Reliable collection of various REAL climate indicators!

Settled? Give me a break! This is not even the full story. We don't know the full story.












.The above is a simplification would you believe? The true workings of the earth's climate as an entirety is something we are a long way from understanding.  I hope you are not to horrified to find out it is not, in fact, "settled science".  That statement is somewhere between hysterical and tragic and you shouldn't take such things seriously which I'm sure you won't if you value critical and independent thought which seems, likely if you are reading this blog. You only need to look HERE to see how far science in general is from being "settled", one of the most absurd utterings I have ever heard.

A simpler diagram but just as clear on making the point

I've established more or less as a certainty that there is a political, internationalist push or agenda behind the AGW movement, but science itself has failed both where its bought and paid for, and in more prosaic ways.  Here is a thorough analysis of the topic by my favourite sceptic. It's an excellent video clip and essential viewing for anyone interested in the state of affairs in the scientific community.
https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/02/the-crises-of-science.html

The real science and scientific data should be responsibly sourced, thought about rationally and reacted to in a way that does not simply serve as a useful perspective for the political agenda of some unseen hand far away.

Destroying the junk science about the Coral Reefs and Anthropogenic Climate Change & more.

What it certainly should NOT look like, is this epic, steaming pile of turds  posing something scientific:
https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/02/so-this-is-where-we-are-fighting-cow.html

Here,  in one image is the non-case of the AGW movement if their revisionist "revised data to minimise the distracting role anomalies play in the data.



 If images are not what you are looking for, the best refutation of the AGW climate change science is the one embedded in this link and it was made by the worlds best long-range weather forecaster. IT was made back in 2014 and is also predictively accurate over the subsequent 5 years, something the AGW movement has never been able to claim,
https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/04/the-best-refutation-of-climate-change.html

A variety of sources is better.  For a random and accessible basic Idea, perhaps start here:

https://greatclimatedebate.com/tutorial-anthropogenic-global-warming-agw/?fbclid=IwAR07-rGyZCC3isuqynAaiYd7OeUU0Zxl7TbLhVJ9eK5ZGzGtQHW9k9gpLqo

(More Links)
30 years of media FAILS
https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2018/06/30-years-of-failed-climate-predictions.html

 Starting with the most important single data set in climate science: The relationship between atmospheric CO2 and temperature for the last 425 million years https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1154/5/4/76/htm

For a brief outline of all the pertinent issues involved with misrepresented climate facts, truncated graphs, anomalies represented as data and all the debate points, please read this post which contains links to all the issues (scientific and political) central to the debate.

http://dwahts.blogspot.com/2018/05/climate-alarmism.html?m=1

For great weather models of all varieties follow Doctor Ryan Maue on Twitter:    https://mobile.twitter.com/RyanMaue
He works for Weather Models dot com and here is the price structure: https://weathermodels.com


For an incredible tool to get live and past data here is a post with instructions on using it:
http://dwahts.blogspot.com/2018/07/is-every-year-really-hottest-year.html?m=1

Weather Service Data:
Here is the incredible tool:
https://earth.nullschool.net/#2018/07/12/1200Z/wind/surface/level/overlay=temp/orthographic

What science is Google quietly removing?
Resources: (From whatsupwiththat)

Tap for link
More Mythbusting:
Are Natural disasters on the rise and killing more people?

Did you know?
The Idea that we anywhere near the optimum levels needed for plants to grow and flourish like they did in the past is simply wrong.  The earth has been in a crisis of sorts of desertification limiting plant growth to only the most suitable conditions.  It was not always so. CO2 is at historically low levels, it was 7 TIMES HIGHER! n the Jurassic and Cretaceous.
https://www.livescience.com/44330-jurassic-dinosaur-carbon-dioxide.html

CO2 since 1800
The 2018 figure is the average of seasonally-adjusted figures for June and July, 2018 (which is a good projection for the annual average). Previous years are annual averages.
We also have a similar graph for methane(CH4),
and a combined graph with both CO2 and CH4.
Direct measurements of CO2 at Mauna Loa Observatory, in Hawaii began in March, 1958. This is the annual average data we’ve graphed:
ftp://aftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/products/trends/co2/co2_annmean_mlo.txt(1959–2017)
For monthly data see:
ftp://aftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/products/trends/co2/co2_mm_mlo.txt.

