Skip to main content

What Does BrExit Really Mean? The Single Greatest Defeat The Globalists Have Ever Faced!

Or more specifically, what is all the fanatical opposition to Brexit really about? Most certainly it is not about helping the refugees from Washington’s wars that the UK government has supported and enabled. If the British establishment cared so much for the Muslims seeking refuge from America’s invasions, bombs, and drones, the British establishment would not have supported Washington’s attacks on these people in the first place.  So no, opposing Brexit on the grounds of racism is a false premise and that argument falls quickly down a slippery slope downhill.  The only tenuous link there is, is that incidentally some right wing groups support Brexit due to the refugee crises, but those people are victim-blamers and they have no understanding of the fact that war that is funded by and has arms supplied BY THE ESTABLISHMENT drove those people out of Syria, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan and Yemen etc.

Let's be serious here for a moment. Opposition to Brexit is, in fact, based on two powerful interests, the international bankster cartel behind the worlds central banks (the globalists) and, of course, Washington.
Regarding the interests of the New York banks and Wall Street to eliminate the UK as a financial center competitor. This blatant fact has seemingly escaped the notice of the City and the Bank of England, or has it?  This is where the NWO and Banksters are so clever and why we need to stop being so gullible and start being much MUCH more vigilant.

The British have forgotten that they only have one foot in the EU, because the UK was permitted to keep its own currency. The UK did not use the euro and by doing so retains the power to finance the British government. Greece, Portugal, Spain, Italy, France, Germany, etc., do not have this capability. They are dependent on private banks for financing.
In order to lure the skeptical UK into joining the EU, the British were given special temporary privileges, but  those were soon to be foreclosed on. The EU process is one of political integration and it's worth noting that it is impossible to centralize fiscal policies if the UK is an independent financial center with its own central bank and currency.
Wall Street understood that if the UK stayed in the EU then soon London as a financial center would diminish, allowing powerful banking dynasties like the Rothschild's and others to sway from the now publicly held Bank of England and restore control in more privately owned central banks, a one region or one-world currency and feudalising and dangerous elitist trade agreements like the TTIP.
Moreover, if the EU unravels, so likely would NATO, which is the necessary cover for Washington’s aggression.
The EU serves Washington and the One Percent of the 1%. It serves no one else. The EU is a destroyer of national identity, sovereignty and a murderer of the worlds most defenseless and poor.  That bold claim cannot be made so bluntly about each member nation, AND THEREIN LIES THE CLINCHER.

The Globalist goal in this particular region is:

  • For the middle east regimes to get the "Assad must go" treatment IE for US puppets, like the one currently governing Ukraine to be installed and for the Middle East, like the EU, to be turned into US vassal states.
  • The Petrodollar hegemony, which is under threat, will be preserved that way.
  • Critically:Russia to be reigned in
  •  For the British, French, Germans, Italians, Greeks, Spanish, and all the rest to disappear culturally as such separate peoples and for society to be flooded with refugees fleeing warzones created by my top bullet point, borders to be opened, visas to be done away with, separate currency or all grass root local governing by the people to be abolished int he name of globalization and centralizing of big power.
This is a truly astonishing victory for the little guy!


Popular posts from this blog

Scientific Consensus is that Consensus is overturned 100% of the time

Everything you know is wrong. There is a very good reason why science succeeds more often than politics does.  Unlike politics, It's not a consensus or a vote,  it's actually method.  The scientific method. Anyone who has read this blog before probably knows I'm a lifelong science junkie as well as someone who spends thousands of hours breaking down the the political and economic agendas behind the special interest groups that guide public policy.  In many ways I'm actually uniquely qualified to tie these angles together in ways not well understood by the overwhelming majority of people.  That actually includes scientists. Scientists are notoriously naive in the political and economic forces that drive the human world.

For example if you are of the opinion that the earth has one moon, the earth revolves around the sun etc you are already wrong. Well sort of. The politicpl world is black and white, the scientific world is nuanced, see http://dwahts.blogspot.com/2018/06…

CO2 is not a pollutant, it is greening the earth!

Whatever your persuasion is on CO² and AGW, nobody disagrees on the tremendous benefit it provides plant life. Many of the past famine disasters and desertification has CO² decline listed as a contributor.

http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2018/04/sheep-science.html?m=1

I feel I've already blown the notion that humans are the main cause of climate change out of the water. Or rather I've used the reasoning of others and put it together in a convenient outline. See my previous post above for starters.  However, I recognize that humans do increase CO² levels, no matter how tiny. Increases are likely to be very short lived because the earth has an effective feedback mechanism, but we can apparently get small increases, and it's been put forward on very poor science that this is a bad thing. That assertion hinges completely on bad models. More on that in the bottom most link.  Model's and the measurement sample dates are dubious at best.


Furthermore, the main increase in CO²  as…

Dīvide et imperā: How To Defeat The Most Effective Social Control Weapon In Human History

Many different empires, cultures and nations have existed in history and while the details, styles, values and aesthetics keep changing, the core structure remains unchanged. In order to benefit from social coperation and steal reward in excess of the labour and value you invest, you cannot take it by brute force for extended periods of time without facing the wrath of the crowds. The crowds need to give it to you willingly or unknowingly. There was one exception to this synopsis, the Feudal System  but there is more to that than people realise, it's a post for a later day and deserves full scrutiny and parrellels do manifest. The support of the home crowd is also needed to win wars. No army has ever been effective fighting under duress, they would assemble, arm  and immediatly turn on you.


Before the current reigning Judeo-Christian Anglo American Empire of today there were other more monolithic empires that the loosely ideologically aligned old money banking dynasties, globalis…