Many people are mysteriously still harboring under the misguided delusion that western mainstream media provides news rather than propaganda that can be financially linked to the establishment mainstays, and I'd like to propose that those of you who fall into that category need a wake up call.
Make important points with fun pics!
At the end of the day, there is no better endorsement than knowing how much time Hillary Clinton, the wicked witch of the west, spent being a groupie during her days heading the State Department as Secretary Of State http://sputniknews.com/us/20151102/1029499902/hillary-clinton-email-leak-rt.html Cut your losses, take the knock now rather than swallowing a larger and infinitely more bitter pill later on. I am not suggesting that Russian TV is bias free, I simply would like to weigh in on the most important geopolitical events in the last five years and compare the calls made AS EVENTS WERE GOING DOWN, with how they turned out afterwards. This is the only barometer of caliber that I can conceivably base a logically reasonable case on. This simple exercise will reveal a conclusion I leave the reader to draw by themselves..... Libya, NATO's most dramatic blunder, a destroyed nation and terrorist hotbed:
What is globalization?A complex system of interacting factors.
What is globalization? It's the opposite of the global village where we all communicate for next to no cost, share information and eradicate poverty in a near Utopian state of being civilized. Globalization is what used to known as Rothschild Zionism, or colonialism in the name of the crown, which was owned by Rothschild but due to anti Semitic religious attitudes at the time, colonialism was the palatable smokescreen that the local British population would culturally tolerate. Indigenous populations at the time had no votes so they were victims of genocide.
We got enslavement rather than becoming civilized, because as we globalized, power was centralized and controlled by fewer and fewer.
It's a complex system, and hard to find coherent engineering unless you understand that the few consistent principles applied only as loose co-operation, by mandate of international institution policy or, when things don't go as planned, by intervention by those at the very top of the pyramid.
Unless you understand this MO it all appears to complex, to much "conspiracy" and not enough "Occams Razor". Once you understand that major global institutions were set up to service this agenda you realize it requires no engineering. The system runs itself. The establishment is established.
Lets deconstruct: Who is really benifitting and who is losing out?
What else is globalization? It's not a natural outcome of modern living in a shrinking finite environment. Contrary to popular belief, It's actually the opposite of the "Global Village" we were sold. You know, the global village where we all communicate for next to no cost, have freedom, liberty and dignity and share information freely. Where we eradicate poverty for once and for all in a near Utopian state of being civilized.
On the other hand, "Globalization" is what used to be known as Rothschild Zionism (the opposite of Judaism), or its front name once used by the old Rothschild's employees like Cecil John Rhodes, JP Morgan, Paul Warburg and even Lenin, It was often sold as colonialism in the name of the crown, the Crown was basically financed by Rothschild but due to anti Semitic religious attitudes at the time Colonialism was the palatable smokescreen that the local British population would culturally tolerate. Indigenous populations at the time had no votes so they were victims of genocide.
I have news for you. We got shortchanged. We got an imperceptibly slow process of (again, at the risk of sounding dramatic) enslavement rolled out rather than becoming civilized, because as we globalized, power was centralized and controlled by fewer and fewer. It;s getting to the critical point where we all begin to notice the pressure cooker beginning to peak. That's all of us, not just the citizens of the already fallen cities, such as Detroit.
I use certain principles to predict the outcome of geopolitical and economic affairs all the time, and if you ask anyone that knows me you'll find I almost never get it wrong, no matter how absurd and sensational my calls are when shit goes down initially.
For a crude guide, the principles that underpin globalization are:
2) Divide & Conquer featured as the angle of choice in media. Black/White
Democrat/Republican Muslim/Jew Russia/West you name it
This Rhetoric smokescreens the real enemy, so to speak, and can be defined simply as those that take away from the vast majority that have so little and where a case can be made for such interests causing
mass death and suffering to the vast majority where the financially disenfranchised cant exclude it, arguably in exchange for greed, since they have so much already.