1850-1958 data is from http://data.giss.nasa.gov/modelforce/ghgases/Fig1A.ext.txt(ice cores).

1800-1850 CO2 data is from http://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/paleo/icecore/antarctica/law/law_co2.txt(Law Dome ice cores, 75 years smoothed).

NOAA tide data: This makes a very persuasive case.
https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/03/30-years-of-noaa-tide-gauge-data-debunk.html



Milankovitch Cycles

Posted by on
Index , ,

The truth about World War One is finally emerging



The Internet functions as the largest open source private investigation tool in history.  At least it does so for the not so gullible.  The gullible will believe anything and the internet is a dangerous place for them.  The challenge of working out the reliable sources from less reliable takes a lot of time and many mistakes.  I was so glad to discover James Corbetts series on World War One which contains so much information that is not only well hidden but hard to believe.  I happen to have been covering alot of similar turf lately and I can tell you that James knows what he is talking about.  I don't agree with his conclusions on everything but I must say  with his WW1 assessment I do, it confirmed everything I suspected in a well evidenced way and ties in perfectly to two of my recent posts:

https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2018/11/who-are-globalists-straight-answer.html
https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2018/11/russian-revolution-or-bolshevik-coup.html

First, because its not always easy for people to believe the lies of War, perhaps have a look at James overview on false flags, most of which were also hard to believe... before they were admitted to.


Here is the link if you prefer to watch on YouTube: 

The Corbett Report Website:
https://www.corbettreport.com/


The World War One Documentary:

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3



Afterthought: History is written by the victors.

The Final Clip below is worth a watch because it deconstructs how it can be that we are taught history that is so fundamentally flawed.

At the end of the day it would be more surprising if that was not the case.  If your university course is mathematics you have little to worry about.  If its History or economics that's another story.





Posted by on
Index , ,

Change!


I think my instincts when I wrote this post in December last year were quite good.
Update 16th March 2019:
https://www.rt.com/news/453989-paris-yellow-vest-protests/

For the first time in years, certainly since I began writing this blog, I can smell blood in the water.  I get information from many different places and over the years I've been able to gauge which sources provide information that is reliable and who the lame ducks are.  Some sources are great for data, others are less valuable for data but are more accessible for a blogger like me who has found that exposure is difficult with the subject matter I do and a high hit count comes from repeat views and shares rather one-off views.  Embedding links from documented archives or dot edu and dot gov links don't bring people back, but YouTube links, despite all the censorship and demonetization that goes on, still seem to be more useful to people. Video media allows us to hear tone of voice and read body language which are in themselves more valuable often than raw data.  This has lead me to believe that real social change is finally on the horizon.  I don't know how long its going to take but the corner has been turned.

The big one has been happening in France with the Yellow Vest Protests.  If you scratch below the surface all the right issues are being addressed.  This is amazing.  A few years back the public at large never even knew about half the issues, let alone were prepared to get off their asses and do something about it.  Even more amazingly the left and right have come together and united against the banksters, carbon taxes, corporate corruption in government and, get this, the globalists!  This is without doubt a watershed moment.
I've embedded a link from the WeAreChange website where Luke Rudowski's excellent instincts for this sort of thing have lead him to personally go down to France and see for himself what has been happening.  I trust his judgment perhaps more than anyone and over the years he's been consistent and well informed.  What he's found over in France has been nothing short of remarkable.  I won't say anything more more it's vital you watch this clip all the way.

