If you think you've thought this issue through, I put it to you that you probably haven't. If this topic interests you at all I suggest watching the whole clip resisting the urge to skip the parts you think you've paid mind to already.
Should space exploration be privatized?
If you think you've thought this issue through, I put it to you that you probably haven't. If this topic interests you at all I suggest watching the whole clip resisting the urge to skip the parts you think you've paid mind to already.
In times of universal deceit, truth is a crime. Censorship should be banned.
Who and what are you not able to openly criticise? Thats who Id like to hear about. Fact checking is propaganda by the very nature of the act.
How to view the file that Facebook has on you
 |
| Image courtesy NickSeal.com |
This article by AntiMedia will tell you just how to download this surprisingly detailed secret file Facebook has on you:
http://theantimedia.org/facebook-secret-file/
In times of universal deceit, truth is a crime. Censorship should be banned.
Who and what are you not able to openly criticise? Thats who Id like to hear about. Fact checking is propaganda by the very nature of the act.
Another thought on infinity from the perspective of overall universal charge being a Zero/Infinite Equivalence
Thinking in absolutes on charge is a paradigm, there is no intrinsic need beyond labels to think of negative charge as fundamentally negative , we could call the charge we name "negative" positive, it's just a label and the field prevailing in the entire universe may even have universally frozen on these particular values somewhat arbitrarily, but it goes beyond that.
Previous post:
http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2018/03/another-thought-on-infinity-from.html?m=1
Further to my previous post on infinity (above) here is something I picked up in comment section from a Facebook post from Jean Paul Guyse
https://m.facebook.com/jeanpaul.guyse?fref=nf&ref=m_notif¬if_t=feed_comment
"Glenn Swart Just looked at your other blogs ref infinity. My theory is a colourless flat pixel lies beneath the curved edge of the event horizon of a black hole, the Zero Squared [-1+1][+1-1]. It may also solve the problem ref dark energy and dark matter.
Under conventional thinking, some-thing can't come from no-thing. But if no-thing is 100% of everything (all negative and positive charges cancelled out) and some-thing is less than 100% (some of both the positive and negative charges remain separate) it simply answers that problem. No-thing of the Zero Squared (100% of everything). It's there but undetectable because it hasn't separated and thus hasn't released any energy beyond its flat surface. Energy is released once the supersymmetry is lost (curvature/warping begins) and the simultaneous Big Bang AND Big Freeze occurs. If the Big Freeze doesn't occur neither can the Big Bang and visa versa. Fire and Ice. This allows for the Universe to both contract and expand at the SAME time. At least TWO open systems but mutually closed into each other. Both stiring into each other and thus entropy doesn't occur. This solves Newton's problem of a close system suffering entropy. Because the Universe is a 'virtual' closed system consisting of two open one's. This is my theory. Quite radical but it works. Not saying it's right but equally it isn't wrong too."
"And just to add, I should have cited Cardot instead of Newton ref Entropy"
In times of universal deceit, truth is a crime. Censorship should be banned.
Who and what are you not able to openly criticise? Thats who Id like to hear about. Fact checking is propaganda by the very nature of the act.
A Virtual Tour Around The Cosmic Web & Nearby Galaxy Clusters
 |
| The Grand Design |
A breathtaking tour (below) zooming out to eventually cover the entire universe.
Thought this was way cool!
And here is a sense of our local galactic neighborhood.
In times of universal deceit, truth is a crime. Censorship should be banned.
Who and what are you not able to openly criticise? Thats who Id like to hear about. Fact checking is propaganda by the very nature of the act.
Documents the US public can now access under the Freedom Of Information Act, are here:
For PDF electronic copies of thousands of interesting Federal Government documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act. Fascinating historical documents, reports on items in the news, oddities and fun stuff and government bloopers, they're all here. Think of browsing this site as rummaging through the Government's Attic -- hence their name. "Our motto: Videre licet."
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_Information_Act_(United_States
In times of universal deceit, truth is a crime. Censorship should be banned.
Who and what are you not able to openly criticise? Thats who Id like to hear about. Fact checking is propaganda by the very nature of the act.
Alternatives to group think and consensus reality
I'm offering up these resources as one potentially of the most liberating experiences a person can go through. Few people engage with and debate issues as widely on all corners of the Internet as I do, and since I've had the same discussions over and over, I've also heard the counterpoints over and over, so I've been able to identify a type of sheparding of thought, "groupthink" if you will, and very often it manifests in people who are actuality free thinkers.
