Anyone with an interest in anything relating to astronomy (cosmology, astrophysics, particle physics and even some history) that is looking for a novel twist, should get something out of these. It doesn't take long to get into a rut on these topics. Before long all the material begins to seem the same. If there is one thing I can assure you, its that you are unlikely to have that sentiment with any of these.
So, here are some free, high quality documentaries on various themes on Astronomy, Cosmology and Astrophysics that you don't usually see . All of these full length features challenge the prevailing narratives more fundamentally than anything else you will find on the internet, and do so with the highest levels of scientific rigor. Where there is speculation its interesting, creative and refreshing. You will get a behind the scenes look at the the real controversy and real crises in cosmology.
Pulsars. Are pulsars these strange objects defying belief, where a teaspoonful weighs more than Mount Everest, where the entire star rotates as fast as a dentists drill... or is there a simple, sensible electrical pulsing explanation that is entirely believable, scientifically much more rigorous and does not go head-to-head with common sense?
And the serious dilemma of "Impossible Quasars" which cannot be lightly dismissed.
Magnetic Fields
Magnetic fields Are everywhere in space. Only electric currents generate magnetic fields. In the SCM magnetic fields are generated by black holes and random supernova explosions, surely that has to be among the weakest reasoning given in all of cosmology. They are expected in Plasma Cosmology.
Do physical impacts and volcanism make up all of the craters and scarring? Was there such a thing as the "late heavy bombardment"? Electrical planetary scarring may not be common these days but during periods where planetary bodies of vastly different charges were in proximity of each other, there would have been unimaginable "lightning" like plasma discharges. It is not even required to have vast overall charge differences, the charge simply needs to be separated, like a common battery of cells, to get the circuit flowing.
The case study of our moon makes for compelling motivation.
Planets simply would not be able to withstand head on impacts at cosmic velocity where the crater makes up a substantial portion of the total surface area of the body. Neither does it make sense that these vast craters could possibly be so shallow.
Please click here for more detailed evidence on an EU perspective regarding craters, scarring, comets meteors and impacts!
Comets, asteroids and meteors.
And surprisingly the most persuasive case for cosmic electrodynamics is surely made by comets and asteroids! What is the real difference between these two celestial objects and could it be possible we have gotten things completely wrong? The evidence here is perhaps the most persuasive of all.
Charged planets (Inner Solar System)
Charged planets (outer Solar System)
COther points of interest :
Below: Impossible stars according to the SCM?
By now you are surely beginning to doubt the SCM and "Big Bang" cosmology. If this is so you surely understand that the implications for the Higgs Boson and the so called "Space-time Continuum" are dire?
Ligo's big lie.
The "Big Bang" breaks an important tenant of science: You cannot perform a creation miracle. Why "Red Shift" has lead cosmologists down the paths of religion.
Red-shift is so important and so central that I cover it in its own post, along witg the Cosmic Microwave Background radiation which you can read by clicking here. There is no way around it, we di not have sufficient evidence to conclude that the universe is expanding or to establish its age. This is actually surprisingly clear. The central issue is: How old? How far away? Is recession the only component of cosmic red shift in light wavelength?
Having a high red shift galaxy in front of a low red shift galaxy isn't just a problem to be ironed out. It's a death blow to big bang cosmology. As we can see there is a massive price to be paid for a myopic interpretation of data. Before putting more eggs in than basket, are there alternative theories for those components of red shift that are not exclusively linked to recessional velocity.
The issue of the creation miracle known as the Big Bang, Cosmic Inflation, Standard Candles, Red Shift as a 1:1 indicator of recessional velocity, and the cosmic background radiation are dealt with in more detail here in this post.
I do not disrespect Albert Einstein, even though I think he was wrong, but his reverence and legacy simply have got to go. Find out why so many now believe that Einstein was wrong by clicking on this text.
Debunking the debunkers!
The"Debunking" on these disciplines is particularly weak, that's why I'm so keen to draw the readers attention to them. Starting with this wonderful video posted by The Electric View which debunks the debunker of a recent popular YouTube channel.
And here David Michalets dissects the same post in more detail with time signatures of the source video and a detailed dissection of all the mischief that was attempted!
