership organization had over 500,000 dues-paying members.

Technocracy Went Into Decline in the 1940s

Public appeal for Technocracy began to fizzle by the end of the 1930s, especially after the Hearst newspaper empire banned all of its writers from covering Technocracy. A parallel organization had a brief life in Nazi Germany before WWII, but it was squashed by Hitler when it was seen as competition. Individual Technocrats in America and Europe, however, continued to hold fast to the Utopian dream of Technocracy.

Trilateral Commission Adopts Technocracy in the 1970s

In 1970, Zbigniew Brzezinski was a young political science professor at Columbia University, the same place where Technocracy was born in 1932. He authored a book, Between Two Ages: America’s Role In The Technetronic Era, that caught the eye of the global banker, David Rockefeller. Together, they subsequently co-founded the Trilateral Commission in order to create a “New International Economic Order.”

Technocracy is Fed to the United Nations in the 1980s

In 1987. Trilateral Commission member Gro Harlem Brundtland ended a United Nations-sponsored task force with the publication of Our Common Future. This book popularized the term Sustainable Development for world consumption. In 1992, when the UN convened the first Earth Summit in Rio De Janeiro, Agenda 21 was born as the “Agenda for the 21st century.” Brundtland’s book received praise and accolades from the UN for providing the framework for Agenda 21 and its related documents.

Today, Agenda 21 is still in force, but has been significantly expanded through the 2030 Agenda and its 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). More recently, the New Urban Agenda was adopted at the UN’s Habitat III conference.

Synonyms for Sustainable Development include Green Economy and Natural Capitalism. Collectively, they describe a new economic paradigm that is highly correlated with the original specification for Technocracy, namely, that it is is a resource-based economic system that uses energy as accounting. Cities are to be converted into ‘Smart Cities’ as the world is transformed into a borderless Utopia, and rural dwellers are to be forced into these cities. All areas of UN publications stress the doctrine of ‘No one left behind.”

The Purpose is to Replace Free Enterprise and Capitalism

This is not an idle speculation. In 2015, the Executive Secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, Christiana Figueres, clearly stated,

“This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the industrial revolution.”

Thus, the saga of the Trilateral Commission’s New International Economic Order (NIEO) has come full circle, and yet it continues on a global basis at breakneck speed.

Tyranny of Science or Scientific Dictatorship

This new resource-based economic system demands that 100 percent of the means of production and consumption be placed into the hands of Technocrats who will make all decisions for manufacturers and consumers. The Technocrats said the same thing in 1938:

“Technocracy is the science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population…” – The Technocrat Magazine, 1938

The intended global Technocracy will be thus operated by Technocrats (not politicians or representatives of the people) according to their narrow view of science, and it will simultaneously remove the need for elected officials.

In short, a Technocracy is operated as a Scientific Dictatorship.

Technocracy Endgame Confirmed

In January 2017, leading globalist scholar Dr. Parag Khanna published a book, Technocracy in America: Rise of the Info-State, that emphatically declares America’s need for a ‘direct Technocracy’. Among other things, he calls for the abandonment of the Senate and for the Supreme Court to directly modify the Constitution as it sees fit.

Khanna believes in a borderless world where global Smart Cities and mega-regions will be connected to create a global society, or a giant city-state.

Next, Listen to Some Videos

Patrick Woods has conducted many interviews on radio and video over the past two years, and many of them on the recommended "TECHNOCRACY" website that all the embedded links lead too, and here are several of the better ones. The last one, “Five Reasons Why You Should Read Technocracy Rising”, will give you a concise, 12 minute synopsis of some of what you are reading here.

💳The U$A: Worlds most socialist country?

socialism

/ˈsəʊʃəlɪz(ə)m/

Learn to pronounce

nouns

1. a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.

1. 
   

Why would I propose that the US is the worlds most socialist country? 

Actually its reverse socialism for the rich where the rich banks are on welfare, at the expense of taxpayers, they (the banks) finance everything (therefore the taxpayers who bailed them out actually finance everything and it follows logically that the taxpayer finances all means of production) Here is the proof:

What percentage of the United States is fully privately owned and what percentage is bank financed?

