Science is not a vote, it's an outlook, an attitude, a discipline and (mostly) It's a method. No scientist worth his salt should ever use the words "settled" especially if voting or "consensus" produce it rather than the scientific method. There are words for the sort of (public or corporate) funded scientific studies and organisations that are better suited to that sort of thing.
Those words are "Politics" and "Commercial" and if that does not jump right out at you then I don't know what will. Each of the above has its place of course, but if you think it through, it turns out the implications are far further reaching than it seems on face value. I think that those aspects are affecting the personalities as well, especially those appointed under the nebulous title of "public understanding of science" are either taking a diengenuous approach on this topic or are perhaps a little politically naive.
Fortunately I've come across this little gem, a research article from Peter Stallinga and Igor Khmelinskii that looks into the issue in a disciplined fashion and I'm posting it here as a basis for a new angle I'm going to explore in future when I address "Climate Change"
Here are the posts that re-cap the relevant information on the 9/11 False Flag operation which I have recently compiled. It includes the latest developments. I have done this because I still consider this the most important issue in the world today. It's resolution would mean a de-facto coup on the criminal wars of regime change and mass murder in the Middle East and elsewhere. It would send the scum from the mainstream media and political establishment running like rats from a sinking ship and embarrass the arrogant defenders of the establishment, the good dogs barking for their biscuits that have been such an obstacle to the global proliferation of truth, justice, liberty and decency worldwide.
I have an upcoming post on operation Talpiot. A Mossad operation to which all the breadcrumbs lead. It's not Chinese spies, It's Mossad spies that the US Deep State already shares tech with. Trump either doesn't know it or is being wilfully deceitful. Even a casual Google search of this and it will become plain to you. I've posted some examples in links at the bottom of this post. Hang in for a post I'm preparing on operation Talpiot which will place this in context. For further context see the excellent open source investigation which I believe has come close to solving the 9/11 false flag operation.
Here it is: http://dwahts.blogspot.com/2018/09/911-anniversary-has-open-source.html?m=1
In this sense even fringe media censored gloryhound Alex Jones has a point, and I'm staying neutral on this just seeing how it turns out.
Remember Jones, before he was gotten to, used to be spot on, he's become increasingly right wing and terrified of Israel. See below his predictions of an upcoming false flag just before the main World Trade Centre attack, including his assertion regarding the first World Trade Center bombing and Oacklahoma.
He's dropped many clues for those who have been listening.
Trump is another person whose been gotten to. It's obvious, cast your mind back:
Here is a video from 28/6/2001 which had to keep being uploaded from VHS, and explained at the time everything that was about to go down, and gets increasingly harder to believe as it progresses.
Incredulous as you may be, if you are on the fence and are on the fence, this is the right time to keep an open mind. This affects everyone, and everyone's voice is needed.
Just like former CIA spy Robert David Steel, who is involved in the investigation, puts it "Mr President, I've run false flag operations, I know what they look like, I know what they smell like"
Public Intelligence Blog Updates. What has been presented to the president and what is available for you? See below:
Memoranda for the President on 9/11: Time for the Truth — False Flag Deep State Truth! UPDATE Adds Videos of Authors
God Bless America. On 15 February 2016, our President, speaking to a wildly enthusiastic crowd in Bluffton, South Carolina, promised that he would find out — and inform the American public — “who really knocked down the World Trade Center.”
As all engaged and informed citizens now know, the 9/11 Commission was a controlled cover-up at the same level of atrocity as 9/11 itself, and totally comparable to the Warren Commission controlled cover-up on the assassination of John F. Kennedy by Lyndon Baines Johnson, Allen Dulles, J. Edgard Hoover, and varied private sector participants as well as the government of Israel, which sent two witnesses to Dallas.
This collection of twenty-eight memoranda, most one page but a few two pages and one four pages, provide the President all he needs to know to do three big things when he gives his planned speech on 9/11 on 11 September 2018:
01 Direct the Attorney General, Jefferson Sessions, to direct the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Geoffrey S. Berman, to act on the petition for a Grand Jury and criminal investigation into 9/11 as delivered on 10 April 2018 from the Lawyer’s Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, a 54-page petition with 57 categories of evidence about 9/11 crimes.
