The little legal case that threatened the entire banking system.

The following is an article I am hosting from www.thetruthaboutthelaw.com. It can be found here: 
http://www.thetruthaboutthelaw.com/banks-lend-money-they-create-out-of-thin-air/

I want to tell you about a simple little case from an obscure little court, where the findings and verdict posed such a danger to the money power, that they tried to prevent the judge from even entering the verdict. He refused. One week later the judge had an “unfortunate” fishing accident and died.

As for the lawyer/individual who brought the case and won it to the jury? Well he was coincidentally disbarred. Oh and the case findings? they were “nullified” on procedural grounds because well, “that’s the law”. And now of course, any lawyer who attempts to cite the case, well, they too face sanctions and possible disbarment by the “licensing” system the government runs that “allows” them to operate in the “legal system” the government runs. Remember, it is all just “following the law”.  What, do you not “support law and order”? You probably hate kittens too then.

So what in the world could the case have stood for that made the system react so violently? Simple. It exposed the truth about the banking system in a simple and straightforward way that allowed anyone to understand the fraud that it is. 

And, just as importantly, it showed how the people could defend themselves. 

Before I tell you about “The Credit River Case” I want to make sure you understand the legal issue.  In order to have a contract even the NSA admits you need the following.
At common law, the elements of a contract are offer, acceptance, intention to create legal relations, and consideration.

This just means the parties have to discuss terms, come to agreement on the terms and then we both have to be OBLIGATED to exchange something of value. The something of value is called “consideration” in the law. Here, from the same NSA link, is what they say about that.

Consideration is something of value given by a promissor to a promisee in exchange for something of value given by a promisee to a promissor. Typically, the thing of value is a payment, although it may be an act, or forbearance to act, when one is privileged to do so, such as an adult refraining from smoking. This thing of value or forbearance from some legal right is considered to be a legal detriment. In the exchange of legal detriments, a bargain is created.

It’s so beautiful isn’t it? Here is an excellent example of a legally binding contract where it can be difficult to determine whether the “consideration” was valid, and what the exact terms were.

So not only do we have to agree to the exchange, but you have to each exchange something of value that is considered a “legal detriment”. It must be real. If you pay me with counterfeit money, well, the contract “fails for lack of consideration”, in legal terminology. You “gave me” something that “was not real and not what we discussed” so I didn’t get the “benefit of the bargain”  That is really all contract law is, a formal discussion of agreements between people.

So now with that legal understanding, let’s look at the  “Credit River Case”.  I encourage you to go look at all of the paperwork yourself if you are interested go to page and search the link for credit river docs mid page.

The case is straightforward.  The Bank/Plaintiff was trying to foreclose, and the property owner/Defendant was defending the action claiming that there was no valid consideration given by the bank under the contract because it simply created the “money” that it “gave” by making a bookkeeping entry. Here is how the court described it.

Lawrence V. Morgan was the only witness called for Plaintiff (Bank)  and Defendant testified as the only witness in his own behalf.   Plaintiff brought this as a Common Law action for the recovery of the possession …by foreclosure of a Note and Mortgage Deed….

Defendant appeared and answered that the Plaintiff created the money and credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry as the consideration for the Note and Mortgage of May 8, 1964 and alleged failure of the consideration for the Mortgage Deed and alleged that the Sheriff’s sale passed no title to plaintiff.

The issues tried to the Jury were whether there was a lawful consideration and whether Defendant had waived his rights to complain about the consideration having paid on the Note for almost 3 years.

Mr. Morgan (the Bank’s only witness) admitted that all of the money or credit which was used as a consideration was created upon their books, that this was standard banking practice exercised by their bank in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, another private Bank, further that he knew of no United States Statute or Law that gave the Plaintiff the authority to do this.

“Owned”, hmmm, exactly what did they use to buy it with again?  I’m a bit unclear on that.

So a straightforward simple case with very straightforward allegations.  The case was tried to a jury.  They found against the bank.  Basically finding that the bank WAS NOT ENTITLED TO POSSESSION because it hadn’t given ANY CONSIDERATION when it made the mortgage!!  

