The worst legislation in US history, H Res 758, summary of the problems.

Designed to consolidate the US national position on Russia in order to facilitate the the geopolitical, military and diplomatic action that will be required in the build up to war.



Here is the full PDF document:

https://www.google.co.za/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&ei=s06BVOfGMISrU4XKgOAP&url=http://docs.house.gov/billsthisweek/20141201/hres758_sus_xml%2520-%2520condemning%2520Russian%2520aggression.pdf&ved=0CD4QFjAK&usg=AFQjCNGJgZEITPUw1Prox1KS1Ynrgvt74w&sig2=PJw05n8vMXbf0GHLYnSGYw

A summary of some of the problems copied and pasted from RPI http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2014/december/04/reckless-congress-declares-war-on-russia/

The resolution (paragraph 3) accuses Russia of an invasion of Ukraine and condemns Russia’s violation of Ukrainian sovereignty. The statement is offered without any proof of such a thing. Surely with our sophisticated satellites that can read a license plate from space we should have video and pictures of this Russian invasion. None have been offered. As to Russia’s violation of Ukrainian sovereignty, why isn’t it a violation of Ukraine’s sovereignty for the US to participate in the overthrow of that country’s elected government as it did in February? We have all heard the tapes of State Department officials plotting with the US Ambassador in Ukraine to overthrow the government. We heard US Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland bragging that the US spent $5 billion on regime change in Ukraine. Why is that OK?

The resolution (paragraph 11) accuses the people in east Ukraine of holding “fraudulent and illegal elections” in November. Why is it that every time elections do not produce the results desired by the US government they are called “illegal” and “fraudulent”? Aren’t the people of eastern Ukraine allowed self-determination? Isn’t that a basic human right?

The resolution (paragraph 13) demands a withdrawal of Russia forces from Ukraine even though the US government has provided no evidence the Russian army was ever in Ukraine. This paragraph also urges the government in Kiev to resume military operations against the eastern regions seeking independence.

The resolution (paragraph 14) states with certainty that the Malaysia Airlines flight 17 that crashed in Ukraine was brought down by a missile “fired by Russian-backed separatist forces in eastern Ukraine.” This is simply incorrect, as the final report on the investigation of this tragedy will not even be released until next year and the preliminary report did not state that a missile brought down the plane. Neither did the preliminary report – conducted with the participation of all countries involved – assign blame to any side.

Paragraph 16 of the resolution condemns Russia for selling arms to the Assad government in Syria. It does not mention, of course, that those weapons are going to fight ISIS – which we claim is the enemy -- while the US weapons supplied to the rebels in Syria have actually found their way into the hands of ISIS!

Paragraph 17 of the resolution condemns Russia for what the US claims are economic sanctions (“coercive economic measures”) against Ukraine. This even though the US has repeatedly hit Russia with economic sanctions and is considering even more!

The resolution (paragraph 22) states that Russia invaded the Republic of Georgia in 2008. This is simply untrue. Even the European Union – no friend of Russia – concluded in its investigation of the events in 2008 that it was Georgia that “started an unjustified war” against Russia not the other way around! How does Congress get away with such blatant falsehoods? Do Members not even bother to read these resolutions before voting?

In paragraph 34 the resolution begins to even become comical, condemning the Russians for what it claims are attacks on computer networks of the United States and “illicitly acquiring information” about the US government. In the aftermath of the Snowden revelations about the level of US spying on the rest of the world, how can the US claim the moral authority to condemn such actions in others?

The real story with Israel & Palestine. Regional stabilty & globalisation platform.

Don't look at the region in isolation,  there is a larger game afoot.

Backed by US funding in order to platform the middle eastern globalisation agenda, Israel is taking over what they call Jerusalem, a huge area many, many times larger than the Jerusalem of old. This includes destruction of many Arab villages with Israeli settlers illegally being brought in.

