The Simple Truth of Vladimir Putin’s Diabolical Plan


In the early 2000s, Vladimir Putin was running a country almost destroyed by corruption, foreign interventions, and pirates bent on privatizing anything of value for western investors. The advance of the globalist doctrine had reached the borders of the country; wars were brewed in former Soviet republics where regime changes and color revolutions were not working. The notorious Russian mob, the Israeli mob, anybody inside the country that could be bought by western pirates was taking a bite from the Russian legacy. Putin stepped in and sorted it out. Putin did not sell Russia out. This was a capital crime.
Later in the decade, Vladimir Putin proposed an initiative known as the “Vladivostok to Lisbon” protocol. The plan was for one gigantic Eurasian market worth tens of trillions of dollars. The plan was for a full and fair integration of Russia within the global context. Only the plan made Russia an integral partner rather than a network of small banana republics like Yugoslavia became. The Putin plan would have assured almost unbreakable cooperation, prosperity, and peace. But the suggestion of such a thing to the existing world order was a heinous crime.
2009 rolls around and the world’s fascination with then Prime Minister Putin grows. The New York Times back then questioned the Russian leader’s work ethic. Western media reported Putin singing “Blueberry Hill” and playing the piano. And the Washington Post begins the rail about “Putin, the killer.” Then in 2010, the heat was turned up. US newspapers began the “huge protest” gambit, Putin the arch criminal became all the rage. The Vladimir Putin legend began to grow during this time. Rumors and speculation became the flavor of the day. Then in 2011, the Russian leader went so far as to criticize the West for the Libya regime change. And we all know how Libya turned out.
Starting in 2012 the mainstream media in the West began predicting the downfall of Vladimir Putin. The Economist titled its prediction. “The beginning of the end of Putin.” So much for deep economic analysis and forecasting. It is in this year that Masha Gessen gets the big headlines for labeling Vladimir a “crime boss” and a homophobe. Meanwhile, the real criminals like Mikhail Khodorkovsky gather steam for the lies and mudslinging to come. NPR and other corporate owned media get readers by labeling Putin a “street thug” and etc. But Putin won the election that year anyhow. And even though The Slate labeled him “Putin the pitiful,” he somehow managed the biggest country in the world skillfully. Pussy Riot defiles a Russian Orthodox Church snagging some jail time, and down the rabbit hole we go.
Then in 2013 the world’s biggest ever arch villain commits the ultimate sacrilege. At the moment then President Barack Obama is gathering his forces to invade Syria, Russia’s leader pecks out a plea to the American people in the New York Times. Then, on the eve of a fateful vote in the US Congress on Obama’s decision to launch strikes against Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad, Putin mediates by instigating a proposal for Syria to surrender all chemical weapons. This was too much for the gilded world order; the gloves had to come off. Meanwhile, Obama and his CIA had already created the proxy war against Assad. But the American people were never told. Funny isn’t it, how overt Putin moves are eviler than covert killing by America? But Russia’s leader became the alchemist of truth, look at his words of warning on alleged gas attacks back then:
“We believe that at the very least we should wait for the results of the UN inspection commission in Syria. I’ve already said I find it absolutely ridiculous that [Syrian] government’s armed forces, which today are actually on an offense mission and in some regions have already encircled the so-called rebels and are finishing them off, that the Syrian army has used prohibited chemical weapons.” 
Almost a year passed until I first learned of the “hell bent” onslaught on anything attached to Vladimir Putin and Russia when the 2014 Sochi Olympics rolled around. The bristling gay globalists had no intention of letting the Russia people welcome the world to their country. Putin had to pay for his past daring. So, Russia bashing took on a whole new meaning. Bad sportsmanship was also redefined when a people created a showpiece and an unparalleled spectacle, only to be insulted and criticized at every turn. Dog packs, unworking toilets, gay skier hunts, unfinished hotels, an environmental catastrophe once again wrought by our ghastly arch villain. The world order taught Putin a lesson in those days. “Mess with us, and we’ll piss on your parade.” This was the message. Then the Euromaidan and an illegal regime change in the midst of an Olympics forced diabolical Putin’s hand again. Instead of allowing Russia’s most strategic position in the southwest to be taken over by NATO, he instead chose to secure it without firing a shot. Crimea should have been seeded to the global hegemony – but Putin dared to resist. For shame.
Since 2014 Vladimir Putin has been blamed for the downing of Malaysian Airlines flight MH17 and without a smidgen of proof. He’s had the gall to ask the world order “Do you even realize what you have done?” And this, before the mighty United Nations and in front of God and everybody else. Our crystal ball at The Economist proclaimed “Putin declares war on the West,” and we believed them. He revealed the United States was backing terrorism in the Middle East, and then he televised his forces destroying ISIS. In 2016 NBC News proclaimed; “US Officials: Putin Personally Involved in US Election Hack.” Amazingly, no pictures of Putin using his laptop to hack the DNC emerged. And the people of the world failed to notice the lack of evidence. For nearly two years now the world has investigated Putin over alleged tampering in the US election. Can you guess what body of evidence has been shown officially or in the media?
Damn that Putin for being so flawless and diabolical a villain! His utter control of every evil deed on planet Earth is being hidden from us. And oh, so skillfully that armies of brilliant private eyes, investigative journalists, whistleblowers, think tanks, the CIA, the NSA, MI6, GCHQ, Mossad, the Pentagon, Naval Intelligence, Senate committees, or even David Copperfield can turn over one leaf of evidence. This, my friends, is Putin’s greatest delinquency against humanity. He is guilty as sin of the real delinquency, the sin of ancient logic. The reason there we cannot see proof of Putin’s misdeeds is stunningly simple.
There is no proof.
Phil Butler, is a policy investigator and analyst, a political scientist and expert on Eastern Europe, he’s an author of the recent bestseller “Putin’s Praetorians” and other books. He writes exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook.”