Here is the short memorandum opinion that the court entered into the record with the order after the trial.  The order the powers that be did everything they could to prevent the judge from entering.

MEMORANDUM
The issues in this case were simple. There was no material dispute of the facts for the Jury to resolve.
Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, which are for all practical purposes, because of their interlocking activity and practices, and both being Banking Institutions Incorporated under the Laws of the United States, are in the Law to be treated as one and the same Bank, did create the entire $14,000.00 in money or credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry.That this was the Consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States Law Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the Note. See Ansheuser-Busch Brewing Company v. Emma Mason, 44 Minn. 318, 46 N.W. 558. The Jury found that there was no consideration and I agree. Only God can create something of value out of nothing….

Plaintiff’s (Bank’s) act of creating credit is not authorized by the Constitution and Laws of the United States, is unconstitutional and void, and is not a lawful consideration in the eyes of the Law to support any thing or upon which any lawful right can be built….

Both parties were given complete liberty to submit any and all facts to the Jury, at least in so far as they saw fit.  No complaint was made by Plaintiff that Plaintiff did not receive a fair trial. From the admissions made by Mr. Morgan the path of duty was direct and clear for the Jury.

Banker’s are hardly man’s best friend.

And that is the case and the opinion that quite literally set off a sh**storm.  Why? Because it very simply explained the fraud that is Banking.  And when given the undisputed facts, the jury had quite RIGHTLY found that there is no actual consideration given by the Bank because the bank just creates the money out of thin air. It doesn’t actually LEND MONEY IT HAS so the contract is not valid!

Do you see how dangerous this case is?  Under no circumstances can these ideas become known or discussed openly as anything even POSSIBLY legitimate.  It Had to be “erased” and found to be “kookery”.

Think of the implications otherwise.   A jury of regular people had been told the truth about what banks clearly do EVERYDAY and they saw that it is nothing but fraud. Nobody has agreed to allow banks to create money out of thin air.  The mortgages and other loans the bank’s make do not have any actual consideration!

Most people in the country assume that when someone borrows money from a bank that the bank is actually lending you some of the money that it has on deposit. But that is just not true under the fractional reserve system we have.  And if people understood this undeniable fact, as Henry Ford said, there would be a revolution overnight.  And so those in charge make sure nobody does find out.

“The process by which money is created is so simple the mind is repelled.”—John Kenneth Galbraith

The law quite literally gives a protected class of private individuals, “central bankers”, (and their facilitators) the right to create money out of thin air, and then to “lend out” the made up money and collect interest on it.  You have to work. They do not.

An honest thief, Josiah Stamp

“The bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take away from them the power to create money and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create money.” — Josiah Stamp Former Director of the Bank of England

The poor soon to be dead judge in this case clearly was a man of principle.  He believed the big lie he had been told about our country and the founding documents and our supposed “freedom”.  He believed the system was what he had been taught.  He was sadly mistaken and apparently paid for that mistake with his life in the form of a fishing accident.

The modern banker plying his craft.

There are two basic types of control systems. Overt systems,  meaning openly with force or threats, and covert systems, enforced, by way of disguise or in secret. In an OVERT system of control, the people CAN SEE the force used to keep them down, like in North Korea.  Therefore they KNOW that the legal system is rigged against them.  In a covert system the people are tricked into imagining they are in control and that therefore the legal system is “fair”. That is the key difference.

Our system is a covert system.  Therefore the ENTIRE system relies upon the people believing that they are in charge of the system, that the system works for them and that it is fair.

One of the most difficult concepts for people to grasp and accept is that the legal system is not there to dispense justice. It is there to control you under the GUISE that it is there to dispense justice.

The only obstacle that any covert system faces, such as ours, is making sure the people don’t find out  the TRUTH about the system.  Like the truth that this case exposes. And that is why so much time and money is spent brainwashing people very early on in government schools under government curriculum about justice and liberty and pledges of allegiance, etc. etc. And that is why the media tells us nonstop about how just and wonderful a country we have our whole lives.

