Assumptions in Science 3B): The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMB) can be exclusively interpreted as evidence of a "Big Bang"?

The CMB  

Find out a surprising number of seldom mentioned facts about cosmology here in this tutorial .This post is technically part 3B of my "Assumptions in Science" series.

Part 3A can be found HERE and it asks whether cosmological redshift is evidence of recessional velocity at a 1:1 ratio?.

In both the anove linked articles I continue to try expose (what is commonly known in some circles) to a wider audience due to the LAMBDA-CDM monopoly on public understanding of science in Cosmology and Astrophisics  IE I should probsbly say the aim is to expose many of what can ultimately be called such things as lies or cover-ups. To use other words would not be accurate. All this perhaps is no surprise really in the second least successful scientific discipline in terms of predictive success, after climatology (climate change messed that up with its political agenda).

The interpretation of the supposed Cosmic Microwave Background radiation does not support the big bang. 
There are more holes in the CMB hypothesis than there are in my socks if you could possibly believe that. How the hell this nepotism and fraud persists through all sense of collective integrity is beyond me. I guess the primary goal of establishment really is to maintain the status quo. 

Here below is the official narrative in one infographic:

Somehow they claim they are looking through our galactic centre, the signal strength not even indistinguishable fm noise but WORSE (they remove the strong foreground signal to reveal the weak background signal and process/bandpass it six ways from Sunday). Ground results are not repeatable fm space (presumably because there is no vast body of water in the immediate proximity). 

These are misrepresented issues that I can only presume are somewhere between deliberate lies, interpretation before data, baseless assumptions and wild unjustifiable conclusions.

Sky Scholar: I have used quite a bit from Dr Roubetaille (papers and embedded media). Why? It's hands down the best analysis of the latest papers, anisotropy maps and a narrative shattering review of the conventional understanding of data from COBE, WMAP, PLANCK etc. 

Above: Scientists of pedigree, like PM Robitaille, who looks like your dads accountant, are too rare for my liking.

Below:  COBE, WMAP, PLANCK demystified.Two videos making a simple and conclusive proof invalidating the work done by Penzias and Wilson and the CMB. 

WMAP: click this text to download a radiological analysis.

Herouni's Antenna

How a ground based radio telescope killed the big bang.

Above: Dr Roubetaille walks us through his discovery in the data archives.

Further:

The Planck Satellite:  problems with the interpretation of its data: 

https://youtu.be/MBFSFm2Yrts

And the paper in PDF HERE

 And finally: An excellent talk given (below clip) at Oxford by LPP Fusions head scientist, Eric Lerner. This talk covers the surprisingly many (and more technical) reasons why the universe cannot be expanding. 

______

...end

Or click here for the site homepage

                  ---xXX---

Citations for papers on CMB in both article and videos:

Oleg V. Verkhodanov https://www.sao.ru/Doc-en/Events/2020... https://www.celestis.com/participants... O. V. Verkhodanov, Series of Anomalies of low multipoles of WMAP and Planck Missions: What are They? Phys. Part. Nuclei, 2015, 46, 237–247. https://www1.jinr.ru/publish/Pepan/v-... O. V. Verkhodanov, Low Multipoles Anomalies of CMB Maps, in "Radiative Mechanisms of Astrophysical Objects (V. Grining et al., eds.). Yerevan, 2017, 363-370.

P.M. Robitaille, WMAP: A Radiological Analysis, Progr. Phys. 2007, v. 3, no. 1, 3-18. http://ptep-online.com/2007/PP-08-01.PDF D. Larson et al.,Comparing PLANCK and WMAP: Maps, spectra, and parameters, Astrophys. J. 2015, 801, 9. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10...

,G.E. Addison, et al., Quantifying discordance in the 2015 PLANCK CMB spectrum, Astrophys. J. 2016, 818, 132.

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10... Hinshaw, et al., Three-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Temperature Analysis, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Series, 2003, 170, 288-334. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10... C. Barnes, et al., First Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Galactic Signal Contamination from Side Lobe Pickup, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Series, 2003, 148, 51-62. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10... Y. Akrami, et al., Power Asymmetry in WMAP and Planck Temperature Sky Maps as Measured by Local Variance Estimator, Astrophys. J. Lett. 2014, 784(L42), https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10...

Cold Spot Discovery paper: M. Cruz, et al., Detection of a non-Gaussian Spot in WMAP, MNRAS 2005, 356(1), 29–40. https://arXiv:astro-ph/0405341 M. Cruz, et al, The non-Gaussian cold spot in Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe: significance, morphology and foreground contribution, MNR

AS 2006, 369(1), 57–67.u

g the CMB Cold Spot, MNRAS 2017, 470(2), 2328–2338. https://academic.oup.com/mnras/articl... C.H. Lineweaver, 7: Gold in the Doppler Hills: Cosmological Parameters in the Microwave Background, in “Quantum Fluctuations to Cosmological Structures”, ASP Conference Series 1997, v. 126, 185-205. https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1997A... N. Aghanim, et al., Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 2020, A6. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/pdf...

against a supervoid causing the CMB Cold Spot, MNRAS 2017, 470(2), 2328–2338. https://academic.oup.com/mnras/articl... C.H. Lineweaver, 7: Gold in the Doppler Hills: Cosmological Parameters in the Microwave Background, in “Quantum Fluctuations to Cosmological Structures”, ASP Conference Series 1997, v. 126, 185-205. https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1997A... N. Aghanim, et al., Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 2020, A6. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/pdf... N. Aghanin, et al., Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods, Astron. Astrophys. 2020, A5. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/pdf... M. Birkinshaw, The Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Effect, Phys. Reports 1999, v. 310, 97-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(98... https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9808050 J.E. Carlstrom, et al., Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2002, v. 40, 643-680. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs... ABELL CLUSTER M. Douspis, Planck SZ Clusters, Société Française d’Astronomie et d’Astrophysique (SF2A) 2011. http://sf2a.eu/semaine-sf2a/2011/proc... https://sci.esa.int/web/planck/-/4769... Abe et al., Planck early results. VIII. The all-sky early Sunyaev-Zeldovich cluster sample, Astron. Astrophys. 2011, v. 536, A8. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/pdf... K. S. Cover, Sky maps without anisotropies in the cosmic microwave background are a better fit to WMAP's uncalibrated time-ordered data than the official sky maps. Europhys. Lett., Volume 87, Number 6, 69003. https://robots.iopscience.iop.org/art... https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/09... All observational images and videos are credited to NASA unless otherwise specified. Images obtained by the SDO satellite are a courtesy of NASA/SDO and the AIA, EVE, and HMI science teams. Images obtained by the SOHO satellite are courtesy of SOHO (ESA & NASA). Link to Professor Robitaille’s papers on Vixra: http://vixra.org/author/pierre-marie_...

The complete directory of source material for the "Assumptions in science" series of posts is now located HERE since it has become so extensive. 

.