From Pussy-Riot To The Arab Spring, The Wests Propaganda War Against Russia.

.

.

...

Globalist groups such as the Tri-Lateral Commission work towards the ultimate goal of integrating all nations into a single European Union style monetary and political system. (Pictured are TC founding members Brzezinski, Kissinger, & Rockefeller)

.

.

.

.

.

.

Zbigniew Brzezinski's 1998 book "The Grand Chess Board" openly calls for the US/Globalist domination of Central Asia. "Zbig" is a strong advocate of the subversive strategy known as "Soft Power."

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

2004: Harvard professor and Tri-Lateral big shot Joseph Nyeauthors "Soft Power."  As opposed to "Hard Power" (war, bombing etc), Nye's 'Soft Power" advocates more subtle strategies for subverting and overturning those foreign governments not under Globalist control.  "Soft Power" funds, promotes, and guides internal "opposition groups" or "human rights activists" or "pro democracy groups" or "dissidents" as they destablize a targeted country. Puppets are to then placed at the head of the overthrown government.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The "Orange Revolution" of Ukraine is a case of  "Soft Power" in which US Globalists  manage to temporarily install an anti - Russian US puppet.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Heavily funded by George Soros, the phony "Rose Revolution" is a clear case of "Soft Power".  The US armed Georgia will later start (and lose) a military conflict with Russia in 2008.

.

.

.

.

.

..

.

.

.

The "Arab Spring" is a more recent example of CIA orchestrated phony "Soft Power" revolutions.

.

.

..

.

.

.

.
November 2007: In a speech before military cadets, Russian Prime Minister Putin speaks out against the dangers of Globalism: "Some people are constantly insisting on the necessity to divide up our country and are trying to spread this theory......There are those who would like to build a unipolar world, who would themselves like to rule all of humanity."
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Because Putin is against waging war on Iran and Syria, and also because he opposses the Global consolidation of power under what he calls "the Uni Polar World", Putin is often vilified in the Western Globalist press.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Only recently a total unknown, Barack Obama's political career was assisted greatly by Globalist Billionaire and "Soft Power" specialist George Soros. Like the Bush Team before it, the Obama administration will continue waging "Soft War" against Russia.

.

.

..

.

.

.

.

Chess Grand Master turned anti-Putin street agitator, Gary Kasparov is a Soft Power agent of the West. He is pictured at left with Arch Globalist Tri-Lateralist Lord Jacob Rothschild.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

By supporting independent Iran's right to pursue peaceful nuclear energy, Putin's Russia has greatly upset BOTH the Globalist and the Zionist power factions of the West.

.

.

.

. 

.

.

.

June 2012: Putin visits Israel and tells the warmongering Prime Minister Netanyahu face-to-face that Russia will not support an attack upon Iran. Netanyahu and the American Israel Lobby are eager to start a major war of Israeli expansion in the Middle East. Iran's NON-EXISTANT nuclear weapons program is only a phony pretext.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill is a strong supporter of Putin. He regards Putin as "a miracle from God" who saved "Mother Russia" from collapse and disintegration.

.

.

.

.

Patriarch Kirill of the Russian Orthodox Church supports Syria's President Assad. Assad, whose own government is under assault by a Western media propaganda campaign and CIA backed "rebels", is strongly supported by the Orthodox Christian community of Syria. The imported Syrian "rebels" have been known to carry out atrocities which the press then blames on Assad.
.
.

Putin & Berlusconi were good friends.

Italy's Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi enjoys a very close friendship with Putin. The two even host each other on vacations. Berlusconi's support of Putin angers the Globalists, and is ridiculed in the press as a "special relationship" and a "romance". In 2011, Berlusconi is muscled out of power and replaced by a glorified technocrat named Mario Monti. "Super Mario" as the propaganda press dubs him, is also head of the Tri-Lateral Commission's European branch. Of course, Monti soon declares Italy's support for "regime change" in Syria, a key ally of Russia.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The US taxpayer funded "National Endowment for Democracy" is one of several American "Soft Power" (CIA) destabilization groups (known as Non-Governmental Organizations /NGO's) operating in Russia. Among their many grant recipients is a Russian "art collective" known as "Voina" (Russian for War).

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Oleg Vorotnikov is the charismatic leader and "Chief Strategist" (CIA?) of "Voina". He exerts a Charles Manson-like mind control over the foolish young women of his Anarchist "art collective." Vorotnikov has been arrested and released numerous times, once for punching a police officer.

.

.

.

.

.

American tax dollars at work.

.

.

.