How can this be? These people, for the most part use the Internet, many have grown up with it. We trust it because it never lies about sports scores, song lyrics or how fat Kim Kardashians ass is these days. But there is one bottleneck I've identified as the source of all the misplaced trust that is associated with this freedom of information when it comes to manufacturing consent in areas where powerful political and economic interests have a stake. So-called "fluid" facts. The type of thing you don't need to lie outright about but can spin to controll a narrative.
It's Google. It's even become synonymous for "search" to just "Google it" I know that Facebook and YouTube and Twitter and Instagram have their issues, but in my experience all of these still offer diversity experience to some extent, whereas Google, particularly in the last few years, has been marshaling a sanitized and monolithic narrative to point where I've now noticed that particular groupthink signature manifesting itself it the patterns and progressions of rational in discussion and debate in important issues.
I can't tell you how insidious this is and how much harm it could potentially do. It goes beyond affecting the outcome of elections etc, it speaks to affecting who we are as a species. Imagine a nation of zombies believing itself a society of enlightened free thinkers? It's evident very much in the polarization of the left/right Partisan divide happening now in society. Google is the chief architect of "Divide & Conquer, Divide & Rule" In the world today.
Before implementing solutions download Tor Browser for the dark web and alleged anonymity although there is evidence that there are still backdoors to intelligence agencies and even funding, but only if you are a big time kingpin in a crime syndicate. You will at least have firewall tools and escape advertising profiling.
https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser.html.en
Or Orford in the Google Play Store or Apples Tor equivalent.
Before implementing solutions download Tor Browser for the dark web and alleged anonymity although there is evidence that there are still backdoors to intelligence agencies and even funding, but only if you are a big time kingpin in a crime syndicate. You will at least have firewall tools and escape advertising profiling.
https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser.html.en
Or Orford in the Google Play Store or Apples Tor equivalent.
SOLUTIONS:
Don't abandon Google altogether, (I still check out CNN and GOOGLE to keep a sense of what I'm required to think, and what many may think. It helps me understand why.
An alternative is Start Page which is enhanced by Google, giving the same sanitized results but with your privacy completely protected.
https://www.startpage.com
https://www.startpage.com
Don't bother with Bing etc, they aren't much better than Google in sanitized quotient, but the search quality is very advertising centered which also has shades of big brother. Duck duck go is marginally better.
Good Gopher is much better, it has two filters, one for Independent Media and another for Academia. I would like to add that "academia" is by no means any guarantee. Science is not a vote and even scientific consensus is regularly overturned.
https://www.goodgopher.com
https://www.goodgopher.com
One site that gives a nice blend of both mainstream and independent results that also respects privacy is SearX. It's a decent search engine.
https://searx.me
https://searx.me
On the cutting edge is an innovative peer to peer decentralized engine called YaCy it's a great portal worth checking out.
https://yacy.net/en/index.html
https://yacy.net/en/index.html
If you ready to make the jump and leave https altogether then do so. I think a revolution is coming so get the jump on things and check out the ipfs protocol. I'll even give you an https starting point.
https://ipfs.io
I'll leave you with one last thought in case you feel the algorithm is simply a commerce tool, or that it's not worth getting to bothered about, you're sure it's quite benign, check out the clip below. Did you know Google AI is actively complicit in drone strikes?
https://ipfs.io
I'll leave you with one last thought in case you feel the algorithm is simply a commerce tool, or that it's not worth getting to bothered about, you're sure it's quite benign, check out the clip below. Did you know Google AI is actively complicit in drone strikes?
In times of universal deceit, truth is a crime. Censorship should be banned.
Who and what are you not able to openly criticise? Thats who Id like to hear about. Fact checking is propaganda by the very nature of the act.
How to prove the Earth is not flat, for yourself, using the Internet and a friend and mathematics.
It was suspected thousands of years ago that the earth is spherical, or geodesic to be precise. A papyrus from 230 B.C. Tells us what gave them the idea, and how we can improve on their work to form a conclusive proof:
Eratosthenes Finds Reasonably Accurate Diameter of Earth.
Alexandria Eratosthenes peered into a well here, at noon, and came up with the diameter andcircumference of our planet! The summer solstice, the Sun and a trip to Syene was all it took...........
Here is the experiment: http://outreach.as.utexas.edu/marykay/assignments/eratos1.html
Two wells or (alternatively two sticks) actually does not prove the earth is round because it does allow for a tiny sun very much closer than the moon to the earth, to be possible. We now know that isn't the case so we can use two wells or sticks, but it's cheating because the ancients never knew this.
