Science Fails.


More fails from the standard model of Cosmology by the brilliant Wallace Thornhill.



Posted by on
Index , , ,

5G is a globalist initiative that nobody can stop.


“No State or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the Commission’s regulations concerning such emissions.”
Section 704 of The Telecommunications Act of 1996 
Click the word "Act" for a pdf copy or visit this site which is one of the few vigilant sites tracking this potentially ominous outcome.

 https://www.telecompowergrab.org/legislation.html

 https://mdsafetech.org/telecommunications-act-of-1996/

Its time to accept major global media, cellular and satelite telecomunications monopolies are firmly under the control of powerful globalist capital finance interests and state/district level government will be powerless to act.  This is the aim of the globalists, to control centralised power to render grass roots local power structures worthless. Telecommunications are almost as important as banking and war to their internationalist MO and where there are no suitable supra-national bodies like the UN or EU or IPCC, such as in the US, then they go federal.  China should offer no resistance either unless the government intervenes, since the population is compliant. This is the MO and it has been for some time. This is a weakness for now to the globalists if people act swiftly, at least some sort of sovereign control can be imagined, meaning potentially there is taxpayer oversight but it wont last forever..
https://www.axios.com/nationalizing-5g-network-raises-a-number-of-concerns-1517168611-4c95d53f-7013-42b9-bcdf-9ef7bbdfde14.html


The Globalisation of Telecomunications is not about connecting the world, its about controlling the worlds communications...

Industry concerns are not the issue I really want to sddress here, but here they are if you are curious:
https://www.ecnmag.com/article/2017/05/5g-six-top-concerns-network-operators

5G sounds like increadable tech, but it appears its too soon and the public health impact is expected to be severe and its really just the latest nefarious development but hopefully will bring some needed attention to the issue. Because the public health concerns over 5G are so serious and the roll out so extensive people imagine there would have been a public consultation process of some sort. There has not been. The opposite has happened and its been planned by the globalist multinationals of Big Telecom years in advance.

Here is a typical attempt to hold power to account:
https://www.activistpost.com/2018/10/verizon-ceo-hans-vestberg-questioned-on-5g-safety-privacy-concerns.html

 This is not a profit driven move because isolated profit interests top globalists less than total control of the profit yeilding system as a whole, and they want it with no prospect of a challenge.  The way these companies work is that those at the top first need control over the industry and the government legislation passed around their objectives. Only then can the R&D (they hold all important patents and intellextuall in be made available to other industry players and wall street CEOs who will try to make profit their goal but they are just employees compared to the very top.

It needs to be understood that in every country an effort like the YELLOW VEST Protests in France will probsbly be need on all these facist points of concern. If you value your self determination and health of your kids you will fight for it, but nobody fights when they think the situation is under control. We are all about to find how little control we really have.


Scientific Papers are suspiciously lacking. Here is one:
https://www.academia.edu/42678825/The_5G_Safety_Dilemma_Plea_for_Urgent_Scientific_Research_in_the_European_Context


Posted by on
Index , ,

Is the structural nature of the universe dictated by gravity or electromagnetism?

Image courtesy www.nasa.gov

This may seem like a question of scientific detail, but actually its a fundamentally disputed scientific worldview.  I say "worldview" because even when there is agreement on the scientific points which are often already proven, there is a vast gulf in interpretation between the two theories of a more established gravity dominated universe, and a universe dominated by electromagnetism.  Walt Thornhill's website www.holoscience.com suggests that the term "Electric Universe" has already registered with a patent office so somebody has big plans.  I will give his synopsis although there is some variation in some of the theories I've looked up, I'll give an assortment of links at the end which you can look up yourself. 

 Introduction
In the wake of recent discoveries, a new way of seeing the physical universe is emerging. The new vantage point emphasizes the role of electricity in space and shows the negligible contribution of gravity in cosmic events.
Images returned by high-powered telescopes and recent space probes have challenged astronomers’ long-standing assumptions about galaxies and their constituent stars, about the evolution of our solar system, and about the nature and history of Earth.
The new discoveries also suggest that our early ancestors may have witnessed awe-inspiring electrical events in the heavens—the source of myths and symbols around the world.

