Plasma Cosmology:
Puts forward that gravity is not the dominant force in the universe, and that electrodynamic forces are as important or more important (depending on the order of magnitude). It is centered around a connected universe where charge separation is prevalent but its scope and focus remains rooted in astronomy including Cosmology and Astrophysics. Not every Plasma Cosmology devotee has the same position but it generally retains the thermonuclear core star principle from the Standard Model despite radically different views on star formation.
Electric Universe Paradigm:
Uses the principles above in all astronomical matters but goes further by invoking the Electric Sun Model, which has a variety of possibilties rooted in self contained plasma magnetic entities, double-layers and arc discharge anode-cathode heliosphere principles that will be explained later on. The EU paradigm goes signicantly further by making the case that the principles defining Plasma Cosmology must therefore be in play in fields such as Geology, Archaeology, Biology, Weather and more since the plasma state of matter is the state we find in over 99℅ of the matter in existence. The Electric Universe highlights how pervasive the influence of charge separation is throughout our reality since this would be an inescapable logical consequence of the laws of Classical Physics.
The Thunderbolts Project:
TBP is one movement within the EU community, without doubt the leading influencer. It goes further yet in scope by reinvestigation of historical events through the EU prism. TBP introduces the potent angle of a spirit of cross disciplinary co-operation as an antidote to the over specialisation that we see in science today. Thunderbolts is also known for its novel view of placing value in the vast libraries of resources available to researchers in ancient mythology. This becomes valuable not by subjective speculation but by using a system where the archetypes of global myths are extracted, and it follows logically that the common themes must regarded as a source of historical value commensurate with how widely proliferated they are, especially when understood through Electric Universe principles.
NB: Foreword
If you are like me, someone with a keen interest all things science, you may feel a certain degree of resistance to these ideas after so much exposure to the science of "Big-Bang" cosmology (The LAMBDA-CDM concordance model) and all the spin that comes with it. I would urge you to overcome those feelings if your sense of certainty gives you the need to dismiss this science out of hand. That would be an unfortunate error in judgement that will cost you a rich source of the most elegant and powerfully predictive science currently available.
If you are indeed willing to open your mind to these findings you will open yourself up to the extraordinary explanatory powers of Plasma Cosmology and The Electric Universe. At this point a remarkable thing happens:
You will find that most of the dead ends in the space sciences will suddenly seem like new horizons.
Unbeknown to some this is actually an extremely well backed up set of disciplines experimentally and is not as much at the mercy of the musings of the more theoretical physics as the standard model is, nor to the projections or modelling mathemagicians (in cases where they conflict with observations) either. As with anything, its not immune to errors or review and has a healthy appetite for reviewing its own body of work. The Electric Universe has many voices. It encourages speculation but always seems perfectly clear on the boundary of where there are proven principles based on Maxwells laws and when there is speculating. Compared to Theoretical Physics of standard models it speculates in incriments instead of compounding layers of assumption ontop of each other creating a house of cards. Such speculation is very sensible and as such it is very healthy.
However:
What you will not find...
You will not find speculation that "Reality is a two dimensional hologram projected onto the surface of a three dimensional sphere" here. Nothing real exists in 2 dimensions, it boggles the mind that String Theorists could overlook that obvious fact! Neither will you learn that reality exists in eleven or more dimensions as String Theory requires. This is because there are only three spacial dimensions. A "dimension" in mathematics merely represents a degree of freedom and should never substitute for rationality or especially for common sense.
Observation must be explainable in cause/ effect terms as was always done in classical physics. These are all critical aspects of what the new cosmology must be.
You will not find that over 80% of the universe is mysterious invisible "dark matter" here, or that (together with the equally fantastical "dark energy) almost all of the universe has turned out to be "missing".
What are the main space sciences?
Astronomy is the broad strokes science of all celestial bodies., planets, moons etc in the night sky. It's involved with the physics somewhat, but also mapping, charting, practical application of telescope and observatory resources and incorporates under it both Astrophysics & Cosmology. The current establishment does not teach competing hypothesis and has the monopoly on the public understanding of science.