To prove it conclusively you actually need the geometry of three wells or sticks. By doing three in a line and three in a triangle. Too much trouble?
BUT NOTE: still DISPROVE the small sun theory using two sticks or wells, because using geometry and shadows you could eliminate the "close to earth" small sun theory, and taking the distance of the required near sun, calculate the shadow angles and zoom the sun further away until it's far enough to match the known modern distances between your chosen cities work backwards. So it's still possible to ultimately prove it using two, and more mathematics but technically speaking the ancients never had that information. Nowadays we can easily just reset the odometer of a car or use GPS or maps.
You can cheat using a cell phone by phoning a friend a few hundred kilometers to your West and timing the gap between the sun disappearing over your horizon (on the shore of a lake, or ocean to guarantee eliminating hills and valleys unless the friend is very far away)
And here is a slightly more complex one by an Islamic scholar in the 11th century.
How Al-Biruni Calculated the Circumference of the Earth Using a Mountain in the 11th century:
https://flatearthinsanity.blogspot.co.za/2016/09/how-al-biruni-calculated-circumference.html?m=1
Another aspect Flat-Earthers struggle to explain is timezones, how it can be midnight somewhere and midday somewhere else, and orbiting satellites and the space station you can view with your telescope.
We saw from our first example that the angles don't correspond to the mathematics, let alone the problems the below invokes refuting gravity etc. It also can't account for complete darkness and relies on a domino effect of requiring everything from the moon landings to orbiting GPS satellites. broadcast satellites, the space station etc being fakes. Its a very needy and unrealistic chain of hundreds of refution points requiring every science discipline, every nations Space Agency, Broadcaster etc to be in on it.
They also don't explain how no moon or meteor, or planet can be anything but round over a certain mass, that way they fail to correctly understand gravity. It's a state of mind relying debate on every point of science having to have proof experiments done right in front of them otherwise they reject them. I have no issue with rejecting anything. Who am I to judge? But rejection of everything Scientific in an age of computers, cell phones and aereoplanes is apparently cognitive dissonance. There is a word for that. It's not skepticism, it's paranoia.
In times of universal deceit, truth is a crime. Censorship should be banned.
Who and what are you not able to openly criticise? Thats who Id like to hear about. Fact checking is propaganda by the very nature of the act.
The Many Faces Of Matter
Apart from dark matter, and Energy (if you take into account the matter / energy equivalency behind nuclear bombs as reconciled by Einstein's E=mc²) Then baryonic (normal) matter itself has many little known forms beyond antimatter and negative matter. It's quite fascinating.
It's difficult to understand matter fully so in that spirit this post seeks merely to describe aspects of its known range. The chart below shows us the mystery of the unknown matter and energy making up about 96% of the universe, which this post doesn't even go into.
Wikipedia states:
"A phase is a form of matter that has a relatively uniform chemical composition and physical properties (such as density, specific heat, refractive index, and so forth). These phases include the three familiar ones (solids, liquids, and gases), as well as more exotic states of matter (such as plasmas, superfluids, supersolids, Bose–Einstein condensates, ...). A fluid may be a liquid, gas or plasma. There are also paramagnetic and ferromagnetic phases of magnetic materials. As conditions change, matter may change from one phase into another. These phenomena are called phase transitions, and are studied in the field of thermodynamics. In nanomaterials, the vastly increased ratio of surface area to volume results in matter that can exhibit properties entirely different from those of bulk material, and not well described by any bulk phase (see nanomaterials for more details)."
But that's by no means the end of the story. The video below covers some of the more bizarre states of matter we never hear about, including 18 different kinds of water ice, time crystals, superfluids and frictionless matter, as well as the weirdness in states of matter we find in nature's densest matter environment, neutron stars (It's a surprisingly little known fact that black holes contain no matter, they have become singularities rather than super dense matter, they owe their extreme gravity to super warping of spacetime)
In times of universal deceit, truth is a crime. Censorship should be banned.
Who and what are you not able to openly criticise? Thats who Id like to hear about. Fact checking is propaganda by the very nature of the act.
... Infinity...
Did you know that you get different sizes of infinity? IE numbers are infinite but so is a set of all EVEN numbers even though any given range only contains half the no. (of numbers)
This is the most basic of conundrums with infinity. The video below explores all the interesting quirks regarding this mind bending concept in an entertaining way.
And below a slightly more math/physics angle with s focus on singularities
In times of universal deceit, truth is a crime. Censorship should be banned.
