Handy Globalist English Into Plain English Translator


With the vast fortunes spent by large multinationals on PR "think tanks", benevolent sounding "foundations" and advertising spin doctors (with the express purpose of sanitizing their projects/products) it's little wonder we find ourselves out in the wilderness regarding who can be trusted.  At the level of lobbied multinational interests public sentiment is critical for political potency.  Too much outrage can sabotage the slickest corporate outfit.  Consent must be manufactured at all costs.


Don't fall for 'sustainability' 



With this in mind I would like to suggest a method that may be useful.  Use this (admittedly) cynical translator, which aims to translate corporate lingo and catchphrases into plain English but assuming the worst. This provides a scale of two extremes.  Look at the stated goal VS my worst case translated scenario, then look at the organisation in question and decide for yourself where their interests lie, and somewhere in between you will likely get a sense of where they are truly pitched.





  •  End poverty in all its forms everywhere
  • Translation: Centralized banks, IMF, World Bank, Fed to control all finances, digital one world currency that is BANK controlled rather than Cryptocurrency,  in a cashless society, using Hashgraph instead of Blockchain. 
  • Feed the world
  • Translation: Control the worlds food supply.
  • Efficient agriculture, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable farming.
  • Translation: GMO
  • Secure Society
  • Translation: Prison Planet
  • Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
  • Translation: Mass vaccination of proven or unproven products, big pharma lobby and pvt medi care, Codex Alimentarius
  • Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all
  • Translation: UN propaganda, brainwashing through compulsory education from cradle to grave.
  • Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all
  • Translation: Privatize all water sources, don’t forget to add fluoride
  • Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all
  • Translation: Smart grid with smart meters on everything, peak pricing
  • Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all
  • Translation: TPP, NAFTA, free trade zones that favor mega-corporate interests and franchise operations over entrpreneurs, McJobs over careers.
  • Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation
  • Translation: Toll roads, push public transit, remove free travel, environmental restrictions

  • Reduce inequality within and among countries
  • Translation: Even more regional government bureaucracy like a mutant octopus
  • Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable
  • Translation: Big brother big data surveillance state
  • Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns
  • Translation: Forced austerity
  • Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts*
  • Translation: Cap and Trade, carbon taxes/credits, footprint taxes (aka Al Gore’s wet dream)
I did a detailed post where I rip apart the climate change lie here: 

  • Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development
  • Translation: Environmental restrictions, control all oceans including mineral rights from ocean floors
  • Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss
  • Translation: More environmental restrictions, more controlling resources and mineral rights
  • Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels
  • Translation: UN “peacekeeping” missions, the International Court of (blind) Justice, force people together via fake refugee crises and then mediate with more “UN peacekeeping” when tension breaks out to gain more control over a region, remove 2nd Amendment in USA
  • Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development
  • Translation: Remove national sovereignty worldwide, promote globalism under the “authority” and bloated, Orwellian bureaucracy of the UN

The US Dept Of Clowns Part 2, The Department Of Excuses & PR For The Pentagon War Machine.


Image courtesy Front Page Mag


For background and part 1 see the link below for the U.S. Department Of Clowns, including some classic foot in mouth moments from John Kirby & Jen Psaki http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2016/01/the-us-department-of-clowns.html. Of course, not much has changed because The US State Department continues to function as a PR Machine for the Pentagon.  This apologist department seems to have little function in the public eye concerning matters of State, and is more and more of an excuse generating unit.

A great assesment from RPI http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/peace-and-prosperity/2016/april/25/state-department-jokesman-obama-never-said-no-boots-on-ground-in-syria/

State Dept flatly Rejects claims Obama said "No boots on the ground in Syria"


But riddle me this, how do we reconcile John Kirby's flat out denials with his president?  The whole thing is just an enigma, wrapped in a mystery....

