US Economy: Teetering On The Brink. My Shortest Post Ever.

             Case Closed!             

The Most Important Speeches In History Are Not Always Regarded As The Greatest, They Include Some Dire And Unheeded Warnings.

Five important moments, one temporarily heeded, two tragedies realized and profoundness of their words now appreciated, two terrible fates not fully appreciated yet but looming ominously near.

Eisenhower's Prophetic warning During His Farewell Address.

Without doubt the most important unheeded warning in history. Eisenhower left office a conflicted and troubled man. His accolades speak for themselves, but he was uniquely positioned as a decorated victorious General and Two Term President to understand the inner workings of the Military-Industrial Complex monster he had a hand in shaping.
No other warning would have spared as much death and misery as this if it had only been properly received.

I Am Prepared To Die.

Nelson Mandela's Rivonia Trial Speech was one example where the message did ultimately prevail but only after untold hardship by some.

"During my lifetime I have dedicated my life to this struggle of the African people. I have fought against white domination, and I have fought against black domination. I have cherished the ideal of a democratic and free society in which all persons will live together in harmony and with equal opportunities. It is an ideal for which I hope to live for and to see realised. But, My Lord, if it needs be, it is an ideal for which I am prepared to die."

                                                     






JFK's Secret Societies Speech.
The last great American President gave this poignant and delicately revealing speech warning the deaf ears of the time of the elites that sought to orchestrate the way global geopolitics unfold. Its the line of liberty he would persue that ultimately cost him his life.

This is a far-reaching and prophetic speech, vastly underestimated, which pretty much exactly predicted the mess the world is in today. Given the scope and timing, a case could be made for this being the greatest speech ever given.

FDR's New Deal.

FDR Taking on big business. This is the SOTU Speech The United States Should be hearing!

I Have A Dream.

Martin Luther King's "I Have a dream" speech remains as stirring now as it was then. Truly iconic.

The Unsatisfying Investigation Behind The Crime Of The Century.

The Neocon Agenda during this century (which is possibly the primary focus of this blog) was pretty much facilitated by this event. It shouldn't have been, looking back, since it made perpetual war justifiable by an isolated band of mavericks welding box cutters, we're told, loosely affiliated by mere assertion to the boogyman of the time, Al Qaeda.

Even worse than that, uninvolved parties like Sadam had less to do with 9/11 it seems than (once again by assertion) he did with WMDS. But it is what it is. The farce started with this event.

The perpetrators of the worst terror attack in recent times may have died in the planes that hit WT1 and WT2, but it has now emerged that the support structure of liaison's, safehouses etc in the US and their admin points of contact all appear to have been very well organized , these guys that eventually boarded the aircrafts did NOT keep entirely to themselves as we were lead to believe.

The Coverage of the film showing the first plane hitting the towers was not aired until Sept 12. Nobody can fathom why Bush told this lie, but it tells us how to position him on the issue.

But something very weird happened, the story from the first few hours of the planes hitting the World Trade Centre, pretty much stayed the story, almost as if it was scripted, and no discernable progress was made. A redacted, practical joke of a report emerged, and Al Qaeda, the US funded parters who are in the good books these days (in their Al Nusra and Al Qaeda guises) backed to overthrow, amongst others, Assad in Syria, were blamed.

But as we know, they went after Sadam Hussein instead. Let's face it, that's simply A strategy which we simply cannot accept they really believed in Washington, especially for their given reasoning. The details mattered little it seems, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz were relying on a mixture of ignorance and bigotry from the voting majority.

And, even worse, it didn't make sense to have such an obviously slack investigation for the crime of the century did it?

The Conspiracy Theorists have lots of Ideas, I have only questions, starting with the clearest inconsistency, the fact that WT7 went down later that evening without being hit, in what I can only understand to be a controlled detonation.

They deny this for some reason, but its the only real certainty requiring no investigation because only a mental patient won't be able to tell. You don't need to know buildings dont fall from fire, or that it was hardly on fire, hardly hit by any rubble etc, you look. You just look, it is there if your mind is open, it really is within all our abilities to see it!

Take a good look....

Its just not good enough to pretend it isnt 100‰ clear! This alone raises many questions. But without investigation we cannot get answers, how unsatisfactory in every possible way!

But let's get stuck in should we?

Resource Guide to 9/11 organisations wanting answers, and presenting their cases:

Below is The Youtube Channel Compiled Indirectly By The Community and Members of  the Thousands Of Proffessional Architects & Engineer's Who Call Bullshit On The Official Report https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCL-c_zvZ3lhlU7NU1ikxgmQ

Architects & Engineers For Truth:

http://www.ae911truth.org

Trailer

Full Feature 

The Bizarre Reporting: Reports from the BBC reporting WT7 collapsed more than 20 minutes too early. This one featured the building still standing in the background!