3) Central Bankster Economic smoke and mirrors: Sell Price fixing as free market. Pass Crony Capitalism as Free Market Capitalism: The Petro-dollar: Trade oil in dollars. Have international trade in dollar hegemony. Link the major global currencies to the dollar, then once achieved, in an act of violation of the good faith agreement, ambush the world remove the dollar from a check and balance system. This happened in 1971
When Bretton Woods removed the gold standard. The Fed now peddles a fiat system that achieves devaluation Keynesian style and use a trickle down wall street mantra of fiat money printing, QE and other devices which will, by design keep the money from the peasants.
4) Globalization of War and Perpetual War: Remove the populations money via taxation and send to a seemingly justifiable military cause. Finance arms via military industrial complex linked blue chip companies. Subjugate nations militarily that resist the agenda.
5) Use Technology to spy, manipulate markets and search engines, media and craft public public sentiment or zeitgeist
6) Globalization Of Agriculture. Same Multinationals from Oil, Media and Banking Shareholder arrangements to control the worlds food supply rather than feed the world. Control Water and Land resources.
7) Boost lobby, in particular the BIg Pharma lobby, for complex reason.
8) Destroy entrepreneurs in favour of creating employees, destroy unions and labor bargaining power Privatize Prisons and maximise the minority population behind bars paid for by public tax earning profit for Prison Inc, eliminate mom and pop operations and get big Multinationals to franchise disenfranchisement. Gene patent farming to eliminate family owned farms so that Monsanto types can turn them into employees, ultimately earning minimum wage, like peasants. Feudalistic method.
The principles that underpin globalisation are:
1) Own the media http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2015/09/the-slippery-slope-how-big.html
2) Divide and conquer featured as the angle of choice in media. Black/White
Democrat/Republican Muslim/Jew Russia/West you name it
This Rhetoric smokescreens the real enemy, so to speak, that means those that take away from the vast majority that have so little and
cause mass death and suffering to the vast majority in exchange for greed, since they have so much already.
3) Petro-dollar: Trade oil in dollars. Have international trade in dollar hegemony. Link the major global currencies to the dollar,
then remove the dollar from a check and balance system. This happened in 1971
When Bretton Woods removed the gold standard. The Fed now peddles a fiat system that achieves devaluation Keynesian style and trickle down
economics, QE etc keep the money from the peasants
4) False Flags and Perpetual War: Engineer terrorist threats or fake attacks on own people to justify common enemies as war pretext and for proxy wars. Create mythical dictators to export democracy to nations whose resources are coveted. Facilitate this cost by removing tax money and send to a military cause. Finance arms via military industrial complex linked blue chip companies. Subjugate
nations militarily that resist the agenda.
5) Eliminate Liberty in exchange for security, Patriot act etc. Use Technology to spy, manipulate markets and search engines, media and craft public public sentiment or zeitgeist
6) Globalization of agriculture. Control the worlds food supply rather than feed the world.
7) Boost lobby, in particular the BIg Pharma lobby, for complex reason. Make for profit medicines and vaccines mandatory. Privatize all Govt functions gradually.
8) Destroy entrepreneurs in favor of creating employees, destroy unions and labor bargaining power Privatize Prisons and maximize the minority population behind bars paid for by public tax earning profit for Prison Inc, eliminate mom and pop operations and get big Multinationals to franchise disenfranchisement. Gene patent farming to eliminate family owned farms so that Monsanto types can turn them into employees, ultimately earning minimum wage, like peasants. Feudalistic method.
9) Mop up the collateral with increasingly militarized Police, and ultimately, after global war or a major event, FEMA CAMPS
10) Eliminate competing global models, like Russia and China
It's no secret that the Feds little cousin, the SARB runs financially unsound monetary policy. Furthermore, it engages and manages the government in a corrupt and unethical way. The global bankster-owned establishment which parades as a part public shareholder owned enterprise (unlike its US counterpart) is little more than a local branch office of, let's face it, Evil Incorporated. Perhaps that's seeming at the risk of being a little dramatic but for reading purposes, drama does no harm to banking matters in the interest department. And yes, I spent ages setting up that last pun...