Israel the rogue state.


Let's get a few things straight upfront.
Anti-Israel is being against the state of Israel.
Anti-Zionism is being against the Jewish state based on destiny by virtue of divine providence.
Anti-semitism etymologically is hatred of all Semitic prople, including Arabs, Assyrians, Ethiopians and Jews. Colloquially, just Jews. The commonly accepted understanding has come to mean aversion to religious Jews even Israel's Ashkenazi Jews despite no genetic lineage to the Israelites of the Bible.
Anti-goverment of Israel (or simplyopposition, if in Israel) is being against the current Israeli government.

Not all Anti-goverment are Anti-Israel.
Not all Anti-Israel are Anti-Zionists.
Not all Anti-Zionists are Anti-semites.
All Anti-semites are racist.

Here is my more detailed position on the Issue because I won't be wasting any effort replying to the usual crowd who lack the intellectual fortitude to process this issue beyond the infantile chant of "anti-Semite". I will never be shut down by the PC police until I hear a persuasive argument. Up til now quite frankly those arguments don't impress me very much.
http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2018/03/looking-for-jews-under-every-rock.html?m=1

I want to draw your attention to an article written by Adam Garrie of Eurasian Future. You will find it in the recommended sites section in the WEB VERSION of this blog but not the Mobile for some reason.

It's a broadly cast and impressive synopsis of the Israeli chicanery in geopolitics and it's "wag the dog" relationship with the United States.

You can find it here. I am linking externally because rather than host it I'd like to push traffic to the site.  It's offers a wealth of refreshing angles and it's well researched. The regional nuances are well understood and it lends legitimacy to the term "Journalism".

http://www.eurasiafuture.com/2018/04/14/heres-how-israel-can-get-trump-supporters-to-stop-backing-assad/

Adam Garrie – Director

Adam Garrie is a geo-political expert who can be frequently seen on Nedka Babliku’s weekly discussion show Digital Divides, RT’s flagship debate show CrossTalk,  Press-TV’s flagship programme ‘The Debate’ and radio Sputnik.
A global specialist with an emphasis on Eurasian integration, Garrie’s articles have been published in the Oriental Review, Asia Times, Geopolitica Russia, the Tasnim News Agency, Global Research, RT’s Op-Edge, Global Village Space and others

CO2 is not a pollutant, it is greening the earth!