I mean, how weird is this? This sort of thing really gets my ones attention no? And the cut out at the end. Its almost like conspiracy bait, and in this case I'm biting!

Even Weirder than the actual broadcast are all the Youtube reactions to this event, which actually happened.

Some dont know that the occurance is not contested and cite it fake, but the crew and presenteras discuss it often so those are a waste of time. 

 Look for "Debunked" and "Explained" versions that sprung up to explain the possible rationale. They are even more bizarre because they explain absolutely nothing!

It's the clearest instance I can think of revealing the unscientific community based need to believe. The sceptic possesing critical thought faculties is much better positioned to avoid these traps, in this case you simply need to look for posts showing the interview's with the reporters concerned trying to provide some sort of reasoning or understanding, which is simirlarly unconvincing, but hard to understand as it is, it happened, and it shouldn't be quite so easy to brush aside.

A very interesting broader perspective short, well worth a view, less on direct evidence on the actual day, more about linking some basic, prudent, unsensational detective work to events surrounding 9/11. The sort of basic policework we HAVEN'T seen from the authorities.

The Bush Administration were wrong about Sadam, but Canadian Economics Professor Michel Chussodovsky is always right, here he raises the issues we all are already thinking...

This from the Author of the defining book on Globalization, "The Globalization of War" needs to be taken VERY seriously, this is not a man in the habit of being wrong.

1. It Appears the investigation has been on ice for a decade.
2. An outline of what was to become the 9/11 Commission Report was produced before the investigation began. The outline was kept secret from the Commission’s staff and appears to have determined the outcome of the investigation.
3. The 9/11 Commission claimed sixty-three (63) times in its Report that it could find “no evidence” related to important aspects of the crimes.
4. One person, Shayna Steinger, issued 12 visas to the alleged hijackers in Saudi Arabia. Steiger issued some of the visas without interviewing the applicants and fought with another employee at the embassy who tried to prevent her lax approach.
5. Before 9/11, the nation’s leading counter-terrorism expert repeatedly notified his friends in the United Arab Emirates of top-secret U.S. plans to capture Osama bin Laden. These treasonous leaks prevented Bin Laden’s capture on at least two separate occasions.
6. Former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger was caught stealing documentsfrom the National Archives that had been requested by the 9/11 Commission. The Commission had previously been denied access to the documents but the White House reluctantly agreed to turn them over just as Berger was trying to steal them.
7. The official story of the failed air defenses on 9/11 was changed several times and, in the end, paradoxically exonerated the military by saying that the military had lied many times about its response. The man who was behind several of the changing accounts was a specialist in political warfare (i.e. propaganda).
8. Military exercises being conducted on the day of 9/11 mimicked the attacks as they were occurring and obstructed the response. NORAD commander Ralph Eberhart sponsored those exercises, failed to do his job that day, and later lied to Congress about it (if the 9/11 Commission account is true).
9. A third skyscraper collapsed late in the afternoon on 9/11. This was WTC 7, a 47-story building that the government’s final report says fell into its own footprint due to office fires. The building’s tenants included U.S. intelligence agencies and a company led in part by Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney. Meetings were scheduled there to discuss terrorism and explosives on the morning of 9/11.
10. News agencies, including BBC and CNN, announced the destruction of WTC 7 long before it happened. One BBC reporter announced the collapse while viewers could see the still-standing building right behind her in the video. Years later, after claiming that it had lost the tapes and then found them again, BBC’s answer to this astonishing report was that everything was just “confusing and chaotic” that day. Of course, one problem with this is that the news agencies predicted the exact building, of the many damaged in the area, that would collapse. Another big problem is that no one could have possibly predicted the collapse of WTC 7 given the unprecedented and unbelievable official account for how that happened.
11. Construction of the new, 52-story WTC 7 was completed two years before the government knew what happened to the first WTC 7. In fact, when the new building was completed in 2006, the spokesman for the government investigation said, “We’ve had trouble getting a handle on building No. 7.” The construction of the new building, without regard for how the first one was destroyed, indicates that building construction professionals in New York City did not believe it could ever happen again.
12. Ultimately, building construction codes were not changed as a result of the root causes cited by the National Institute for Standards and Technology for destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) buildings. This fact shows that the international building construction community does not believe that the WTC buildings were destroyed as stated in the official account.
13. AMEC, the company that just finished rebuilding the exact spot where Flight 77 was said to hit, was put in charge of cleanup at the WTC and the Pentagon. The man who ran the company, Peter Janson, was a long-time business associate of Donald Rumsfeld.
14. The response of the U.S. Secret Service to the 9/11 attacks suggests foreknowledge of the events in that the agency failed to protect the president from the obvious danger posed by terrorists.
15. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission notified the FBI of suspected 9/11 insider trading transactions. That evidence was ignored and the suspects were not even questioned by the FBI or the 9/11 Commission.

