Look, its simple, the US economy is not in recovery.

Mass stupidity is the flavor of the month in every one of media mainstays economics section.

Its nuts, insane actually.

The US economy is obviously not “recovering” or “healthy” at all. This is not rocket science, its a very simple situation to read.

Additionally, the latest news of 50,000 bank employees terminated in one month suggests a lot more than is being reported.

Its not just that the American middle class has been systematically eradicated, or that for the first time in history, more businesses fail each day, than open (a horrific fact)

Add to this that that for the first time in history, there are more people on welfare, food stamps and other handouts than working in the private sector. Another staggering first!

Almost 100 million working-age Americans aren’t working, and 40 of Americans earn less than what the minimum wage of 1968 was if it hadn't been dropping deceptively and near 110 million Americans are on some or other form of welfare.

If you add in Medicare, Medicaid and people working for government, more than 165 million Americans — about half the population — are dependant on a government check. Think about it. Its fucking disastrous!

Much of the increase in third quarter GDP was courtesy massive increases healthcare costs due to Obamacare.

Next, unemployment is down right?

Oh no it isn't, How could it be down if the workforce participation rate is the lowest in history? The answer is fraud. The government came up with genius plot to not count the disillusioned people no longer looking for jobs or who don’t want a job (who would rather sit home collecting welfare).

The reality is that unemployment is at Great Depression levels.

Worse, almost every single new job being created crappy, low-wage, part-time jobs or pensioners unable to retire.

The Stock Market:
A rising stock market based on good news and positive economic fundamentals would be great. But a rising stock market based on fake money printing by the Fed, misleading economic stats and massive debt is not so great. Actually, it’s a tragedy. The US stock market is also akin to the subprime mortgage crisis. It’s a debt bubble about to pop.

Its mainly up because Obama has added almost $8 trillion in debt. Fact: DEBT is out of control. Off the charts!

All the housing and vehicle sales were produced by dropping the financing down payments from 25 to 10 and 3 percent. 3 Percent!?? What does that mean? Prepare for record defaults on payments obviously.

Even more than before, it amounts to the world’s largest Ponzi scheme. They've  printed trillions in fake dollars to make the stock market go up for the corporate elite and to pay for those near 110 million Americans on welfare and food stamps I mentioned. 

This mountain of debt is like a credit card credit line that will soon explode, destroying mid term prospects for their currency or even country.

That will give the rest of the world time to normalize the economic environment but in the States, as an outsider I reckon for their benefit every politician, wall street insider trader and bankster who has supported this direction should be thrown in jail.

My challenge to YOU, if you fancy yourself as a modern skeptic.

If you think living in our age of enlightenment means that you wield the faculties of critical thinking like warrior wields an Axe, think again.

If you think you've escaped the trappings of religious faith, the purposeful suspension of logic and reason to accept the narrative of the establishment, think again.

Allow me to demonstrate. Even though I research my strange little hobby of world Geopolitics typically on more recent events, I've deliberately chosen this 2001 example because its the most emotionally loaded, and best illustrates my point.

Below is commonly available video footage of WT7 going down:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrzeN-wvHD4

Casual research will allow anyone to grasp that buildings don't go down like that due to proximity, fire and rubble. We know fire can't melt the structural support, and there is barely any fire on the building anyway. I put forward that not only engineers like the group of 2000 engineers who have challenged the narrative as (basically) impossible, but we all should because its actually common sense.

Of course we can all easily see that this is a controlled detonation, without demolition training. But will be admitt it without context?

Yet the power of the establishment can make you watch this and somehow have faith that fire did this, fire dropped the huge fireproof building, for the first time ever, like a demolition job. Fire. Not that there was any visable.

Add the famous BBC reports that WT7 went down before it did, twice, while it was still up and visible in the background, was ultimately and weakly explained away as a quirk:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mxFRigYD3s

The "Debunking" vids on youtube are like the official narrative, similarly weak.

The journalists themselves ascribe it to a freakishly unlucky coincidence, which is possible, but lets build our perspective.

