Skip to main content

Do You Want To Know How Baron Jacob Rothschild Exercises his "Off Record" Control Over Global Finance & Geopolitics?

The Original Bankster
The Rothschild's arguably still sit on top of the global banking Elite hierarchy, above even the likes of the Rockefeller clan and they still pull the strings. How? Well, you will be very surprised to hear the answer because it's exactly the same way traditionally as the Rothschild dynasty always have, and I will explain precisely how this is achieved and why they do not need to "change with the times" They define how the age they are in works. For a background to this article I recommend my previous series of posts "All Wars Are Banker Wars"

You will see from the link that Mayer Amschel Rothschild made sure very early on that all details of the family Will & Testament have never been made public in order to prevent a revolution by the masses.  The Rothschilds use a complex system of shareholder arrangements and offshore trusts to ensure they can never be linked to major political activity.  They also use their control over the global financial institutions like the Fed, the IMF and the Bank of International Settlements to exercise their economic and political policy.

But this vice-like grip over these institutions and the Bilderberg group, as well as the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) is not enough if you want to actively steer events. They also own Reuters, all the big commercial media via shareholding and all the most influencial think tanks, councils and foundations that are chief mechanisms in global functioning and sentiment crafting.

The Rothschilds have always famously used generals like Like Jacob Schiff, JP Morgan, Paul Warburg and Cecil John Rhodes to enforce their world order, and they have done so with a high degree of effectiveness.  Nothing has changed with their man George Soros.  George Soros and his Open Society Foundation have been chief mischief makers in the 21st Century. It's common knowledge that before Soros put Obama's name forward, he was an unknown. Soros has been singularly responsible for the marginalization of Russia in line with uni-polar globalist ambition, and he engineered the coup in the Ukraine and elsewhere.
George Soros: Where Did He Get His Money?
Soros: is just a front man. Soros has been identified as a front man of the Anglo-French Rothschild banking group. Understandably neither he nor the Rothschilds want this important fact to be public, so the tight links to his friends in the London “City”, in the British foreign ministry, in the state of Israel and to his mighty friends in the American establishment would stay concealed.”
William Engdahl explains : “Soros’ connection to the ultra-secret international finance circles of the Rothschilds is not just an ordinary or accidental banking connection. The extraordinary success Soros has on the high-risk financial markets cannot simply be explained with “gambler’s luck”. Soros has access to the “insider track” of the world’s most important information channels, both government and private.

Prudently, George Soros has been having a lot of headache lately with hackers & leaks:
The global elite march in four essential columns: Corporate, Academic, Political and Organized Religion. In general, the goals for globalism are created by Corporate. Academic then provides studies and white papers that justify Corporates goals. Political sells Academic’s arguments to the public and if necessary, changes laws to accommodate and facilitate Corporate in getting what it wants. Organized Religion along with church and state secures corporate, academic and political rule into a global order.
The power behind the Committee of 300 is the Anglo-Jewish cousin-hood that dominate the financial and political systems of the world. This cousin-hood includes the Rothschild, Rockefeller, Oppenheimer, Goldsmid, Mocatta, Montefiore, Sassoon, Warburg, Samuel, Kadoorie, Franklin, Worms, Stern and Cohen families.

The video below is the Rothschild apologists version of reality that the casual investigator will eventually uncover, discover that there are many raving loon conspiracy theorists out there and decide that this version sounds about the most sensible.  It's not. It's just plain wrong that there was mischief back in the day but not any more.  This is pure ignorance I'm afraid to say.  Spend enough time investigating in detail every small link, with reputable sources and you soon get beyond this sanitized and on-the-surface-sensible-sounding version to one inescapable conclusion.  It's still happening. 

The Version The Rothschild's want you to believe, just enough scandal then pull back...

Now let's be serious here. Beyonce? Illuminati?  Come on!  How much do these idiots want to cheapen the debate?  Do they really think that because a few whack jobs on the internet make that dumb argument that the issue is as unnuanced and one dimensional as that? All they do is reveal that they have spent no time researching and they cannot be trusted to do even basic research because they probably research with a google search :)
You must never get information from a source like this video who polarizes issues into simple yes or no issues.

Popular posts from this blog

Dīvide et imperā: How To Defeat The Most Effective Social Control Weapon In Human History

Many different empires, cultures and nations have existed in history and while the details, styles, values and aesthetics keep changing, the core structure remains unchanged. In order to benefit from social coperation and steal reward in excess of the labour and value you invest, you cannot take it by brute  for extended periods of time without facing the wrath of the crowds. The crowds need to give it to you willingly or unknowingly. There was one exception to this synopsis, the Feudal System  but there is more to that than people realise, it's a post for a later day and deserves full scrutiny and parrellels do manifest. The support of the home crowd is also needed to win wars. No army has ever been effective fighting under duress, they would assemble, arm  and immediatly turn on you.

Before the current reigning Judeo-Christian Anglo American Empire of today there were other more monolithic empires that the loosely ideologically aligned old money banking dynasties, globalists an…

Scientific Consensus is that Consensus is overturned 100% of the time

Everything you know is wrong. There is a very good reason why science succeeds more often than politics does.  Unlike politics, It's not a consensus or a vote,  it's actually method.  The scientific method. Anyone who has read this blog before probably knows I'm a lifelong science junkie as well as someone who spends thousands of hours breaking down the the political and economic agendas behind the special interest groups that guide public policy.  In many ways I'm actually uniquely qualified to tie these angles together in ways not well understood by the overwhelming majority of people.  That actually includes scientists. Scientists are notoriously naive in the political and economic forces that drive the human world.

For example if you are of the opinion that the earth has one moon, the earth revolves around the sun etc you are already wrong. Well sort of. The politicpl world is black and white, the scientific world is nuanced, see…

CO2 is not a pollutant, it is greening the earth!

Whatever your persuasion is on CO² and AGW, nobody disagrees on the tremendous benefit it provides plant life. Many of the past famine disasters and desertification has CO² decline listed as a contributor.

I feel I've already blown the notion that humans are the main cause of climate change out of the water. Or rather I've used the reasoning of others and put it together in a convenient outline. See my previous post above for starters.  However, I recognize that humans do increase CO² levels, no matter how tiny. Increases are likely to be very short lived because the earth has an effective feedback mechanism, but we can apparently get small increases, and it's been put forward on very poor science that this is a bad thing. That assertion hinges completely on bad models. More on that in the bottom most link.  Model's and the measurement sample dates are dubious at best.

Furthermore, the main increase in CO²  as…