There are, of course, many more incredible facts about 9/11 that continue to be ignored by authorities and much of the media. Let’s hope that the next major terrorist attack results in legitimate reporting and unified calls for truth before fourteen years have passed.

Stay Tuned Activists, I'll Soon Be Showing You How To Hit Them Where It Hurts!

EMAIL: admin@dwahts.hqzone.co.za


In order to be effective against an establishment designed to protect the status quo, you need to know all the tricks employed to manage outrage, descent, protesters and organized collectives.

I've been building up an arsenal of understanding designed to disarm this mischief entirely and expose the underlying common factors that activism groups have in common to potentially unite for more impact at these critical areas.

Let's explore the link between money, division strategy, media and politics and bypass the conjurors distraction tactics!

The Slippery Slope: How Big Multinationals Destroy Entrepreneurs, Unions & Turn Free Market Capitalism Into Crony Capitalism (Fascism)

Its not just Monsanto's decision to put farmers and bees out of business when they decided that the globalization of agriculture would not be about feeding the world but instead about controlling the worlds food supply, right down to the very genes themselves!

Neither is it Walmarts globalized network of franchised disenfranchisement.

The entire system is structured this way, and the complex network of shareholders that own the banks and media have their clutches in most of the global retail scene nowadays.

When political leaders posture about creating entrepreneurs, its a type of victim blaming because unless they are prepared to tackle a system loaded in favour of the big players who finance their campaigns and lead their lobbying cash cows, then they really are taking the biggest dodge available.

This informative article from Sputnik explores the relationships that make the fat cats laugh in the faces of the activism boycott movements that usually fade out like a sack of wet mice.

http://sputniknews.com/art_living/20150918/1027180035/top-ten-companies-that-own-everything-we-buy.html#ixzz3m59z2ZQv

Oil & Gas Piplines, How Can We Reconcile The Geography Of War, Refugees & Ambitious Planned Contrsruction Projects?

I'm posting this Mintpress News article by @mnarmuh to broaden the perspective on last weeks article "Why Syria?"

HERE is the link to the article online.

Don’t let anyone fool you: Sectarian strife in Syria has been engineered to provide cover for a war for access to oil and gas, and the power and money that come along with it.

By Mnar Muhawesh  @mnarmuh | September 9, 2015

• 
• 
• 

• 

Refugees and migrants wait to cross the border from the northern Greek village of Idomeni to southern Macedonia, Monday, Sept. 7, 2015. Greece has borne the brunt of a massive refugee and migration flow of people heading into the European Union. (AP Photo/Giannis Papanikos)

---

Editor’s note: This article has been updated to reflect recent Wikileaks revelations of US State Department leaks that show plans to destabilize Syria and overthrow the Syrian government as early as 2006.  The leaks reveal that these plans were given to the US directly from the Israeli government and would be formalized through instigating civil strife and sectarianism through partnership with nations like Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar and even Egypt to break down the power structue in Syria to essentially to weaken Iran and Hezbolla. The leaks also reveal Israeli plans to use this crisis to expand it’s occupation of the Golan Heights for additional oil exploration and military expansion. 

---

Podcast: Science, Conspiracy Theories, Vaccines, GMO's, Activism, Causes - Reconciling With Globalization

After initially resisting podcasts because they didn't seem a good fit with my personalty I've now embraced the opportunity they afford to cover a wide range of topics quickly and with stream if consciousness. And because a few people have asked me things over the last year or so that I just never got around to, and one two called me old fashioned....

I don't consider myself an activist, more a hobby journalist, or even (less glamorously) a scrapbooker.

But I have done alot of research, which must count for something. In that regard, these podcasts are not just my thoughts, they are what insights I feel Ive gained that could offer real benefit to commited activists open to this approach and open to better understanding the establishment they seek to take on.

Podcast 2) Part A (Part B to follow, apologies for audio quality in parts)

All music on podcasts is original or sequenced samples and available on request, composed, arranged on Flexbyte software, Groovemixer and Magix, not Licenced for commercial use.

How Is The Price Of Physical Gold Being Kept Artificially Low By Paper Contracts?

By Mike Finger on www.schiffgold.com 

The latest update from CME Group shows a huge outflow of gold held for delivery by Comex. There are now less than 6 tons of registered physical gold available for delivery. For every 207 ounces of gold claimed by paper contracts on the Comex market, there is only one ounce of physical gold in Comex vaults. This is the lowest “coverage” ratio in the history of the Comex.

What exactly does this mean for precious metals investors? The price of paper gold versus the price of physical gold is experiencing one of its biggest disconnects ever, because those paper gold contracts are so diluted. There’s never been a worse time to judge the strength of the fundamental strength of the physical gold market based upon Comex futures contracts.