Continuous Creation from Electric Plasma versus Big Bang Universe
The Big Bang Universe, 95 % unobservable in hypothetical dark matter and dark energy is giving way to one alive with electric plasma currents accumulating mass and transferring energy over galactic and intergalactic space in a cosmic extravaganza of constant creation Dr. Mae-Wan Ho
Black holes:
https://vixra.org/abs/2004.0569
Bekenstein-Hawking Black Hole Entropy, Hawking Temperature, and the Unruh Effect: Insight from the Laws of Thermodynamics – a Synopsis
Irwin et al recently reported on ultraluminous X-ray bursts in two ultracompact companions to nearby elliptical galaxies NGC 4697 and NGC 5128 (sources 1 and 2 respectively). Although they discuss a number of possibilities, they favour neutron stars and black holes as the likely sources: "the sources appear to be normal accreting neutron-star or black-hole X-ray binaries". However, there is no possibility for black holes to be associated with these X-ray sources because the mathematical theory of black holes contains a latent violation of the rules of pure mathematics.
There exists an infinite equivalence class of solutions for the equations Rμν = 0, thereby constituting all admissible 'transformations of coordinates'. If any element of this infinite equivalence class cannot be extended to produce a black hole then none can be extended to a black hole, owing to equivalence. No such element can be extended to produce a black hole. Consequently, the mathematical theory of black holes violates the rules of pure mathematics.
Physics of the Plasma Universe https://ia800702.us.archive.org/29/items/AnthonyPerattPhysicsOfThePlasmaUniverse_201901/Anthony-Peratt--Physics-of-the-Plasma-Universe.pdf
It has recently been reported in the journal 'Astronomy and Astrophysics' that the active galactic nucleus of Markarian 1018 has likely changed optical type due to the effects of a supermassive black hole or a binary system consisting of two such black holes. It is however impossible for any type or form of black hole to be involved with Mrk 1018 because the mathematical theory of black holes violates the rules of pure mathematics.
The Legacy of Birkeland's Plasma Torch, A. L. Peratt, The Kristian Birkeland Lecture, Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters, v.9, Oslo, Norway, 1996 (12MB).
A short featurette on the origins of SAFIRE, the "Star in a jar on earth"
I'll tell you what was to follow. A project so remarkable that it can use harmful radioactive nuclear waste AS FUEL and produce its own harmless non toxic "waste" out of stuff that would normally be radioctive for a million years if just buried in the ground. A project that can turn common hydrogen gas into a whole suite of other elements including metals at low energy levels. There is much more they can do, but we have to wait for patents before we find out. But how many of you realize the biggest disruption will probably be felt in GEOPOLITICS!?
Before I expand upon the utterly amazing results coming from SAFIRE, I want to first give a little bit of the realities of international geoplitics, globalization and the powerful special interests with unimaginable power and money that dictate proceedings, largely from the shadows.
SAFIRE : Stellar Atmosphere Function In Regulation Experiment.
Its not so much about the Hydrocarbons monopolies, NATO etc but also the non profit think tanks like the Council On Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, Rockerfeller and Carnegie Foundations, Brookings Institute, Rand Institute, Center For American Progress etc (list is 50 deep). Almost all of these had their origins an offshoot of the warmongering dynastic central banker cabal and their legacy of, well, lets face it... death!
They are always steering the ship even when directives appear to come from the Pentagon, DOD, AIPAC, or big oil corporates and appear to be "spontaneously" reported on by the talking heads at MSM news media. Its less about hydrocarbons (inaccurately called 'fossil feuls') as it is about Petrodollar economics itself.
Wind and solar farms are just window dressing for a tolerated green energy sector, tolerated because the globalist are currently using climate change to internationalize taxation and control sovereign energy policies at their internationalist climate conference's, plus it will NEVER be be threat. #SAFIRE is different, SAFIRE flew under the radar and became a privately funded near billion dollar plasma fusion reactor that is energy super efficient due to transmutation profile (elemental alchemy almost) that came from the ELECTRIC SUN model. This not only vindicated the outsider Thunderbolts Project movement, the championions of the Electric Universe paradigm that currently overturning the establishment in Cosmology, Geology, Weather, Mythology, and the inner workings of the planet.
