Climate Change, Banks, Globalization & the 3rd World


In 1987, Edmund de Rothschild creates the World Conservation Bank which is designed to transfer debts from Third World countries to this bank, and in return, those countries would give land to this bank.
The idea is for the IMF to create more and more SDR’s backed by nothing, in order for struggling nations to borrow them.

"These nations will then gradually come under the control of the IMF as they struggle to pay the interest, and have to borrow more and more. The IMF will then decide which nations can borrow more and which will starve. They can also use this as leverage to take state owned assets like utilities as payment against the debt until they eventually own the nation states.

"1988: The World Central Bank has three arms, the World Bank, the BIS and the IMF. 2000: How the World bank and the IMF took over Argentina, Tanzania and Bolivia. Terrible reading.



The IMF is closely interwoven and here with Rothschild's BIS Bank, and the BIS, IMF and the World Bank have a common external website."
Alexander de Rothschild
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-02-27/rothschild-said-to-soon-promote-7th-generation-heir-to-lead-bank


David Rothschild,  Nigerian oil and The GEF:

Established in 1991, the GEF is today the largest funder of projects to improve the global environment.
The GEF has allocated $8.8 billion, supplemented by more than $38.7 billion in co-financing, for more than 2,400 projects in more than 165 developing countries.

The GEF partnership includes 10 agencies:
  1. The United Nations Development Program (David Rothschild consultant/Nigeria)
  2. The UN Environment Program (UNEP)
  3. The UN Food and Agriculture Organization (A Rockefeller-partner organization)
  4. The UN Industrial Development Organization
  5. The African Development Bank
  6. The Asian Development Bank
  7. The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
  8. The Inter-American Development Bank (David Rothschild consultant)
  9. The International Fund for Agricultural Development

Here is a broadly cast post completely deconstructing and exposing how and why the lie that all warming and cooling is man-made was perpetuated.  It does so in a clear and easy to follow way:
http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2018/03/scientific-consensus-is-that-consensus.html?m=1

Arch Globalists, The Conservation Bank & Globalist Climate Conferences

Israeli currency 500 Shekels banknote 1982 Baron Edmond de Rothschild, Bank of Israel 

The Globalist/Bankster connections that hijacked the Green Movement was a strategically brilliant series  of events going back to the 90's but the roots  go back much further than that.  I'll be addressing these connections in a series of posts over the next few months.


Before getting into this consider a look at the overview first:
Here is a broadly cast post I wrote completely deconstructing and exposing how and why the lie that all warming and cooling is man-made was perpetuated.  It does so in a clear and easy to follow way:
http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2018/03/scientific-consensus-is-that-consensus.html?m=1



Some obscure history first.  The relevance will become apparent as this issue progresses, but this puzzle piece is needed early on despite how much changed from the original aspirations.  Don't poo-poo this as containing tired old conspiracy elements,  facts don't care about our feelings. 

By the time President Nixon was forced to understand the sobering realities of the post Bretton-Woods world, US debt to the banking dynasty brokered treasury bond holders at point where the nations gold holdings were going to have to be collateralized, the gold standard for the US Dollar, the world's reserve currency, would be abandoned on favour of a US Dollar backed by Saudi Oil, interest bearing debt and WAR. Ultimately the debt built up through deficit spending would not be serviceable, even with the nations taxation on the line as collateral surety, public land would need to back public funding in readiness for such a moment. It would take years to collateralize public land, in the form of State Parks, forrestry and fishery wilderness reserves and national heritage sites, to private interests. To do so would require a cause percieved to be so vital for the well being of humanity that nobody would question it. Before "Global Warming" was finally decided as the horse to back, other contenders by the globalist think tanks to being considered for massive fear campaigns. These were Global Cooling and the hole in the Ozone layer  among several other equally ginned-up lies which had just enough elements of truth to them to persuede the peasants using the media establishment available to the globalist dynastic banking houses. But first some context on the mobilization for such a strategy. The Rockefeller clan as well as the robber-baron backed think tanks and foundations all signalled willingness to devote resources of their tax exempt entities, from the Rockerfeller foundation, the Gugenheim Foundation, the Ford Foundation, The Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign foundations and literally dozens of others.