"Again, I repeat: We’re not considering any open-ended commitment. We’re not considering any boots-on-the-ground approach."
-Obama at a press conference at the White House with Baltic leaders on
"And in no event are we considering any kind of military action that would involve boots on the ground; that would involve a long-term campaign."
-Obama in remarks with the presidents of Estonia, Lithuania, and Latvia at the White House
"Now, after careful deliberation, I have decided that the United States should take military action against Syrian regime targets.  This would not be an open-ended intervention. We would not put boots on the ground."
-Obama in a statement on Syria at the White House
"What we’re talking about is not an open-ended intervention.  This would not be another Iraq or Afghanistan.  There would be no American boots on the ground."
-Obama in his weekly address
"This will not be Iraq or Afghanistan. There will be no American boots on the ground — period."
-National Security Advisor Susan Rice
"I will not put American boots on the ground in Syria."
-Obama in a televised national address from the White House
 More recently, in 2014, Obama talked less about "no boots on the ground" and more about those hypothetical troops not having a "combat" mission or be actually fighting — a distinction the White House keyed on Friday.
"With respect to the situation on the ground in Syria, we will not be placing U.S. ground troops to try to control the areas that are part of the conflict inside of Syria."
-Obama in remarks at a NATO conference
"I want the American people to understand how this effort will be different from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. It will not involve American combat troops fighting on foreign soil."
-Obama in his plan to destroy the Islamic State
"The president has ruled out the option of deploying American boots on the ground in Iraq and in Syria in a combat role."
-Earnest in a press briefing
"I won’t commit our troops to fighting another ground war in Iraq, or in Syria."
-Obama in his weekly address
Image courtesy The Blaze

The Climate Change Hoax Hurts Green Activists Like You!


Last century green activists, or anyone who cares about the planet mostly cared about issues that actually affected planet earth insofar as human damage was concerned.  Plastic in the sea, pollution, species going extinct and commercial development over national heritage sites or sensitive ecosystems by large multinationals who placed profit above the environment.

The climate change movement is a political movement designed to help the globalist elite, it is not the green movement which is about protecting the planet.  We have seen the globalists Neocons hijack US foreign policy and the US constitution, the media, they hijacked Judaism with Zionism, they hijacked science and medicine with funding grants, R&D grants and profit centered models being linked to funding and there are many other examples, I wrote the following post as a guide against the disinformation http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2016/05/4-point-guide-to-understanding.html
The worst offender in this political campaign is the IPCC and most of the propaganda usually is traceable to this source, but I will devote a post to them shortly in detail.

Since the last Ice Age the earth has been warming and cooling at various times. The variance is sometimes many degrees per year, sometimes only 1.6 degree per century like recently.  In the 14th to the 18th century the Thames was at times frozen over, it was known as the "Little Ice Age" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ice_Age and naturally we are warming out of it. Right now we are not at the warmest since the last ice age. The periods between Ice Ages are called Interglacials, this one we are currently in is called the holocene and the Holocene Maximum period between 6 and 9 thousand years ago was much warmer   The issue over whether man is causing the now slower increase than thousands of year ago is illogical, and the conclusion that man is causing all global-warming is therefore impossible.  Here the issue is debated and the true mischief of the establishments unscientific method is exposed.



The illusion of the "scientific" conclusions of weather phenomena is called into question below.


The issues of polluting and poisoning our planet destroys eco-systems, they are the issues that matter, but they have been swept under the rug and now the only legislation that matters revolves around climate change. As long as you have "greenwashed" your products you can continue selling and damaging the environment, and only the large Multinationals can afford to greenwash.  Nobody focuses on the separates anymore, it's all been made a "wash" into the climate change witch-hunt and the corporations have gone back to destroying the planet unchallenged. Mission accomplished by the think tanks!  We all lose and so do our children.

CO2 level is a fraction of what it used to be, CO2 stabilizes weather and is not pollution or poison, and the big businesses that pollute and poison have pulled a cunning switch and bait move.