If even a small fraction of Comex contracts were called in for delivery right now, there would not be nearly enough bullion to fulfill the orders. Major defaults on those contracts would occur, and the price of paper gold could collapse.

On the other hand, those left holding actual physical bullion would be find themselves part of a very prestigious minority.

You can read a good summary of this news onZeroHedge, which concludes:

And while we know what caused this epic surge in potential claims on gold – namely the relentless outflow in registered gold – what we don’t know is whether this is a systemic event, one which threatens the next Comex gold delivery request with an ‘insufficient product’ response, and a potential default, or simply a one day abnormality.”

Why Syria, The Specifics A Recap, Apart From The Broader Agenda.

In order to fully appreciate certain elements at play I'd suggest reading my former post on who really owns The Fed.

1) (top image) You guessed it: Oil and Gas. Syria is loaded.

2) (above) Alliances, gas pipelines and geopolitical strategic alliances. US/NATO encirclement of Russia.



3) Bankster Cartel, because as we know already, all wars are banker wars.

(Excerpt courtesy Adrian Salbuchi  as appearing in RT/op edge)

Syria’s Central Bank is state-owned & controlled – In other words, it manages its national currency so that it serves the Syrian people and not the Rothschild-controlled global bankers operating from their New York, London, Frankfurt, Tel Aviv, Basel and Paris hideouts.

This means that the volume of currency it issues is in proper sync with the true needs of real economy of work, labor, production and all that is useful to Syria’s people, instead of being in sync with parasitic, usurious, speculative foreign financiers. The latter seek to control local central banks so they can artificially limit the volume of currency available for genuine economic needs, especially the no-interest credit needed to finance useful things in the real economy: power plants, roads, gas works, housing, private enterprise and initiatives. This forces productive players – public and private - to have to resort to deadly interest and usury-based private banking loans whereupon the eternal debt chain starts to grow and grow as the so-called ‘sovereign debt crises’ that hit country after country throughout decades of time eloquently show.

By artificially distorting the volume of ‘public currency’ issued by sovereign central banks that generates no interest, countries are thus forced to resort to high interest bearing ‘private currency’ (loans) handled by the monopolistic private bankster cabal in the hands of Rothschild, Rockefeller, Warburg, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, CitiCorp, JP Morgan Chase interests.

Clearly, a very good reason for these parasitic banksters to want to take out Syria.

Canadian Economics Professor Sums Up The Nauseating Truth About ISIL In One Striking Quote.

Recent developments confirm what is known and documented: Washington is behind the Islamic State (ISIS) and at the same time it is behind the moderate Al Qaeda terrorists, which the Obama administration is supporting as part of America’s campaign against the Islamic State (ISIS). And they expect us to believe that they are committed to waging a campaign against terrorists

The Islamic State (ISIS) was until 2014 called al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI).

Al Nusra is an al Qaeda affiliate which has committed countless atrocities in Syria.  It is now considered by the Obama administration as the “Moderate Opposition”. 

America’s “anti-terrorist campaign’ consists in supporting a so-called “moderate” Al  Qaeda entity (Al Nusra)  with a view to going after another al Qaeda entity entitled The Islamic State, formerly designated as Al Qaeda in Iraq.  

“Al Qaeda is going after Al Qaeda”, and both wings of al Qaeda are supported covertly by US intelligence. 

Both ISIS and Al Nusra are protected by the Western military alliance. Both Al Qaeda entities are used to destroy Syria and Iraq. The air campaign allegedly against ISIS does not target ISIS, it targets Syria and Iraq, schools, hospitals, factories, residential areas, government buildings, roads, bridges, etc. 

Both Al Qaeda affiliated entities are being used to destroy Iraq and Syria as nation states.

The terrorists  are the foot-soldiers of the Western military alliance.

US-NATO-Israel are state sponsors of terrorism, providing training, weapons and money to various terrorist formations. 

The endgame is “regime change” in Syria and the fragmentation of Iraq.  

Michel Chossudovsky, September 03, 2015

Michel Chossudovsky is an award-winning author, Professor of Economics (emeritus) at the University of Ottawa, Founder and Director of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG), Montreal.  He is a contributor to the Encyclopaedia Britannica.
 He has taught as visiting professor in Western Europe, Southeast Asia, the Pacific and Latin America. He has served as economic adviser to governments of developing countries and has acted as a consultant for several international organizations. He is the author of eleven books including The Globalization of Poverty and The New World Order (2003), America’s “War on Terrorism” (2005), The Global Economic Crisis, The Great Depression of the Twenty-first Century (2009) (Editor), Towards a World War III Scenario: The Dangers of Nuclear War (2011), The Globalization of War, America's Long War against Humanity (2015).   His writings have been published in more than twenty languages. In 2014, he was awarded the Gold Medal for Merit of the Republic of Serbia for his writings on NATO's war of aggression against Yugoslavia. He can be reached at crgeditor@yahoo.com