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/tags/series?t=loans%3Busa

What Percentage of the banks should be publicly owned due to the bailouts but is not due to the greatest con on earth?  (Size of the forward projected bailout figure that the taxpayer is on the hook for but banks remain privately owned instead of state owned)

29 Trillion (you read that correctly!) 

https://www.cnbc.com/amp/id/45674390

*Ok they removed the above article, unsurprisingly. No problem, you can access an archived version of its at archive.com by copying the above URL and pasting it in the search bar HERE. (Screenshot below.)

What is the typical US Budget?

Military spend is socialist spend! 

The trillions  spent on needless wars has bankrupted America.

Murder for profit , protection of the Petrodollar, control of resources and a pretext  to manufacture conflict in n order use the  Equipment we paid for to murder innocents and steal their oil.

Now here is the part that where you get to know exactly how you are being screwed!

 Corporations on Welfare.

Which Billionaires are you sponsoring?

Good Jobs First, an economic development watchdog group, published Tuesday what it considers to be the first comprehensive database of corporate subsidies at the federal level, tallying awards from 137 different programs. 

Here  is a   report that  covers 379 companies from the Fortune list that were profitable in 2018 and finds that 91 paid an effective federal tax rate of 0% or less. Those companies come from a wide range of industries and include the likes of Amazon, Starbucks and Chevron.

How do small business owners compete against that when it's their tax subsidizing these giants? You must pay YOUR STAFF as well as Amazon's staff!

Discover Where Corporations are Getting Taxpayer Assistance Across the United States

SUBSIDY TRACKER is the first national search engine for economic development subsidies and other forms of government financial assistance to business.

Subsidy award entries: 672,000 (429,000 state/local; 243,00Bl)
Subsidy programs: 1,045 (907 state/local; 138 federal)
Parent companies covered: 2,934

Uncle Sam's Favorite Corporations (report on federal data)
Megadeals (largest state and local subsidy awards)
Inventory of data sources
TARP and ARRA data
Update log

Other examples of socialism spend and gross financial mismanagement funded by society and spent by the elite:

https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/11/the-brazen-theft-of-21-trillion-from.html

The elephant in the room in the socialism vs capitalism debate.

We've all looked carefully at the economic problems plaguing the planet, I have tied to in this blog over the years, and my conclusion is that the solution is being sold to us, yet again, in the form of two false choices. Just like the false choice in the partisan divide with Democrat or Republican, the establisment has already mobilised the globalisation of socialism and the globalisation of capitalism and participation in either in our current model would effectively yeild control to the same globalist cabal of banksters (the more capitalist face if the cabal) or globalists (the more socialist face of the cabal). The truth is they are interchangeable.

There is no reason why an all or nothing choice must be made. We can look at each element in either system and either regulate, embrace or dispose of whatever can be determined to be good, bad or ugly.

CAPITLISM

How socialists view capitalism.

I'm not too unhappy with the argument that Capitalism always works well builds wealth and prosperity when the pure, libertarian style environment is largely still recognisable as driven by something resembling a Free Market and not overly corrupted. However, for all its merits the Libertarian take on capitalism fails to adequately deal with the problems of monopoly, anti-trust and the rise of monopolistic robber-barons and powerful multinational corporations. For all the Libertarian talk against big government, the truth is that these behemoths use influence peddling to lobby for (and essentially decide for whichever party is in power) every bill passed in the capital, whereas taxpayers only vote every 5 years. Whoever the vote for is lobied issue by issue. 

Capital finance has captured the peoples reprentative goverment and left hollow plattitudes in its place.  The subversive central banks have abandoned the free market guidance of monetary policy, they are communist and care only about the artificial policy that drives "price stability" and implement communist type "central command" style policy. 
These unaccountable central banks that dictate monetary policy by decree with no taxpayer oversight are NOT a good thing for you and I. The shadowy group should not brag about "independence" and should instead apologize for being "unaccountable" 
Crony capitalism is what late-stage capitalism turns into an
An ideological seeming form of fake capitalism that seizes the people's representation in govt, the apparatus of the state and places elite globalists of capital finance at the helm and the citizens are condemned to wage slavery.