We'll see how well Putin and BRICS do wooing government away from this reserve bank lot, because in the end it boils down to the same crowd behind Anglo, De Beers and Lonmin and the major players who have themselves mined SA's mineral wealth AND (basically) shipped it to themselves and their holding companies. We already know BRICS was too late for Trevor Manual.
Meanwhile I strongly urge you to read this gutting expose by former SARB director Stephen Goodsen where he not only reveals the corrupt core of South Africa's Central Bank, but more stunning revelations on the biggest crime in the history of the country, Project Hammer, where SAs people were robbed of thousands of tons of gold to prop up Americas failing banks like Citibank, JP Morgan and and the boys, right up to 1989, with former president FW De Klerk the biggest offender, and it would not even surprise me if the murder of FWs wife was somehow related, but theres no evidence for that.
Police attempt to arrest SARB former Director turned Whistle-blower but fail.
Banknotes: Always autographed but inexpressive and passionless.
Reserve Bank Shareholders have no say or role other than as a signature to help the organisation pose as if it were an accountable pvt company.
Just misunderstood? Two harmless looking old gentlemen...
If you believe that Bill Gates is the wealthiest person on the planet, congratulations, you've been had! The truth is, he isn't even close. The horrific figures that Bernie Sanders has been quoting all over the United States campaign trail are also FAAAAAAR too optimistic. Why? Because the richest people in the world are so much richer than Bill Gates, there is simply no chance their wealth will ever be made public. This is not a guess. Lets deconstruct a few aspects.
Most overtly, It's common knowledge that the Federal Reserve bank in the US not audited, and that simply one undisclosed source of wealth, apart from undeclared historic heritage blended into the wealth ethernet of properties, offshore funds hidden by Swiss banks and complex shareholder arrangements.
I strongly suggest reading my post from a while back where I reveal who owns the Fed, this was accurate at the time despite it not being publically declared.
To be fair, artistic license was used to make these chaps look friendlier.
First, the official story:
In January 2014, Oxfam announced that the richest 85 people on the planet share a combined wealth of $110 trillion. The figure was based on Forbes’s rich list 2013, and it equates to 65 times the total wealth of the entire bottom half (3.5 billion) of the world’s population. While some deluded commentators welcomed this as “fantastic news,” the rest of us were disgusted. Winnie Byanyima, Oxfam’s executive director, said at the time: “It is staggering that in the 21st Century, half of the world’s population own no more than a tiny elite whose numbers could all fit comfortably on a double-decker bus.”
Two months later, following Oxfam’s calculation and having published the new 2014 rich list, Forbes journalist Kasia Morena did some fact-checking. She found that the number of billionaires owning the same as the poorest 3.5 billion had dropped from 85 to 67: which demonstrates an enormous widening of the global inequality gap in just one year.
Don't let the handsome, welcoming face fool you. He's not nice as he looks.
Fast-forward to 2015, and another Oxfam investigation. The anti-poverty charity warned in January that if nothing is done to tackle global wealth inequality- by forcing corporations to pay their taxes and closing off-shore tax havens, for example- JUst based on the under-declared bogus figures, the richest 1% will own more than everybody else in the world combined by 2016. In a paper called Wealth: Having it all and wanting more, Oxfam outlined how the richest 1 percent have seen their share of global wealth increase from 44% in 2009 to 48% in 2014, and will likely surpass 50% in 2016. Winnie Byanyima again warned that the explosion in inequality is holding back the fight against global poverty at a time when one in nine people do not have enough to eat, and more than a billion people still live on less than $1.25 a day.
The organization also outlined how 20 percent of billionaires around the world have interests in the financial and insurance sectors, a group that saw their cash wealth increase by 11 percent in the last 12 months. Billionaires listed as having interests in the pharmaceutical and healthcare sectors saw their collective net worth increase by 47 percent, and the industry spent more than $500 million lobbyingpolicy makers in Washington and Brussels in 2013 alone.