Add the testimony of the Emergency Services at WT7, who all say they were evacuated just before hearing multiple blasts and personally witnessing the detonations, were dismissed as confusion:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PSziAiD9jM

This is damning stuff and there is no excuse for leaving the claims uninvestigated. I cant think of one benefit.

Fast forward to late 2014, Here is what the Engineers are now saying:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7eCG4OsW1sY

This case is FAR from solved. FAR.

Lets be serious here people! Is it possible that if you are against reopening the investigation then you are no different to the witch-burners of old?

There is only one sensible take on the issue, lets face it. Call it common sense, Occams Razor etc, I call it obvious.

Many of you may be exposed by this exercise. Exposed to the harsh reality that an implausible establishment narrative IS accepted over the clear and simple facts right in front of your eyes, due possibly to the stress inherent in rejecting the narrative.

Let me draw a comparison between the draconian church of old and the current establishment. Lets look at how if truth goes against the narrative its treated the same way the church used to treat scientific heretics. "Truther" became a dirty word somehow, akin to the label assigned to a whack job.

I've had my sanity questioned many times since addressing these issues and its endlessly fascinating. I'm almost always right with time proving it and I post it weekly online in black and white to back myself, but I no longer expect vindication, just like with religion it only makes people dig their heels in deeper.

Ask yourself honestly, which scenario below, looked back on from 200 years in the future, will be considered the least sane:

1) Despite clear evidence to the contrary, the narrative is WT7 collapsed evenly and symmetrically at the rate of gravity due to fire for the first time in history, yet it was somehow anticipated for evacuation purposes and reported on in advance. Any further investigation into the issue must be as a result of crazy Truther mischief only, and those people must be treated, for some reason, as if they are proposing something ridiculous. All you little zombies must smile knowingly every time someone raises any call for clarity on the issue we must laugh at them as if they are all fools.

2) There are clearly some inconsistencies in the official narrative. Not resolving them is not only disrespectful to those that lost their lives, but it may allow criminal elements to remain un prosecuted, free to repeat such crimes in the future. Is there really harm in raising questions? What is the real argument for avoiding searching for truth?

The Bilderberg Group

A Review of Daniel Estulin's book by Stephen Lendman on the Global Research site.

For over 14 years, Daniel Estulin has investigated and researched the Bilderberg Group’s far-reaching influence on business and finance, global politics, war and peace, and control of the world’s resources and its money.

His book, “The True Story of the Bilderberg Group,” was published in 2005 and is now updated in a new 2009 edition. He states that in 1954, “the most powerful men in the world met for the first time” in Oosterbeek, Netherlands, “debated the future of the world,” and decided to meet annually in secret. They called themselves the Bilderberg Group with a membership representing a who’s who of world power elites, mostly from America, Canada, and Western Europe with familiar names like David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Bill Clinton, Gordon Brown, Angela Merkel, Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke, Larry Summers, Tim Geithner, Lloyd Blankfein, George Soros, Donald Rumsfeld, Rupert Murdoch, other heads of state, influential senators, congressmen and parliamentarians, Pentagon and NATO brass, members of European royalty, selected media figures, and invited others – some quietly by some accounts like Barack Obama and many of his top officials.

Always well represented are top figures from the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), IMF, World Bank, Trilateral Commission, EU, and powerful central bankers from the Federal Reserve, the ECB’s Jean-Claude Trichet, and Bank of England’s Mervyn King.

For over half a century, no agenda or discussion topics became public nor is any press coverage allowed. The few invited fourth estate attendees and their bosses are sworn to secrecy. Nonetheless, Estulin undertook “an investigative journey” that became his life’s work. He states:

“Slowly, one by one, I have penetrated the layers of secrecy surrounding the Bilderberg Group, but I could not have done this withot help of ‘conscientious objectors’ from inside, as well as outside, the Group’s membership.” As a result, he keeps their names confidential.

Whatever its early mission, the Group is now “a shadow world government….threaten(ing) to take away our right to direct our own destinies (by creating) a disturbing reality” very much harming the public’s welfare. In short, Bilderbergers want to supplant individual nation-state sovereignty with an all-powerful global government, corporate

What does the US get back in return for its overwhelmingly exorbitant funding of Israel?

