Skip to main content

Fake News, Fake Wars, Fake Money, Fake Reality TV, Fake food, Fake Causes, Fake Celebrity & Fake Democracy. .


Liberal Snowflakes live in a world where all that ever drives anything is Climate Change,  Sexism,  Racism and various other PC issues where the way we solve issues is not uncovering their causes,  it's focusing on the window dressing and expanding upon the list of what the wrong offensive words are.  This is the manufactured consent generation with no real understanding of the world and such a strident lack of nuance and ability to explore the real underlying root causes of issues  that we are seeing a new phenomenon emerge.  The cause driven psychotic episode.

This psychological crises appears to stem from being in a state of conflict about strongly held beliefs clashing with clear evidence,  producing detachment from reality because,  just like with religion,   when your identity is tied into your beliefs,  and your beliefs are threatened,  the person you believe you are is threatened,  producing either crises or delusion.  Delusion is how our mind protects us against crises.

Let's look at a few issues of 'Snowflake Meltdown'

The title picture of the Syrian revolution being linked to climate change.  
This is perverse.  We know neither climate or the propaganda alleging government abuse drives the exodus. A complex story of human tragedy,  of a people pulling together under tremendous odds attacked by powerful external  forces,  being cheapened to a snowflake issue.

Here is the reality behind the refugees issue in Syria,  very few of whom are farmers .  Don't let them cheapen it.
Drive around Ghouta with President Bashar Al Assad and see destruction.  Or below get an aerial view of Homs by drone footage (courtesy AFP News Agency and RT) to utter see utter devastation.




Climate Change is sexism,  Hillary Clinton :
I don't even know where to start:

Text link:
https://www.dailywire.com/news/26800/hillary-clinton-now-says-climate-change-sexist-emily-zanotti

Stop using the word 'Man'  (Courtesy Fox News)  disingenuous balancing act between satire and the down right infuriating and entirely focally misplaced movement to crush 'gender bias'.  There surely is a better way to campaign for gender equality?


But more insidious is what's happening in Delaware where primarily schools can override parents with children's gender Identity or race and keep it secret from parents.


The BBC does not believe they should be holding power to account stopping their government selling arms to let the Saudis Butcher the Yemeni people,  but rather they have their finger on the pulse of the nation. MANSPLAINING., MANTERUPTING The real issues are given a shot in the arm with new vocabulary.  Clip courtesy BBC.  The BBC tries to strike an awkward balance with humour,  but fails as things always do when there is serious  contention proposed.


If you ask me,  this is yet more divide and conquer rhetoric,  only now the damage on the mental health of the Western society is being turned into some kind of perverse Borat satire.

But for all the Liberal Snowflakes out there,  don't fear,  can get yourself an experts Political Analysis Set for under $15.00
https://m.ebay.com/itm/7GG69-SNOWFLAKE-SURVIVAL-KIT-YOU-TOO-CAN-HELP-A-SNOWFLAKE-COPE-WITH-REALITY-/142294016056?_mwBanner=1

Popular posts from this blog

Dīvide et imperā: How To Defeat The Most Effective Social Control Weapon In Human History

Many different empires, cultures and nations have existed in history and while the details, styles, values and aesthetics keep changing, the core structure remains unchanged. In order to benefit from social coperation and steal reward in excess of the labour and value you invest, you cannot take it by brute force for extended periods of time without facing the wrath of the crowds. The crowds need to give it to you willingly or unknowingly. There was one exception to this synopsis, the Feudal System  but there is more to that than people realise, it's a post for a later day and deserves full scrutiny and parrellels do manifest. The support of the home crowd is also needed to win wars. No army has ever been effective fighting under duress, they would assemble, arm  and immediatly turn on you.


Before the current reigning Judeo-Christian Anglo American Empire of today there were other more monolithic empires that the loosely ideologically aligned old money banking dynasties, globalis…

Scientific Consensus is that Consensus is overturned 100% of the time

Everything you know is wrong. There is a very good reason why science succeeds more often than politics does.  Unlike politics, It's not a consensus or a vote,  it's actually method.  The scientific method. Anyone who has read this blog before probably knows I'm a lifelong science junkie as well as someone who spends thousands of hours breaking down the the political and economic agendas behind the special interest groups that guide public policy.  In many ways I'm actually uniquely qualified to tie these angles together in ways not well understood by the overwhelming majority of people.  That actually includes scientists. Scientists are notoriously naive in the political and economic forces that drive the human world.

For example if you are of the opinion that the earth has one moon, the earth revolves around the sun etc you are already wrong. Well sort of. The politicpl world is black and white, the scientific world is nuanced, see http://dwahts.blogspot.com/2018/06…

CO2 is not a pollutant, it is greening the earth!

Whatever your persuasion is on CO² and AGW, nobody disagrees on the tremendous benefit it provides plant life. Many of the past famine disasters and desertification has CO² decline listed as a contributor.

http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2018/04/sheep-science.html?m=1

I feel I've already blown the notion that humans are the main cause of climate change out of the water. Or rather I've used the reasoning of others and put it together in a convenient outline. See my previous post above for starters.  However, I recognize that humans do increase CO² levels, no matter how tiny. Increases are likely to be very short lived because the earth has an effective feedback mechanism, but we can apparently get small increases, and it's been put forward on very poor science that this is a bad thing. That assertion hinges completely on bad models. More on that in the bottom most link.  Model's and the measurement sample dates are dubious at best.


Furthermore, the main increase in CO²  as…