The mentally deranged members of "Voina" specialize in staging shocking acts of public indecency. In a grocery store aisle, "Voina" films one of its members as she shoves a whole chicken carcass up her vagina, then walks out without paying as only the chicken's head dangles from her vagina!

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

One of the group's "works of art" features Communist leader Lenin replacing the head of Jesus. Voina's members are admitted Marxists and Anarchists with an extreme intolerance for Christianity.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

"Voina" member (and future leader of "Pussy Riot") Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, covers her naked body in large cockroaches. In another action, this same stunt was done in front of a pre-school.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The vandals of Voina paint a massive penis on the road of a draw bridge. Police try to stop "Voina" from raising the bridge, but they are then sprayed with urine that was prepared in advance. When the draw bridge raises, the huge penis is visible to all.

.

.

.

.

.

"Voina" Anarchists (including Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, the future leader of "Pussy Riot") have group sex in a public museum! Amazingly, they were NOT arrested for this act.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

"Voina" members go out of their way to violently confront police so that they can then claim that their "human rights" have been violated..

.

.

.

.
.
.
"Voina" Anarchists overturn a police car.
.
.
.

.

Female members of "Voina" form a "Feminist Punk Band" called "Pussy Riot" (after the vulgar term for a certain part of the female anatomy). The troubled young cult members have no musical skills, and do not produce any albums nor singles. Their act consists solely of donning masks and screaming obsceneties towards President Putin and Patriarch Kirill as they strum on guitars that they know not how to even play. Yet, the western media continues to describe them as a "Punk Rock band."

.

.

.

.

.

Flashback to 1931: The Christ the Savior Cathedral in Moscow was demolished during the Stalin / Kaganovich persecution of Christianity. It was the grandest Cathedral in all of Russia.

.

.

.

.

.
.
After the fall of Communism, private donations were raised and the historic Cathedral was rebuilt. Because of its history, the rebuilt Cathedral has special cultural and historic significance to Russia.
.
.

The girl on the left appears to be pointing an imaginary gun at the worshippers.

.

.

.

As a gang of "Voina" members film and blast music in the Cathedral, four other deranged masked feminists storm the altar of the cherished Cathedral and begin screaming that Putin is "Shit! Shit! The Lord's shit"  and that Patriarch Kirill is a "bitch". Their "Punk Prayer" song also urges Mother Mary to"become a feminist." Priests, nuns, and worshippers look on in stunned disbelief as their cherished Cathedral is desecrated and their Patriarch mocked.

.

.

The demented little whores seem happy about going to jail!

.

.

Three of the girls are captured and charged with "hooliganism with the intent of inciting religious hatred." Throughout their trial, the remorseless "Pussy Riot" girls smirk and laugh in between their political commentaries. In consideration of their past conduct, acts of vandalism, continued public defiance, and total lack of any remorse, they are sentenced to two years in jail. They will likely be rich when they get out.

.

.

.

Turning The Tide

My third "Syria By Syrians" Post (See http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/p/syria.html)

A poignant contrast of fortunes wit these photographs above from today, 22 Feb 2016, and the ones below from just yesterday. Above (uploaded by Samiah Assade and Ghassan Al-Assad from Damascus, Syria.) shows the liberation of a thermal power plant in Eastern Aleppo by the SAA from desperate and defeated terrorists just a day after the people of Homs faced the horrific bombings as shown in the photographs below. 

The tide is clearly turning in Syria, and my hope is that their victory can offer some momentum globally to any nation faced with mischief and meddling from the dark and shadowy hand of external influence and their presstitute media yes men.

With Turkish and Saudi Arabian forces massing on the border and mixed signals coming from the US (never a good sign) the future is far from certain, but this series of victories will hearten the local population and surely help in some way with any future challenges they may face. 

  

Mohsen Abdelmoumen Interviews DR Brandon Turbeville. The Connections Between The US & Daesh Are there For All To See.

For more by Mohsen Abdelmoumen see this dedicated page on my blog: http://www.dwahts.blogspot.co.za/#!http://dwahts.blogspot.com/p/articles-in-french.html

Who is Brandon Turbeville?

Brandon Turbeville is an author and a writer who resides in Florence, South Carolina. He is –article archive here – the author of seven books, Codex Alimentarius — The End of Health Freedom, 7 Real Conspiracies, Five Sense Solutions and Dispatches From a Dissident, volume 1 and volume 2,The Road to Damascus: The Anglo-American Assault on Syria, andThe Difference it Makes: 36 Reasons Why Hillary Clinton Should Never Be President. Brandon joined Anti-Media’s team as an independent journalist in July of 2014. He has written over 700 articles dealing with the Middle East, Geopolitics, Syria, Economics, Health, government corruption, and Civil Liberties. Turbeville has been interviewed by a number of media outlets in the alternative media as well as the independent and mainstream. He has been interviewed by PRESS TV, al-Etejah, FOX, ITAR-TASS, LPR, and Sputnik International.Brandon Turbeville’s radio show Truth on The Tracks can be found every Monday night 9 pm EST at UCYTV.