This is the penalty the globalist cabal must pay for not taking this cosmological model seriously, this monopoly prone cabal, whose scientific investments have been LAMBDA-CDM focused, have been surpressing (among other things) electric cars since 1930, other innovative energy as well, and they have been delighted that the Thermonuclear Fusion Model of the sun has lead scientists on an 80 year wild goose chase. As it turns out, stars are NOT POWERED Internally by thermonuclear fusion, but externally by birkeland currents in ionised plasma, resulting in fusion reactions in the photosphere. That is why you never get a "star in a jar" based on the thermonuclear fusion model of the sun the way we have with the Electric Sun model.
They scorned this ELECTRIC UNIVERSE model and other Plasma Cosmology models such as LPP Fusion, Eric Lerners Focused Plasmoid Fusion, and now they are too big to stop. To be fair there is another project that may be interesting, but I don't yet know enough about it to comment and I will do a folliw up at a future date: https://phys.org/news/2019-07-recreate-sun-solar-plasma-burps.amp Safire is under Aureon Energy running what will soon amount to a billion dollar reactor that is privately funded and has scientific advice from EU Cheif Science advisor, Wallace Thornhill and a great corporate board of directors and commercial energy innovators. They flew completely under the radar, soon they will BE the radar...
Above: How does the electrodynamic environment of the sun work and the quiete revolution in cosmology.
Instruments
real-time, post experimental, supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA)
Existing
Plasma potential probes
IR camera
UV camera
Optical Spectroscopy
Pressure
Mass Spec
Chamber Voltage
Chamber Current
Thermocouples
RF antennas
Gas Composition & Flow
Coming Soon
Raman Spectroscopy
Neutron detectors
Neutrino Detectors
Laser Thompson Scattering
3-axis magnetometer
The investment phase. Escaping the public funding where purse strings are dominated by the Globalist Cabal that captured the US State and directs all public money into the climate change agenda and LAMBDA-CDM science, is what allowed the team to break new ground.
The above video clip contains many visuals of the beautiful "star in a jar" on earth. The fact that this little man-made star is so beautiful is often ignored because we get so excited by the results.
At this juncture for various reasons any investment opportunities that have closed will open up when the tech is taken to development. The clean energy and nuclear waste remediation industries alone are trillion dollar industries. There are opportunities from $25 thousand dollars minimum for small investors, but I am not invested in the project, everything I write purely because it is such an exciting interplay of all the themes I write about on this blog. The yellow highlighted partners below SAFIRE assures are national security formalities only, Don Scott of the Thunderbolts Project who developed the first scientific model of the Birkeland Current that power the sun, was (along with others in the community) close friends with the Lockheed Director who is recently deceased, and he was a huge supporter of the Electric Universe Paradigm before the reactor was built and when the Electric Sun model was mocked by the soon-to-be-out-of-a-career LAMDA-CDM establishment. The DOD is only involved due to security concerns that come wirh all nuclear reactors of any form.
Vantage Machine Ltd.
Lockheed Martin
Los Alomos National Labs
US Department of Defense
Space Propulsion Consultants
DMI Precision Ltd.
Fogler Rubinoff LLP
University of Toronto
Princeton Instruments
Delta Photonics
Brooks Automation
Intlvac
Fluke Corporation
Plasus
Computer Elite
Orillia Tool & CNC
SAS Institute
Red Cage Solutions
Swagelok Company
Kurt J. Lesker Company
Hathaway Consulting Services
Paradigm Creative Group
Silver Wolf Productions
Spectragryph
Some Aureon.ca / SAFIRE partners above. Who is Monty Childs and why is there still secrecy on some of results that SAFIRE have produced? Rumours abound that they have transmuted Gold or Uranium, or that the military has captured the project, but this hour long interview below allows Monty to set the record straight.
A short video feature on the Safire Sun in a laboratory on earth.