Cosmology

Today, magnetic fields are detected everywhere, even in the “empty” depths of intergalactic space. Magnetic fields cannot exist without causative electric currents. The naked electric force is 39 orders of magnitude (a thousand billion billion billion billion times) stronger than gravity. The visible universe is constituted almost entirely of electrically active plasma.
In the twentieth century, the pioneers of plasma science inspired a new school of investigation called plasma cosmology. Plasma cosmologists suggest that electricity is the primary force organizing spiral galaxies and the astonishing galactic clusters now seen in deep space.
Plasma cosmology has achieved surprising success in predicting major discoveries of the space age. This new perspective does not require purely theoretical inventions based on mathematical assumptions like the Big Bang, dark matter, dark energy, neutron stars, or Black Holes.

Stars

An Electric Universe extends the findings of plasma cosmology to the formation and evolution of stars and their planetary satellites. Stars are formed at the intersections of galactic current filaments in dusty space plasma. The size of a star and its colour are determined electrically and may change suddenly. Novae and supernovae are the explosive response of stars to a power surge in their galactic circuit.
Proponents of the Electric Universe suggest that there are no isolated islands in the universe. All objects in space, from subatomic particles to galactic clusters, are connected by manifestations of the electric force acting in real-time.
The Standard Model of the Sun proposes that pressure at the core of the Sun provokes a thermonuclear reaction. Proponents of this model say that this thermonuclear furnace causes the Sun to shine.
The Electric Sun Model, on the other hand, envisions thermonuclear reactions and neutrino production at or close to the surface of the Sun where the maximum exchange between the Sun and its external environment occurs.
It is electricity that energizes the stars, including the Sun, in a form of glow discharge. This external power source explains why the temperature of the Sun increases above the photosphere to coronal temperatures of 2 million degrees. Powerful plasma feedback effects maintain a steady output of visible solar radiation while variations in power input show up in the familiar sunspot cycle.
It is in the nature of a glow discharge that all stars possess a weak electric field beyond the corona. As charged particles of the solar wind move away from the Sun, they continue to be accelerated due to the Sun’s electric field, which extends to the heliopause.
Watch  Scientists Claim Discovery “Confirms” Standard Solar Model  for more information on the differences between the two stellar models.
Comets
Comets are electrically charged bodies moving on elliptical orbits through the Sun’s interplanetary electric field. As it approaches the Sun, the comet’s swift radial movement develops arcing on the nucleus. The arcs produce jets of dust and ions that form the coma and visible tails.
Many comets are solid rocks with dry surfaces. The sharply defined features of comet nuclei make clear that they are not “dirty snowballs” sublimating in the Sun. Due to the electric force, a comet can entrain a mass of hydrogen from the Sun greater than the mass of the comet’s nucleus. The unexpected X-rays of a cometary discharge can reach 2 million degrees.
Cometary nuclei reveal deeply cratered and blackened surfaces due to electric arcing. Since comet nuclei are eroded electrically, they could not survive across aeons of solar system history and may have been produced much more recently than proposed in the Standard Model.
For more information on the Electric Comet model click here.
Home

The Brilliant Electric Universe YouTube Channell by Thunderbolts Project:


Overview:



The Thunderbolts Project Website: www.thunderbolts.info


SAFire Project:





Other Related Websites

One of the premiere sites dedicated to the Electric Universe and plasma cosmology. Developed and managed by Wallace Thornhill, the site contains all of his Holoscience articles over the past 12 years.

Electric Cosmos   http://electric-cosmos.org/

Don Scott’s site that is currently announcing his book, The Electric Sky.

Plasma Universe    http://plasmauniverse.info/

The nature of space plasma according to Anthony Peratt. A long-time proponent of plasma cosmology, Peratt is an associate director of Los Alamos National Laboratories and one of the leading experts on high-energy plasma discharge.

Plasma Mythology  http://www.mythopedia.info/

Mythopedia.info: “Our objective is to study historical information regarding the structure, workings and origins of nature, with special emphasis on transient events. As scientists now recognise plasma as the dominant state of matter in the universe, the subject is conveniently referred to as plasma mythology. This eye-catching term serves to distinguish the present approach from more traditional schools of ‘nature mythology’, that did not acknowledge the significant role of transient events in human traditions.”