 In 1987, the 4TH WORLD CONSERVATION SUMMIT was held to discuss the implementation of a World Conservation Bank using the WILDERNESS LANDS of the world as the supposed collateral. The sole purpose of this fraud was to save the wealth and power of the elite.  All funds were to be housed in the Royal Bank of Canada (that strategy was changed) .  Now as the globalist EU crumbles,  and NAFTA stalls,  historical events like the ending of the cold war forced several plans to abandoned and new strategies forced focus on sorting out the Middle East,  we all know that a plan to have multiple dictators over sovereign nations will probably never happen in currency and customs unions as soon as they hoped , but in the process they may well ruin everything known to the people of the world,  especially in the ME, continue with endless wars and waste the entirety of the green budget and all R&D Grant funding chasing CO² ghosts,  using the GLOBAL LIE that GLOBAL WARMING Is MAN MADE. 
Read more here on the least known aspect.  Just ignore the little religious overtones here or there on the embedded video if you watch it,  it's still.  Worthwhile because in reality sometimes Priests and  Rabbis can also be whistlblowers
http://www.americaismyname.org/world-conservation-bank.html

Dont be fooled by Edmonde de Rothschild's naming of the Conservation Bank which they have since renamed,  they have full scope  to do as they please as usual.  

http://www.edmond-de-rothschild.com/site/Luxembourg/en/private-

banking/terms-and-conditions

(below a quick synopsis of what would one day emerge out of these strategies and how they would be presented for public consumption so as to disguise their intentions) 

  • End poverty in all its forms everywhere
  • Translation: Centralized banks, IMF, World Bank, Fed to control all finances, digital one world currency that is BANK controlled rather than Cryptocurrency,  in a cashless society, using Hashgraph instead of Blockchain. 
  • Feed the world
  • Translation: Control the worlds food supply.
  • Efficient agriculture, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable farming.
  • Translation: GMO
  • Secure Society
  • Translation: Prison Planet
  • Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
  • Translation: Mass vaccination of proven or unproven products, big pharma lobby and pvt medi care, Codex Alimentarius
  • Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all
  • Translation: UN propaganda, brainwashing through compulsory education from cradle to grave.
  • Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all
  • Translation: Privatize all water sources, don’t forget to add fluoride
  • Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all
  • Translation: Smart grid with smart meters on everything, peak pricing
  • Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all
  • Translation: TPP, NAFTA, free trade zones that favor mega-corporate interests and franchise operations over entrpreneurs, McJobs over careers.
  • Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation
  • Translation: Toll roads, push public transit, remove free travel, environmental restrictions
  • Reduce inequality within and among countries
  • Translation: Even more regional government bureaucracy like a mutant octopus
    • Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable
    • Translation: Big brother big data surveillance state
    • Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns
    • Translation: Forced austerity
    • Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts*
    • Translation: later this be Cap and Trade, carbon taxes/credits, footprint taxes (aka Al Gore’s wet dream)


Continued here:
http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2018/03/climate-banks-globalization-and-3rd.html?m=1

Some more interesting open sourced thoughts on gravity relating to climate


Here are some thoughts from Alistair Riddick which really caught my eye.
https://m.facebook.com/alistair.riddoch?fref=nf&ref=m_notif&notif_t=feedback_reaction_generic

These are thoughts casually written down on a forum,  so take the delivery into consideration there is Is some profound rationale here:

Nigel Best Think about this.

One thing holds air to the planet = gravity.
Without gravity there would be atmosphere.
Without gravity there would be no barometric pressure.
Barometric pressure fluctuations are the primary cause of could formation.
Barometric pressure is the ONLY source of pressure, and without pressure you have no heat.

So ask yourself. What do you know about gravity?

Ask yourself what does humanity, collectively know about gravity.

We THINK it is a "force". Like from Star Wars.

That magically makes things want to be together. BUT. That is a theoretical belief.

One other theory proposes it is an emergent phenomena and not a force at all.

Another theory suggests it is made by quantum loops.

Another theory suggests it is made by 1, 10, 11, and 12 dimensional vibrating quantum-scale strings.

Another theory suggests it is the result of "turbulence" within some theorized quantum foam.

The list of theories attempting to explain gravity, the most fundamental, primary, prerequisite understanding necessary to understand Earth's energy budget and resulting climate has over two dozen hypothesized candidate theories.

Every single theory is mathematically unique.