Here are the shocking (to the US taxpayer whose benefits have disappeared for this) facts on Israels full benefits, if it is still up for a change and hasn't been removed http://www.adc.org/IB85066.pdf

Everyone knows the United States is Israel's best friend. It has the most (or possibly only) Pro Israel foreign policy in the world. The US gives Israel billions of dollars in aid annually, consistently blocks UN Security Council resolutions condemning Israel, and backs its military offensives publicly. But why? What's the thinking behind America going above-and-beyond for Israel while leaving its own people with flailing schools, jobs and social benefits?

Well there are 3 clear factors. Each one will get its own post from me in the coming weeks.

1) Votes? The large Jewish community resident in the US?
Its not as big as you think.

This is an interesting aspect and very misunderstood, if you have read my previous post on Globalization and Anti-Semitism you'll realize I think people oversimplify their non-mainstream view of global Geopolitics by looking for Jews under every rock and blaming Jews collectively for the ills of the world. There is simply no place for that sort of myopic bigotry for any serious or amateur political analyst.

2) Israel as the regions platform for globalization.

This is where the real meat is.

3) Pro Israel Jews and Christian Neocons in the globally guided mainstream media, old Banking Houses but more realistically paradoxically capitalist types of the old Dynasties who essentially own the Western Political machine (not a sensastionalist claim in reality), who will as gladly dispose of the used husk of America as they will of Israel, to fulfill their agenda. They and their class usually parade as some or other sort of patriots of their time.

A quick look back at the recent history, perhaps 500 years, shows how this seemingly made-for-TV or bestselling novel financial backstory to history contains all the uncomfortable truths if you ditch the texbooks and folliw the money. The devil is in the details.

Here is where the scandal and mad sounding conspiracies kick in. Much of what is claimed is true and surprisingly easy to verify.

The torture reports are watered down lies. Heres why, What are your thoughts?

The torture or advanced interigation details doing the rounds dont tell the truth about the legacy of US torture in the last decade. Rape, child abuse in front of parents and the worst kind of sadism imaginable are the real legacy as pointed out by one example here: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Ghraib_torture_and_prisoner_abuse

In the wake of the latest outrage of further details of recent much milder half truths regarding CIA torture being made public we just have to wonder what we stand for in the west if these are our methods? Some people don't seem to mind, please vote in the poll in the top left of the blog body whatever your feelings may be.

More disturbing arguably are the without trial assassinations carried out on foreign soil known as drone killings.

Since 2004 (According to Wikipedia), the United States government has attacked hundreds of targets in Northwest Pakistan using unmanned aerial vehicles (drones) controlled by the Central Intelligence Agency's Special Activities Division. Most of these attacks are on targets in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas along the Afghan border in Northwest Pakistan.

These strikes began during the administration of U.S. President George W. Bush, and have increased substantially under  Barack Obama.

Amnesty International found that a number of victims were unarmed and that some strikes could amount to war crimes.

Pakistan's Prime Minister, Nawaz Sharif, has repeatedly demanded an end to the strikes, stating: "The use of drones is not only a continual violation of our territorial integrity but also detrimental to our resolve and efforts at eliminating terrorism from our country".^[28] The Peshawar High Court has ruled that the attacks are illegal, inhumane, violate the UN charter on human rights and constitute a war crime.

Click here for a brilliant  visual representation of the fatalities, stats and timeline in Pakistan.

Of course many more Drone killings happen in North Africa, Yemen and other countries whose boundaries, innocent collateral citizens, extradition treaties for the suspects etc are not respected by the US who commits what ultimately amounts to murder for a shadowy agenda never revealed to the public.

Even pro-establishment CNN place the drone strike success rate as low as 2%

And many disastrous errors occur like this mistaken murder of 12 innocent wedding guests in Yemen

Gold is about to sink the Dollar, soon.

Following hot on the heels of Germany and the Netherlands, now Belgium's central bank has just indicated it will repatriate its US gold supplies.

This is big. Huge. It thwarts the Feds all out assault on keeping gold at such a massively undervalued level, a level desperately needed to prevent the dollars demise and its a slippery slope downhill from here for the $.