It certainly appears the vipers den of the Neoliberal globalist bankster order, the EU, is staring down the barrel of a gun. I always thought change would need to come from the US but I guess I must have missed some major cues despite BrExit and some other proceedings.  But what of the US?   Trump2016 did shake up the GOP establishment but the left/right divide is wider than its ever been and that is the missing ingredient from giving the US its Paris moment is that same partisan divide.
Conservatives, despite making more progress in the post Bush/Cheney era than liberals (who all seemed to driving over a cliff together in an SJW bus) are still too focused on Islam and Israel to understand the real dangers of US foreign policy, and still too enamored by Trump to spot that his backers have now surrounded him by a team that are more Neocon that the Bush Administration. . Put your feelings about Trump on ice and recognise the change in the party.
The left has finally made some progress, despite the fact that they are still suckers in areas like climate change.
See if you agree with me, here are two popular left leaning shows. Put your feelings for Ocassio Cortez aside and focus on their angles and content.




The UK's establishment sock puppet Tory government is on the ropes.  

I think what will ultimately bring the Yellow Vest protests to the UK will be when the British people eventually work out Teresa May has all along been working with her globalist masters to sabotage the voice of democracy.  George Galloway  has worked it out.

Finally,  the Irony of the MSM hypocrisy  in all of this can not go by unnoticed. 



Posted by on
Index ,

HOW THE U.S. EXPORTS INFLATION & WHAT IT MEANS




  1. American people buy stuff they don’t need from Chinese company with money they don’t have on US bank credit card. 
  2. US Bank creates new US dollars out of thin air by creating debt for American people and giving US dollars to Chinese company.
  3. New debt stays in America while new US dollars leave America.
  4. Chinese company takes new US dollars to Chinese central bank and exchanges for Chinese RMB. 
  5. Chinese central bank prints new Chinese RMB out of thin air to give to Chinese company in exchange for US dollars. 
  6. Chinese central bank puts US dollars in a vault out of circulation. 
  7. New US dollar’s are out of circulation, not impacting market value of existing US dollars and therefore not impacting US dollar price inflation. 
  8. New Chinese RMB are in circulation, negatively impacting value of existing Chinese RMBs causing Chinese RMB price inflation to rise. 
  9. US dollar value remains artificially high while Chinese RMB value declines.
  10. THE WORLD VIA THE PETRODOLLAR MUST BUY SAUDI OIL IN US DOLLARS.  THIS CREATES ARTIFICIAL DOLLAR DEMAND AND SENDS ALL THE INFLATION FROM QE MONEY PRINTING TO EVERYWHERE AROUND THE WORLD.  THE WORLD PAYS THE INFLATION ON THE FEDS MONEY PRINTING TO PAY FOR THE US MILITARY AND BAIL OUT US BANKS.
  11. American people and Chinese people are poorer. US bank, Chinese company and Chinese central bank are wealthier. 
https://seekingalpha.com/article/2125113-how-the-fed-has-exported-inflation-and-what-happens-to-risk-assets-when-the-money-flows-reverse

Summary
Geopolitical risks are increasing that suggest a seminal shift in economic power in the coming weeks.
The next major battle between the East and the West will take after the G20 with the arrest of the Huawei executive.
IMF ultimatum to the US could escalate the trend to move away from the dollar in international trade and the creation of a parallel SWIFT system.
The risks are high that the dollar will breach support levels and the likelihood of a new era of high inflation in the US seems certain.
What such a shift means for investment assets.
A trade pact between China and Germany is the latest in a series of blows to the US dollar as reported on Friday by Bloomberg - Bundesbank, PBOC in Pact to Turn Frankfurt Into Renminbi Hub (1):
Germany's Bundesbank and the Peopleâs Bank of China agreed to cooperate in the clearing and settling of payments in renminbi, paving the way for Frankfurt to corner a share of the offshore market.
The central banks signed a memorandum of understanding in Berlin today, when Chinese President Xi Jinping met German Chancellor Angela Merkel, the Frankfurt-based Bundesbank said in an e-mailed statement.
Germany's financial capital prevailed over Paris and Luxembourg in a euro-area race to win trade in renminbi, which overtook the euro to become the second-most used currency in global trade finance in October, according to the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication. The U.K. Treasury said on March 26 that the Bank of England would sign an initial agreement with the PBOC on March 31 to clear and settle yuan transactions in London.
Read that again if you missed it. What it says is that the renminbi has overtaken the euro in global trade settlements and now is positioned ahead of all currencies except the US dollar. I have been reporting on this highly significant paradigm shift for more than a year now and at this point it would appear my warnings were well founded. There are two very significant events scheduled in the next few weeks that seem certain to move us closer to the end of the dollar's reign as the world's reserve currency.

