Assumptions in science 5.) We have to disregard most of the evidence in the universe, and develop a gravity fetish in order to undersand the universe.
If the title to this post sounded a bit ridiculous to you, of course it is. We should look at ALL the evidence. What I am putting forward as an assuption may sound ridiculous, but there is no doubt it's true.
Thankfully change is coming, slowly, VERY slowly because of a fair degree of resistance is being put up by those in line to be turfed out with it. And rightly so. Its desperately needed.
This is why:
https://phys.org/news/2019-10-nobel-prize-physics-awarded-scientists.html
Yes, you read correctly. They are STILL giving out Nobel Prizes for dark matter, one of the biggest failings cosmology. They cannot admit failure and such a huge waste of resources and money over the years. That means your money, taxpayer money.
Let's be serious here. Everyone knows that dark matter, and half of the other patchwork solutions they came up with to save their collapsing theory, simply does not exist.
Dark matter is just another casualty of ASSUMING that only gravity guides galactic rotation, so with only one tool in their tool box they are running around that a farce or satire, looking for invisible, undetectable matter, of which the VAST majority is supposedly missing! The lunatics are running the assylum, but what does one expect?
This little tweet thread (below) should give you an idea of what regard the EU/Plasma crowd has for the exclusively gravity crowd.
They cannot simply account for the electrodynamics and electromagnetism from birkeland currents in the galactic circuit, with the charge moving with the ionised plasma and matter towards the central load or plasmoid where it will be disharged via cosmic jets. That simple and obvious solution, which was put forward DECADES ago by another Nobel Prizewinner, Hannes Alven, is not based on gravity, to horror of the establishment who cannot absorb it with almost no electrical engineers in their staff. They are blind. They prefer fairy tales, as long as they can balance equations around them.
Read more about Plasma Cosmology and get the jump on the scientific community, here this comprehensive tutorial I compiled.
Things are changing. Take this article for example, Science in society, which archives scientific reports etc, but what is significant is that it has one of these left leaning angles that panders to rubbish such as climate change, so I consider it part of the establishment .
Cosmology
Continuous Creation from Electric Plasma versus Big Bang Universe
The Big Bang Universe, 95 % unobservable in hypothetical dark matter and dark energy is giving way to one alive with electric plasma currents accumulating mass and transferring energy over galactic and intergalactic space in a cosmic extravaganza of constant creation Dr. Mae-Wan Ho
Stars and galaxies, NASA image
How our Universe originated and developed
Imagine the moment our human ancestors first lifted their eyes to gaze deep into night sky; that must have been the very moment art/myth/religion/science was conceived, and cosmology – the quest for the origin and development of our universe – has held our fascination and imagination undiminished ever since.
Some would argue that the currently dominant Big Bang science theory of the universe has strong elements of mythology if not artistic verisimilitude (see [1] Galaxy Making Stars at the Edge of the Universe & Other Anomalies, SiS 60), and it is being defended by an establishment with a zeal bordering on blind faith and religious fervour. So much so that 34 eminent scientists from 10 countries around the world were moved to sign an open letter criticising the establishment, calling for openness and funding to investigate the validity of Big Bang and its alternatives, among them, Steady State and Plasma cosmology (Box 1).
Box 1
Open Letter from eminent scientists criticising the Big Bang establishment
An “Open Letter to the Scientific Community” was published in 2004 in the New Scientist magazine, signed by 34 eminent scientists from 10 countries around the world [2]:
“The big bang today relies on a growing number of hypothetical entities, things that we have never observed-- inflation, dark matter and dark energy are the most prominent examples. Without them, there would be a fatal contradiction between the observations made by astronomers and the predictions of the big bang theory.
“What is more, the big bang theory can boast of no quantitative predictions that have subsequently been validated by observation. The successes claimed by the theory's supporters consist of its ability to retrospectively fit observations with a steadily increasing array of adjustable parameters, just as the old Earth-centred cosmology of Ptolemy needed layer upon layer of epicycles…
“Even observations are now interpreted through this biased filter, judged right or wrong depending on whether or not they support the big bang. So discordant data on red shifts, lithium and helium abundances, and galaxy distribution, among other topics, are ignored or ridiculed. This reflects a growing dogmatic mindset that is alien to the spirit of free scientific enquiry…”
The letter ended with a call for funding to investigate the validity of Big Bang and its alternatives, among them, Steady State and Plasma cosmology, both proposing an evolving universe without beginning or end, the latter able to explain the basic phenomena of the cosmos without invoking dark energy and dark matter.. Read more at the source article to help register hits on the subject.
Click here for part 6 and you will be very surprised by what you learn concerning the latest data on what drives galactic rotation!