Whatever your persuasion is on CO² and AGW, nobody disagrees on the tremendous benefit it provides plant life. Many of the past famine disasters and desertification has CO² decline listed as a contributor.

http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2018/04/sheep-science.html?m=1

I feel I've already blown the notion that humans are the main cause of climate change out of the water. Or rather I've used the reasoning of others and put it together in a convenient outline. See my previous post above for starters.  However, I recognize that humans do increase CO² levels, no matter how tiny. Increases are likely to be very short lived because the earth has an effective feedback mechanism, but we can apparently get small increases, and it's been put forward on very poor science that this is a bad thing. That assertion hinges completely on bad models. More on that in the bottom most link.  Model's and the measurement sample dates are dubious at best.


Furthermore, the main increase in CO²  as we warm out of the last mini ice age is warming oceans, because CO² as we know trails warming, it does not cause it. This is well documented.


Whatever the cause there seem to measurably evidenced benefits, not only in my country in a draught year, but globally.

Here are some case studies:
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/carbon-dioxide-fertilization-greening-earth

https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/barbara-hollingsworth/record-co2-coincides-record-breaking-crop-yields-greening-globe

https://www.thegwpf.com/south-africa-set-for-biggest-maize-crop-harvest-on-record/

https://m.timesofindia.com/india/record-global-harvest-of-cereals-india-too-heads-for-a-new-high/articleshow/58187896.cms


And this article which raises the point that plant increases will actually absorb more CO² and thereby regulate modest increases but ensure no runaway increases happen. It's a natural buffer, but even so that is the smallest of many natural atmospheric, oceanic and terrestrial buffers which are known to exist.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2016-04-26/global-snapshot-shows-how-humans-are-greening-the-earth/7346382

Here is a website dedicated to basic science, the unrefuted basic science of the benefit of CO² to plants:
https://hydroloop.org/co2/

We could go on and on, but nobody contests this. The real areas of interest are who stands to gain from stopping green spending on Mercury, Lead, Solvents, Nuclear Waste, Toxic chemicals etc and redirecting them to chasing CO² ghosts?

Well fortunately I've already covered that in great detail here, I strongly suggest taking a look because I took great care to address every aspect in detail:
http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2018/03/scientific-consensus-is-that-consensus.html?m=1

Assumptions In Science 1) Dark Matter Exists?

The "Cosmic Web" is more like a  cosmic electric grid. It is strung together not with hypothetical "dark matter" but with electrodynamics, IE ionized plasma along with the cosmic dust and gas known to be out there. REAL matter. Plasma only needs to be 1% ionized to conduct, and it can easily drive galactic rotation even when very diffuse in concentration. 

Assumption: Gravity alone causes galactic rotation so therefore without sufficient mass (and it follows, gravity) then there must be some unknown source of gravity undetected by us.

Astronomers used a new technique to reveal 'lostlight around the largest galaxies in Hubble Ultra-Deep Field images. ... By reprocessing the image, and combining several images, the group was able to recover a large quantity of light from the outer zones of the largest galaxies in the image. This accounts for some of the "missing matter" but nowhere near all of it, which as it turns out is not required. The most interesting part of Hubbles "Lost Light" is it shows more clearly the plasma connections between galaxies and ultimately the cosmic web structure. 


The "lost light" of Hubble. 

50 years after the basics of the galactic rotation problem has been solved (now that electrodynamics propagating through ionized plasma is understood to make up the fillimentry Birkeland Currents and associated magnetic fields that drive them) we haven't admitted to ourselves that gravity isn't the primary force at galactic scales. It is (arguably) at solar system scales but as it turns out it may even be entirely irrelevant at galactic orders of magnitude. Despite this the search for the dark matter required to validate the joke parading as the standard cosmological model, the LAMBDA-CDM model, rages on. The cold dark matter model for some reason dominates cosmology despite no predictive success and nothing but failure in almost all channels of its expression.


MIT physicist Winston H Bostic first proved ionized plasma could form the characteristic spriral galaxy shapes, in a laboratory with magnetic feilds and no gravity required, back in 1956

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winston_H._Bostick

Bostic's Lab plasmoids

More recently this was done by Professor Anthony Perrat, of Los Alamos Labs including computer models approximating all of the main spiral galaxy formations.