So again the question. "How well do you think humans understand the most important ingredient in understanding climate?"

(p.s. none of these are thought to actually be exactly correct).







Is the theory of gravity just a "theory"?

3D Representation of mass curving spacetime
Did you know that there is no such thing as a gravitational force?  Nothing is "at rest" And nothing "attracts"  anything else as if it were a magnet,  everything simply moves through on a straight line on a geodesic.  Before this can be grasped you have to check out this super-cool video on frames of reference below,  made in 1960. The sound takes a few seconds to kick in.


It can be expanded upon in thought experiment.
If if there was only a single particle in a universe with no fields,  would it be still or moving?  The answer is that it's not knowable or relevant. The one particle universe has no space.  Movement t is not possible and time cannot pass because causality requires a sequence of particle events. 
Add another particle.  The two particle universe only allows the particles to move closer to each other or further apart.  Even if you imagine the space around them in your mind to be 3 Dimensional it is irrelevant,  that's just the way we think,  only the space between the particles matters,  other dimensions don't exist there.  Time can at least now pass.
In a three particle universe all the complexities of our universe emerge as per the above video.

But we still need to add fields! And we still need to add a fabric framework for spacetime. What is it?  It boils down to the path light takes travelling through spacetime,  but there is a massive difference (so to speak)  between trapping a moon into orbit and trapping a bean of light.


Hopefully you will be interested enough to watch the 5 series of clips below to resolve the finer points of this topic.


Should space exploration be privatized?


If you think you've thought this issue through,  I put it to you that you probably haven't.  If this topic interests you at all I suggest watching the whole clip resisting the urge to skip the parts you think you've paid mind to already.

How to view the file that Facebook has on you

Image courtesy NickSeal.com

This article by AntiMedia will tell you just how to download this surprisingly detailed secret file Facebook has on you:
http://theantimedia.org/facebook-secret-file/

Another thought on infinity from the perspective of overall universal charge being a Zero/Infinite Equivalence


My idea to make science as open source as media gets a great boost when you stumble accross great ideas from people on social media.

Thinking in absolutes on charge is a paradigm,  there is no intrinsic need beyond labels to think of negative charge as fundamentally negative ,  we could call the charge we name "negative"  positive,  it's just a label and the field prevailing in the entire universe may even have universally frozen on these particular values somewhat arbitrarily,  but it goes beyond that.

Previous post:
http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2018/03/another-thought-on-infinity-from.html?m=1

Further to my previous post on infinity (above) here is something I picked up in comment  section from a Facebook post from Jean Paul Guyse
https://m.facebook.com/jeanpaul.guyse?fref=nf&ref=m_notif&notif_t=feed_comment

"Glenn Swart Just looked at your other blogs ref infinity. My theory is a colourless flat pixel lies beneath the curved edge of the event horizon of a black hole, the Zero Squared [-1+1][+1-1]. It may also solve the problem ref dark energy and dark matter.

Under conventional thinking, some-thing can't come from no-thing. But if no-thing is 100% of everything (all negative and positive charges cancelled out) and some-thing is less than 100% (some of both the positive and negative charges remain separate) it simply answers that problem. No-thing of the Zero Squared (100% of everything). It's there but undetectable because it hasn't separated and thus hasn't released any energy beyond its flat surface. Energy is released once the supersymmetry is lost (curvature/warping begins) and the simultaneous Big Bang AND Big Freeze occurs. If the Big Freeze doesn't occur neither can the Big Bang and visa versa. Fire and Ice. This allows for the Universe to both contract and expand at the SAME time. At least TWO open systems but mutually closed into each other. Both stiring into each other and thus entropy doesn't occur. This solves Newton's problem of a close system suffering entropy. Because the Universe is a 'virtual' closed system consisting of two open one's. This is my theory. Quite radical but it works. Not saying it's right but equally it isn't wrong too."

"And just to add, I should have cited Cardot instead of Newton ref Entropy"

A Virtual Tour Around The Cosmic Web & Nearby Galaxy Clusters

The Grand Design 

A breathtaking tour (below) zooming out to eventually cover the entire universe. 
 Thought this was way cool! 


And here is a sense of our local galactic neighborhood. 