Russia and China have been buying whatever gold they can get their hands on in anticipation of the fiat dollar house of cards finally exposing its feeble foundation.

Belgium is particularly interesting because Brussels is the the EU HQ and it sends a strong sign out revealing that there is a broader game afoot.

Something's up...

The worst legislation in US history, H Res 758, summary of the problems.

Designed to consolidate the US national position on Russia in order to facilitate the the geopolitical, military and diplomatic action that will be required in the build up to war.



Here is the full PDF document:

https://www.google.co.za/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&ei=s06BVOfGMISrU4XKgOAP&url=http://docs.house.gov/billsthisweek/20141201/hres758_sus_xml%2520-%2520condemning%2520Russian%2520aggression.pdf&ved=0CD4QFjAK&usg=AFQjCNGJgZEITPUw1Prox1KS1Ynrgvt74w&sig2=PJw05n8vMXbf0GHLYnSGYw

A summary of some of the problems copied and pasted from RPI http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2014/december/04/reckless-congress-declares-war-on-russia/

The resolution (paragraph 3) accuses Russia of an invasion of Ukraine and condemns Russia’s violation of Ukrainian sovereignty. The statement is offered without any proof of such a thing. Surely with our sophisticated satellites that can read a license plate from space we should have video and pictures of this Russian invasion. None have been offered. As to Russia’s violation of Ukrainian sovereignty, why isn’t it a violation of Ukraine’s sovereignty for the US to participate in the overthrow of that country’s elected government as it did in February? We have all heard the tapes of State Department officials plotting with the US Ambassador in Ukraine to overthrow the government. We heard US Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland bragging that the US spent $5 billion on regime change in Ukraine. Why is that OK?

The resolution (paragraph 11) accuses the people in east Ukraine of holding “fraudulent and illegal elections” in November. Why is it that every time elections do not produce the results desired by the US government they are called “illegal” and “fraudulent”? Aren’t the people of eastern Ukraine allowed self-determination? Isn’t that a basic human right?

The resolution (paragraph 13) demands a withdrawal of Russia forces from Ukraine even though the US government has provided no evidence the Russian army was ever in Ukraine. This paragraph also urges the government in Kiev to resume military operations against the eastern regions seeking independence.

The resolution (paragraph 14) states with certainty that the Malaysia Airlines flight 17 that crashed in Ukraine was brought down by a missile “fired by Russian-backed separatist forces in eastern Ukraine.” This is simply incorrect, as the final report on the investigation of this tragedy will not even be released until next year and the preliminary report did not state that a missile brought down the plane. Neither did the preliminary report – conducted with the participation of all countries involved – assign blame to any side.

Paragraph 16 of the resolution condemns Russia for selling arms to the Assad government in Syria. It does not mention, of course, that those weapons are going to fight ISIS – which we claim is the enemy -- while the US weapons supplied to the rebels in Syria have actually found their way into the hands of ISIS!

Paragraph 17 of the resolution condemns Russia for what the US claims are economic sanctions (“coercive economic measures”) against Ukraine. This even though the US has repeatedly hit Russia with economic sanctions and is considering even more!

The resolution (paragraph 22) states that Russia invaded the Republic of Georgia in 2008. This is simply untrue. Even the European Union – no friend of Russia – concluded in its investigation of the events in 2008 that it was Georgia that “started an unjustified war” against Russia not the other way around! How does Congress get away with such blatant falsehoods? Do Members not even bother to read these resolutions before voting?

In paragraph 34 the resolution begins to even become comical, condemning the Russians for what it claims are attacks on computer networks of the United States and “illicitly acquiring information” about the US government. In the aftermath of the Snowden revelations about the level of US spying on the rest of the world, how can the US claim the moral authority to condemn such actions in others?

The real story with Israel & Palestine. Regional stabilty & globalisation platform.

Don't look at the region in isolation,  there is a larger game afoot.

Backed by US funding in order to platform the middle eastern globalisation agenda, Israel is taking over what they call Jerusalem, a huge area many, many times larger than the Jerusalem of old. This includes destruction of many Arab villages with Israeli settlers illegally being brought in.