So now that you see the reality of the system, let’s recap what happened in this case.  The BANK filed the case in the court. The BANK looked to the Court to take the property.  The bank did not complain it didn’t get a fair trial.  The bank did not complain it was not allowed to put on its evidence. The evidence used by the jury was the BANK’S own witness’ admissions.  The facts of this case were not in dispute! 

And what was the result of all this after the jury found against the bank?  The bank ended up winning “later” on procedural grounds after the judge ended up dead, and the lawyer ended up disbarred.   Do you see the real system yet?

I don’t know whether to laugh or cry when I see people who are so deluded. They actually think that they have to WAIT for 9 guys and gals to GIVE them their RIGHTS.

What more does it take for you to see that the Constitution prevents NOTHING!  It is not part of the solution, it is part of the problem.  Continuously talking about “getting back to it” and “enforcing it” and “its principles and limitations” just drains off energy that could be used to create REAL change.

If the constitution or the system actually did anything that people imagine, then outcomes like THIS could never happen. And if they did, the people would know about them and those responsible would have been brought to justice.  But none of THAT ACTUALLY happened because that is not what the system ACTUALLY does.

The system is there to control you, but its success depends entirely on you never finding this fact out.

I can’t take anymore freedom today.  Plus there are the limitations of space. There is a lot more to the case that happened afterwards. If you want to find out about it, I wrote about that here.  Because I am done for today. 

I hope you learned something. Take care my brainwashed Brethren.  Live in the light and tell someone the truth about the law.

And the truth shall set you free.

🔵 The Saturn Connection

Have you ever wondered why the planets were named after God's despite merely  being little pin-pricks of light that we could not even differentiate from stars? Why were the lives of ancient peoples governed by these astronomical observation phenomena that were apparently of utterly no consequence to their daily lives and rendered  imperceptible compared to the sun and moon? Or were they really as I have just described?

   Above: The diefication of planets. In almost all ancient       myth and religion the planets were not merely      representative of the gods, they were the gods!

What is the true source of the global archetype myth that was part of a little known culture whose mythology or perhaps even real experiences were arguably the genesis (or at least influencer) of all the better known and more familiar ancient mythology? Better answers surely lie in a synthesis between the latest science and the oldest myths rather that the prevailing insistence on making them mutually exclusive.

The one bit of emergent science that needs to be taken seriously to fully appreciate what I'm about to present to you is the electrodynamic centred understanding of cosmology rather than just working with the old "gravity only" paradigm. I say this particularly  because the electric sun is relevant, a model (where low energy fusion happens more as transmutation in the photosphere) and why I propose its superior to the thermonuclear fusion model (where high energy fusion happens in the core.)

Myth:

Below: There was a time when all rock art represented a very different looking sun compared to how its been depicted in the last 1000 years (If it was even the sun at all)

Is there a possibility that our ancestors saw a different sun?

Here are some known problems with the notion of a solar system not being interfered with (in any fundamental way) for 4.5 billion years. It has an unusual profile which does not match any of the 1000s of exoplanet systems observed to date. Nearly all exoplanetary systems we discover are all vastly different, it seems we are unique in many ways. 

Here below is some good speculation surrounding this potential scenario which is much more interesting yet still actually  scientifically MORE plausible and makes sense of mythology as well as accounting for our unusual, non-binary solar system and its lack of a "Hot Jupiter" . 

Plasma formations and notions of a primordial sun (below)

That is not to say that plausibility is evidence per se, although this understanding I'm putting forward here for consideration has both circumstantial and specific hard evidence in spades when compared to the prevailing hypothesis, which basically doesn't have ANY.  I understand that last sentence is predicated on a bold claim. I understand the implications of such a claim. 

The current reconstruction (it must be remembered that it's just a reconstruction) is basically just an educated guess. That's fine obviously, what other options do we have? BUT, now consider that such a guess is getting old and is one which emerged from now falsified astronomical assumptions. 