It looks fine on a map in terms of territory, but don't be fooled. Most of what is allocated to Palestine is basically desert. And all of this is separate from what is going on with the gradual takeover of the Jordan Valley lying eastwards.

Let's be clear, Israel has no official policy of directly taking  over land, but they are pushing the same successful policy in cahoots with the USA, doing business in the same way that has been working slowly for a hundred years while they establish military zones.

The Palestinians who live there have to be displaced of course, since since we are talking about a military zone after all. Sure, this may seem to mean no normal settlements are allowed here, but pretty soon there are military settlements which, let's face it,  gradually morph into regular settlements.

This clears the local Arab population as numbers dropped from over 300k in the sixties to not much more than 50k today.  Whoever is left are living as glorified prisoners.

Remember, Israel has no intention of taking over the remaining Palestinian population. Their attitude is that it doesn't matter if they leave voluntarily or stay and die, it's all fine.

This is the reality and it will continue as long as the US funds and supports it.

Forget the two state solution, that's just a perpetual trick that will not materialise as long as the status quo persists.

Once you understand all of this the ridiculous Hamas terror tactics start to become understandle, that is they are if you understood ANC terror tactics in Apartheid South Africa. 

Personally I think Hamas terror tactics are wrong & only serve to justify Israeli/US colonisation.  Another method must be found to stop this ugly pocket of Globalisation in the world.

Financial collapse. Soon. Here's why.

Peter Schiff alone predicted the collapse of Wall Street in 2007 and he did it with all the right reasoning.   This time he is one of a chorus of financial advisers and economists who are absolutely certain of a much larger collapse soon for simelar reasons, all of them based on the phoney system of monetary policy spawned by the Federal Reserve Bank http://youtu.be/--vWo-o3vJ0 here he discusses, in his usual engaging fashion, why we can be so sure.

Who really owns the Fed?

Here is a surprisingly little known secret: 80% ownership of the New York Federal Reserve Bank is by just 8 families.
They are:
•Rothschilds of Paris
•Rothschilds of London
•Goldman Sachs
•Rockefellers,
•Lehmans and Kuhn Loebs of New York
•Warburgs of Hamburg
•Lazards of Paris
•Israel Moses Seifs of Rome.

Furthermore:

10 banks control all twelve Federal Reserve Bank branches:

•N.M. Rothschild of London •Rothschild Bank of Berlin •Warburg Bank of Hamburg •Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
•Lehman Brothers of New York •Lazard Brothers of Paris
•Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York
•Israel Moses Seif Bank of Italy •Goldman Sachs of New York
•JP Morgan Chase Bank of New York.

In addition there are individuals who own large shares of the Fed like William Rockefeller, Paul Warburg, Jacob Schiff and James Stillman (The Schiffs are insiders at Kuhn Loeb. The Stillmans are Citigroup insiders, who married into the Rockefeller clan at the turn of the century)

Now ask yourself, which banks were bailed out with taxpayers money, who lost the homes and mortgages of millions of taxpayers to start with, to the tune of hundreds of billions each after the economic collapse of 2008?

35) Globalisation & Anti-Semitism

By far the worst enemy of Jews that I can see is not anti-semitism as it stands on the surface but rather the cause.  It's this imperial styled Rothschilds Zionism that has laid it's blame through word association and heritage of Jewish family legacy by Mayer Amshel Rothschild (among others) onto Jews in general,  rather that taking accountability themselves.  This is done purposefully in order to hide behind the veil of anti-semitism and they have never been to cocerned about incidental harm they may do for Jewish PR because it works in their favour. The Rothschilds Dynasty developed this blueprint, peaking in the nineteenth century and diversifying and evolving with other heirs like JP Morgan and the Rockerfellers among many others into what it is today.

The US Federal Reserve Bank does not disclose it's shareholders or even allow anyone, including the US President, to be privy to their methods behind monetary policy (or the extent to which it influences other Rothschilds style Central Banks globally). It's difficult to see what strategy the banks have beyound QE (Quantitative Easing) and one could be forgiven for starting to think they are just "Rolling It" for as long as US dollar hegemony can last. These days the seat of influence is no longer carried simply by heirs carrying the names of the great families but there are still key members that are strategically critical in this global financial ponzi scheme. 