Now, lets look at the UK money supply VS US Money supply and Inflation.

The above makes sense, because money printing IS INFLATION! That's what it is. Forget the rest, most of it all just investor sentiment and fads.
Now look at the US Below, the US exports most of its inflation.

What does it mean?  It means when the Petrodollar collapses, and the world dumps all its US treasury bonds, all those returning dollars will be causing HYPERINFLATION!

Posted by on

Insane in the Ukraine: What is Poroshenko's game?


Porky has upcoming presidential elections and its not looking good for him. Russia is of course the bogiman again. I find this beyond ironic. Ukraine in its current incarnation is simply a vassal of empire, although its gotten off lightly compared to such nations as Syria and Libya.
Ukraine is nowhere near as fortunate as Crimea, rescued from the empire by Russia just as they rescued Syria but with the added protection of now being incorporated into Russia, thanks to Putin's swift action and the now famous referendum that broke all records in attendance and outcomes with almost all votes opting to join Russia.

So far the circumstantial case is not looking good for Porky.

Most regime change states either end up destroyed or run by a dictatorship that accomodates Western interests. Is Ukraine going to be an exception? Unlikely...

Meanwhile, something is up. And there is clear collusion and foresight here. A US contractor accidentally revealed a US military specialist deployment in the combat zones in Ukraine via an Job Advertisement on LinkedIn.
https://southfront.org/us-military-contractor-is-hiring-personnel-to-support-classified-contingency-operations-in-ukraine/?fbclid=IwAR2JLBEfMwaZdk5QTI54-n41_ClVY1aEGsQhpJVhB4nsQo6M3hjBbMnP1yI

So it seems regarding the Kerch Straight, that circumstantial case is not looking good for Porky either.

It's almost as if he has some sort of agenda or something?

Read 21st Century Wire to find out:
https://21stcenturywire.com/2018/11/26/evidence-kerch-strait-was-planned-provocation-pretext-for-us-aid-martial-law-war-in-donbass-et-all/


Posted by on
Index ,

The desperate attempt to link forrest fires to Climate Change is not even supported by the facts.


The Climate Change fear-mongering of years and decades past has all but been exposed, since most of all the times "we have ten years left" have passed, I think its safe to say the science was not quite as settled as they would have us believe. This major loss of credibility in the scientific community I don't blame on scientists, the vast majority of those involved were usually grant funded and depended on political agendas if they wanted to keep their jobs and eat or secure funding. Politics fails and drags everything down with it. Science left without agenda's will always send man to the moon or internet to the palm of your hand.

The tenuous link between temperature posed at 1° of warming, which appears itself to be dubious, and a rampant alleged increase in forrest fires and "OMG we are all going to die" conclusions are so childishly clear to be infested with agendas that you would need to not be able to see the wood for the burned down trees to miss it.
The data simply does not support this claim.

Let's start with insurance claims and assessments.

https://www.verisk.com/insurance/visualize/key-findings-from-the-2017-verisk-wildfire-risk-analysis/?utm_source=Social&utm_medium=Twitter&utm_campaign=VeriskSM&utm_content=842017

https://www.iii.org/fact-statistic/facts-statistics-wildfires

What about the recent past?Turns out not, apparently they were even worse during cool periods, notably the little ice age.

http://landscapesandcycles.net/forest-fires-were-worse-during-the-little-ice-age.html

And far greater fires on a scale we could scarcely comprehend have burned their way into recent history.
https://www.fireengineering.com/articles/2007/10/remembering-the-great-peshtigo-fire-of-1871.html?fbclid=IwAR20LcmhWQH1kiGPHH0GsnE5Y9aVNyIe1OuRFMH-CAsTqtd5KWBT7jjHV5Q

A thorough analysis of number of fires, acres burned, frequency, over various timeframe and timescales reveals no causal relationship between warming on any level and fires. In fact some correlation actually suggests the reverse, but I chalk i up to coincidence. There is even suggestion fires are decreasing but again, I prefer to chalk small changes down to cycles. It is disengenuous to pass off small trend variations as scientific findings. Doing so makes us no better that the Climate Change fraternity.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4874420/

The Media certainly does their fair share of fear-mongering, not only because the six multinational behemoth conglomerates left are ideologically aligned with globalist agendas, but because fear SELLS.