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Peratt

Perrat's work

Below: Mainstream cosmology seems to be getting to the point where alot of questions are being asked about the intractable problems presented by the fruitless search for Dark Matter, but is this impacting on the model in any meaningful way? 
The futile search for dark matter still rages on. It remains still to this day utterly imperceptible to mortals. Either its very good at hiding itself, or, the rather more obvious scenario presents itself. It quite obviously does not exist! The assumption that gravity alone shapes the cosmos lead to failure of reasoning involving imagining invisible matter being in places where not enough gravity was detected for celestial mechanics, instead of looking for another force. Its easily the most idiotic decision in any branch of science in history.

The lunatics are running the asylum? Or is just that the very nature of establishment is to protect the grants, funding and careers at stake? To protect the Status Quo?

Synchrotron radiation incorrectly inferring "dark matter" 

Establishment science is currently in such a pathetic state of affairs that it uses hypothetical or theoretical conclusions or mathematics as proof. At such a point ( the invention of "strong theoretical evidence") the observation aspect is no longer needed. We are no longer doing science.


Dark Matter, Dark Energy, cosmic inflation, strange matter etc. There is no evidence for any of it but for some reason it's acceptable that they just add the ad-hoc property of invisibility onto it and they get away with it. Just like you would if you were a clown pulling an invisible penny from a child's ear.  This is of course not science. Science requires that observation is actually supposed to back up theory. This situation with the phantom unicorns we are in can (at best) be called guessing, rushing to conclusions or speculation.

I would go a step further and suggest that Cosmology must be removed from the responsibility of trying to understand the big, universal questions and instead be transferred to a science fiction movie set.  AS far as I can tell they appear to be mathematicians parading as physicists or s frustrated science fiction writers for real. Perhaps they should be replaced with the rocket scientists, engineers and the electrical engineers that do such an unbelievable job on the space probes, craft and telescopes. Those guys know what they are doing!

The table below shows how cosmologists have dark matter so well classified and technically broken down. Not bad considering nobody has heard, seen or smelled a a single atom of it. But Nobel Prizes are still to this day awarded for work in the field. I would suggest to all of them that waiting for evidence before declaring it certain is prudent, but I'm old fashioned, I like science to follow the scientific method... Call me crazy!!

Some dark matter hypotheses[80]
Light bosonsquantum chromodynamics axions
axion-like particles
fuzzy cold dark matter
neutrinosStandard Model
sterile neutrinos
weak scalesupersymmetry
extra dimensions
little Higgs
effective field theory
simplified models
other particlesWeakly interacting massive particles
self-interacting dark matter
superfluid vacuum theory
macroscopicprimordial black holes[81][82][83][84][85]
massive compact halo objects (MaCHOs)
Macroscopic dark matter (Macros)
modified gravity (MOG)modified Newtonian dynamics (MoND)
Tensor–vector–scalar gravity (TeVeS)
Entropic gravity

To remind yourself of just how pathetic the state of affairs is today read this:
https://www.universetoday.com/141713/massive-photons-could-explain-dark-matter-but-dont/

 It started off in earnest but after all this time I would say this now has the paw print of a huge money wasting scam all over it. Firstly we dont need these fantasy unicorn and fairy dust concoctions. Plasma Physics and Electrodynamics has already explained everything that baffles the standard cosmological model, but to concede electrodynamics through models like Plasma Cosmology, the Electric Universe or the Thunderbolts project, were right all along, or at least closer to it.  But these guys are not publically funded, they are self funded and as such will make the cosmologists who are pissing away our tax money look like idiots. With a bit of luck they will lose their jobs and their publicly funded status.

However, that is exactly why they are not teaching science anymore. Science would expose them. They teach mathematics and a bizarre fetish for trying to explain the universe with a single force. Gravity. This obviously was never going to work, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO HAVE BALANCED SYSTEMS AND EQUILIBRIUM WITHOUT A MINIMUM OF AT LEAST TWO FORCES plus velocity is needed. Even simple orbital systems quickly descend in chaos with one attractive force added to velocity. But the original gatekeers adjusted the syllabus so all the lies are tought AS SCIENCE, in prestigious Universities, and graduates end up working for places like NASA, and use the telescopes and funding TO ACTUALLY LOOK for all the dark things they made up to comply with conclusions only using gravity.