It looks fine on a map in terms of territory, but don't be fooled. Most of what is allocated to Palestine is basically desert. And all of this is separate from what is going on with the gradual takeover of the Jordan Valley lying eastwards.

Let's be clear, Israel has no official policy of directly taking  over land, but they are pushing the same successful policy in cahoots with the USA, doing business in the same way that has been working slowly for a hundred years while they establish military zones.

The Palestinians who live there have to be displaced of course, since since we are talking about a military zone after all. Sure, this may seem to mean no normal settlements are allowed here, but pretty soon there are military settlements which, let's face it,  gradually morph into regular settlements.

This clears the local Arab population as numbers dropped from over 300k in the sixties to not much more than 50k today.  Whoever is left are living as glorified prisoners.

Remember, Israel has no intention of taking over the remaining Palestinian population. Their attitude is that it doesn't matter if they leave voluntarily or stay and die, it's all fine.

This is the reality and it will continue as long as the US funds and supports it.

Forget the two state solution, that's just a perpetual trick that will not materialise as long as the status quo persists.

Once you understand all of this the ridiculous Hamas terror tactics start to become understandle, that is they are if you understood ANC terror tactics in Apartheid South Africa. 

Personally I think Hamas terror tactics are wrong & only serve to justify Israeli/US colonisation.  Another method must be found to stop this ugly pocket of Globalisation in the world.

Financial collapse. Soon. Here's why.

Peter Schiff alone predicted the collapse of Wall Street in 2007 and he did it with all the right reasoning.   This time he is one of a chorus of financial advisers and economists who are absolutely certain of a much larger collapse soon for simelar reasons, all of them based on the phoney system of monetary policy spawned by the Federal Reserve Bank http://youtu.be/--vWo-o3vJ0 here he discusses, in his usual engaging fashion, why we can be so sure.

Who really owns the Fed?

Here is a surprisingly little known secret: 80% ownership of the New York Federal Reserve Bank is by just 8 families.
They are:
•Rothschilds of Paris
•Rothschilds of London
•Goldman Sachs
•Rockefellers,
•Lehmans and Kuhn Loebs of New York
•Warburgs of Hamburg
•Lazards of Paris
•Israel Moses Seifs of Rome.

Furthermore:

10 banks control all twelve Federal Reserve Bank branches:

•N.M. Rothschild of London •Rothschild Bank of Berlin •Warburg Bank of Hamburg •Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
•Lehman Brothers of New York •Lazard Brothers of Paris
•Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York
•Israel Moses Seif Bank of Italy •Goldman Sachs of New York
•JP Morgan Chase Bank of New York.

In addition there are individuals who own large shares of the Fed like William Rockefeller, Paul Warburg, Jacob Schiff and James Stillman (The Schiffs are insiders at Kuhn Loeb. The Stillmans are Citigroup insiders, who married into the Rockefeller clan at the turn of the century)

Now ask yourself, which banks were bailed out with taxpayers money, who lost the homes and mortgages of millions of taxpayers to start with, to the tune of hundreds of billions each after the economic collapse of 2008?

35) Globalisation & Anti-Semitism

By far the worst enemy of Jews that I can see is not anti-semitism as it stands on the surface but rather the cause.  It's this imperial styled Rothschilds Zionism that has laid it's blame through word association and heritage of Jewish family legacy by Mayer Amshel Rothschild (among others) onto Jews in general,  rather that taking accountability themselves.  This is done purposefully in order to hide behind the veil of anti-semitism and they have never been to cocerned about incidental harm they may do for Jewish PR because it works in their favour. The Rothschilds Dynasty developed this blueprint, peaking in the nineteenth century and diversifying and evolving with other heirs like JP Morgan and the Rockerfellers among many others into what it is today.

The US Federal Reserve Bank does not disclose it's shareholders or even allow anyone, including the US President, to be privy to their methods behind monetary policy (or the extent to which it influences other Rothschilds style Central Banks globally). It's difficult to see what strategy the banks have beyound QE (Quantitative Easing) and one could be forgiven for starting to think they are just "Rolling It" for as long as US dollar hegemony can last. These days the seat of influence is no longer carried simply by heirs carrying the names of the great families but there are still key members that are strategically critical in this global financial ponzi scheme. 