Lets not forget that the vast majority of fires are started in one way or the other by humans, so already the variables are far from the parameters required to satisfy the scientific method.

https://www.nifc.gov/fireInfo/nfn.htm


Posted by on
Index ,

The United States uses chemical weapons.


The US usage and supply of chemical weapons seems to go back as far as you are prepared to investigate. For the current situation in the Middle East there is a good case to be made that based on OPCW findings it was either Turkish backed or US backed rebels that used chlorine gas and Sarin gas to frame Assad, who has since been cleared despite that important part receiving practically no coverage in Western media.

That gas can be traced back to Donald Rumsveld when he worked as an economic hitman in the Chemical Industry, and supplied it to Sadam Hussein, himself a CIA man at the time, for use against Iran in the Iran/Iraq war they were plotting.


I love this above clip from CNN most of all because its CNN of all people, and because of Rumsvelds surprise that a CIA embedded news agency would rumble him on his earlier closed door meetings. He thinks fast on his feet though. They subsequently brought their man down but are still trying to nail Iran any way they can. Iran was toppled once when they brought down Mosedesch but has since appeared to have developed an iron resolve never to fall to foreign invaders again.


Post 9/11 during the "War on Terror" the US showed in all sorts of ways that it is in fact the real terror. Despite that, I was still slightly surprised when in 2003 they were caught using Depleted Uranium, considering the WMDs fiasco.



White phosphorus is the modern banned weapon of choice for the US military, its even more horrible but doesn't require large scale "boots on the ground" deployment (or if they wish to conceal such deployment).
Also there are loophole's in its procurement meaning it's not illegal to own if not used in open battle against civilians in populated areas.
It is being used in most of the US involved battles, including against civilians, region wide, so unless some shadowy force is following the US military undetected, and burning the civilians to frame the US in over a hundred seperate cases going back years, then the US is guilty.


Here is Amnesty Internationals findings:
https://www.amnesty.org.uk/press-releases/syria-us-led-coalitions-use-white-phosphorus-raqqa-may-be-war-crime-new-analysis

And from Human Rights Watch:
https://www.hrw.org/news/2017/06/14/iraq/syria-danger-us-white-phosphorus

The world's press are picking up on it too. Here is an assortment of articles, including MSM articles surpringly, but those outlets won't be permitted to run such reports in the future so read them while you still can.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/10/world/middleeast/raqqa-syria-white-phosphorus.html

https://globalnews.ca/news/4436862/syria-white-phosphorus-us-russia/amp/

https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/moscow-accuses-us-using-banned-white-phosphorous-syria-1249368703

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2017/06/09/u-s-led-forces-appear-to-be-using-white-phosphorous-in-populated-areas-in-iraq-and-syria/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.4996c30ecfd4

https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2018/10/13/576883/USled-warplanes-drop-white-phosphorus-bombs-in-eastern-Syria-Report

https://sputniknews.com/amp/world/201810141068878088-syria-un-investigation-use-white-phosphorus-coalition-forces/


Posted by on
Index

Climate Change In One Diagram.


I never said it would be a simple diagram
Posted by on
Index

Russian Revolution Or Bolshevik Coup Funded By Internationalists?


The Issue at question is the November Revolution. Just as much of ancient history was probably adjusted by the powerful religious authorities that existed in the past due to their tight control over narratives, so to do we find that even relatively modern history is tweaked and adjusted by the influencers of the syllabus, curriculum and research at academic institutions.
Putin: "Lenin was not a statesman, he was a Bolshevik Revolutionary". I would go a step further.

Below you will find an excellent but old talk of the variety you don't get anymore by Professor Antony Sutton, who taught economics at California State University, and was a research fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution.