“Do we really want to live in a world where the one percent own more than the rest of us combined?” Byanyima asked. “The scale of global inequality is quite simply staggering, and despite the issues shooting up the global agenda, the gap between the richest and the rest is widening fast.”
Bill Gates, richest of all the peasants, but still a bit backwards, making money from "Sales" lol.
Here is Forbes’s (real-time) list of the 66 billionaires who (officially) own half of all global assets, and will soon own more than the rest of Earth’s seven billion populationcombined. They range from CEOs of large corporations to oil and gas tycoons and Silicon valley entrepreneurs. The list details name, net worth, percentage change since the 2015 results, their age, industry and nationality.BillGatesis ranked first at $469 billion, and James Simons at #66 with the $14 billion he made from hedge funds.
But where are the world’s Royal families? And more to the point, where are the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers? These two families have an unimaginable amount of wealth that surpasses the trillion mark- they are the only trillionaires in the world, and yet they are missing from Forbes’s list every single year, along with the handful of other men commonly believed to own our politicians, our media, our corporations, our scientists, and even our money supply.
If you want to understand how we got here, I lay it all out for you in my easy to follow series covering the financial backstory of history, THE ESSENTIAL backstory to history.
I've researched many groups opposed to the state of affairs in the world, and I have realized that you can expect neither perfection, nor complete coherency from any of them. Its not something you can expect from the experts either, we are all human, we all get things wrong, but some of us get most things right.
This is why Id like to single out "Anonymous" as an excellent example that a grassroots, self organizing operation can aspire to be an effective and organised force against oppression in today's world. The group focuses on many social issues but what makes them unique is that they connect the dots, at least they do at their HQ, which does not exist... Are you picking up what I'm putting down? Their contributors at the very least understand the issues that they each tackle separately and its all put together under a fierce brand that has its finger on the pulse of today's Zeitgeist.
Perhaps most importantly, ANONYMOUS CAN HIT BACK. They are big guns in the hacking community and in today's climate this is true power. When Paypal banned them from their transaction services they brought them down temporarily. They brought down countless child pornography sites PERMANENTLY and exposed their clients as well as countless KKK members. When the CIA passed snide remarks they BROUGHT DOWN THE CIA systems. After Sony instituted legal actions against hackers, Anonymous brought them down for a week and cost them 3.2 Billion dollars I could go on and on.
You can find a link to their HQ site on the right hand side of this blog, and below are a few powerful and slick media presentations to give you a taste of how they get their message out there. Don't fall into the trap of cherry picking an article or two that one of their contributors may pen that you feel is a bit off the mark, they typically are not. Focus rather on the amazing feat that they have accomplished of understanding, organizing and intimidating the establishment. Support them, encourage them, they are us.
Summing it all up
Singling out members of the elite to punish, which they/we did.
The ridiculous Attempts by Benjamin Netanyahu to make the word "Israeli" synonymous with the word "Jew" is not as benign a gesture as it seems on the surface and its insulting and divisive to countries with Jewish communities that consider them as citizens, and its not going to win him the support he's looking for. It's a cheap stunt to garner allegiance from from the increasingly cynical international Jewish community. Nobody elected him spokesman for the world's Jews, and its people like him who consistently frustrate bloggers like me who try to get around the diversion of race, creed, religion, nationalism and culture to get to the REAL issues and motives of the decision makers.
Noam Chomsky, son of a Ukrainian-born Ashkenazi Jew who had fled to the United States in 1913, talks frankly on on the History of Israel and Palestine No nation state in the world that seeks to entirely avoid secular multiculturalism has a future, at least a small degree of comrimise is needed, not full london melting pot, just a reasonable comprimise, that will eventually include Israel as well as the Arab monarchies. Its no coincidence that both these groups are US stooges, or the other way around depending on how you look at it... Norman Finkelstein echoes my sentiments towards the end of the clip below:
Finkelstein: Netanyahu is a maniac!