Its a biggotted myth that Jews are collectively conspiring against the world. Jews are a more diverse people than most others due to being dispersed worlwide for so long. You can be sure that the Rothschilds Zionist couldn't give a rats ass about the fate of Jews either. 

Rothschilds style Zionists are proponents of what is today called Globalisation. This association with Zionism has somehow wickedly and generically laid blame for it's actions and agenda on Jews and even capitalists in general and a strong case could be made that this has indirectly caused reaction leading to tradegies like the Holocaust and mass killings in Russia and elsewhere. Being called anti-semitic by being anti globalisation is like being called anti Germany just because you don't like Hitler.

The word "Zionism" was originally coined to explain objectives of creating a single Jewish state in Palestine by religious Jews and included the rebuilding of the temple on the site of the Dome of the Rock etc: 1AhUuhbe88DfRi14srj5VZFmb3QmuPEahy Even Religious Zionism is waning from the popularity amongst Jews. Religion may even fall to second place, behind money,  as the essential backstory to all of history. 

In the 1800's the House of Rothschild, among others, were old Jewish money influencers of Kings and countries. They took their name from the germanic translation of the "Red Sheild" crest on their original Frankfurt place of business.  By shrewd purchase of Government bonds and gold after loading the odds with insider information and sway in wars and major historical events, they were able to pioneer the sytem of boom and bust that enabled gobbling up currencies and resources with buy/sell timing that lead to unimaginable wealth and power.

In those days there really was an "Illuminati" of Freemason brotherhood pulling the puppet strings behind the charade of the worlds political stage.

These days  (mostly athiest, capitalistic) Jewish descendant heirs of that group still largely own the central banks of the world  with their new western partners and have found themselves ideologically aligned with the equally aspirational Christian Neoconservative right and Wallstreet Corporate Multinational players to form a new type of Rothschild Styled Zionism or Globalisation. 

This is not about creation of a Jewish State anymore, although if it's required to sustain support from influential Jewish American, European and Israeli quarters it will be persuaded for sure (as an alliance strategy). There can be little doubt that Islam is something none of these people really want or need around beyond having a bogeyman to blame to stoke the fires and bang the war- rhetoric terrorism drums.
Instead, as if opposite to the Zion in "The Matrix" movie series, it involves creation of a single sphere maximum global marketplace (Globalisation) for goods and services based on the Western Capitalist Economic model. In this "movie" the institution is Zion, a World Bank will be increasingly prolific

How will this play out logically?

The economic model involves printing Fiat money for nothing but the cost of paper at central banks, lending to commercial banks at interest who in turn lend to governments and people. Nation States are only necessary in so far as to manage different national identities and to bring into line rogue states that have not yet fallen in line with this maximum marketplace model.

The wealth gap will continue to increase, eroding the middle class and civil rights and liberties will fade in the interests of national security.

Consumers will replace citizens, for profit prisons and militarised police forces will work in synch with mass media owned by those same few corporate interests who weild subtle control not by instruction but by advancing the careers of journalists that tow the line.

Wars will be fought over resources, strategic advantage and installations of the central banking economic model in areas that do not have them in place. Money will always be created by fractional reserve and value based materials like gold whose values are harder to control will never back currencies.  Currencies will be stocks and traders get their info from the media, if you own the media then what you report determines the values of the shares traded (in this case the currency).

So with Fiat money if you control the central banks and the news you control money and governments.

If this Orwellian dystopia sounds far-fetched to you perhaps it's time for you to pull your head out of the sand and take a good look around?

34) The Rothschilds Dynasty influence in History is quite staggering

http://antimatrix.org/Convert/Books/Coleman/Rothschild_Dynasty/Rothschild_Dynasty.htm

Article at link address above:

An absolutely staggering and convincing read that will leave you questioning everything you know about the financial backstory of history being THE definative backstory. 

33) Why are there so many sheeple out there?