The CO2 link is misrepresented in an unforgivable way


Watch out for the may release of this! http://www.climatehustlemovie.com/
Trailer for Climate Hustle

Every aspect of the climate hustle broken down by category here, in brilliant and humerous video clips, well researched and well presented:
http://www.climatehustle.org/climate-hustle-clips/

The UN and big oil are mobilizing to take over half the world, the oceans, funded by George Soros, The Carnegie Foundation and hedge fund billionaires , under the cover of the green movement., climate change and sustainable development.  This is a massive push and we need to be smarter to stop this globalization parading as environmentalism.

The UN and Big Oil unveil "Agenda 2030"

Comedians on the left like Bill Maher and science schills who are not experts in the field, like Bill Nye, now encourage intolerance to reasonable debate on a level of ignorance that rivals religious faith.  They have lied to you, the real experts do not agree and there is no consensus.
Al Gore was WRONG! http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/8-highly-inconvenient-facts-for-al-gore-10-years-after-his-infamous-movie/

Interview with a REAL expert Jim Steele

It is not the science that sways public sentiment, it's the science that MAKES IT VIA THE MEDIA FOR PUBLIC CONSUMPTION, and we know who owns the media.  This includes the google search results so heavily leveraged in their algorithms to show search results listed on their acceptable sources list, which get more hits add to their hit count and it turn move them higher in a never-ending cycle designed to proliferate selected propaganda.

Polar Bear numbers are increasing, Antarctic Ice is increasing and Al Gore was just plain dead wrong about everything. http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/business/alatheia-larsen/2015/11/12/antarctic-ice-growing-even-hit-record-evening-news-shows   What does that mean, that we should become oil industry apologists? No, of course not, I am the biggest opponent of multinational globalization and the oil industry I know of in my entire social circle.  I do however, care about what is true, and greenwashing hurts what I care about, my planet.  Lets pull our heads out of our asses and start fighting for our planet again and stop being derailed by the NWO!

All the biggest globalists like the Rockerfellors, Unilever, the Rothschilds and Prince Charles are throwing their weight behind sustainable development by making the issue a "wash" of real issues mixed with globalization control strategies via the public sympathy that the green movement garners.

Truthstream media is a brilliant source to use to translate the stated goals of the UN's Agenda 2030 into the true goals for the Banksters: http://truthstreammedia.com/2015/09/25/agenda-2030-b-s-translator-how-to-read-the-uns-new-sustainable-development-goals/

The documentary below is outstanding and covers so much more than I have, I challenge anyone who sees it not to seriously reconsider their perspective.

The Great Global Warming Swindle (Full Movie)



How To Become The Symbol Of Resistance Against Empire.

It's not about who you are, it's about what you represent. Those seeking to overthrow Bashar al Assad are turning him into a symbol of resistance against the Military Industrial Complex, oil industry and banker backed empire behind NATO and the Gulf state region. The irony is so thick you can cut it with a knife. Just like Che Guevara came to represent (even to Westerners) more than just the Argentine Marxist revolutionary he actually was, the idea is harder to fight than the person.  All sorts of facts are starting to emerge regarding the true facts and SAA casualties during (what essentially amounted to Western NGO and insurgency activity) during the fake Arab Spring, a PR exercise designed to lend legitimacy to the efforts in Libya, Egypt, Syria and elsewhere. Back in 2011, before all of the media was essentially recruited by the complex shareholder arrangement that eventually brings all of MSM under one narrative, some Western press reports, were still slightly less biased (http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2061364,00.html)  Sure, they never reported on the agitation of the likes of Hillary Clinton exploiting tensions between Sunni and Alawite Muslims, but they never had the leaked emails spilling all the beans  https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/18328

Posters of Syria president Bashir Al Assad have started appearing in Yemen capital Sanaa.
It is also proven beyond reasonable doubt that Assad was framed in the Ghouta sarin gas attacks, the main pretext for the "Assad must go" policy the US propaganda masters have been hiding behind to enforce their proven "Regime Change 101" formula of soft power grabs.
http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2015/10/assad-did-not-gas-his-own-people-ghouta.html

What's really important here is what Assad's victory, with the help of Russia, represents to the bigger picture. For the first time we are seeing the globalists comprehensively defeated.  The cost has been the blood of Syrians, and a wave of refugees, just like with Libya, spreading across Europe.  It's only a matter of time before European taxpayers connect the dots between their governments wars to overthrow these trumped up "brutal dictators" and the refugee crises.  They are already calling into question their support of the true brutal dictators, the Wahhabi extremists of Saudi Arabia (alarmingly similar to the head choppers of ISIS.)