How plausible is the conventional wisdom? 

I propose It should actually be described as unlikely or barely plausible. In all of its underpinnings, none are confirmed by observation since being first speculated. Even the latest telescopes just keep increasing the conflicts between theory and observation.  

All LAMBDA CDM principles (the cosmology model that sets the parameters for theoretical principles our solar systems origins are framed by) are falling apart over time going right back to the Big Bang. 

As a sidenote please consider the fact that our "Standard Model" has a monopoly on public funding. It relegates global mythology to child-like fantasy and treats the improbable uniformity in their global structures and themes as pure chance.

Science:

This post represents one possible stunning conclusion to two previous posts. Its notable conclusion is that all of the natural disasters associated with the post are related to a possible disassociation with our original brown dwarf star, the star Proto-Saturn, and assimilation into our orbit with the sun, or alternatively some relationship along those lines.

There can be no certainties but I'll make a case (or two) suggesting that such a scenario is a more complete circumstantial case than the unlikely accepted and established scenario. Four billion 500 million years of totally uninterrupted gradualism thinking is possible, but is it plausible? 

No. A plausible case over that time frame would involve thousands of cataclysm scale events that flavour each stellar system. Understanding what these events were entirely is a fool's errand, but understanding events, even relatively minor ones, in the last few hundred thousand years may be attainable despite the fact that they occurred before written history..

..or did they?

 Post on rethinking our history of civilization.  

Here is the post

And the other post is a tutorial of sorts which I put together to succinctly cover all the most basic aspects of the science required to consider this a better understanding of the history of our solar system and a means of setting  a context for explaining historical anomalies through s version of human history that better assimilates the problems arising from the improbable timeline of the established story.
Here is that post

_______

Let's get to it.

There is credible evidence to suggest we were one of Saturn's moons. This has has been proposed in many guises from David Talbots Saturn myth, later refined in collaboration with the Thunderbolts Project. Many variations of this hypothesis are currently energing, each with interesting angles I suggest you give a chance.

To dismiss this out of hand in light of all the evidence presented here (and in the two given links to previous posts) is in my view very unscientific. Nobody can claim to have the settled story of our solar system, and I would be very skeptical of anyone who makes such a claim.

Let me go over some aspects of this hypothesis 

The Polar Configuration. 

A) Gravitational capture. When a captured system enters a system of stronger gravitational or electromagnetic force. 

Comet Schumacher-Levy 9 stretched to a  formation as the described "polar configuration"  looked as it approached Jupiter. Saturns satelites would have behaved similarly as it approached the sun. 

B) Electrodynamics. Herbig Harow objects. In the electric sun model which is gaining favour and supported by all observation to date (No observation as yet has ever been made supporting the accretion disc model which also does not work on computer model) the star Proto-Saturn would form immediately following the sun, and on capture not exceed escape velocity. Saturn would flicker out being dominated by the suns electrical environment and only a salty water residue, probably a shower of water raining down on its satelites such as earth, explaining its oceans and identical chemical composition which is such a mystery right now. When forming ice it would become a ring system on the equator, which is exactly what Saturn has. 

C) Other possibilities like this exist such as the Expanding Earth Hypothesis. The addition of so much water as well as changes to the earths ionized plasma charge environment of a brown dwarf changing to the more exposed emptier space Goldilocks zone of the sun may have effects on our planets size and gravity. This is initially quite "out there" sounding but the fact that the continents fit perfectly when the earth is 60% size is compelling, and its often pointed out, correctly, that a billion years of Continental Drift by the the current plate tectonic model would ensure that there is no recognizable relationship between continents. They would never fit together if this was the case or even bear a vague relationship, they would be entirely randomly shaped. 