Who and what are you not able to openly criticise? Thats who Id like to hear about. Fact checking is propaganda by the very nature of the act.
I'm taking a stab at explaining Quantum Mechanics, Time & LightSpeed in laymans terms, as a Layperson.... In one post!
As ambitious as it sounds It's deceptively simple. Although I need some creative license for the broader understanding. It all boils down to things being able to happen rather than not happen. Hang in there with me for one second...
At the root we must actually start with a premise of Quantum Mechanics rather than lead up to it!
Why must information come in preset quanta or packets of data rather than a smooth sliding scale? Because to have causality and therefore time Itself you need to (at some point) break with infinity because when it comes to EXISTING , infinity turns the universe into nothing if it's involved in any SEQUENCE in certain areas of nature. In fact the Zero/Infinity equivalence is the prevailing theme of the universe itself.
Let me use deliberately mischievous phrasing here to sound like I'm talking nonsense, just to see if I can talk my way out of it. I'm not being a dick about, its the coolest way to make the point!
The reason why there is something rather than nothing is because something is not nothing at its core therefore it's not infinite either at its cause even though its infinite in its effect, ie its nothing in its effect.
Stay with me... ⚛️
How can this not be a paradox, without even getting into the fact that the overall energy if the universe IS ACTUALLY ZERO? (I'll cover that later) It's Because it takes forever to cover infinite values no matter how fast you cover them. For Causality (What we perceive as the arrow of time) to exist the universe must be incremented in some basic minimum possible unit or nothing would ever happen and nothing could exist. Basically there is, at the core of nature some basic resolution which would seem super hi res compared to any digital pixilation we understand. Perhaps subatomically we may one day see quantum probabilistic 0's and 1's make up quarks fragments...
At the root we must actually start with a premise of Quantum Mechanics rather than lead up to it!
Why must information come in preset quanta or packets of data rather than a smooth sliding scale? Because to have causality and therefore time Itself you need to (at some point) break with infinity because when it comes to EXISTING , infinity turns the universe into nothing if it's involved in any SEQUENCE in certain areas of nature. In fact the Zero/Infinity equivalence is the prevailing theme of the universe itself.
Let me use deliberately mischievous phrasing here to sound like I'm talking nonsense, just to see if I can talk my way out of it. I'm not being a dick about, its the coolest way to make the point!
The reason why there is something rather than nothing is because something is not nothing at its core therefore it's not infinite either at its cause even though its infinite in its effect, ie its nothing in its effect.
Stay with me... ⚛️
How can this not be a paradox, without even getting into the fact that the overall energy if the universe IS ACTUALLY ZERO? (I'll cover that later) It's Because it takes forever to cover infinite values no matter how fast you cover them. For Causality (What we perceive as the arrow of time) to exist the universe must be incremented in some basic minimum possible unit or nothing would ever happen and nothing could exist. Basically there is, at the core of nature some basic resolution which would seem super hi res compared to any digital pixilation we understand. Perhaps subatomically we may one day see quantum probabilistic 0's and 1's make up quarks fragments...
Let me clarify, once more with creative license, by trying to make one event happen, using an example.
Let's use the example of simply lowering the pitch of a note on your guitar for sound, but it could apply elsewhere such as the frequency of light (ie lowering the frequency of violet to red)
Let's use the example of simply lowering the pitch of a note on your guitar for sound, but it could apply elsewhere such as the frequency of light (ie lowering the frequency of violet to red)
Now how would you detune a guitar string from G sharp to B flat if you had to cover every single possible frequency between the acoustically pleasing notes we name as well as form in an octave, on a fret or keyboard IF you had to cover the infinite number of theoretical frequencies between them? You can't, it's impossible, it would take forever because there are infinite possible frequency single points between each frequency (See my infinity post by clicking this text)
Therefore on this chosen imagined example to illustrate the principle, our exercise of lowering the frequency of a wave is only possible if the values ultimately come in a certain minimum quanta (it's really a tiny value, Google PLANCK to find out how unimaginably tiny (or see the below videos) which is why we never encounter it outside of the sub-atomic scale, but for causality to exist then at some point it must be encountered or nothing would ever happen)
Ie at some point you can't get any more in-between shades of colour and there would be no further in-between notes.