02 Support and call on Congress to pass — prior to the November 2018 elections — the Bobby Mcllvaine World Trade Center Investigation Act, to be completed and reported out to the President and the Public by 4 July 2019.
03 Utilize the information in this collection to inspire the expelling of the fake news media from the White House, the creation of a two-way truth channel engaging all 200 million US voters, the passage of #UNRIG Election Reform Act to give all #WalkAway voters a fair shake in a broader political system that terminates the two-party tyranny; and an end, for once and for all, of Deep State and Zionist control of the Shadow Government including the secret intelligence community that persists in advancing lies inciting assassination, defamation, and impeachment proceedings against the President.
Authors represented in this volume, each of whom created an original work of public intelligence, include, in alphabetical order:
Kevin Barrett; Scott Bennett; Christopher Bollyn; Fred Burks; Steve De’ak; A. K. Dewdney; Gordon Duff; Aero Engineer; Greg Felton; James Fetzer; Richard Gage; Tom-Scott Gordon; David Ray Griffin; Sander Hicks; T. Mark Hightower; Barbara Honegger; Eric Hufschmid; Ed Jewett; Nicholas Kollerstrom; John Lear; Susan Lindauer; Joe Olson; Peter Dale Scott; Robert David Steele; and indirectly, Victor Thorn and Judy Wood. Contact information for all authors is available to alternative and conventional media outlets desiring to do interviews.
Below is the Table of Contents in Abbreviated Form:
Donald Trump Makes A Promise Letter of Transmittal Overview & Call for A Presidential Truth Summit Who Did It? Why? How? Epilogue References Index
The two most shocking memoranda reveal that the WTC was condemned by 1989 and all parties including the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and the Mayor of New York City knew the buildings would have to be brought down at a cost of $2B — this provides the commercial insurance fraud motivation and the foundation for the planning of a political false flag operation years in advance; and that 9/11 was used to launder $240 billion dollars used from 1998 to 2001 for a Gold War against Russia — an economic covert war not authorized by Congress or declared to the public, in which Buzzy Krongard, John Brennan, and William Browder appear to have been the principal actors, under the direction of George H. W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and George Tenet.
All of those named are innocent until proven guilty. What this collection does is make it crystal clear to the public who has not been investigated, and why they should be.
Includes 15 minute video (the one embedded above) for the President that ends with two asks; several individual authors speaking for up to 3 minutes each with an opening and closing by editor and publisher Robert David Steele; and a long (1.5 hrs) video of everyone that includes some important testimony but uneven delivery (all at the link above).
UPDATE 3
A couple of the authors are uncomfortable with the proximity of this volume to the new volume on Sandy Hook as well as other elements of this volume with which they are not in full agreement. No author has liability in relation to the words of other contributors, front or back matter, where and how the volume is published or distributed, or how the volume is publicized. That is solely and exclusively the responsibility and authority of Robert David Steele, editor and publisher. Each author’s contribution should be appreciated in isolation, as their unique and valuable contribution to our understanding of 9/11 specifically. This volume asks the questions that have not been answered.
ROBERT STEELE: The matter of 9/11 Truth is now on the table at the White House, the National Rifle Asscoation (NRA) and the Republican National Council (RNC). Below are the three cover letters that accompanied the work shown and linked below.
The future course of America cannot be charted if we continue to tolerate the high crimes and lies of the Deep State and its Shadow Government. ENOUGH!
Here bulleted below I quote from the NATO website.
Collective defence means that an attack against one Ally is considered as an attack against all Allies.
The principle of collective defence is enshrined in Article 5 of the Washington Treaty.
NATO invoked Article 5 for the first time in its history after the 9/11 terrorist attacks against the United States
Basically, through Article 5 it's the basis of 18 years of military action starting with the occupation of Afghanistan.