These, and many more seldom heard hypotheses, are all possibilities which only seem contraversial because we are trained to see an unlikely model, where for 4.8 billion years no real disturbances other than the formation of our moon, and the delivery of our water, and the craters of every moon in the solar system happen by ad hoc seperate events. The scenarios above actually could apart, or in combination explain all those events in a much more believable way. The orbital chaos could have lasted a thousand years or millions of years, easily accounting for extinctions and the anomalies of myth and legend, depending on when they happened. They also answer roundly ignored puzzles like the impossible size of dinosaurs and that is just the ones I have mentioned. 

If you think we fully understand gravity, think again:

( link for direct YouTube play is https://youtu.be/OTMELHUAzSM )

Gravity grey areas

🔵 Plasma Cosmology, The Electric Universe & The Thunderbolts Project - Difference/ Background/ Basic Tutorials (Pt 1)

Plasma Cosmology:  

Modern Plasma Cosmology has evolved from but is inspired by what was once known as the "Plasma Universe" It puts forward that gravity is not the dominant force in the universe, and that electrodynamic forces are as important or more important (depending on the order of magnitude).  It is centered around a connected universe where charge separation is prevalent, but its scope and focus remain rooted in astronomy including Cosmology and Astrophysics. Not every Plasma Cosmology devotee has the same position, but it generally retains the thermonuclear core star principle from the Standard Model despite radically different views on star formation.

Electric Universe Paradigm:

Uses the principles above in all astronomical matters but goes further by invoking the Electric Sun Model, which has a variety of possibilities rooted in self-contained plasma magnetic entities, double-layers and arc discharge anode-cathode heliosphere principles that will be explained later on.  The EU paradigm goes significantly further by making the case that the principles defining Plasma Cosmology must therefore be in play in fields such as Geology, Archaeology, Biology, Weather and more since the plasma state of matter is the state we find in over 99℅ of the matter in existence. The Electric Universe highlights how an "overall universal charge" is not needed.  Neither is a "source for all the electrons". This is simply because of the clear and pervasive influence of many forms of charge separation on all scales.  That means the principles should apply broadly throughout our reality since this would be an inescapable logical consequence of the laws of Classical Physics.

The Thunderbolts Project: 

TBP is one movement within the EU community, without doubt the leading influencer.  It goes further yet in scope by reinvestigation of historical events through the EU prism. TBP introduces the potent angle of a spirit of cross disciplinary co-operation as an antidote to the over specialisation that we see in science today. Thunderbolts is also known for its novel view of placing value in the vast libraries of resources available to researchers in ancient mythology. This becomes valuable not by subjective speculation but by using a system where the archetypes of global myths are extracted, and it follows logically that the common themes must regarded as a source of historical value commensurate with how widely proliferated they are, especially when understood through Electric Universe principles.

NB: Foreword

If you are like me, someone with a keen interest all things science, you may feel a certain degree of resistance to these ideas after so much exposure to the science of "Big-Bang" cosmology (The LAMBDA-CDM concordance model) and all the spin that comes with it.  I would urge you to overcome those feelings if your sense of certainty gives you the need to dismiss this science out of hand.  That would be an unfortunate error in judgement that will cost you a rich source of the most elegant and powerfully predictive science currently available.

If you are indeed willing to open your mind to these findings you will open yourself up to the extraordinary explanatory powers of Plasma Cosmology and The Electric Universe. At this point a remarkable thing happens: 

You will find that most of the dead ends in the space sciences will suddenly seem like new horizons.  

Pay no mind to those "debunking" videos on YouTube or other mainstream platforms.  I will get to why they are so weak.  Better still, I will place you in a position to have enough of a grasp of the fundamentals that you will not take them seriously and may even be able start spotting the agendas behind the attacks.  Usually, they are out of a sense of feeling threatened. Unbeknown to some this is actually an extremely well backed up set of disciplines experimentally and is not as much at the mercy of the musings of the more theoretical physics as the standard model is, nor to the projections or modelling mathmagicians (in cases where they conflict with observations) either. As with anything, it's not immune to errors or hypotheses and has a healthy appetite for reviewing its own body of work. It's vital to keep in mind at all times that The Electric Universe now has many voices and no one voice speaks on behalf of all. It encourages speculation but always seems perfectly clear on the boundary of where there are proven principles based on such fundamentals as Maxwells equations and alternatively when there is speculating.  Compared to Theoretical Physics of standard models it speculates in increments instead of compounding layers of assumption on top of each other creating a house of cards. Such speculation is very sensible and as such it is very healthy.  

