Skip to main content

How To Become The Symbol Of Resistance Against Empire.

It's not about who you are, it's about what you represent. Those seeking to overthrow Bashar al Assad are turning him into a symbol of resistance against the Military Industrial Complex, oil industry and banker backed empire behind NATO and the Gulf state region. The irony is so thick you can cut it with a knife. Just like Che Guevara came to represent (even to Westerners) more than just the Argentine Marxist revolutionary he actually was, the idea is harder to fight than the person.  All sorts of facts are starting to emerge regarding the true facts and SAA casualties during (what essentially amounted to Western NGO and insurgency activity) during the fake Arab Spring, a PR exercise designed to lend legitimacy to the efforts in Libya, Egypt, Syria and elsewhere. Back in 2011, before all of the media was essentially recruited by the complex shareholder arrangement that eventually brings all of MSM under one narrative, some Western press reports, were still slightly less biased (,8599,2061364,00.html)  Sure, they never reported on the agitation of the likes of Hillary Clinton exploiting tensions between Sunni and Alawite Muslims, but they never had the leaked emails spilling all the beans

Posters of Syria president Bashir Al Assad have started appearing in Yemen capital Sanaa.
It is also proven beyond reasonable doubt that Assad was framed in the Ghouta sarin gas attacks, the main pretext for the "Assad must go" policy the US propaganda masters have been hiding behind to enforce their proven "Regime Change 101" formula of soft power grabs.

What's really important here is what Assad's victory, with the help of Russia, represents to the bigger picture. For the first time we are seeing the globalists comprehensively defeated.  The cost has been the blood of Syrians, and a wave of refugees, just like with Libya, spreading across Europe.  It's only a matter of time before European taxpayers connect the dots between their governments wars to overthrow these trumped up "brutal dictators" and the refugee crises.  They are already calling into question their support of the true brutal dictators, the Wahhabi extremists of Saudi Arabia (alarmingly similar to the head choppers of ISIS.)

The Writing is on the wall.

Popular posts from this blog

Dīvide et imperā: How To Defeat The Most Effective Social Control Weapon In Human History

Many different empires, cultures and nations have existed in history and while the details, styles, values and aesthetics keep changing, the core structure remains unchanged. In order to benefit from social coperation and steal reward in excess of the labour and value you invest, you cannot take it by brute  for extended periods of time without facing the wrath of the crowds. The crowds need to give it to you willingly or unknowingly. There was one exception to this synopsis, the Feudal System  but there is more to that than people realise, it's a post for a later day and deserves full scrutiny and parrellels do manifest. The support of the home crowd is also needed to win wars. No army has ever been effective fighting under duress, they would assemble, arm  and immediatly turn on you.

Before the current reigning Judeo-Christian Anglo American Empire of today there were other more monolithic empires that the loosely ideologically aligned old money banking dynasties, globalists an…

Scientific Consensus is that Consensus is overturned 100% of the time

Everything you know is wrong. There is a very good reason why science succeeds more often than politics does.  Unlike politics, It's not a consensus or a vote,  it's actually method.  The scientific method. Anyone who has read this blog before probably knows I'm a lifelong science junkie as well as someone who spends thousands of hours breaking down the the political and economic agendas behind the special interest groups that guide public policy.  In many ways I'm actually uniquely qualified to tie these angles together in ways not well understood by the overwhelming majority of people.  That actually includes scientists. Scientists are notoriously naive in the political and economic forces that drive the human world.

For example if you are of the opinion that the earth has one moon, the earth revolves around the sun etc you are already wrong. Well sort of. The politicpl world is black and white, the scientific world is nuanced, see…

CO2 is not a pollutant, it is greening the earth!

Whatever your persuasion is on CO² and AGW, nobody disagrees on the tremendous benefit it provides plant life. Many of the past famine disasters and desertification has CO² decline listed as a contributor.

I feel I've already blown the notion that humans are the main cause of climate change out of the water. Or rather I've used the reasoning of others and put it together in a convenient outline. See my previous post above for starters.  However, I recognize that humans do increase CO² levels, no matter how tiny. Increases are likely to be very short lived because the earth has an effective feedback mechanism, but we can apparently get small increases, and it's been put forward on very poor science that this is a bad thing. That assertion hinges completely on bad models. More on that in the bottom most link.  Model's and the measurement sample dates are dubious at best.

Furthermore, the main increase in CO²  as…