Plasma Resources      http://www.plasmaresources.com/

Your one-stop-non-shop for exploring plasma cosmology, our electric universe and almost anything else even remotely related to the electrical nature of space, climatology and our Earth.

 Click on the below titles for links

Plasma Cosmology

This site offers a straightforward introduction to the Plasma Universe. An excellent source for newcomers.

Plasma Universe Wiki

A Wiki about the Plasma Universe, a model of the universe in which electromagnetic forces dominate since 99.999% of the universe is plasma (charged particles). Although the equal numbers of charged particles tend to cancel, the tendency results in “quasi-neutrality”, and charge separation may occur.

Electric Universe Wiki

The Electric Universe theory highlights the importance of electricity throughout the Universe. It is based on the recognition of existing natural electrical phenomena (eg. lightning, St Elmo’s Fire), and the known properties of plasmas (ionized “gases”) which make up 99.999% of the visible universe, and react strongly to electro-magnetic fields.

Society for Interdisciplinary Studies

The SIS was formed in 1974 to consider the role global cosmic catastrophes may have played in our history, and even recorded by cultures worldwide in their oral and written ancient traditions.

Maverick Science

The present web site offers a generous sampling of my previously published articles as well as the latest findings from ongoing researches.  Included are several chapters from Martian Metamorphoses: The Planet Mars in Ancient Myth and Religion and the companion volume The Many Faces of Venus: The Planet Venus in Ancient Myth and Religion.  Also included are a number of monographs on a variety of subjects, ranging from the origins of rock art and writing to cosmography.

Posted by on
Index , , ,

Assumptions In Science 2) The Thermonuclear Fusion Model Of The Sun

The Sun in various ionization bands. Credit: David H Brooks, Ignacio Ugarte-Urra, Harry P Warren.

 As an indroduction I strongly suggest viewing the below clip because it does a nice job of invalidating the current model, Eddington's inside out model where the lightest element (hydrogen) somehow finds its way to the centre of the star where it's said to fusion to helium, and as far as I am concerned that is it, case closed! 

"I can find no way to state this diplomatically, so let me be blunt: The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun."

 Ralph Juergens


 As a science junkie, I am drawn to the discipline by its explanatory powers and I see modern technology as a testament to that.  However, the more interested I become the more surprised I am when I discover that some of the most widely accepted "facts" are as yet unproven which to me is astonishing because science prides itself on being evidence-based, which it is. 
The standard model of the sun violates the first law of thermodynamics!
What leads to my astonishment is not that we don't have all the answers but that popular understanding of science has unfolded in such a way that someone like me does not encounter the fact that certain aspects are not definitively proven until he takes sufficient interest in really look into them.  

I'll use an example that brings me to the theme of the post. We often hear from astrophysicists that the thermonuclear fusion model of the sun is well tested. It is not. We has successfully reproduced each step under great artifice, but continuous hydrogen to helium fusion HAS NOT been achieved and remains the holy grail of science. (See below.)



But you will hear that despite this failing, its still the best science we have. Thats something you will hear often in astrophysics and cosmology so get used to it. The truth is for every failing there are usually better tested theories that better fit with observational evidence and measurement data. Sometimes these theories ARE reproducible in labs! Case in point is that we have an experiment on earth that actually confirms, in principle (unlike the current model) the much maligned electric sun model. Click HERE for details. Much more on that to come.

Taking a step back I should point out that I don't include the obvious Global Warming/Climate Change fraud in this assessment because I view it more as a political fraud that happens to have reached its tentacles into science.  I suppose what I'm saying that even in science where no obvious political agenda is manifest you get the kind of establishment territoriality that I always thought would be more of a problem in History because the vested interests make it inevitable, especially in fields like Egyptology where certain interests stand to lose when narratives change. History also explains the agendas behind powerful interests still causally connected to the outcome of wars etc, so where there has been corruption it makes sense powerful interests would have an agenda with the way history paints its participants.  However, in the sciences it's a lot more subtle, so wherever I encounter a possibility I'll post on it, like the below from Stephen Smith. 

 Please see Part one of Assumptions In Science: 1)  Dark Matter Does Not Exist before or after reading this. If this series has your attention rest assured there are several more equally controversial posts to come, all of which I would be be prepared to bet my life on as closer to the truth than what conventional wisdom has taught us. All information is easy attainable in the public domain but to make the the job of referencing easier for you I am accumulating a vast library of peer reviewed and published scientific papers and academic articles (found HERE). This includes scientific experiments conducted in world class facilities to back up today's latest industry and engineering projects. 