Documents the US public can now access under the Freedom Of Information Act, are here:


For PDF electronic copies of thousands of interesting Federal Government documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.  Fascinating historical documents, reports on items in the news, oddities and fun stuff and government bloopers, they're all here.  Think of browsing this site as rummaging through the Government's Attic -- hence their name.   "Our motto: Videre licet.


Governmentattic.org  and for some background:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_Information_Act_(United_States





Alternatives to group think and consensus reality




I'm offering up these resources as one potentially of the most liberating experiences a person can go through.  Few people engage with and debate issues as widely on all corners of the Internet as I do,  and since I've had the same discussions over and over,  I've also heard the counterpoints over and over,  so I've been able to identify a type of sheparding of thought,  "groupthink" if you will,  and very often it manifests in people who  are actuality free thinkers. 
How can this be?  These people,  for the most part use the Internet,  many have grown up with it.  We trust it because it never lies about sports scores,  song lyrics or how fat Kim Kardashians ass is these days.  But there is one bottleneck I've identified as the source of all the misplaced trust that is associated with this freedom of information when it comes to manufacturing consent in areas where powerful political and economic interests have a stake.  So-called "fluid"  facts.  The type of thing you don't need to lie outright about but can spin to controll a narrative.
It's Google.  It's even become synonymous for "search"  to just "Google it" I know that Facebook and YouTube and Twitter and Instagram have their issues,  but in my experience all of these still offer diversity experience to some extent,  whereas Google,  particularly in the last few years,  has been marshaling a sanitized and monolithic narrative to point where I've now noticed that particular groupthink signature manifesting itself it the patterns and progressions of rational in discussion and debate in important issues. 
I can't tell you how insidious this is and how much harm it could potentially do.  It goes beyond affecting the outcome of elections etc,  it speaks to affecting who we are as a species.  Imagine a nation of zombies believing itself a society of enlightened free thinkers?  It's evident very much in the polarization of the left/right Partisan divide happening now in society.  Google is the chief architect of "Divide &  Conquer,  Divide &  Rule"  In the world today.

Before implementing solutions download Tor Browser for the dark web and alleged anonymity although there is evidence that there are still backdoors to intelligence agencies and even funding,  but only if you are a big time kingpin in a crime syndicate.  You will at least have firewall tools and escape advertising profiling.
https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser.html.en
Or Orford in the Google Play Store or Apples Tor equivalent. 

SOLUTIONS:
Don't abandon Google altogether,  (I still check out CNN and GOOGLE to keep a sense of what I'm required to think,  and what many may think.  It helps me understand  why.
An alternative is Start Page which is enhanced by Google,  giving the same sanitized results but with your privacy completely protected.
https://www.startpage.com

Don't bother with Bing etc,  they aren't much better than Google in sanitized quotient,  but the search quality is very advertising centered which also has shades of big brother. Duck duck go is marginally better.

Good Gopher is much better,  it has two filters,  one for Independent Media and another for Academia.  I would like to add that "academia"  is by no means any guarantee.   Science is not a vote and even scientific consensus is regularly overturned.
https://www.goodgopher.com

One site that gives a nice blend of both mainstream and independent results that also respects privacy is SearX.  It's a decent search engine.
https://searx.me

On the cutting edge is an innovative peer to peer decentralized engine called YaCy it's a great portal worth checking out.
https://yacy.net/en/index.html

If you ready to make the jump and leave https altogether then do so. I think a revolution is coming so get the jump on things and check out the ipfs protocol. I'll even give you an https   starting point.
https://ipfs.io

I'll leave you with one last thought in case you feel the algorithm is simply a commerce tool,  or that it's not worth getting to bothered about,  you're sure it's quite benign, check out the clip below.  Did you know Google AI is actively complicit in drone strikes?


How to prove the Earth is not flat, for yourself, using the Internet and a friend and mathematics.


It was suspected thousands of years ago that the earth is spherical,  or geodesic to be precise.  A papyrus from 230 B.C. Tells us what gave them the idea, and how we can improve on their work to form a conclusive proof:

Eratosthenes Finds Reasonably Accurate Diameter of Earth. 

