Skip to main content

Seeing Bitcoin as an investment only is missing the point entirely

If you pay attention to the average investors advice, and you have any sort of vague grasp of the ideology behind Cryptocurrency, you will straightaway notice that many are fimly locked into a paradigm that they seem unable to begin to appreciate may be causing their myopia.  They cannot fundamentally let go of the outdated notion that Crypto is a stock or investment, and that alone is what makes them unable to understand what is happening as anything but a bubble. The real bubbles are the DOW, S&P, NASDAQ, the Bond market etc all puffed up by QE and cheap money printed after the 2008 crises by the Fed.
Steve Keen explains the first Central Bank created market bubble beautifully here:

But regarding bubbles and viewing Bitcoin through this prism, This is entirely missing the point. There is no precedent here. We are dealing with the first credible currency alternative to the fiat currency controlled by the banker cabal behind the worlds central banks (the Fed, The ECB, The BOJ, the SARB etc)

As soon as this is understood you realize that there is no fundamental valuation on this "stock". Suddenly all the worlds fiat becomes potential market-share and value from nothing is absolutely possible. Values of over a thousand dollars don't seem unreasonable, market demand places the realistic price for Bitcoin between 100 000 and one million dollars per Bitcoin, depending on the demand vs fiat, the proven money of gold/silver other crypto in the emerging basket, most of which will go to zero when the winners succeed. These values are not just possible, but probable with the blockchain distributor ledger backed currency, aided by the real money criteria "store of value" (like gold) potential. Fiat by comparison is not created with scarcity but can be printed out of thin air, making it not scarce and backed by value but infinitely printable and inflationary by design of fractional reserve and QE. Fiat is backed by INTEREST BEARING DEBT.

One is based in value, the other in debt.

This amazing tool will put you in the picture:

This understanding is not unlike looking at a three dimensional illusion on a 2D page, letting your eyes blur and BOOM, suddenly you see the image emerge in three dimensions out of nothing.  At the risk of coming across as poetic I assure you I am not stretching. We are dealing with the most important revolution in money in living memory,

The banks drove the Dotcom and Subprime bubbles, this is not like them, banks are AFRAID of crypto, it could make them irrelevant at a time when bank bailouts from the last bankster caused bubble cost us 30 TRILLION dollars, nearly thirty years of the entire annual budget of the USA!

You don't believe me?

Crypto is peer to peer decentralized currency.  If we want to escape bankster tyranny we need vision, we need to stop being defeatist and embrace peoples money.

Popular posts from this blog

Dīvide et imperā: How To Defeat The Most Effective Social Control Weapon In Human History

Many different empires, cultures and nations have existed in history and while the details, styles, values and aesthetics keep changing, the core structure remains unchanged. In order to benefit from social coperation and steal reward in excess of the labour and value you invest, you cannot take it by brute  for extended periods of time without facing the wrath of the crowds. The crowds need to give it to you willingly or unknowingly. There was one exception to this synopsis, the Feudal System  but there is more to that than people realise, it's a post for a later day and deserves full scrutiny and parrellels do manifest. The support of the home crowd is also needed to win wars. No army has ever been effective fighting under duress, they would assemble, arm  and immediatly turn on you.

Before the current reigning Judeo-Christian Anglo American Empire of today there were other more monolithic empires that the loosely ideologically aligned old money banking dynasties, globalists an…

Scientific Consensus is that Consensus is overturned 100% of the time

Everything you know is wrong. There is a very good reason why science succeeds more often than politics does.  Unlike politics, It's not a consensus or a vote,  it's actually method.  The scientific method. Anyone who has read this blog before probably knows I'm a lifelong science junkie as well as someone who spends thousands of hours breaking down the the political and economic agendas behind the special interest groups that guide public policy.  In many ways I'm actually uniquely qualified to tie these angles together in ways not well understood by the overwhelming majority of people.  That actually includes scientists. Scientists are notoriously naive in the political and economic forces that drive the human world.

For example if you are of the opinion that the earth has one moon, the earth revolves around the sun etc you are already wrong. Well sort of. The politicpl world is black and white, the scientific world is nuanced, see…

CO2 is not a pollutant, it is greening the earth!

Whatever your persuasion is on CO² and AGW, nobody disagrees on the tremendous benefit it provides plant life. Many of the past famine disasters and desertification has CO² decline listed as a contributor.

I feel I've already blown the notion that humans are the main cause of climate change out of the water. Or rather I've used the reasoning of others and put it together in a convenient outline. See my previous post above for starters.  However, I recognize that humans do increase CO² levels, no matter how tiny. Increases are likely to be very short lived because the earth has an effective feedback mechanism, but we can apparently get small increases, and it's been put forward on very poor science that this is a bad thing. That assertion hinges completely on bad models. More on that in the bottom most link.  Model's and the measurement sample dates are dubious at best.

Furthermore, the main increase in CO²  as…