Astrophysics involves itself principally with the actual physics involved with these bodies. It's become increasingly mathematically reliant and as an example it would attempt to deal with the problematic physics of the thermonuclear fusion model of the sun, or the infinities laden black hole physics as well as interface with such things as String Theory etc. Cosmology is tasked with the ultimate quest. The big picture questions. What is the origin and fate of the universe. Should we persist with the failing LAMBDA-CDM standard cosmological model or look at contenders to the throne such as Plasma Cosmology. Despite an overlap with Astrophysics it is Cosmology that will ultimately be discipline that we use as our arena for questions beyond the overall model, such as:
Was there a big bang?
How old is the universe?
What is space and time?
How many dimensions are they set in?
What is the Cosmic Web? What is the origin of comets etc. It's been referred to as the "Queen of the sciences".
And may I cordially welcome you to the rabbit hole!
An introduction to the Electric Universe by the founders of The Thunderbolts Project.
Getting a sense of the landscape in Astronomy, Cosmology and Astrophysics:
Below: The nature of the current insurgency, why its so critical it must happen, and a succinct overview of the suns electrical environment. The clip includes a quick overview of how exactly it works. This is an important fundamental aspect of understanding what is to follow.
Tutorial:
Plasma Cosmology Basics
Hannes Alfven looms large as one of the fathers of Plasma Cosmology and Plasma Physics. He is the inventor of Magnetohydrodynamics. Those equations are known for creating beautiful elegance out of the extraordinarily complex dynamics of plasmas. I included the transcript of his acceptance speech for his Nobel Prize because physicists have not gotten the message where he warns about the danger of using his creation for space plasma.
That being said, the Bristol and Philadelphia Institute of Physics Publishing has a free booklet available on Plasma Physics which you can download for free by clicking here:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321587589_The_Fourth_State_of_Matter
More great free EU books from Everything Is Electric
What makes Plasma so important?
Plasma is known as the fourth state of matter (Solids, liquids and gasses being the first three) although in truth it should be known as the first since plasma actually makes up over 99% of matter in the universe. The influence of gravity as a very weak force compared to the electromagnetic force is well established (Electromagnetism - the force we know best - is 10 to the 36th power stronger than Gravity. That's actually a staggering 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 times stronger!) and this fact has been well integrated into the plasma physics used by Plasma Cosmology.
Plasma cosmologists understand that magnetism is everywhere in space, and that only electric currents cause magnetic fields, even in the case of remnant magnetism in bar magnets, they originally need an electric current to form. Plasma only needs to be 1% ionized to conduct. It is an excellent conductor. There is resistance (See Alvens speech above). So the inventor of Magnetohydrodynamics himself has warned that his own theory is rubbish in certain applications. MHD parading as tidy mathematics fails to account for the well established fact that self contained Plasma Magnetic Entities in space will not behave like a mysteriously magnetised fluid. They operate on complex electrodynamic interactions. Ionized plasma has the charged particles, the protons and electrons, separated from the atomic structure to some degree to facilitate the movement of charge (electric current). This ionized plasma in the form of Birkeland Current provides the facilitation of these currents over vast distances and even when they may be extremely weak in any one concentrated place. Their influence over galactic scales is powerful compared to the weak force of gravity. Experimental back up is solid with the disciplines. Repeatable, falsifiable observation is strong.
More recently this was done by Professor Anthony Perat, of Los Alamos Labs including computer models approximating all of the main spiral galaxy formations.
EU and Plasma Physics in the early days of the first pioneers.
Norwegian scientist and explorer Kristian Birkeland, while investigating the aurora discovered the electric currents that cause them, now bearing his name "Birkeland Currents"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kristian_Birkeland
A terrella (Latin for "little earth") is a small magnetised model ball representing the Earth, that is thought to have been invented by the English physician William Gilbert while investigating magnetism, and further developed 300 years later by the Norwegian scientist and explorer Kristian Birkeland, while investigating the aurora.
Plasma, if occurring on earth, we tend to think of more in the terms of the gas laws, or we may see it as lightning or fire, in chemical reactions and this is true in a small way in plasma discharges in some places in the universe too, but the plasma that conducts electric current in any florescent bulb or neon light is closer. But we will still never see the incredible self organizing properties of ionized plasma until we move out to the realm that plasma truly dominates.
That is just the beginning of this incredible journey into the most exciting and cross-disciplinary field in all of science.
 |
| https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winston_H._Bostick |
 |
| Click HERE |
EU and Plasma Physics in the early days of the first pioneers.