SOCIALISM

Socialism is often mischeiviously characterised by East European and South American dictator ruled nations but those that do so never explain the role of the West or Internationalists in placing them there, they just blame the economic system. With the scandanavian model democratic socialist states, and for a while Canada and the UK had elements of this working well incorporated into their landscape, taxes were high but the standard of living remarkably high and social security remarkably succesful. Medical care and societies ability to deal with problems was very good and crime was low with social ills mamaged. 

If anything privatisation started putting an end to this run whereas in the eastern european states government corruption brought down their systems in tandem with external meddling from the West.  Eventually the externally corrupted or sabotaged leadership or corrupt governance from within will show but its corruption, not socialism that fails in socialist states especially when forced or bribed to start conspiring with the corrupt financiers and governments of the capitalist West or face regime change and elites scratch each other back leading to dictatorships in Socialist states and again,  globalism. At thisbpoint with the West watching its manufacturing outsourced to former socialist or communist countries which are now viewed as "low cost wage centres" Manufactured goods must be shipped back to the western markets with the globalist multinationals outcompeting the entrepreneurs that capitalism was so hopeful for, feudalising society with a wealth divide and ultimately leaving the people of socialist and capitalist nations in thw same feudalised state. Right now all roads lead to globalism.

The only conclusions that can be drawn easily are that seeing the military, private prisons and private healthcare are working TERRIBLY under the profit motive. They are guided by powerful defence contractors or lobby, and big pharma lobby has been as disastrous as any other group. Another are that msking private is disaterous is to have private central banks. These should all be nationalised. Those are areas that must remain socialist.
That being said, govt run bureaucracies have their own issues and militaries can still end up just like the old Soviet Union if under government control unless the parliamentary, constitutional and congressional systems account for this.

I will give thoughts on how I believe this can be remedied in a later post combined with my thoughts on the remedy for the ills of democracy because the same globalist corruption is at the heart of both.

The popular perception is underneath.

Differences Between Capitalism and Socialism

ROSEMARY PEAVLEUpdated November 20, 2018

 Capitalism vs. socialism. Two different political, economic and social systems in use by countries around the world. The United States, for instance, is usually considered a prime example of a capitalist country. Sweden is often considered a strong example of a socialist society. Sweden is not socialist, however, in the true sense of the word. In practice, most countries have mixed economies with economic elements of both capitalism and socialism.

What is Capitalism?

Capitalism is an economic system where the means of production are owned by private individuals. "Means of production" refers to resources including money and other forms of capital. Under a capitalist economy, the economy runs through individuals who own and operate private companies. Decisions over the use of resources are made by the individual or individuals who own the company.

In a capitalist society, companies that incorporate are typically treated by the same laws as individuals. Corporations can sue and be sued. They can buy and sell property. They can perform many of the same actions as individuals.

A capitalist system is also called a free market economy or free enterprise.

Under capitalism, companies live by the profit motive. They exist to make money. All companies have owners and managers. Sometimes, especially in small businesses, the owners and managers are the same people. As the business gets larger, the owners may hire managers who may or may not have any ownership stake in the firm. In this case, the managers are called the owner's agents.

The job of the management is more complex than just making a profit. In a capitalist society, the goal of the corporation is maximizing shareholder wealth.

Under capitalism, it is the government's job by enforcing laws and regulations to make sure there is a level playing field for privately-run companies. The amount of governing laws and regulations in a particular industry generally depends on the potential for abuse in that industry.

What is Socialism?

Socialism is an economic system where the means of production, such as money and other forms of capital, are owned by the state or public. Under a socialist system, everyone works for wealth that is in turn distributed to everyone. Under capitalism, you work for your own wealth. A socialist economic system operates on the premise that what is good for one is good for all. Everyone works for their own good and for the good of everyone else. The government decides how wealth is distributed among the people.

In a pure socialist economy, there is no free market like we see in a capitalist nation. The government provides for the people. The taxes are usually higher than in a capitalist system. There may be government-run health care and a complete system of government-operated education. It is a misconception that people do not pay for these services. They do pay for them through higher taxes. Socialist systems emphasize equal distribution of wealth among the people.

Mixed Economies

Many countries have mixed economic systems with elements of both capitalism and socialism. In the U.S., predominantly a capitalist system, there are many government-run programs, notably Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare. In many socialist countries, as in Sweden, there are also still private businesses. 

Image by the Balance 2018