The Writing is on the wall.




Fear-mongering & Manufactured Consent For War: The ISIS Bogyman Scam.


The sort of media fear-mongering the Population of the West is used to.


Recent revelations inside Iraq have exposed ISIS. They don’t exist, simple as that, not across Iraq, not in Mosul, not in control of any oil regions, not in any way remotely resembling what the world has been told. The real “ISIS,” more recently identified as a Turkish, Israeli, Saudi construct is, at least in Iraq, run out of Erbil, not Mosul or Raqqah, cannot be identified, or explained. It is a ghost. Let our story begin.
In January 2014, I met with Sunni governors to discuss their views on the ISIS threat as it applied to their regional security issues. At that time ISIS was in Ramadi only, seen by a cynical but powerful few as a useful tool to leverage political reforms from the Shiite led government.
The subsequent almost magical rise of ISIS across Iraq was believed by all though it made no sense. The ISIS of January 2014 and the ISIS of September 2014 were unrelated, certainly not the same entity.
The new “ISIS” made militarily impossible simultaneous moves across Anbar, Nineveh, Salahaddin, Tamim, Dyala, Karbala, Babil, Najaf, Qadisiyyah and even Sulaymania provinces and this is in Iraq alone.
This evidenced early on that the tribally interrelated Sunni political groups, all of which had long since formed militia organizations with which I am very familiar, had suddenly become “ISIS” in Iraq but that there were other powers as well acting under the theatrical guise of ISIS or ISIL or the Islamic State.
Thus, we knew from the first, and by “we,” I mean the Iraqi government, Iran, Russia and maybe even the United States, that the ISIS threat was misrepresented.
This has long been an unspoken fact that the insurgency we suspected was nothing more than an Iraqi civil war, not the rise of a mystical cult of “head choppers” with mad internet skills and lots of Hollywood backing.
If the thought has crossed your mind that ISIS isn’t what it seems to be, your suspicions may well have been justified. If you had head of conspiracy theories about ISIS, that intelligence agencies were helping it or that it isn’t quite what it seems, there is reason to believe, reason rooted in facts that you are shooting well short of the mark.
We now have reason to believe that there really is no “ISIS, not as represented by anyone, not even by conspiracy theorists. In fact, the closest anyone has come to what we are now learning about who and what they really are came out in December 2014 during the Damascus Security Conference when the American delegation headed by Colonel James Hanke and I named ISIS as only an “arm” of a global organized crime syndicate.
Deconstructing ISIS
Last week, the regional government in Erbil covering the Kurdish areas of Iraq, received a very strange and inexplicable payment of $200m from Turkey for “oil revenue shortfalls.”
However, records indicate that in accordance with Iraq’s constitution, Erbil had received its requisite 17% of Iraq’s oil revenue with consistency. Also note that the constitution of Iraq expressly prevents the Kurdish Regional Government from directly negotiation oil sales with any nation or corporate entity.
Moreover, Iraq’s massive Kirkuk oil reserves are well outside the borders of the Kurdish Regional Government’s limited control. Then, however, KRG Prime Minister Barzani announced that he was planning to annex Iraq’s major oil fields as part of a ploy to withdraw from Iraq.
Adding to this, all in one week mind you, including another $300m payment to Erbil from an oil company in the West to secure oil rights within the territory Barzani said he plays to seize.
The problem is, Barzani already seized that territory and has, since 2014, been selling the oil to Turkey. Moreover, according to a June 10, 2014 story from the Iraqi News, the government of Iraq has cited Barzani personally as having sold $119b in Kirkuk oil through Turkey and Israel and for personally pocketing the entire amount, sales from 2010 onward, an amount now believed to exceed $160 billion American dollars. That entire amount, according to the Baghdad government, cannot be found in any account.
All the while, the people of the KRG are told they are bankrupt and local services are being curtailed.
We Said Erbil Had Seized the Oil Fields, What Did We Mean?