Here is the first part of a series on the topic in the latest Space News segment from one of the best space channels on YouTube. 

Do convection currents and vibrating magnetic field lines create the dynamic phenomena observed on the Sun?
According to the thermonuclear fusion model of the Sun, hydrogen in its core is crushed with so much force that it is converting to helium, releasing tremendous amounts of energy. The core’s temperature is thought to be 15 million Celsius, with compressive strain greater than 340 billion times Earth’s atmospheric pressure. A common metaphor used to illustrate the process is to imagine millions of hydrogen bombs exploding all at once within a confined space: 700 million tons of hydrogen are said to be converted into helium every second.
The Sun’s surface is known as the photosphere. Above that surface layer is the chromosphere, and above that is the corona, the outermost part of the Sun’s visible atmosphere. The photosphere averages 6000 Celsius, while the corona can be as much as two million Celsius! This is the great mystery that has encumbered researchers. How is it that the hottest region of the Sun begins at an altitude of 4000 kilometres and extends over a million kilometres from its surface without any significant temperature drop?
I suspect there are questions to addressed here regarding the exact temperature difference. There are two splar spectrums and its not fully accounted for that chemical reactions, electrical plasma arc discharge reactions and other fission and LENR reactions are going on and not easy to quantify. However lets accept that certainly some large difference is certain.

Many ideas have been proposed for how this steep temperature rise occurs. Some research groups have concluded, rather idiotically I have to say, it is the “rearrangement of magnetic field lines,” otherwise known as “magnetic reconnection,” that is causing the heating. Both the SOHO and TRACE satellite observatories have detected small, rapidly changing magnetic regions on the Sun’s surface.
It has been suggested that “reconnection events” within those fluctuating fields continuously heat the solar corona. The problem with that theory is that no one has ever observed magnetic field lines “reconnecting.” As Electric Star theory advocate, Dr. Donald Scott has repeatedly stressed, no one ever will.

Another potential explanation for the solar corona’s extreme thermal radiance is that convection on the Sun’s surface causes magnetic field lines to oscillate. As the field lines move up and down, waves travel along them, eventually moving outward into the corona where (presumably) sufficient kinetic energy heats it up.

Well the problem with much of this reasoning, is that magnetic field lines such as we see in text books, don't exist! 

In the electric model of stars, the Sun is a positively charged electrode, an anode, in a circuit, while the negatively charged electrode is located far beyond the planetary orbits. The “virtual cathode is known as the heliopause. That may sound outrageous by current reasoning, but the model goes further and has always predicted that a superheated sheath of plasma would envelope the heliosphere with rapid double layer charge inversion being a defining characteristic. Well guess what the voyager space probes have just uncovered?
As the electric model relates, sunspots, flares, coronal heating, and all other solar activity is most likely a result of fluctuations in electricity from our galaxy. Birkeland current filaments slowly rotate past the Solar System, supplying more or less power to the electric circuit powering the Sun.
The electric current flowing out of the Sun is balanced by the current flowing into it, so perhaps the changes in temperature indicate the magnetic field polarity and the strength of the electric field. If the Sun is connected to the rest of the galaxy by Birkeland current “transmission lines,” then its puzzling characteristics with respect to conventional interpretations are most likely demonstrating the fluctuations in current arriving from the Milky Way’s electric generator.
The Sun’s inverted temperature gradient can be explained by the Electric Star theory because it conforms to an electric discharge within the z-pinch zone of intergalactic Birkeland current filaments. The Sun is a gigantic electric arc, not a ball of hot hydrogen gas. Therefore, much of the energy of the Sun, probably most, is focused from outside and not expelled from inside.

For part 3 in my "assumptions in science" series which deals with assumptions surrounding redshift, the CMB and more, please click here. 