His website is BrandonTurbeville.com.

Published in American Herald Tribune, February 16, 2016:http://ahtribune.com/politics/519-brandon-turbeville-daesh.html

In Oximity:https://www.oximity.com/article/Brandon-Turbeville-The-connections-bet-1

Mohsen Abdelmoumen: Do you think that the agreement on a ceasefire in Syria that the US has got to Russia is not intended to give a new breath the terrorist groups to enable them to reorganize, but also to erase the traces of links between the United States and Daesh? Some information from various intelligence sources reveal that Daesh elements were exfiltrated further to Russian bombardments, what do you think?

Brandon Turbeville: I think the major reason behind the ceasefire was an attempt on the part of the Western powers, particularly the United States, to buy time for the terrorists in Syria who are now on the run because of the Russian assistance being provided to the SAA. The connections between the United States and Daesh are there for all to see – from the “ineffective” bombing campaign, the links between virtually all other groups fighting against the Syrian government to al-Qaeda and Daesh, and the leaked DIA documents that revealed the creation of a “Salafist principality” was actually the desire of the U.S. and its allies. So simply eliminating specific elements of the terrorist groups would not necessarily erase the clear connections between the United States and Daesh. Remember, Daesh is merely the progression of a series of name changes made by al-Qaeda and al-Nusra, not some mystery army that appeared in the middle of the desert without warning.

It is true enough that allowing groups designated as ISIS proper to be eradicated might satisfy the curiosity of some but it would also eliminate the justification for direct American involvement in Syria also and it is not likely that the NATO powers want to see that happen. Also remember, this is a pattern we have seen since the Syrian military began launching a series of successful counter-offensives a few years ago and even more so since the Russian involvement. By this I mean that, whenever the terrorists (call them what you will – “ISIS,” “Nusra,” or “moderate rebels,”) begin to gain ground, the Western powers scream for Assad to step down. Then, there is no negotiation. But, when the Syrian military gains ground, we hear incessant calls for “peace” and “ceasefires.”

How you explain the commitment in Syria of the Saudi army which is massacring in all impunity in Yemen in full sight of the planet. Don’t you think that Saudi Arabia sends reinforcement to Daesh?

Of course Saudi Arabia sends reinforcements to Daesh! Saudi Arabia has been one of the main financial backers of the group long before it was named “ISIS” in the Western media. Saudi Arabia has long been known as a major financial backer, supporter, and commander of terrorism. As far as their commitment to Syria, I would suggest that any direct Saudi or, for that matter, Qatari forces inside Syria are no more than decoys and proxy deterrents for the Russians and Syrians. The whole world has seen that Saudi Arabia and Qatar are paper tigers when it comes to military force. Neither country would stand a chance against any opponent in the Syrian theatre. But they can function as a state actor on the ground that would justify greater NATO involvement if bombed by the Russians or the Syrians. The Gulf forces would thus be much more than mere reinforcements for ISIS and other related terror organizations. They would be “untouchables” committing acts of war against Syria, supporting terrorists, and daring the Russians or Syrians to hit them with the possible repercussions being an American or NATO military response.

You mentioned 36 reasons why Hillary Clinton should not be president. No more than 36? How do you explain the mediocrity of the presidential debates?

There were many more than 36 but, at some point, a book has to come to an end if it is to be released before the primary elections which was the goal. By far, Hillary Clinton is the most odious Presidential candidate in the race. Her ties to Wall Street, Foundations, NGOs, oligarchs, and treacherous think tanks are too numerous to mention. Her support for every single war since she was first lady, her assault on Constitutional rights, and her numerous scandals should disqualify her from being legitimately considered as a candidate for President.

I think the candidates appear mediocre because every single one of them represents the continuation of the present system. For instance, can you name one who does not support war in some form? Can you name one that has a modicum of respect for Constitutional rights? You can’t! Even the more seemingly radical candidates like Sanders and Trump are supportive of “safe zones” in Syria, essentially direct military invasion. Both are selective in their support for Constitutional rights with Trump demonstrating a willingness to clamp down on the First Amendment and Sanders willing to crack down on the Second.