Norwegian scientist and explorer Kristian Birkeland, while investigating the aurora discovered the electric currents that cause them, now bearing his name "Birkeland Currents"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kristian_Birkeland
A terrella (Latin for "little earth") is a small magnetised model ball representing the Earth, that is thought to have been invented by the English physician William Gilbert while investigating magnetism, and further developed 300 years later by the Norwegian scientist and explorer Kristian Birkeland, while investigating the aurora.
An example of one of his experiments is depicted on the left front of a previous version of the Norwegian 200 kroner note; it shows a magnetized terrella, simulating the Earth, suspended in an evacuated chamber. Birkeland's face appears a second time in a watermark in the blank space above the drawing of the Terrella, and his rudimentary magnetosphere appears on the back, but is only visible under ultraviolet light. The ring encircling the magnetic pole depicted on the back of the bank note is similar to the patterns predicted by Birkeland and shown more recently by satellites. His drawing of what became known as Birkeland currents from his book, The Norwegian Aurora Polaris Expedition 1902–1903,[7] is shown on the back of the banknote at the right.
In 2017, Yara International ordered the Yara Birkeland, which will be the world's first autonomous ship and is named after Birkeland. It will enter service in 2018 and be fully autonomous by 2020.[20]
Those days seem so long ago. Today theoretical physicists ACTUALLY ADMIT that they have abandoned the scientific method! (Below)
Michio Kaku: Mathemagician
They have abandoned it in favour of mathematics, which is how we got into such a mess.
https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/12/mcmathematics-mathemagicians.html?m=1A different way to understand Plasma required by Plasma Physics
Plasma, if occurring on earth, we tend to think of more in the terms of the gas laws, or we may see it as lightning or fire, in chemical reactions and this is true in a small way in plasma discharges in some places in the universe too, but the plasma that conducts electric current in any florescent bulb or neon light is closer. But we will still never see the incredible self organizing properties of ionized plasma until we move out to the realm that plasma truly dominates.
That is just the beginning of this incredible journey into the most exciting and cross-disciplinary field in all of science.
Alvens galactic circuit in 60 seconds:
The notion of the galactic circuit is eclipsed by the cosmic web, or once the nature of ionized plasmas are accounted for, the cosmic circuit is a better way of understanding the vast scales electrodynamics forces control. Not dark matter, but electromagnetism.
 |
| Cosmic web or cosmic electromagnetic grid? |
And here is an Academic Paper:
*See the bottom of the post for a complete list of source references since from this point I wont reference them after each point is made, there are too many.
Accretion discs? or Bennet Pinches / Z-Pinches?
The idea that a gas, dust or plasma cloud collapses gravitationally is quite frankly absurd. Gases and plasmas especially, when not self organized through twisted filaments or double layers immediately disperse widely into the vacuum of space. This is well known. Gravity is far to weak to self organize matter this way.
Furthermore, this is reflected by the failure of computer models to simulate the accretion discs and early stellar and planetary formation required by the standard model. It comes as no surprise when we see how straightforward the Plasma Cosmology models are, and all along consistent with understood dynamics proven by plasma physics in laboratories.
Is there such a thing as "Dark Matter"?
Black holes or plasmoids?
Nothing has the paw-print of a huge money-wasting scam imprinted all over it as much as the fruitless search for dark matter. So much so that it deserves it's own post, which you can find by clicking here.
Black holes or plasmoids?
Baffled Again: I thought black holes were considered "dormant" only when not snacking on an accretion disc? I never knew they could decide to take a break and decide sometimes they just would do any sucking.... many physicists concluded that we may need to revisit our model. Meanwhile, This behavior, The self contained plasma magnetic entity, was already predicted by the proponents of an Electric Universe, who all along had been saying we were looking at a phenomenon of electrodynamics known as a PLASMOID.
Embarrassing fail for ^CDM
Plasmoids are known science and black holes cannot be observed and remain speculation despite the press releases treating them as if they are established fact. Let that sink in for a moment and keep an open mind.
Moreover, Plasmoids are expected phenomena in Plasma Cosmology and they are expected exactly where black holes are alleged to be in the standard cosmological model (SCM from this point on). Plasmoids account for all the observable signs we ascribe to black hokes, plus they are expected to discharge massive interstellar jets, a real patched up aspect of black holes that doesn't really make sense.