Alexandria Eratosthenes peered into a well here,  at noon,  and came up with the diameter and
circumference of our planet!  The summer solstice, the Sun and a trip to Syene was all it took...........
Here is the experiment: http://outreach.as.utexas.edu/marykay/assignments/eratos1.html

Two wells or (alternatively two sticks) actually does not prove the earth is round because it does allow for a tiny sun very much closer than the moon to the earth, to be possible. We now know that isn't the case so we can use two wells or sticks, but it's cheating because the ancients never knew this.

To prove it conclusively you actually need the geometry of three wells or sticks. By doing three in a line and three in a triangle. Too much trouble?

BUT NOTE: still DISPROVE the small sun theory using two sticks or wells, because using geometry and shadows you could eliminate the "close to earth" small sun theory,  and taking the distance of the required near sun, calculate the shadow angles and zoom the sun further away until it's far enough to match the known modern distances between your chosen cities work backwards. So it's still possible to ultimately prove it using two, and more mathematics but technically speaking the ancients never had that information. Nowadays we can easily just reset the odometer of a car or use GPS or maps.

You can cheat using a cell phone by phoning a friend a few hundred kilometers to your West and timing the gap between the sun disappearing over your horizon (on the shore of a lake, or ocean to guarantee eliminating hills and valleys unless the friend is very far away)

An experiment proving conclusively the earth can't be flat

And here is a slightly more complex one by an Islamic scholar in the 11th century.

How Al-Biruni Calculated the Circumference of the Earth Using a Mountain in the 11th century:
https://flatearthinsanity.blogspot.co.za/2016/09/how-al-biruni-calculated-circumference.html?m=1


Nowhere in the observable universe can object's over a certain mass be flat or even potatoe shaped without gravity crushing it round. What makes you think only tbe earth is different.

Another aspect Flat-Earthers struggle to explain is timezones,  how it can be midnight somewhere and midday somewhere else,  and orbiting satellites and the space station you can view with your telescope. 

We saw from our first example that the angles don't correspond to the mathematics, let alone the problems the below invokes refuting gravity etc. It also can't account for complete darkness and relies on a domino effect of requiring everything from the moon landings to orbiting GPS satellites. broadcast satellites, the space station etc being fakes. Its a very needy and unrealistic chain of hundreds of refution points requiring every science discipline, every nations Space Agency, Broadcaster etc to be in on it.


They also don't explain how no moon or meteor,  or planet can be anything but round over a certain mass,  that way they fail to correctly understand gravity. It's a state of mind relying debate on every point of science having to have proof experiments done right in front of them otherwise they reject them. I have no issue with rejecting anything. Who am I to judge? But rejection of everything Scientific in an age of computers, cell phones and aereoplanes is apparently cognitive dissonance. There is a word for that. It's not skepticism, it's paranoia.




The Many Faces Of Matter


Apart from dark matter,  and Energy (if you take into account the matter / energy equivalency behind nuclear bombs as reconciled by Einstein's E=mc²) Then baryonic (normal)  matter itself has many little known forms beyond antimatter and negative matter.  It's quite fascinating.

It's  difficult to understand matter fully so in that spirit this post seeks merely to describe aspects of its known range.  The chart below shows us the mystery  of the unknown matter and energy making up about 96%  of the universe,  which this post doesn't even go into.  


Wikipedia states:
"A phase is a form of matter that has a relatively uniform chemical composition and physical properties (such as densityspecific heatrefractive index, and so forth). These phases include the three familiar ones (solidsliquids, and gases), as well as more exotic states of matter (such as plasmassuperfluidssupersolidsBose–Einstein condensates, ...). A fluid may be a liquid, gas or plasma. There are also paramagnetic and ferromagnetic phases of magnetic materials. As conditions change, matter may change from one phase into another. These phenomena are called phase transitions, and are studied in the field of thermodynamics. In nanomaterials, the vastly increased ratio of surface area to volume results in matter that can exhibit properties entirely different from those of bulk material, and not well described by any bulk phase (see nanomaterials for more details)."

But that's by no means the end of the story.  The video below covers some of the more bizarre states of matter we never hear about,  including 18 different kinds of water ice,  time  crystals,  superfluids and frictionless matter,  as well as the weirdness in states of matter we find in nature's densest matter environment,  neutron stars (It's a surprisingly little known fact that black holes contain no matter,  they have become singularities rather than super dense matter,  they owe their extreme gravity to super warping of spacetime)


Labels

Search This Blog

Your Feedback

Name

Email *

Message *