It is also important to note that the Establishment here in the United States appears to favor Hillary Clinton as its figurehead. Thus, we see a major push by the American oligarchs to install her as President. Hence, we see the air of inevitability given her by the Republicans and mainstream media, Sanders’ weakness when debating and campaigning against her, and the possibility that Republican candidates like Donald Trump are actually working with her on the Republican side of the field.

Essentially, the candidates are mediocre because American political discourse is mediocre. The oligarchs in the United States have made sure that truly original ideas or those that do not reflect the position of the oligarchy never make it through in a political debate.

There was the show of the COP 21 where the major powers have said that it was a success and that the agreements would be respected. Do you think that with a carnivorous capitalism and a criminal imperialism, it is possible to lead to any agreement for environment?

I don’t see the COP 21 meeting as positive in any way. Particularly because the solutions to environmental degradation are based upon the idea of Anthropogenic Man-Made CO2-based Global Warming and amount to nothing more than genocidal austerity measures that drastically reduce the living standards of the First World and condemn the Third World to remain in its current conditions. The tragedy is that it does not have to be this way. The world’s people are very much able to have their cake and eat it too when it comes to higher living standards, development, and a clean environment. However, an obsession with faulty “climate science” that blames CO2 for everything under the sun and a world corporatist system that would sooner eliminate every tree from the planet if it meant increasing profits are combining to provide the worst of both worlds – austerity and corporate feudalism.

My suggestion to people of good will is to abandon the CO2 alarmism and focus on real world solutions to real world problems like deforestation, fracking, radioactive contamination, genetically modified crops, and the like. Ending imperialist wars would also go great lengths to providing an opportunity to tackle environmental issues. Focusing on true environmentally friendly development and the repair of damage already done should be the focus of the world community. Money is already available for this from any nation that has the courage to nationalize its central bank and use credit stimulus for the purpose of research and implementation.

About the Zika virus, one speaks of a great manipulation which serves the interests of industrial groups and various lobbies. What is your opinion?

Zika Virus represents a potential world health emergency but it also represents the possibility that certain lobbies – medical, pharmaceutical, vaccine, and many others – are attempting to generate panic for increased profits. It is also possible that certain elements within the ruling elite are helping push the concern over Zika for the purpose of distraction or even the eventuality where many societies may see a government crackdown on their civil liberties under the guise of a public health emergency. Remember, only months ago, Ebola was touted as the disease that would kill us all. We saw preparations for vaccines, quarantines, and virtual martial law. In February, 2016, few Americans even remember the Ebola scare.

What is your assessment of both Obama mandates, and is he free from the arguments of the neocons?

Obama was rushed to office in 2008 in what could almost be deemed a color revolution. There were certainly elements of a well-funded personality cult. 2012 seemed to represent more of a fear of Romney on the part of the electorate than support for Obama, who, for some, still retains his personality cult superstardom. I would be careful of calling it a mandate, however.

As for the neocons, Obama is no different than a neocon. His policies are essentially the same as George W. Bush and one could scarcely point to one that is different. Only in implementation are differences visible. For instance, Bush’s years were marked with direct military invasion while Obama’s involved “humanitarian bombing” and proxy forces but the overarching agenda of imperialism continued. The crackdown on domestic civil liberties has continued at an increasing speed. Neocons themselves are still visible in the Obama cabinet. All this is a demonstration of the fact that the office of the President has become a mere puppet post, where a dominant elite changes figureheads every four to eight years. The agenda of that elite simply moves forward under a different brand. Mark my words, regardless of who is elected, 2016-2020 will be no different.

Interview realized by Mohsen Abdelmoumen

My Interview With UBUNTU's Michael Tellinger. The Critical & Urgent Need For Change.

Michael Tellinger has put himself out there in the public eye since the early eighties. He's typically made a success of everything he's done from being a published author with a cult following, a singer songwriter, to driving some innovative and pioneering work as an adventuring archaeologist of sorts by going off the beaten track while investigating and discovering evidence that challenges our accepted understanding of our history, culture and origins as human beings.

However, it's his role as founder of the UBUNTU Liberation movement, now contesting the 2016 South African Municipal Elections in the form of a political party (not owned by or serving the needs of special interests) that has caught my attention most.  I am not in the habit of endorsing political parties because I've done enough homework to nurture the appropriate degree cynicism towards them. However UBUNTU is more than just another political party, it's a global movement.

What is UBUNTU all about?  http://www.ubuntuplanet.org/

In his own words he describes the movement as such:

"The people behind the UBUNTU Contribution System are not politicians or corporations with profit or control in mind. We are a growing group of HUMANS from all walks of life who consist of mothers, fathers, scientists, teachers, doctors, inventors, housewives, and many other ordinary people who care about other humans. We have taken these steps to share our knowledge with everyone in the belief that it will help us move towards unity and abundance for all."