It was declassified in 2008 in what I believe was the only oversight by US government conspiritors in their effort to lie to the US people. It appeared on Intel Files in 2009 and only recently has the critical importance of the document has been understood. It was danish Professor Niels Harrit (Associate Professor of Chemistry for Copenhagen University for 37 years) who first made the connection. The esteemed Professor tasted the sting of organised Deep State public smear campaign after doing nothing more than report his expert findings on the use of nanothermite in the demolition World Trade Centre 7. The resulting backlash subsequently caused him to join the 9/11 truth movement. https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Niels_Harrit
Why exactly is it so important? Let's go back to time the decisions were made.
Lord Robertson, NATO's general secretary gives the legal justification required for getting all 19 countries on board for military action, citing the Frank Taylor reports compelling EVIDENCE.
The above clip was taken from NATO'S official YouTube channel.
Here is a great synopsis from the Corbett Report of the events at the time, and why it took so many years for the penny to drop. It all comes down to dates which make the story impossible, and "cut and paste" repetitions being where they shouldn't, and the fact that THE REPORT CONTAINS NO EVIDENCE.
How can this scenario not be a candidate for one of the greatest historical oversights? Of course it is, we just aren't allowed the faculty of critical thought required to think it.
As for all those academics at US institutions still towing the line, all those good dogs barking for their biscuits in internet "skeptics" forums defending the governments official 9/11 conspiracy theory (the most crackpot of all the crackpot theories) and all those MSM presstitute talking heads, just remember this. The time is coming to choose which side of history to be on.
The thin veneer of decency is nearly gone, soon we will all be confronted with the fact that we have no effect on the Orwellian Cabal than lurks behind the curtain.
How will we react? No idea.
All I know is this: To name a thing for what it is, is to take its power.
In a moment of ireverant stupidity and before realising it would be impossible to rig explosive devices in WT7 in under 2 weeks, let alone in under 2 hours following the Chaos of the 9/11 attacks. LS made this stunning attempt at explaining the clear controlled demolition of the tower that fell without being hit by a plane.
We Are Change (https://wearechange.org) some actual Journalism at work here in a time of universal media selling out, with the balls to confront him on his stunning admission above.
Revised with intro: SEP 17 2018
Religion was the Primary means of social control during the times when so much of the natural world was truely mysterious to us. In those days the supernatural would have been the only way to understand nature. Back then it appears that ideology alone was enough to achieve the goal of being the controlling institution of most societies. Later control was engineered through social institutions (beurocratic stonewalling through primary finace, information and social influencers such as media and Political institutions with the legal sanctioning of the state and the clout of the police and military backing it. Using labels of collective identity is the first step towards the weaponizing of demographics and nothing screams beurocracy louder than a good old fashioned Roman survey (Census). I consider part 1 the most important post I've ever written because all the information consists of information in the public domain, there is nothing new in it, quite the opposite I left out many "facts" because I'm skeptical that thousand year old texts could survive until today still representing the truth as it was told back then when the MSM news still can't even get it right TODAY!
Websites or contacts and even friends who've helped me look at these issues correctly have been hugely helpful. BUT.. there has not been enough public appetite to draw the political, economic, historical and ethical parallels. This is actually sonething that surprises me. I won't cover it all again, here is the post. http://dwahts.blogspot.com/2018/06/how-to-defeat-most-effective-social.html?m=1
I consider religion to be the direct POLITICAL (not philosophical, spiritual or socio-economic) genesis of the above post. This will give a sense of my regard for religion so that you don't consider my perspective on it something more that.
The Bible. (Citations for murder and genocide in bold text for those looking for the highlights package to cross check)
I've spent my entire life listening to discussions centered around the Bible and all of them presuppose that it represents some sort of moral fortitude and that God is a god of love. Well if you are interested in and empirical reconcilliation the Bible with our stated values according to the values espoused in most constitutions you can remove opinion yo fall way short. This would involve comparing the acts put forward as "good" and seeing if the meaning of the word has even a creative relationship with the dictionary definion, rather than the qualification of "good"being defined as the act of following gods word. The Nazi concentration camp guard argument in other words.