I don't care if "Sheeple" is seen a passe term, its the most suitable.

Tell me this scenario hasn't happened to(or is) you: A friend will watch Zeitgeist, or Fahrenheit 911, or some other well researched or convincing expose of the establishment and experience ”Neo” like mini awakening for a few days but won’t go as far as drying off the goo or ripping the cable out of their heads. What I mean by this is: Usually, such people will then proceed to warn everyone that media offers a distorted, most likely malevolently crafted version of reality crafted by their corporate/government masters,  then go on to defend precisely that exact position a few weeks later, the one they warned you about  so passionately just a short while before?

I can only imagine that most peoples only source of knowledge is that same media, very people actually go as far as to independently research.  There is no interest because the sterile version of the news and much of history for that matter is not especially interesting. So, we get bored and go back to the comfort of our consumer culture opiates so well serving of the interests that facilitate the unchallenging society we inhabit.  Soon afterwards a warm and soapy picture that re-enforces our identity as civilised westerner, capitalist defender of the free and liberator of the worlds oppressed peoples by their tyrannical governments.

We don’t like thinking of ourselves as implicated in the crime of the corporate vultures that pollute the environment, exploit the poor, drive the trees and animal species to extinction, fatten the mega rich and influence the media who in turn influence our perception of reality.

These are the same people that are compelled to present the questioner, someone who does not accept the given media reason, as a conspiracy theorist.

Let’s think about that for a second.  In reality the questioner cannot be a theorist unless he has a theory, certainly not if one is just asking why conventional wisdom in news media it does not ring true. 

When did questioning become seen as crackpot, and when did being gullible become noble?

There are conspiracy nuts out there.  They go on about lizard people, illuminati of every variety and secret aliens that rule the earth with their freemason brothers.

How the hell did someone who asks questions about control over the media, a very nefarious and likely prospect, ever get lumped in with a “lizard-people” crowd like that?

I’m not entirely sure to honest, but some genius Spin Doctors out there are doing a hell of a good job to get things to this point, you kinda gotta give it to them….

32) MH17, THE ONLY FACTS

MH17, THE FACTS
• IT’s most likely that Either the US/EU backed Ukraine Nazis or the PRO Russian Separatists shot down the plane
• The US Backs and funds Al Qaeda and Kiev but accepts no responsibility for their terrorist actions even against the US itself it blames Al Qaeda.
• If US/EU backed forces of Kiev shot down the plane, oh well.. what a pity…
• The plane was ordered over a war zone and ordered to drop altitude to missile range by KIEV, FACT
• Russia backs PRO Russian separatists, not terrorists, who are simply fighting not to part of a Western Puppet state, exercising basic human rights for autonomy/alignment with Russia.
• If Russian backed forces shot down the plane GET RUSSIA, SANCTIONS, BAD RUSSIA, ALL PUTINS FAULT

But, wait, they are going ahead with sanctions anyway….

Hold on, they don’t have the evidence yet you say?

That’s fine, go back and watch your TV, there’s nothing fishy going on here folks, right?

31) How does the criminal banking global empire affect South Africa?

The South African economy certainly does not exist in Isolation. Our economic fate and the strength of our currency are intimately intertwined with the US dollar and the Euro. It’s much deeper even than that due to the alignment with the practices of the US Federal Reserve and the South African Reserve bank, the two are old chums that go back almost to their mutual inception. Furthermore, most of Africa, Asia and South America have great difficulty making World Bank and IMF loan repayments due to interest rates and designer terms which often results in these Nations  exchanging the debt for civil infrastructure contracts and other positioning agreements designed to give controlling influence over an emerging counties natural wealth and resources, a practice which poses serious risk of keeping that country permanently economically enslaved.

One Political party, UBUNTU, has recognised this and made its main campaign focus for the next elections the issue of fundamental corruption entrenched in South Africa’s financial institution and has some radical ideas for reform. 

It’s good to see that society is beginning to acknowledge the problem and it's really worth taking a look at the UBUNTU website here: http://www.ubuntuparty.org.za/2014/05/only-banking-reform-can-save-south.html