It's a pity because these are not hard problems to solve for real scientists, the dark matter problem can be solved by watching the below 60 second clip, and because the obvious answer with loads of evidence wasnt "gravity" they concocted an eighty year long search for the invisible evidence. They already had the answer, gravity, the matter would surely turn up eventually. By then evidence wont be a part of the science anyway if they keep going like that. In case, we foot the bill.


These clowns have inserted full blown lunacy all over science, and we pay for it. They would have us believe most of the matter and energy in the universe is just mysteriously invisible, that there are 11 spatial dimensions and that the universe is just a 2D hologram on a 3D sphere, when actually there ARE other explanations that would not make such an all-around mockery of Occam's Razor. The below clip explains how the origins of dark matter were not the sorcery of today, simply matter we couldn't see. It follows what went wrong.


With that established, someone needs to explain what good it would do even if there was a claim dark matter was discovered, because its not just missing mass to be accounted for, Birkeland  currents drive galactic rotation with no need for gravity.. 


.. but also entire galaxies move in synch with these currents, and dark matter cant explain that now can it? 

If you look closely you won't see anything, that's an accurate representation of dark matter


Click here for part 2 of my "Assumptions in science" series dealing with the thermonuclear solar model.


References:
References supported by the following published scientific papers


https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285991555_Cosmic_web_or_cosmic_electricity_grid

PLASMA COSMOLOGY


ELECTRIC SPACE

The Evidence For Electrical Currents in Cosmic Plasma, A. L. Peratt, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 18, p.26 (1990) (548KB).

Plasma Experiments in the Laboratory and Space, A. L. Peratt, C.-G. Fälthammar, and N. Rynn (1992) (548KB)

Equilibrium of Intergalactic Currents, B. E. Meierovich and A. L. Peratt, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 20, p.891, 1992 (152KB)

Alfvén Waves and Birkeland Currents, T. A. Potemra, Physica Scripta, T60, 107-112, 1995




ENERGY DENSITY AND TEMPERATURE OF UNIVERSE

The Redshift Revisited A.K.T. Assis and M.C.D. Neves(36KB), Astrophys. Space Sci. 227, 13-24, 1995 (696K)


Thermalization of synchrotron radiation from field-aligned currents, W. Peter and A. Peratt, Laser and Particle Beams, vol. 6, part 3, pp. 493-501, 1988 (560K)


COBE Sows Cosmological Confusion, Science, vol. 257, 28, 1992 (356K).

Fretting About Statistics, Daniel Kleppner, Physics Today, July 1992 (236KB).


GALAXIES

Atlas of Peculiar Galaxies, H. Arp, Astrophys. J., Supplement Series, 123-132, 1966 (152K).

Evolution of the Plasma Universe: I. Double Radio Galaxies, Quasars, and Extragalactic Jets, A. L. Peratt, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. Vol. PS-14, N.6, pp.639-660, December 1986.(1.7M)

Evolution of the Plasma Universe: II. The Formation of Systems of Galaxies, A. L. Peratt, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. Vol. PS-14, N.6, pp.763-778, December 1986 (1.9M).

