Do We Already Have The Solutions?

Some more interesting open sourced thoughts on gravity relating to climate

Here are some thoughts from Alistair Riddick which really caught my eye.
https://m.facebook.com/alistair.riddoch?fref=nf&ref=m_notif&notif_t=feedback_reaction_generic

These are thoughts casually written down on a forum, so take the delivery into consideration there is Is some profound rationale here:

Alistair Riddoch

Nigel Best Think about this.

One thing holds air to the planet = gravity.
Without gravity there would be atmosphere.
Without gravity there would be no barometric pressure.
Barometric pressure fluctuations are the primary cause of could formation.
Barometric pressure is the ONLY source of pressure, and without pressure you have no heat.

So ask yourself. What do you know about gravity?

Ask yourself what does humanity, collectively know about gravity.

We THINK it is a "force". Like from Star Wars.

That magically makes things want to be together. BUT. That is a theoretical belief.

One other theory proposes it is an emergent phenomena and not a force at all.

Another theory suggests it is made by quantum loops.

Another theory suggests it is made by 1, 10, 11, and 12 dimensional vibrating quantum-scale strings.

Another theory suggests it is the result of "turbulence" within some theorized quantum foam.

The list of theories attempting to explain gravity, the most fundamental, primary, prerequisite understanding necessary to understand Earth's energy budget and resulting climate has over two dozen hypothesized candidate theories.

Every single theory is mathematically unique.

So again the question. "How well do you think humans understand the most important ingredient in understanding climate?"

(p.s. none of these are thought to actually be exactly correct).

Is the theory of gravity just a "theory"?

3D Representation of mass curving spacetime

Did you know that there is no such thing as a gravitational force? Nothing is "at rest" And nothing "attracts" anything else as if it were a magnet, everything simply moves through on a straight line on a geodesic. Before this can be grasped you have to check out this super-cool video on frames of reference below, made in 1960. The sound takes a few seconds to kick in.

It can be expanded upon in thought experiment.
If if there was only a single particle in a universe with no fields, would it be still or moving? The answer is that it's not knowable or relevant. The one particle universe has no space. Movement t is not possible and time cannot pass because causality requires a sequence of particle events.
Add another particle. The two particle universe only allows the particles to move closer to each other or further apart. Even if you imagine the space around them in your mind to be 3 Dimensional it is irrelevant, that's just the way we think, only the space between the particles matters, other dimensions don't exist there. Time can at least now pass.
In a three particle universe all the complexities of our universe emerge as per the above video.

But we still need to add fields! And we still need to add a fabric framework for spacetime. What is it? It boils down to the path light takes travelling through spacetime, but there is a massive difference (so to speak) between trapping a moon into orbit and trapping a bean of light.

Hopefully you will be interested enough to watch the 5 series of clips below to resolve the finer points of this topic.

Should space exploration be privatized?

If you think you've thought this issue through, I put it to you that you probably haven't. If this topic interests you at all I suggest watching the whole clip resisting the urge to skip the parts you think you've paid mind to already.

How to view the file that Facebook has on you

Image courtesy NickSeal.com

This article by AntiMedia will tell you just how to download this surprisingly detailed secret file Facebook has on you:
http://theantimedia.org/facebook-secret-file/

Another thought on infinity from the perspective of overall universal charge being a Zero/Infinite Equivalence

My idea to make science as open source as media gets a great boost when you stumble accross great ideas from people on social media.

Thinking in absolutes on charge is a paradigm, there is no intrinsic need beyond labels to think of negative charge as fundamentally negative , we could call the charge we name "negative" positive, it's just a label and the field prevailing in the entire universe may even have universally frozen on these particular values somewhat arbitrarily, but it goes beyond that.

Previous post:
http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2018/03/another-thought-on-infinity-from.html?m=1

Further to my previous post on infinity (above) here is something I picked up in comment section from a Facebook post from Jean Paul Guyse
https://m.facebook.com/jeanpaul.guyse?fref=nf&ref=m_notif&notif_t=feed_comment

"Glenn Swart Just looked at your other blogs ref infinity. My theory is a colourless flat pixel lies beneath the curved edge of the event horizon of a black hole, the Zero Squared [-1+1][+1-1]. It may also solve the problem ref dark energy and dark matter.

Under conventional thinking, some-thing can't come from no-thing. But if no-thing is 100% of everything (all negative and positive charges cancelled out) and some-thing is less than 100% (some of both the positive and negative charges remain separate) it simply answers that problem. No-thing of the Zero Squared (100% of everything). It's there but undetectable because it hasn't separated and thus hasn't released any energy beyond its flat surface. Energy is released once the supersymmetry is lost (curvature/warping begins) and the simultaneous Big Bang AND Big Freeze occurs. If the Big Freeze doesn't occur neither can the Big Bang and visa versa. Fire and Ice. This allows for the Universe to both contract and expand at the SAME time. At least TWO open systems but mutually closed into each other. Both stiring into each other and thus entropy doesn't occur. This solves Newton's problem of a close system suffering entropy. Because the Universe is a 'virtual' closed system consisting of two open one's. This is my theory. Quite radical but it works. Not saying it's right but equally it isn't wrong too."

"And just to add, I should have cited Cardot instead of Newton ref Entropy"

A Virtual Tour Around The Cosmic Web & Nearby Galaxy Clusters

The Grand Design

A breathtaking tour (below) zooming out to eventually cover the entire universe.

Thought this was way cool!

And here is a sense of our local galactic neighborhood.

Documents the US public can now access under the Freedom Of Information Act, are here:

For PDF electronic copies of thousands of interesting Federal Government documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act. Fascinating historical documents, reports on items in the news, oddities and fun stuff and government bloopers, they're all here. Think of browsing this site as rummaging through the Government's Attic -- hence their name. "Our motto: Videre licet."