Furthermore, not just the wavelength, frequency but also the amplitude. Here is a pretend Quantum wave as imagined at the Planck Scale at the with only X values (or lets simplify it to number of possible steps) in quanta on each curve rather than infinite values on a smooth sine curve.
 |
| Imagine a wave with limited, finite values instead of an infinite curve. |
That way you can graduate between notes, colors etc with moving only up and down finite predefined set values (an imagined equivalency to quanta or packets of information to illustrate the point)
Therefore the implications are vast yest fundamentally profound. A MINIMUM Value, meaning a smallest and (it follows logically) fastest can be defined based on it, since everything is relative it makes no difference what the ACTUAL figure is. I must add that the smallest, fastest etc can only be defined based on this minimum unit relatively speaking. The eventual size of Planck's number is a finite size which means things can happen at a finite rate rather than at an infinite rate, and something can happen rather than nothing ever happening .
In principle, Time (causality rather) passes because massless particles travel the fastest (photons or light) also at an irrelevant speed but because they lack mass its the fastest speed, which means the speed of light (electromagnetic waves that is) determines the upper limit, having no mass, and therefore basis of causality, because of Planck's number being finite) and all things that happen must happen from there, and why nothing with mass can ever travel faster than light (because of causality and Planck, not because of the light speed we assigned a number too) without an INFINITE amount of energy required for acceleration.
Further interesting material:
In principle, Time (causality rather) passes because massless particles travel the fastest (photons or light) also at an irrelevant speed but because they lack mass its the fastest speed, which means the speed of light (electromagnetic waves that is) determines the upper limit, having no mass, and therefore basis of causality, because of Planck's number being finite) and all things that happen must happen from there, and why nothing with mass can ever travel faster than light (because of causality and Planck, not because of the light speed we assigned a number too) without an INFINITE amount of energy required for acceleration.
Further interesting material:
In times of universal deceit, truth is a crime. Censorship should be banned.
Who and what are you not able to openly criticise? Thats who Id like to hear about. Fact checking is propaganda by the very nature of the act.
Sky Censorship
CNN and Sky always mark my perfectly reasonable, merit based and polite comments as spam because there is an opinion challenging their monolithic narrative
SKy Censorship
In times of universal deceit, truth is a crime. Censorship should be banned.
Who and what are you not able to openly criticise? Thats who Id like to hear about. Fact checking is propaganda by the very nature of the act.
The Elephant In The Room With mass Shootings
In the aftermath of yet another mass shooting in the United States, the internet and broadcast news alike are inundated with commentary about why this keeps happening in America. Some blame guns, others blame mental health, and still others confidently blame false flag events or over medication.
But one commonality among numerous mass killings in the United States remains absent from these conversations. It is always reported when details of the shooter are published, but the widespread connection is rarely acknowledged: A mounting number of mass shooters have ties to the military
http://theantimedia.org/mass-shooters-common/
In times of universal deceit, truth is a crime. Censorship should be banned.
Who and what are you not able to openly criticise? Thats who Id like to hear about. Fact checking is propaganda by the very nature of the act.
Regime Change 101 in a meme.
A simple recipe for regime change or color revolution in one simple meme.
In times of universal deceit, truth is a crime. Censorship should be banned.
Who and what are you not able to openly criticise? Thats who Id like to hear about. Fact checking is propaganda by the very nature of the act.
NewsWeak Update: Newsweek Update
 |
| According to Newsweek (unbelievably no pun intended), Assad, who is currently in power in Syria, is trying to "take over" Syria, making China (one of the few countries not directly involved already) the big winner???!!! WTF |
Here is the link to my previous NewsWeak update from late last year:
http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2017/09/newsweak-update.html?m=1
As my header pic makes clear, Newsweek is a former bastion of dinosaur media. It's one of the establishments staples for controlling the narrative and their content is questionable at best. But as the video from the Corbett Report below points out, some unexpected truthbombs are popping out of them in light of the recent troubles they have been having. This is truly amazing and makes for interesting speculation as to the future of all old media.
In times of universal deceit, truth is a crime. Censorship should be banned.
Who and what are you not able to openly criticise? Thats who Id like to hear about. Fact checking is propaganda by the very nature of the act.
Erdogan Did Not Stage The Failed Turkish Coup. FETO & US Intelligence Services Did!
 |
| Image courtesy Politico Europe |
The source article written by Adam Garrie from www.eurasiafuture.com is available here:
http://www.eurasiafuture.com/2018/02/13/julian-assange-languishes-while-the-terrorist-fetullah-gulen-lives-freely-in-america/
 |
| Image Courtesy Birgun.net |
In times of universal deceit, truth is a crime. Censorship should be banned.
Who and what are you not able to openly criticise? Thats who Id like to hear about. Fact checking is propaganda by the very nature of the act.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)