The Second Solar Spectrum.
The fact that there could be a mix-up between spectrum lines for elements/molecular and lines in air with chemistry vs vacuum vs in denser plasmas with micro fields changes everything. Astrophysicists have no idea what is going on in the sun. They use purely physics, no chemistry, and their model treats the sun as an ideal gas not dense enough for chemistry despite acknowledging the magnetic fields everywhere, they treat it as a mysteriously magnetized gas.
The Chromosphere & Second Solar Spectrum: Monitoring the Chemical Playground of the Sun! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BinXp... Is the Sun a Gas? The Standard Solar Model Explained! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDFPx... Is the Corona at MILLIONS of degrees? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yrYIx... J.S. Ames, The Spectrum Researches of Professor J.M. Eder and E. Vallenta, Astrophys. J. 1895, 1, 443-446. https://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/p... M. Saha, Ionization of the Solar Chromosphere, Phil. Mag. 1920, 40, 479-488. http://www.saha.ac.in/web/images/libr... J.A. Anderson, The Vacuum Spark Spectrum of Calcium, Astrophys. J. 1924, 59, 76-96. https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1924A... C.M. Olmstead, Sun-Spot Bands Which Appear in the Spectrum of a Calcium Arc Burning in the Presence of Hydrogen, Astrophys. J., 1908, 27, 66-69. https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1908A... A.V. Demura, Physical Models of Plasma Microfield, Int. J. Spectros. 2010, 671073, pp42. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijs/... H. Zirin, The mystery of the chromosphere. Solar Phys., 1996, v. 169, 313–326. https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1996S... G. Tsiropoula G., et al. Solar fine-scale structures I. Spicules and other small-scale, jet-like events at the chromospheric level: Observations and physical parameters. Space Sci. Rev. 2012, 169, 181–244. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1207.3956.pdf P.M. Robitaille, The Liquid Metallic Hydrogen Model of the Sun and the Solar Atmosphere IV. On the Nature of the Chromosphere, Progress Phys. 2013, 3, L15-L21. http://www.ptep-online.com/2013/PP-34... D. Nield, How Paint and a Speaker Could Explain The Physics of The Sun's Plasma Jets, March 13, 2022. https://www.sciencealert.com/jets-of-... Spicules in H-Alpha Credit: Big Bear Solar Observatoryλ http://www.bbso.njit.edu/images.html J.O. Stenflo and C.U. Keller, New Window for Spectroscopy, Nature 1996, 382(6592), 588. J.O. Stenflo and C.U. Keller, The Second Solar Spectrum. A new window for diagnostics of the Sun, Astro. Astrophysics 1997, 321, 927-934. J.O. Stenflo et al., Anomalous polarization effects due to coherent scattering on the Sun. Astron. Astrophys. 2000, 355 789-803. https://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/p... J.O. Stenflo, Polarization of the Sun’s continuous spectrum, A & A, 2005, 429, 713-730. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/pdf... P.M. Robitaille, Polarized Light from the Sun: Unification of the Corona and Analysis of the Second Solar Spectrum – Further implications of a Liquid Metallic Hydrogen Solar Model, Progr. Phys. 2015, 11(3), 236-245. http://ptep-online.com/2015/PP-42-07.PDF Second Solar Spectrum A.M. Gandorfer, High Resolution Atlas of the Second Solar Spectrum, Istituto ricerche solari Aldo e Cele Daccò, Locarno. https://www.irsol.usi.ch/data-archive... https://www.irsol.usi.ch/data/data_ar...

NIST Atomic Spectra Database Lines Form

Best viewed with the latest versions of Web browsers and JavaScript enabled

NIST lines data https://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/ASD/... Solar Fraunhofer Spectrum with assignments https://bass2000.obspm.fr/download/so... Digital Fraunhofer Spectrum https://bass2000.obspm.fr/solar_spect...
Solar abundance data 




Posted by on
Index , , , ,

Reliable collection of various REAL climate indicators!

Settled? Give me a break! This is not even the full story. We don't know the full story.












.The above is a simplification would you believe? The true workings of the earth's climate as an entirety is something we are a long way from understanding.  I hope you are not to horrified to find out it is not, in fact, "settled science".  That statement is somewhere between hysterical and tragic and you shouldn't take such things seriously which I'm sure you won't if you value critical and independent thought which seems, likely if you are reading this blog. You only need to look HERE to see how far science in general is from being "settled", one of the most absurd utterings I have ever heard.