Its a biggotted myth that Jews are collectively conspiring against the world. Jews are a more diverse people than most others due to being dispersed worlwide for so long. You can be sure that the Rothschilds Zionist couldn't give a rats ass about the fate of Jews either. 

Rothschilds style Zionists are proponents of what is today called Globalisation. This association with Zionism has somehow wickedly and generically laid blame for it's actions and agenda on Jews and even capitalists in general and a strong case could be made that this has indirectly caused reaction leading to tradegies like the Holocaust and mass killings in Russia and elsewhere. Being called anti-semitic by being anti globalisation is like being called anti Germany just because you don't like Hitler.

The word "Zionism" was originally coined to explain objectives of creating a single Jewish state in Palestine by religious Jews and included the rebuilding of the temple on the site of the Dome of the Rock etc: 1AhUuhbe88DfRi14srj5VZFmb3QmuPEahy Even Religious Zionism is waning from the popularity amongst Jews. Religion may even fall to second place, behind money,  as the essential backstory to all of history. 

In the 1800's the House of Rothschild, among others, were old Jewish money influencers of Kings and countries. They took their name from the germanic translation of the "Red Sheild" crest on their original Frankfurt place of business.  By shrewd purchase of Government bonds and gold after loading the odds with insider information and sway in wars and major historical events, they were able to pioneer the sytem of boom and bust that enabled gobbling up currencies and resources with buy/sell timing that lead to unimaginable wealth and power.

In those days there really was an "Illuminati" of Freemason brotherhood pulling the puppet strings behind the charade of the worlds political stage.

These days  (mostly athiest, capitalistic) Jewish descendant heirs of that group still largely own the central banks of the world  with their new western partners and have found themselves ideologically aligned with the equally aspirational Christian Neoconservative right and Wallstreet Corporate Multinational players to form a new type of Rothschild Styled Zionism or Globalisation. 

This is not about creation of a Jewish State anymore, although if it's required to sustain support from influential Jewish American, European and Israeli quarters it will be persuaded for sure (as an alliance strategy). There can be little doubt that Islam is something none of these people really want or need around beyond having a bogeyman to blame to stoke the fires and bang the war- rhetoric terrorism drums.
Instead, as if opposite to the Zion in "The Matrix" movie series, it involves creation of a single sphere maximum global marketplace (Globalisation) for goods and services based on the Western Capitalist Economic model. In this "movie" the institution is Zion, a World Bank will be increasingly prolific

How will this play out logically?

The economic model involves printing Fiat money for nothing but the cost of paper at central banks, lending to commercial banks at interest who in turn lend to governments and people. Nation States are only necessary in so far as to manage different national identities and to bring into line rogue states that have not yet fallen in line with this maximum marketplace model.

The wealth gap will continue to increase, eroding the middle class and civil rights and liberties will fade in the interests of national security.

Consumers will replace citizens, for profit prisons and militarised police forces will work in synch with mass media owned by those same few corporate interests who weild subtle control not by instruction but by advancing the careers of journalists that tow the line.

Wars will be fought over resources, strategic advantage and installations of the central banking economic model in areas that do not have them in place. Money will always be created by fractional reserve and value based materials like gold whose values are harder to control will never back currencies.  Currencies will be stocks and traders get their info from the media, if you own the media then what you report determines the values of the shares traded (in this case the currency).

So with Fiat money if you control the central banks and the news you control money and governments.

If this Orwellian dystopia sounds far-fetched to you perhaps it's time for you to pull your head out of the sand and take a good look around?

34) The Rothschilds Dynasty influence in History is quite staggering

http://antimatrix.org/Convert/Books/Coleman/Rothschild_Dynasty/Rothschild_Dynasty.htm

Article at link address above:

An absolutely staggering and convincing read that will leave you questioning everything you know about the financial backstory of history being THE definative backstory. 