Back in November 2015, Russian Aerospace forces attacked oil truck convoys, at places moving four abreast, near the Turkish border crossing of Zahko. Though this was announced by no one, that border crossing is not between Syria and Turkey but rather Iraq and Turkey.
The oil transported along this ground route, parallel with the Kirkuk-Ceyhan oil pipeline, brought high grade light sweet Iraqi crude oil from fields north and east of Baghdad that were very remote from any known ISIS military capability.
We were told that ISIS had conquered the oil fields and refinery facilities that the Erbil government, since 2003, had coveted and had made more than two dozen military grabs to seize, each blocked by the Baghdad government with overwhelming force, something known well in Iraq but never reported in the West.
Until the “ISIS” moves across Iraq, the ones cited as Sunni militias pretending to be ISIS and limited real ISIS activities in and around their only base of operations in Ramadi, the Baghdad government had kept strong military forces between these oil facilities and production regions and the incursions from Erbil.
Where we had assumed that ISIS had taken these areas, though militarily impossible, and had somehow been allowed to transit oil directly through Erbil controlled territory into Turkey, perhaps explaining the $200m payment, thus representing a partnership between Turkey, ISIS and the KRG, we find we had this wrong. We had underestimated the situation.
We have now realized that, in fact, the Pergmersha had taken the oil fields based on, as Barzani has stated, “Baghdad’s inability to defend them.” Moreover, Erbil’s sales of oil to Turkey, all shipped through Mosul, supposed ISIS capitol, past the new Turkish base in Iraq, and up to Zahko where Russian attacks have attenuated this activity, tell another story.
Mosul is not an ISIS capitol at all. It is the home base for an international criminal conspiracy that Erbil is a prime member of and that the Turkish forces to the North of Mosul and the Pergmersha forces who have, for years now sat only miles away to the East, are there to protect their investment, not lay siege.
Thus, when Obama announced a plan to recapture Mosul in late 2014 and to have complete control by March 2015, we now know why these plans failed to materialize. There simply is no ISIS occupation of oil fields, production facilities and the oil route to Turkey, a route which is flowing cash into the Swiss bank accounts of friends of Erdogan and Barzani.
According to the Baghdad government, this is also an oil trade shared by the state of Israel in every way.
Did the Pipeline Really Blow?
Our next question involves the mysterious pipeline explosion supposedly blocking oil from Kirkuk, held by ISIS or is it the Pergmersha, and Turkey or is it Israel?
On July 29, 2015, Turkey announced a massive explosion of the 670 mile long pipeline that had been transporting 400,000 barrels a day of oil from “ISIS controlled” regions of Iraq to Turkey and to the Mediterranean port of Ceyhan. There, tankers from Exxon and British Petroleum carry this oil to world markets and no one has ever asked who gets the billions of dollars from these sales. From 2003 onward, Iraqi oil, or by estimates 40% of Iraqi oil shipped through Ceyhan, the entire production of the Kirkuk oil fields, largest known oil reserves in the world, was paid for.
In fact, there are no real figures on how much oil has left Iraq from 2003 onward with up to $1.5 t, and yes we are saying “trillion,” missing and unaccounted for. Whether talking hundreds of billions or in really serious figures, this kind of money can only not only be moved but in actuality “exist” within the network of Rothschild banks and within a global criminal organization itself beyond any nation state or “superpower.”
Let us return to why we are discussing the offending pipeline which may or may not have been destroyed back in 2015, which Turkey claims is related to their recent $200m payment to Erbil. Again, we preface with the simple fact that Erbil in no way, manner nor form has any financial rights to monies tied to the sale of Iraqi crude oil, whether trucked or “pipelined” out of Iraq.
There is no “Kurdish oil,” either within the borders of the KRG or within areas theoretically held by ISIS on behalf of Erbil or Turkey or Israel, if ISIS exists as described.
What we do know is this, there is no evidence of any kind that a pipeline was destroyed but we do have evidence that Turkey claimed down on the press in that region and has ethnically cleansed the city of Cizre, killing hundreds of civilians in a reign of terror.