Israel is ideologically a racist apartheid state, you go go by government direction, regarldless of whether not all citizens agree, end of story. It's no matter of debate, it just is true. Let's start with the Law Of Return, allowing historic Jews to return to their "Homeland" Link below: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/mar/11/israel-return-jews-palestinians Besed on the evidence it would appear this is achieved by REMOVING PALESTINIANS BORN THERE FROM THEIR HOMELAND! To make way for some perceived historical birthright based on race, creed or religion depending on who is doing the justifying. None of those flies in 2015 right? Excuse me, but what a crock of shit. Besides this, what about the fact that most settlers in Israel were not Israelites in the biblical sense, but in fact they are Khazars. They are from a country once called called Khazaria, which occupied the land locked between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea which is now predominantly occupied by Georgia. The Khazars, under the instruction of the King, converted to the Jewish faith in 740 A.D. You will find, in fact, that the vast majority of people in the world today who call themselves Jews are actually Khazars, or as they like to be known, Ashkenazi Jews. Regarding the land of Israel being theirs by birthright, well that's blown out of the water because in actual fact their real homeland is over 800 miles away in Georgia. There are other such examples of this sort of thing invalidating attempts to justify apartheid colonialism based on historical claims.
In reality this is a moot point because It shouldn't matter, but its a useful counter. In the absence of further settlement and once we see legal equality and dignity return then Israeli's today should be allowed to live in peace there, and Palestinians should be allowed to join them. End of story, full inclusion for both parties, no BS 2 State Solution which is nothing more than a creeping death tactic. But lets take a step back, don't look at the region in isolation, there is a larger game afoot.
Backed by US funding in order to platform the middle eastern globalization agenda, Israel is taking over what they call Jerusalem, a huge area many, many times larger than the Jerusalem of old. This includes destruction of many Arab villages with Israeli settlers illegally being brought in.
It looks fine on a map in terms of territory, but don't be fooled. Most of what is allocated to Palestine is basically desert. And all of this is separate from what is going on with the gradual takeover of the Jordan Valley lying eastwards.
Let's be clear, Israel has no official policy of directly taking over land, but they are pushing the same successful policy in cahoots with the USA, doing business in the same way that has been working slowly for a hundred years while they establish military zones.
The Palestinians who live there have to be displaced of course, since since we are talking about a military zone after all. Sure, this may seem to mean no normal settlements are allowed here, but pretty soon there are military settlements which, let's face it, gradually morph into regular settlements.
This clears the local Arab population as numbers dropped from over 300k in the sixties to not much more than 50k today. Whoever is left are living as glorified prisoners.
Human Rights watch concurs: https://www.rt.com/news/329622-israel-settlements-businesses-hrw/ Remember, Israel has no intention of taking over the remaining Palestinian population. Their attitude is that it doesn't matter if they leave voluntarily or stay and die, it's all fine.
This is the reality and it will continue as long as the US funds and supports it.
Forget the two state solution, that's just a perpetual trick that will not materialize as long as the status quo persists.
Violence is never an option civilized people want as a solution, but there is a difference between, a mugger and defending yourself against one. If you cherry pick the incidents of violence unwarranted by Palestinians against Israelis out of the context I've just framed it paints a mischievous and false picture. Mainstream media should be held to account for this. Once you understand all of this, the Hamas terror tactics that are represented as tit-for-tat by mainstream media, start to become understandable, that is they are in a way if you understood ANC resistance tactics in the old South Africa.
Personally I think Hamas terror tactics are wrong but since the international community is not helping what are they meant to do? MEdia reports on violence from both sides, which serves indirectly to represent it as a "wash" as if both sides are wrong, which will only serve to justify Israeli/US colonization. Another method must be found to stop this ugly pocket of Globalization in the world. In my opinion that method will involve pressure from Israelis and Jews globally, the US citizens demanding the government cease all support to Israel immediately and possibly apply sanctions, and the citizens of the world forcing change in a similar way that they did to the Apartheid Regime in South Africa last century. In South Africa today, while there is much discontent about the ruling class, and pockets of racism and entitlement in all communities, overall its a society that does generally tolerate other races, religions and cultures.