The Role of Particle Beams and Electrical Currents in the Plasma Universe, A. L. Peratt, Laser and Particle Beams, vol.6, part.3, pp.471-491, 1988.
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PLASMA SCIENCE, SPECIAL ISSUES ON PLASMA ASTROPHYSICS AND COSMOLOGY
Guest Editorial: Plasma Experiments in the Laboratory and in Space, A. L. Peratt, C.-G. Fälthammar, N. Rynn, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 1992 (548K).
Guest Editorial, Space Weather Effects, S. T. Lai, N. Singh, A. L. Peratt, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. December 2000 (36K).
Guest Editorial Sixth Special Issue on Space and Cosmic Plasma, A. L. Peratt and C.-G. Fälthammer, December 2003 (1.4MB)
Guest Editorial Seventh Special Issue on Space and Cosmic Plasma, A. L. Peratt and T. E. Eastman, August 2007 (3 MB)
LABORATORY ASTROPHYSICS
Evolution of Colliding Plasmas, A. Peratt, J. Green, and D. Nielsen, Physical Review Letters, 44, pp. 1767-1770, 1980 (248K).
Microwave Generation from Filamentation and Vortex Formation within Magnetically Confined Electron Beams, A. L. Peratt and C. M. Snell, Physical Review Letters, 54, pp. 1167-1170, 1985 (688K).
A Particle-in-Cell Simulation of a Cyclic Beam Buncher, A. L. Peratt, C. M. Snell, and F. S. Felber, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 18, p.626, (1990) (448KB).
REDSHIFTS
Comments on Tired-Light Mechanisms, H. Arp, IEEE TPS v.18, 1990 (136K).
Evidence for Quantized and Variable Redshifts in the Cosmic Background Rest Frame , W. G. Tifft, in Modern Mathematical Models of Time and Their Applications to Physics and Cosmology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1997 (1.2M).
Redshifts and Blueshifts of Spectral Lines Emitted by Two Correlated Sources, E. Wolf, Phys. Rev. Letters, 58, 2646, 1987 (176K)
Shifts of Spectral Lines Caused by Scattering from Fluctuating Random Media, D. F. V. James, M. P. Savedoff, and E. Wolf, Astrophysical J., 359, 67, 1990 (448K).
SOLAR, SOLAR SYSTEM, INTERSTELLAR, GALACTIC PLASMA, PLASMA SPACE, ELECTRIC SPACE
Filamentation of Volcanic Plumes on the Jovian Satellite Io, A. L. Peratt and A. J. Dessler, Astrophys. Space Sci. 144, pp. 451-461, 1988 (1M).
Interstellar Neutral Hydrogen Filaments at High Galactic Latitudes and the Bennett Pinch, G. L. Verschuur, Astrophys. Space Sci. 227, pp. 187-198, 1995 (776K).
Radiation Properties of Pulsar Magnetospheres: Observation, Theory, and Experiment. K. Healy and A. Peratt, Astrophys. Space Sci. 227, 1995 (1.1MB).
Galactic Neutral Hydrogen Emission Profile Structure, G. L. Verschuur and A. L. Peratt, Astron. J. 118, pp.1252-1267, 1999 (672K).
Observation of the CIV Effect in Interstellar Clouds: A Speculation on the Physical Mechanism for Their Existence, A. L. Peratt and G. L. Verschuur, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. December 2000 (344K).
Trends in Apparent Time Intervals Between Multiple Supernovae Occurrences, E. Sanders, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci.31, pp.1252-1262, 2003 (408Kb)
Self-similarity of plasma networking in a broad range of length scales: From laboratory to cosmic plasmas, A. B. Kukushkin and V. A. Rantsev-Kartinov, Rev. Scientific Instr., 70, n.2, pp.1387-1391, 1999.
SPACE PLASMA PIONEERS
Plasma Physics from Laboratory to Cosmos—The Life and Achievements of Hannes Alfvén, C.-G. Fälthammar (808KB)
Dean of the Plasma Dissidents, A. L. Peratt, The World & I, Natural Science Sec., pp.190-197, May 1988, (4 MB)
The Most Feared Astronomer on Earth: Halton Arp. W. Kaufman III. (592KB).
A Tribute to Oscar Buneman—Pioneer of Plasma Simulation, R. Buneman, R. J. Barker, A. L. Peratt, S. H. Brecht, A. B. Langdon, H. R. Lewis, IEEE Trans.Plasma Sci. 22, 1994 (1.2MB)
The Legacy of Birkeland's Plasma Torch, A. L. Peratt, The Kristian Birkeland Lecture, Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters, v.9, Oslo, Norway, 1996 (12MB).
In Memoriam Grote Reber 1911-2002 Founder of Radio Astronomy, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 31, December 2003 (372kB)
ENERGETIC AURORAS: NEAR-EARTH MANIFESTATIONS OF THE PLASMA UNIVERSE

PLASMA SCIENCE APPLICATION PRESENTATIONS

Labels

Search This Blog

Your Feedback

Name

Email *

Message *