There is no answer but global crime, feeding on assets, more base than empire building, no land to conquer only things to steal, people to slaughter, to burn, to debase and destroy.

Who is to blame? The military forces able to stop the terrorists and their travelling pr team, but who do not.

Simple as that.

Were this a battle of good against evil only one thing is missing. There is no “good.”

Some very interesting questions need to raised once this all comes out regarding all the "Terror Attacks" and possible links to false flag operations.


ISIS is turning out to be pure theater.



YOU Can Understand What The Problem Is With The Economy, READ THIS.



There never was a recovery.  This was always obvious to me, I blogged about it often like during that same so-called-recovery. Here is a compilation of my warnings in real time as it went down: http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2016/01/the-world-is-in-trouble-to-protect.html

It's less frustrating making that point now because more people are working it out. The light at the end of the tunnel is, and always was a freight train heading our way. Now the frustrating part is that the talking head economists are looking at symptoms in isolation. like OIL and CHINA.  That is no explanation, how about some sort of reasonable discussion, an interesting discussion that people will actually follow about what CAUSED it.  It's very very simple. I can't stress this point enough. Anyone (I really mean ANYONE) can understand it.

I am not an economist, I have no training in macro-economics. None.  I'm lousy with figures, yet it's strikingly simple to me, and I assure you my amateur take is there or thereabouts to the truth. That's how simple things are.

Permit to oversimplify one or two bits despite my claims of "simplicity" and leave a few factors out which distract or don't factor in the overall trend. Please correct me if you think I miss something as a result.  I have to make the point that as far as I can tell there is no mystery here.  If you can explain to me that I've missed something, please explain so that I can understand, nobody else is! It seems that this is what happened.