Nobody has seen a black hole, the chance of them mysteriously occurring where plasmoids should be is weak, recent "proof" of a black hole only showed us the characteristic doughnut shape of a plasmoid.
And here the cosmic jets only act as EVIDENCE for Plasma Cosmology. Black holes should not eject matter, even by the given patchwork reasoning, nor should they remain so thin and focused without dispersion into the vacuum of space, among other other theory-shredding problems. These are evidence of plasmoidal behavior.
Black holes also get a post of their own. For a more thorough scrutiny of the case against black holes can be found by clicking on this text.
Neutron stars, and other very exotic stars
The childish physics behind Neutron stars, which violate nuclear physics island of stability and make ridiculous claims. Pulsars are not billion ton per teaspoon fantastical beasts that spin several times per second, they are simply strobe-like stars whose electrodynamic environment mimics a simple relaxation oscillation circuit.
Do you really think such things exist? Just because the mathematics takes us there?
Neutronium, just like "strange matter", dark matter, "modified" (fudged) Newtonian physics, dark energy and the intractable logical conflicts surrounding infinities with black holes. Not science, not even Sci-fi.
Pulsars. Are pulsars these strange objects defying belief, where a teaspoonful weighs more than Mount Everest, where the entire star rotates as fast as a dentists drill... or is there a simple, sensible electrical pulsing explanation that is entirely believable, scientifically much more rigorous and does not go head-to-head with common sense?
This concludes part 1. The article was split
Into 2 parts to avoid page loading hangtime
Please Click this link for part 2:
*Full source material located here
(Below) References and citations for this this post:
n from field-aligned currents, W. Peter and A. Peratt, Laser and Particle Beams, vol. 6, part 3, pp. 493-501, 1988 (560K)
COBE Satellite Finds No Hint of Excess in the Cosmic Microwave Spectrum, Physics Today, 1990 (128K).
COBE Sows Cosmological Confusion, Science, vol. 257, 28, 1992 (356K).
Fretting About Statistics, Daniel Kleppner, Physics Today, July 1992 (236KB).
On the Critical Ionization Velocity Effect in Interstellar Space and Possible Detection of Related Continuum Emission, G. L. Verschuur, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., vol. 35, pp. 759-766, 2007.
Atlas of Peculiar Galaxies, H. Arp, Astrophys. J., Supplement Series, 123-132, 1966 (152K).
Evolution of the Plasma Universe: I. Double Radio Galaxies, Quasars, and Extragalactic Jets, A. L. Peratt, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. Vol. PS-14, N.6, pp.639-660, December 1986.(1.7M)
Evolution of the Plasma Universe: II. The Formation of Systems of Galaxies, A. L. Peratt, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. Vol. PS-14, N.6, pp.763-778, December 1986 (1.9M).
The Role of Particle Beams and Electrical Currents in the Plasma Universe, A. L. Peratt, Laser and Particle Beams, vol.6, part.3, pp.471-491, 1988.
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PLASMA SCIENCE, SPECIAL ISSUES ON PLASMA ASTROPHYSICS AND COSMOLOGY
Electrical Engineering, Plasma Science, and the Plasma Universe, A. L. Peratt, 1986 (312KB)
The Golden Anniversary of Magnetic Storms and the Aurorae, T. A. Potemra and A. L. Peratt, 1989 (516KB)
Guest Editorial: The IEEE International Conference on Plasma Cosmology, La Jolla, CA, A. L. Peratt, 1990 (1.1MB)
Guest Editorial: Plasma Experiments in the Laboratory and in Space, A. L. Peratt, C.-G. Fälthammar, N. Rynn, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 1992 (548K).
Guest Editorial, Space Weather Effects, S. T. Lai, N. Singh, A. L. Peratt, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. December 2000 (36K).
Guest Editorial Sixth Special Issue on Space and Cosmic Plasma, A. L. Peratt and C.-G. Fälthammer, December 2003 (1.4MB)
Guest Editorial Seventh Special Issue on Space and Cosmic Plasma, A. L. Peratt and T. E. Eastman, August 2007 (3 MB)
Evolution of Colliding Plasmas, A. Peratt, J. Green, and D. Nielsen, Physical Review Letters, 44, pp. 1767-1770, 1980 (248K).