Click here for the UBUNTU Campaign website: http://www.ubuntuparty.org.za/p/home.html

Anyone who reads any of my articles will be under no illusion as to how alarmed I am with the direction taken by the institutions of the establishment.  Nobody is untouched by the criminal bankster network that has it's filthy, bloody blade pressed menacingly at the jugular of global governments who they have reduced to mere administrators of it's corrupt institutions.  Increasingly the people of the world are seeing the establishment for what it is, a perverted Frankensteins monster version of reality tailored towards maintaining the status quo, threatening to cut our exposed collective jugular at the first sign of any real change.  Leaders who challenge the establishment such as Jeremy Corbyn, Bernie Sanders and Ron Paul have been making an impact as a fed-up public , weary of hollow promises, corrupt governments, financial hardships and an insatiable lust for war.  The media mainstays in the west are shedding viewers faster than a suicidal banker, realizing the gig is up, can hit the sidewalk when taking the shortcut via his window from his plush office on the 70th floor.  The media have been a terrible let down to the people in South Africa and the world.  It's time they stop their mischief serving their corporate masters when painting the best candidates as "no-hopers" like they tried to do in the US, UK, Spain and Greece, and start reflecting the spirit of the people.  I hope South Africa will send that same message during this years election.

Click Here For Info On The 2016 Elections. Register 5/6 March

We have lost our way.  We feel alienated and helpless as a society and religious or racial divisions are growing as we seek to understand the source of our simmering discontent.  We are looking in the wrong places. UBUNTU's campaign signals a return to the community by being refreshingly human.  It's also brash, brave and honest. 

Join UBUNTU now: http://www.ubuntuparty.org.za/p/join-us.html

Here's how we can donate to the UBUNTU Municipal Campaign 2016: http://www.ubuntuparty.org.za/p/donate.html

They are not establishment apologists and are THE ONLY PARTY with a fundamental grasp of the critical reality we face: You cannot bring about meaningful change if you seek to work within the institutionalized criminal system. You need to change the system.  We have only ourselves to blame if we don't do something about it now.

Start connecting again as a community by liking the Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/ubuntupartysouthafrica/

And connect with others in the global community with this innovative global connector: http://www.ubuntuplanet.org/wp/ubuntu-planet-on-coeo/

US Foreign Policy Lows, Lets Turn It Around & Apply It To Them (An Exercise In Hypocrisy)

I've come up with a novel way of getting those who don't have a good sense of international policy norms to instantly identify with the plight of those victimized by US foreign policy.  Put yourself in their position. Lets do an exercise where we place Bashar Al-Assad in the role of the US and the US in the Role of Syria. We will substitute local elements at play with their equivalents on the opposite side and allow the neighboring countries to assume to relevant roles in reverse.

Turning it around:

If Trump or Clinton, who Assad considers unfit to lead, win the US election, the method requires arming and funding local rebels (In Trumps case I think Mexican Drug Cartels would be the most enthusiastic) but he can find moderates like the Colombians too. All the Leaders of South America will support Assad and the Drug Cartels in their freedom bombing which will be branded a "Civil War". These groups can then bomb US towns and cities and innocent US women and children as well as the US military. The newspapers won't report that, they will report that "Trump Must Go" and brand any attempts made By Canada to intervene for a political solutions as "support for a brutal regime" Canada will be demonized for trying to stabilize the situation across her border. her border with the US. 

The elections will be branded illegitimate, and the fleeing US population will flood South American countries, the ones who support Assads bombing, where they will be attacked, insulted and generally not offered any sympathy. The South American countries will be criticized for their handling of the US refugee crises, but will get no heat from the media for supporting Assad bombing the US, the root cause. of the crises. Just as the US is about to fall to the drug cartels, Canada will intervene with its military and defeat the cartels, at which point the media will target Canada for bombing civilians (actually bombed by Assad and the cartels) and their liberation of the US from the external regime change attack will not really get any coverage, but Canada will remain the focus of the ever watchful media due to its territorial aggression.

If you are a Westerner, you will most likely find that situation sound absolutely bonkers in 2016?

It's no exaggeration. This is reality. Same principles in play but perhaps you can now get a better sense of why so many people feel this is completely unacceptable and at odds with our stated global goal of becoming more civilized as a planet. This is exactly what the US is doing in Syria, but this time they failed. Some people still don't see a problem with the scenario I just painted above and want the US and their media using this method around the world for freedom. The people who are against it will only oppose it when it happens to their country.... so they are in the minority every time.

WHAT A WONDERFUL WAY TO BUILD A FUTURE!