33) Why are there so many sheeple out there?

I don't care if "Sheeple" is seen a passe term, its the most suitable.

Tell me this scenario hasn't happened to(or is) you: A friend will watch Zeitgeist, or Fahrenheit 911, or some other well researched or convincing expose of the establishment and experience ”Neo” like mini awakening for a few days but won’t go as far as drying off the goo or ripping the cable out of their heads. What I mean by this is: Usually, such people will then proceed to warn everyone that media offers a distorted, most likely malevolently crafted version of reality crafted by their corporate/government masters,  then go on to defend precisely that exact position a few weeks later, the one they warned you about  so passionately just a short while before?

I can only imagine that most peoples only source of knowledge is that same media, very people actually go as far as to independently research.  There is no interest because the sterile version of the news and much of history for that matter is not especially interesting. So, we get bored and go back to the comfort of our consumer culture opiates so well serving of the interests that facilitate the unchallenging society we inhabit.  Soon afterwards a warm and soapy picture that re-enforces our identity as civilised westerner, capitalist defender of the free and liberator of the worlds oppressed peoples by their tyrannical governments.

We don’t like thinking of ourselves as implicated in the crime of the corporate vultures that pollute the environment, exploit the poor, drive the trees and animal species to extinction, fatten the mega rich and influence the media who in turn influence our perception of reality.

These are the same people that are compelled to present the questioner, someone who does not accept the given media reason, as a conspiracy theorist.

Let’s think about that for a second.  In reality the questioner cannot be a theorist unless he has a theory, certainly not if one is just asking why conventional wisdom in news media it does not ring true. 

When did questioning become seen as crackpot, and when did being gullible become noble?

There are conspiracy nuts out there.  They go on about lizard people, illuminati of every variety and secret aliens that rule the earth with their freemason brothers.

How the hell did someone who asks questions about control over the media, a very nefarious and likely prospect, ever get lumped in with a “lizard-people” crowd like that?

I’m not entirely sure to honest, but some genius Spin Doctors out there are doing a hell of a good job to get things to this point, you kinda gotta give it to them….

32) MH17, THE ONLY FACTS

MH17, THE FACTS
• IT’s most likely that Either the US/EU backed Ukraine Nazis or the PRO Russian Separatists shot down the plane
• The US Backs and funds Al Qaeda and Kiev but accepts no responsibility for their terrorist actions even against the US itself it blames Al Qaeda.
• If US/EU backed forces of Kiev shot down the plane, oh well.. what a pity…
• The plane was ordered over a war zone and ordered to drop altitude to missile range by KIEV, FACT
• Russia backs PRO Russian separatists, not terrorists, who are simply fighting not to part of a Western Puppet state, exercising basic human rights for autonomy/alignment with Russia.
• If Russian backed forces shot down the plane GET RUSSIA, SANCTIONS, BAD RUSSIA, ALL PUTINS FAULT

But, wait, they are going ahead with sanctions anyway….

Hold on, they don’t have the evidence yet you say?

That’s fine, go back and watch your TV, there’s nothing fishy going on here folks, right?

31) How does the criminal banking global empire affect South Africa?

The South African economy certainly does not exist in Isolation. Our economic fate and the strength of our currency are intimately intertwined with the US dollar and the Euro. It’s much deeper even than that due to the alignment with the practices of the US Federal Reserve and the South African Reserve bank, the two are old chums that go back almost to their mutual inception. Furthermore, most of Africa, Asia and South America have great difficulty making World Bank and IMF loan repayments due to interest rates and designer terms which often results in these Nations  exchanging the debt for civil infrastructure contracts and other positioning agreements designed to give controlling influence over an emerging counties natural wealth and resources, a practice which poses serious risk of keeping that country permanently economically enslaved.