 When I do public domain research I always am interested in the most rebuked views, and then check out both sides of the argument, this appears sounder than the arguments opposing it which largely uses information I've already established to be propaganda as its counter argument.
In this talk, Prof. Sutton goes into his impeccable research on how a close-knit group of Western financiers and industrialists (centered around Morgan and Rockefeller in the US, and around Milner and the City financiers, in the UK) created and sustained Soviet Russia. Particularly, he goes into how Wall Street/City of London financiers used their banking institutions and their industrial enterprises to help finance and sustain the Bolshevik Revolution. Build up Soviet industry during Lenin's Five-Year Plans, both through finance, technology/industrial transfers and technical assistance. Continue to build the Soviets throughout the entire Cold War, through the same kinds of deals. This included the Korea and the Vietnam eras, during which American troops were being killed by... Western-made Soviet equipment. In his academic research, Sutton also went into how these internationalist interests also supported national-socialism, in Nazi Germany, and in general supported every brand of top-down, command-and-control, socialist type political system. Sutton was not a wild speculator. He was a distinguished academic researcher who documented his conclusions impeccably in his several works. Not being able to counter his research, the establishment (including academia) simply attempts to ignore it, and pretend it isn't there. The purpose for these Wall Street policies was very simple: to create, and globalize, what Sutton calls Corporate Socialism. A system under which everything in society is ruled by the state, and the state is, in its stead, controlled by financiers who, hence, get to rule and manage society, to their liking. In other words, to get society to work for the financiers, using a socialist state as an intermediary. This is what we now know as the globalization economic model. As a result of all the clashes of the 20th century, most notably WWII and the Cold War (fought between powers that were manipulated and controlled by these banker cliques), the world has been 'globalized'. Meaning that it has been entirely taken over by these financiers, and is ever closer to being completely ruled by them, through not only the national states and national central banking systems, but mainly through supranational agencies and institutions.


The entire argument is centered around matters raised that have been left out of the history text books, and this counter arguments have thus been forced outside the given historical established narrative which I appreciate, like this from Caleb Maupin, who I actually like generally. It focuses on Jacob Schiff and the Zionists, which I believe is a fail because I agree that the Marxists and Zionist were opposed to one another and I consider it not entirely relevant.


Or this one, which reveals the chip on his shoulder the poster has regarding the Jewish Banker conspiracy that is prevalent, which I actually understand and I don't blame him. But it falls short in content and makes a false claim reffering to the academic fortitude of callibre of reseach of the specific clip  I posted first.


Decide for yourself, but this post of mine goes into great detail as to why I know this sort of counter is irrelevant. The misunderstanding about who the globalists really are:
https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2018/11/who-are-globalists-straight-answer.html?m=1

The accepted explanation of who the Bolsheviks were as players, their funding and who within an outside of Russia they worked with contains mostly correct facts in a standalone sense fact but is full of holes and omits all the important narrative defining facts. Here is the typical assessment: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Bolshevik

The differences between Soviet and Bolshevik may also need some fine tuning, it's typically put forward as:
Bolsheviks were part of Soviets who later split to pursue their own manifesto.
Bolsheviks believed in armed struggle, whereas Soviets believed in non-violent means.
Bolsheviks propagated industrial form of socialism, but Soviets believed in agrarian form of socialism.
Soviets believed in smooth transition of society, Bolsheviks emphasized on immediate transition.
Bolsheviks’ movement was more organised than that of Soviet revolutionaries.
Unlike Soviets, Bolsheviks gave more importance to methodology of revolution than the interest of proletariat's.
Bolsheviks favoured radical party members, Soviets preferred more liberal members.
Unlike Soviets Bolsheviks did not believe in creation of a bourgeois class in the process of transition.
Bolsheviks while in power, put trade unions under state control, which was opposed by Soviets.
Bolsheviks tried to impose state controlled capitalism, whereas Soviets opposed arguing that socialism should be devoid of any element of capitalism.


Posted by on
Index , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)

Labels

Search This Blog

Your Feedback

Name

Email *

Message *