Skip to main content

Arch Globalists, The Conservation Bank & Globalist Climate Conferences

Israeli currency 500 Shekels banknote 1982 Baron Edmond de Rothschild, Bank of Israel 
The Globalist/Bankster connections that hijacked the Green Movement was a strategically brilliant series  of events going back to the 90's but the roots  go back much further than that.  I'll be addressing these connections in a series of posts over the next few months.

Before getting into this consider a look at the overview first:
Here is a broadly cast post I wrote completely deconstructing and exposing how and why the lie that all warming and cooling is man-made was perpetuated.  It does so in a clear and easy to follow way:

Some obscure history first.  The relevance will become apparent as this issue progresses, but this puzzle piece is needed early on despite how much changed from the original aspirations.  Don't poo-poo this as containing tired old conspiracy elements,  facts don't care about our feelings. 

 In 1987, the 4TH WORLD CONSERVATION SUMMIT was held to discuss the implementation of a World Conservation Bank using the WILDERNESS LANDS of the world as the supposed collateral. The sole purpose of this fraud was to save the wealth and power of the elite.  All funds were to be housed in the Royal Bank of Canada (that strategy was changed) .  Now as the globalist EU crumbles,  and NAFTA stalls,  historical events like the ending of the cold war forced several plans to abandoned and new strategies forced focus on sorting out the Middle East,  we all know that a plan to have multiple dictators over sovereign nations will probably never happen in currency and customs unions as soon as they hoped , but in the process they may well ruin everything known to the people of the world,  especially in the ME, continue with endless wars and waste the entirety of the green budget and all R&D Grant funding chasing CO² ghosts,  using the GLOBAL LIE that GLOBAL WARMING Is MAN MADE. 
Read more here on the least known aspect.  Just ignore the little religious overtones here or there on the embedded video if you watch it,  it's still.  Worthwhile because in reality sometimes Priests and  Rabbis can also be whistlblowers

Dont be fooled by Edmonde de Rothschild's naming of the Conservation Bank which they have since renamed,  they have full scope  to do as they please as usual.


The above clip goes into detail on how the source data for most MSM and Google sources is doctored on a year by year basis.  Never use Google.

Continued here:

Popular posts from this blog

Dīvide et imperā: How To Defeat The Most Effective Social Control Weapon In Human History

Many different empires, cultures and nations have existed in history and while the details, styles, values and aesthetics keep changing, the core structure remains unchanged. In order to benefit from social coperation and steal reward in excess of the labour and value you invest, you cannot take it by brute force for extended periods of time without facing the wrath of the crowds. The crowds need to give it to you willingly or unknowingly. There was one exception to this synopsis, the Feudal System  but there is more to that than people realise, it's a post for a later day and deserves full scrutiny and parrellels do manifest. The support of the home crowd is also needed to win wars. No army has ever been effective fighting under duress, they would assemble, arm  and immediatly turn on you.

Before the current reigning Judeo-Christian Anglo American Empire of today there were other more monolithic empires that the loosely ideologically aligned old money banking dynasties, globalis…

Scientific Consensus is that Consensus is overturned 100% of the time

Everything you know is wrong. There is a very good reason why science succeeds more often than politics does.  Unlike politics, It's not a consensus or a vote,  it's actually method.  The scientific method. Anyone who has read this blog before probably knows I'm a lifelong science junkie as well as someone who spends thousands of hours breaking down the the political and economic agendas behind the special interest groups that guide public policy.  In many ways I'm actually uniquely qualified to tie these angles together in ways not well understood by the overwhelming majority of people.  That actually includes scientists. Scientists are notoriously naive in the political and economic forces that drive the human world.

For example if you are of the opinion that the earth has one moon, the earth revolves around the sun etc you are already wrong. Well sort of. The politicpl world is black and white, the scientific world is nuanced, see…

CO2 is not a pollutant, it is greening the earth!

Whatever your persuasion is on CO² and AGW, nobody disagrees on the tremendous benefit it provides plant life. Many of the past famine disasters and desertification has CO² decline listed as a contributor.

I feel I've already blown the notion that humans are the main cause of climate change out of the water. Or rather I've used the reasoning of others and put it together in a convenient outline. See my previous post above for starters.  However, I recognize that humans do increase CO² levels, no matter how tiny. Increases are likely to be very short lived because the earth has an effective feedback mechanism, but we can apparently get small increases, and it's been put forward on very poor science that this is a bad thing. That assertion hinges completely on bad models. More on that in the bottom most link.  Model's and the measurement sample dates are dubious at best.

Furthermore, the main increase in CO²  as…