Creation of concurrent collisional and non-collisional plasma
Eruptive discharges analogous to Solar CME’s
Chemistry as a catalyst to Double Layer formation
Slowing the speed of UV light by 5,000x
Analogous transformer / capacitor behavior
Continuous spectrum from plasma double layers
NEWEST DISCOVERIES
Dark mode plasma electromagnetic structures
Sequestering of heavy elements to the SAFIRE core
New elements confirmed by Mass & Optical spectra, SEM & EDAX
Extreme atmospheric pressure changes – response to high energy plasma discharges (may be analogous to the changes in the velocity of the Solar wind due to CME’s)
Who is Wallace Thornhill? To succeed with fusion the SAFIRE team had to defacto finally reject the LAMBDA-CDM cosmological model, which incorporates the thermonuclear fusion model of the sun. THE ^CDM model which has been the biggest failure of any model in any scientific doscipline in the history of science, and thats INCLUDING the flopped climate change models such as the Hockey Stick Graph based "runaway catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming", a failure of note.
To appreciate how revolutionary the science is, Wallace Thornhill gives a two part interview that is short, to the point, entertaining (even witty). He basically overturned the entire body of science that has lead us into the crises in Cosmology in one interview. Thornhill, who is an Australian physicist and chief science advisor to the Thunderbolts Project (a SAFIRE consulting group and movement for interdisciplinary cooperation in science) basically rewrites the physics that lost 96% of the universe for us. Suddenly we realize what a massive waste of time and energy it has all been, and how fast we are about to progress after dumping it. Before these ideas were being proved and validated, it was not that long ago that these ideas were scorned by mainstream science. Who is laughing now?
Part 1
Part 2
Theories and Models of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions
It is important to note that there is no accepted theory for the observed results in the SAFIRE chamber. This page presents several reasonable theories and models for nuclear transmutations and energy production. The SAFIRE team does not endorse or support any particular theory or model. We welcome proponents of theories to design experiments that will test the validity of their model.
For the sake of brevity, we will consider a physical "theory" and "model" to be interchangeable terms. Some rightly argue that a "theory" is very general and broadly encompassing, such as the theory that all atoms have a nucleus. In contrast, there might be several different "models" that could be constructed to embody a theory. There are currently more than a dozen different models for the nucleus, and these models are selected depending upon their usefulness in a given situation. As stated above, the SAFIRE team does not endorse or support any particular atomic theory or atomic model for what is happening inside the chamber, or inside other group's chambers. We focus on refining our process to achieve predictable results.
That being said, we present several theories for low energy transmutation and energy production. The reader can find much material on all these and other theories by searching scientific articles. This webpage is not intended to be a thorough review of the subject.
Slow Neutrons
The Widom-Larsen theory is based on weak interactions and are consistent with existing physics. The theory explains how nuclear reactions can occur at or near room temperature through the creation of ultra-low-momentum neutrons and subsequent neutron-capture processes. Such neutrons, according to the theory, have a very large DeBroglie wavelength and therefore have a huge capture cross-section, explaining why so few neutrons are detected. Many-body collective quantum and electromagnetic effects are fundamental to Widom and Larsen's explanation for the energy required to create neutrons in LENR cells. Crucially, such reaction-rate calculations are based not on few-body interactions but on many-body interactions.
Alexander Parkhomov has published extensive work on low energy transmutations. Although the results stand on their own without introducing any theories, Parkhomov's model of low energy neutrinos does make testable predictions. The model works on standard physics, with the requirement that the neutrinos be very low energy. For clear descriptions of the experimental and theoretical work, we suggest the book https://www.amazon.com/SPACE-EARTH-HUMAN-Views-Science/dp/171122121X
Neutrinos are known to enter into nuclear reactions. In the formula below, (A,Z) is an element with proton number Z and atomic mass A. When an electron neutrino interacts with this atom, the proton number of the atom increases by one, and an electron is ejected from the nucleus.
Slow neutrinos can stimulate beta decay, which will raise the atomic number of the starting element by one, like Mn to Fe.
The other direction lowers the atomic number, like Fe to Mn.
Hydrinos
The Hydrino theory states that Hydrogen can exist in states that have lower energy than the traditionally believed ground state. Mr Mills has published ample experimental evidence supporting this theory. Mr Mills has also published ample experimental evidence that his reactions produce energy. Three references are provided below.
Results. Energy production from short pulses of 1000 amp, 50V. Some tests ran for 60 days.
Theory: Hydrogen jumps to a “lower than ground state”, referred to as H(1/p), and gives the excess energy to create water. The excess energy goes into soft X-rays, UV, kinetic energy of the products.