A simpler diagram but just as clear on making the point

I've established more or less as a certainty that there is a political, internationalist push or agenda behind the AGW movement, but science itself has failed both where its bought and paid for, and in more prosaic ways.  Here is a thorough analysis of the topic by my favourite sceptic. It's an excellent video clip and essential viewing for anyone interested in the state of affairs in the scientific community.
https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/02/the-crises-of-science.html

The real science and scientific data should be responsibly sourced, thought about rationally and reacted to in a way that does not simply serve as a useful perspective for the political agenda of some unseen hand far away.

Destroying the junk science about the Coral Reefs and Anthropogenic Climate Change & more.

What it certainly should NOT look like, is this epic, steaming pile of turds  posing something scientific:
https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/02/so-this-is-where-we-are-fighting-cow.html

Here,  in one image is the non-case of the AGW movement if their revisionist "revised data to minimise the distracting role anomalies play in the data.



 If images are not what you are looking for, the best refutation of the AGW climate change science is the one embedded in this link and it was made by the worlds best long-range weather forecaster. IT was made back in 2014 and is also predictively accurate over the subsequent 5 years, something the AGW movement has never been able to claim,
https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/04/the-best-refutation-of-climate-change.html

A variety of sources is better.  For a random and accessible basic Idea, perhaps start here:

https://greatclimatedebate.com/tutorial-anthropogenic-global-warming-agw/?fbclid=IwAR07-rGyZCC3isuqynAaiYd7OeUU0Zxl7TbLhVJ9eK5ZGzGtQHW9k9gpLqo

(More Links)
30 years of media FAILS
https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2018/06/30-years-of-failed-climate-predictions.html

 Starting with the most important single data set in climate science: The relationship between atmospheric CO2 and temperature for the last 425 million years https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1154/5/4/76/htm

For a brief outline of all the pertinent issues involved with misrepresented climate facts, truncated graphs, anomalies represented as data and all the debate points, please read this post which contains links to all the issues (scientific and political) central to the debate.

http://dwahts.blogspot.com/2018/05/climate-alarmism.html?m=1

For great weather models of all varieties follow Doctor Ryan Maue on Twitter:    https://mobile.twitter.com/RyanMaue
He works for Weather Models dot com and here is the price structure: https://weathermodels.com


For an incredible tool to get live and past data here is a post with instructions on using it:
http://dwahts.blogspot.com/2018/07/is-every-year-really-hottest-year.html?m=1

Weather Service Data:
Here is the incredible tool:
https://earth.nullschool.net/#2018/07/12/1200Z/wind/surface/level/overlay=temp/orthographic

What science is Google quietly removing?
Resources: (From whatsupwiththat)

Tap for link
More Mythbusting:
Are Natural disasters on the rise and killing more people?

Did you know?
The Idea that we anywhere near the optimum levels needed for plants to grow and flourish like they did in the past is simply wrong.  The earth has been in a crisis of sorts of desertification limiting plant growth to only the most suitable conditions.  It was not always so. CO2 is at historically low levels, it was 7 TIMES HIGHER! n the Jurassic and Cretaceous.
https://www.livescience.com/44330-jurassic-dinosaur-carbon-dioxide.html

CO2 since 1800
The 2018 figure is the average of seasonally-adjusted figures for June and July, 2018 (which is a good projection for the annual average). Previous years are annual averages.
We also have a similar graph for methane(CH4),
and a combined graph with both CO2 and CH4.
Direct measurements of CO2 at Mauna Loa Observatory, in Hawaii began in March, 1958. This is the annual average data we’ve graphed:
ftp://aftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/products/trends/co2/co2_annmean_mlo.txt(1959–2017)
For monthly data see:
ftp://aftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/products/trends/co2/co2_mm_mlo.txt.

1850-1958 data is from http://data.giss.nasa.gov/modelforce/ghgases/Fig1A.ext.txt(ice cores).

1800-1850 CO2 data is from http://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/paleo/icecore/antarctica/law/law_co2.txt(Law Dome ice cores, 75 years smoothed).

NOAA tide data: This makes a very persuasive case.
https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/03/30-years-of-noaa-tide-gauge-data-debunk.html



Milankovitch Cycles

Posted by on
Index , ,
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)

Labels

Search This Blog

Your Feedback

Name

Email *

Message *