  • Nixon did his owners job by taking the US off the gold standard in the early seventies, this set the broad parameters to facilitate a fiat currency ponzi scheme, but was not in itself the cause.
  • The above allowed for real world economic laws to be abandoned in favour of central banking economic models and theory, justified by all sorts on fancy financial sorcery.  
  • The US bamboozled the world by pulling off a con that allowed the petro-dollar to allow the dollar to function as a defacto parasite currency and create a war-backed new backing system.
  • In 1996 the Clinton administration destroyed remaining hope with NAFTA, but even more blatantly with their repeal of the Glass-Steagal Act, creating a terrible environment for a workers economy and essentially removing many safeties separating investment banking and banking.  This almost directly resulted in the casino environment that created the "Too Big To Fail" banks.
  • While they "rolled it" the new central bankster pranksters, like Alan Greenspan at the US Fed had the short term pay offs appreciated as a new economic frontier in thinking, rather than the scam it really was. Trickle down economics, an obvious scam, was seen as the future.  The wealth gap and wall street economy was now firmly entrenched as a savior in societies press and financial institutions.
  • The continued outsourcing of career jobs of the worlds largest consumer economy, the US, to China and the developing world, dangerous national debt and trade deficits where all relegated to marginal concerns instead of red flags, the destruction of union power and shocking unchecked Lobby power in congress, resulted in a bit of desperation for momentum as the money velocity dropped causing unusually lenient or risky terms in consumer debt responsibility.  this was bundled off into all sorts of junk and futures derivative products which the investment institutions (now, like the new Mafia, were unrestricted by old laws) simply passed off as AAA rated.  The recipe is now set for disaster but it does not happen right away.
  • The Dot-Com Bubble provided clues, but the 2008 Credit Crises drove the point home. Why?
  • Because of rising debt and fake printed money (made sound legitimate by using the term "Quantitative Easing") were seen to trump real world economic basics, monetary policy, printing money and dropping interest rates to absurd levels were incrementally tolerated, their short term quick fixes were seen as solving these problems for some mystifying reason.
  • The establishment doubled down, used taxpayer money to bail out the banks and inceased the same failed policies to solve the problem. It follows logically that what they did was insane. I think a serious case can be made for either madness, or treason.  That is not an attempt to be dramatic, it's a serious statement and plain to prove.
  • The widening wealth gap meant the elite hold ever higher shares of the money.  The elite are more likely to spend 5% of that money whereas if it were in the hands of the working class many would spend 100 or even 110 percent of what they earn.
  • The velocity of money is now seriously shrinking and of course this is hammering global demand.
  • Shrinking demand means less freight, less transport and a dropping oil price before production figures are even considered.
  • China, by now the worlds largest producer, is selling to the US, the worlds largest consumer losing demand at record pace.  China's growth rate must taper off according to logic. Add disastrous central bank EU policy and a failing EU to the equation and.... Well I think it's quite obvious isn't it?
  • US military action, a petrodollar essential, is costing more and failing more.  The tax dollars transferred from taxpayers to wealthy Military Industrial Complex shareholders rivals the wealth transfer rate of the taxpayer to financial institutions.  The welfare for the rich starts as welfare for the poor, who need it, is pulled back each year.  The scam term for this is Austerity and it manifests in countless morally reprehensible and economically unsound forms.  It's simply not good economics apart from the moral factors.
  • The markets by now have no real relationship to the real world economy, purely in investor sentiment (guided by the media) and the price of gold has no relationship to scarcity, supply or demand (thanks mainly to the "paper position" Comex market established by the banksters).
  • A fantasy state of affairs has been created. The central banks are out of ammo. We actually have witnessed the birth of negative interest rates, once considered financial heresy. It's so bad that a war on cash has started to force people to keep their cash in banks instead of in their mattresses at home.  Anyone with debt would see the principle debt reduce the longer it goes unpaid. It's actually nuts.
To end off, there is no easy way out. Trust me, we are headed for disaster.  If you have any form of wealth, I suggest wealth preservation as your key strategy.  Buy physical gold and silver.  Wait for the property bubbles to pop before even thinking of buying property, it will only end in tears.  This is the inescapable truth. Hold me to it.

Cheers,




Huge Moment, Short Post: Congratulations To Russia On The First Successful Military Operation In the Modern Era

Syria prevails! And there is a new sheriff in town.


But that is for future news to reveal.

Let's get to the heart of the matter, after cumbersome US and Soviet military operations that characterized the last 65 years or so (almost all of which involved being bogged down, being defeated or using the op as cover to occupy the targeted nation for a protracted period of time) we have witnessed something remarkable. Russia actually did what they said they would.  They moved their military into Syria on invitation from the legitimate government (others just illegally bombed in a questionable fashion), decimated ISIS and other terrorist groups, destroyed the ISIS/Turkish black market oil trade, sent a loud message to anyone with future designs on Syria, and moved out with few casualties.  It's worth noting that they have not "abandoned" Assad (he was the first to know) and are in fact leaving enough clout in key areas to secure the situation.

Take the time to reflect on this achievement, unique in modern times. This is a truly landmark moment and it proves the military can be used effectively, in a remarkably short time period.

If the situation changes, they can move back in, but they have basically succeeded despite the overwhelming & unjustified Western media suspicion,  I think it's time the MSM acknowledge that Putin has cleaned up the mess left by Western/Gulf States/Israel/Turkeys intervention, and basic decency really calls for some sort of thanks. Unless of course, defeating terrorists was not their true goal.....

If it was, they should be embarrassed that after two years trying to achieve it, Russia did it in three short months.


Labels

Search This Blog

Your Feedback

Name

Email *

Message *