This exercise is simply a reality check, and a way to make the "moral guidance" argument something empirical rather that a futile interpretation lottery. We are getting better at faulting other religions and calling them out but if we dont apply the same critical eye to our own we end up perpetuating the same "Divide and Rule" premise that religion sought to create in the first place.
Unless one is boundlessly naive, we should realise that its simply a myth that the teachings are there for moral purposes, there is no argument for this whichever way you slice it. They are all there for social control and all dont just lack moral fortitude, they are utterly bankrupt of it.
Deconstruct every premise and logic reveals this time and time again. Even the cherry pick approah fails the logical litmus test, IE the afterlife:
Logically if you need to get into heaven, you need to obey God. Obedience by selfish incentive for reward is not the same as moral. The correct word for this is OBEDIENCE, it's being conflated with moral. It's not logically possible to be moral and religious if you want to get petty. I only mention that because I hear so often the reverse from the religious. Every premise once you parse it out fosters control yet fails to reconcile the stated pupose with its suggested rationale.
Either this supreme being is petty and an insecure control freak, or its written by men that seek control by the act of invoking of brutal and powerful god and passing him off as love.
Love? It always amazes me how many times this God orders the killing of innocent people even after the Ten Commandments said Thou shall not kill. For example, God kills 70,000 innocent people because David ordered a census of the people (1 Chronicles 21).
God also orders the destruction of 60 cities so that the Israelites can live there. He orders the killing of all the men, women, and children of each city, and the looting of all of value (Deuteronomy 3). He orders another attack and the killing of all the living creatures of the city: men and women, young, and old, as well as oxen sheep, and asses (Joshua 6). In Judges 21 He orders the murder of all the people of Jabesh-gilead, except for the virgin girls who were taken to be forcibly raped and married. When they wanted more virgins, God told them to hide alongside the road and when they saw a girl they liked, kidnap her and forcibly rape her and make her your wife!
Just about every other page in the Old Testament has God killing somebody! In 2 Kings 10:18-27, God orders the murder of all the worshipers of a different god in their very own church! In total God kills 371,186 people directly and orders another 1,862,265 people murdered
The God of the Bible also allows slavery, including selling your own daughter as a sex slave (Exodus 21:1-11), child abuse (Judges 11:29-40 & Isaiah 13:16), and bashing babies against rocks (Hosea 13:16 & Psalms 137:9). This type of criminal behavior should shock any moral person.
Murder, rape, pillage, plunder, slavery, and child abuse can not be justified by saying that some god says it’s OK. If more people would actually sit down and read the Bible there would be a lot more atheists like myself. Jesus also promoted the idea that all men should castrate themselves to go to heaven: For there are eunuchs, that were so born from their mother’s womb: and there are eunuchs, that were made eunuchs by men: and there are eunuchs, that made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven’s sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it (Matthew 19:12). I don’t know why anyone would follow the teachings of someone who literally tells all men to cut off their privates.
And just in case you are thinking that the evil and immoral laws of the Old Testament are no longer in effect, perhaps you should read where Jesus makes it perfectly clear: It is easier for Heaven and Earth to pass away than for the smallest part of the letter of the law to become invalid (Luke 16:17). There are many more quotes on this topic Here Do Not Ignore the Old Testament web page.
I know that most Christians believe that God is a good and loving god, and wants people to do good things. I believe that most people want to do good things and behave morally. I also believe that many Christians haven’t really read the Bible, or just read certain passages in church. This is understandable, as the Bible is hard to read due to its archaic language and obscure references. Also many priests and preachers don’t like to read certain passages in the Bible because they present a message of hate not love.
When I cover the Talmud next you will be even more shocked.
Here is a great documentary that explains the true origins of religion. It has to do with the transition of civilization from hunter-gatherers, agrerian to farming.