One Political party, UBUNTU, has recognised this and made its main campaign focus for the next elections the issue of fundamental corruption entrenched in South Africa’s financial institution and has some radical ideas for reform. 

It’s good to see that society is beginning to acknowledge the problem and it's really worth taking a look at the UBUNTU website here: http://www.ubuntuparty.org.za/2014/05/only-banking-reform-can-save-south.html

30) How America Exports Inflation - Explained in Ten Easy Steps

How America Exports Inflation - Explained in Ten Easy Steps by Greg Simon from the excellent website  www.knowmadiclife.com

1. American people buy stuff they don’t need from Chinese company with money they don’t have on US bank credit card. 
2. US Bank creates new US dollars out of thin air by creating debt for American people and giving US dollars to Chinese company.
3. New debt stays in America while new US dollars leave America.
4. Chinese company takes new US dollars to Chinese central bank and exchanges for Chinese RMB. 
5. Chinese central bank prints new Chinese RMB out of thin air to give to Chinese company in exchange for US dollars. 
6. Chinese central bank puts US dollars in a vault out of circulation. 
7. New US dollar’s are out of circulation, not impacting market value of existing US dollars and therefore not impacting US dollar price inflation. 
8. New Chinese RMB are in circulation, negatively impacting value of existing Chinese RMBs causing Chinese RMB price inflation to rise. 
9. US dollar value remains artificially high while Chinese RMB value declines.
10. American people and Chinese people are poorer. US bank, Chinese company and Chinese central bank are wealthier. 

29) Remember how WRONG they all were?

Click on the link below to read the article printed with permission from RT on the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity

Read how Bush, Blair , Rumsfeld and Co got it wrong then and why they, along with the new batch of corporate puppet politicians will GET IT WRONG AGAIN AND AGAIN.

When are we going to stop listening to these people?

Iraq: The Things Warmongers Said

written by neil clark

READ THE ARTICLE HERE

28) Understand why the BRICS initiative is a potential game-changer

I’m sure when the ongoing talks of the BRICS nations new world banking plans appears on the local news stations of the participating nations, the potential gravity of the initiative is not fully grasped by the participating public in the nations of Russia, China, Brazil, India and South Africa.  What I am sure of is how seriously the western dollar based banker controlled community, the most powerful community in the world, is taking this initiative.  The BRICS nations represent 40% of the world’s population and believe it or not they have currencies with more fundamental intrinsic value than the current standard global trade currency, the US dollar.

Make no mistake about it, the plan is a direct challenge to the World Bank and the IMF, the current powerhouses of world finance and puppets of the western banks that pull their strings.

The Dollar has had its  value propped up and subsidised by desperate US initiatives of parasitic investment, control of resources by war, the resulting fuel subsidy, exchange rate subsidy, exchange of debt via outsourcing civil infrastructure and most importantly - the fundamentally corrupt banking practices.  That value is unsustainable, even by military threat if the economic weapons are removed by a competing sphere of influence.  This initiative, along with decentralised crypto currency could be the geneses of a solution to nasty spectre cast over the developing world community by the greasy fossil fuel burning corporate dollar monsters than have the US government so deeply in their pockets.  I’t good to see the genesis of possible future solutions arriving on the horizon, but one wonders if means will not be found by endlessly resourcefully current world order to marginalise these endeavours? 

Click here for the history and structure of BRICS: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BRICS  

27) Dick Cheney wants more war, says Iran is developing the nuke.

Dick Cheney creates "Alliance for Stronger America" warns (as he did incorrectly before with Iraq in 2002) than Iran, who he says is housing Al Qaeda, is marching towards a nuclear weapon, something needs to be done to stop them.

He says Syria is a training ground for Islamic Militants and is the most dangerous place in the world for America, so the US are increasing their funding to Al Qaeda in Syria.

Wait...... hold on?????

Oh sorry, I meant "Rebels" in Syria.....

Read here: http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/neocon-watch.aspx