Microwave Generation from Filamentation and Vortex Formation within Magnetically Confined Electron Beams, A. L. Peratt and C. M. Snell, Physical Review Letters, 54, pp. 1167-1170, 1985 (688K).
A Particle-in-Cell Simulation of a Cyclic Beam Buncher, A. L. Peratt, C. M. Snell, and F. S. Felber, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 18, p.626, (1990) (448KB).
Comments on Tired-Light Mechanisms, H. Arp, IEEE TPS v.18, 1990 (136K).
Evidence for Quantized and Variable Redshifts in the Cosmic Background Rest Frame , W. G. Tifft, in Modern Mathematical Models of Time and Their Applications to Physics and Cosmology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1997 (1.2M).
Redshifts and Blueshifts of Spectral Lines Emitted by Two Correlated Sources, E. Wolf, Phys. Rev. Letters, 58, 2646, 1987 (176K)
Shifts of Spectral Lines Caused by Scattering from Fluctuating Random Media, D. F. V. James, M. P. Savedoff, and E. Wolf, Astrophysical J., 359, 67, 1990 (448K).
Filamentation of Volcanic Plumes on the Jovian Satellite Io, A. L. Peratt and A. J. Dessler, Astrophys. Space Sci. 144, pp. 451-461, 1988 (1M).
Was the Titius-Bode Series Dictated by the Minimum Energy States of the Generic Solar Plasma? E. Wells, IEEE TPS v.18, 1990 (264K).
Interstellar Neutral Hydrogen Filaments at High Galactic Latitudes and the Bennett Pinch, G. L. Verschuur, Astrophys. Space Sci. 227, pp. 187-198, 1995 (776K).
Radiation Properties of Pulsar Magnetospheres: Observation, Theory, and Experiment. K. Healy and A. Peratt, Astrophys. Space Sci. 227, 1995 (1.1MB).
Galactic Neutral Hydrogen Emission Profile Structure, G. L. Verschuur and A. L. Peratt, Astron. J. 118, pp.1252-1267, 1999 (672K).
Observation of the CIV Effect in Interstellar Clouds: A Speculation on the Physical Mechanism for Their Existence, A. L. Peratt and G. L. Verschuur, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. December 2000 (344K).
Trends in Apparent Time Intervals Between Multiple Supernovae Occurrences, E. Sanders, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci.31, pp.1252-1262, 2003 (408Kb)
Self-similarity of plasma networking in a broad range of length scales: From laboratory to cosmic plasmas, A. B. Kukushkin and V. A. Rantsev-Kartinov, Rev. Scientific Instr., 70, n.2, pp.1387-1391, 1999.
Plasma Physics from Laboratory to Cosmos—The Life and Achievements of Hannes Alfvén, C.-G. Fälthammar (808KB)
Dean of the Plasma Dissidents, A. L. Peratt, The World & I, Natural Science Sec., pp.190-197, May 1988, (4 MB)
The Most Feared Astronomer on Earth: Halton Arp. W. Kaufman III. (592KB).
A Tribute to Oscar Buneman—Pioneer of Plasma Simulation, R. Buneman, R. J. Barker, A. L. Peratt, S. H. Brecht, A. B. Langdon, H. R. Lewis, IEEE Trans.Plasma Sci. 22, 1994 (1.2MB)
Particle Beams and Basic Plasma Phenomena in the Plasma Universe: A Special Issue in Honor of the 80th Birthday of Hannes Alfvén, Laser and Particle Beams, v.6, pt.3, 1988 (464KB)
The Legacy of Birkeland's Plasma Torch, A. L. Peratt, The Kristian Birkeland Lecture, Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters, v.9, Oslo, Norway, 1996 (12MB).
In Memoriam Grote Reber 1911-2002 Founder of Radio Astronomy, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 31, December 2003 (372kB)
PLASMA SCIENCE APPLICATION PRESENTATIONS
“Multiple Platform Application of 3D CAD PIC Simulations in Pulsed Power: The Coaxial Plasma Thruster: Demonstration of Large-Scale Separation of Electrons and Ions In Space and in the Laboratory for the Production of Gigawatt Microwaves , Invited Paper, A. L. Peratt and M. A. Mostrom, IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science, Madison, WI.,1995