However:

What you will not find...

You will not find speculation that "reality is a two-dimensional hologram projected onto the surface of a three-dimensional sphere" here.  Nothing real exists in two dimensions, it boggles the mind that String Theorists could overlook that obvious fact!  Neither will you learn that reality exists in eleven or more spatial dimensions as the mathematics of trendy theoretical physics requires. 

This is because there are only three spatial dimensions.  A "dimension" in mathematics merely represents a degree of freedom and should never substitute for real world representation, relatability, ability to communicate in principle what concept means and most importantly the one thing modern astrophysics repeatedly ask you to disregard in a form of brainwashing.  That thing is common sense.  Place value in it. 

Observation must be explainable in cause/ effect terms as was always done in classical physics. These should all be self-evident, and it goes without saying that they are all critical aspects of what the new cosmology must be.  I am here to tell you that this is possible, it's already been achieved!  There are very important consequences. In this regard you will not find that over 80% of the universe is mysterious invisible "dark matter" here, or that (together with the equally fantastical "dark energy") almost all of the universe has turned out to be "missing".

What are the main space sciences?

Astronomy is the broad strokes science of all celestial bodies., planets, moons etc in the night sky. It's involved with the physics somewhat, but also mapping, charting, practical application of telescope and observatory resources and incorporates under it both Astrophysics & Cosmology.  The institutions under the current establishment do not teach competing hypotheses and despite heavy competition for funding interally it must be said that overall the status quo has the monopoly on public funding and the public understanding of science.

Astrophysics involves itself principally with the actual physics involved with these bodies. It's become increasingly mathematically reliant and as an example it would attempt to deal with the problematic physics of the thermonuclear fusion model of the sun, or the infinities laden black hole physics as well as interface with such things as String Theory etc. Cosmology is tasked with the ultimate quest. The big picture questions. What is the origin and fate of the universe. Should we persist with the failing LAMBDA-CDM standard cosmological model or look at contenders to the throne such as Plasma Cosmology. Despite an overlap with Astrophysics, it is Cosmology that will ultimately be discipline that we use as our arena for questions beyond the overall model, such as:

• Was there a big bang?
• How old is the universe?
• What are space and time? 
• How many dimensions are they set in?
• What is the Cosmic Web? 
• What is the origin of comets etc.
• What is "embedded space" and is it a consequence of or setting for space and time?

Its Cosmology that was once referred to as the "queen of the sciences".

And may I cordially welcome you to the rabbit hole! 

 An introduction to the Electric Universe by the founders of The Thunderbolts Project. 

 Getting a sense of the current landscape in Astronomy, Cosmology and Astrophysics:  

Below: The nature of the current insurgency, why it's so critical it must happen, and a succinct overview of the sun's electrical environment. The embedded clip below includes a quick overview of how exactly it works. This is an important fundamental aspect of understanding what is to follow. 

NB* Watch me! 

An overview of Plasma Cosmology is HERE

Urgent: "We only have 12 years left before we extend the deadline to a later date!" Climate Scientists

Global warming became "climate change" and word on the street is that "climate fiasco" or "climate farce" is the front-runner for the next rebrand.

WORLD—Climate experts have solemnly warned that we only have twelve years left until they change the dates on globalwarming again. (Continued below link)

https://www.thegwpf.com/english-summer-failing-to-meet-alarmist-expectations/?fbclid=IwAR3M-9kakGMxfcmACciUWnnnwVIAp91W-9ZtLKFy7ahjASKukdYfGYy43lo

"If we don't take action, then in 12 years we will have to explain why the world hasn't ended and come up with a new number," one UN scientist warned. "This is a very serious threat, and we urge everyone to hand control of the economy to the government immediately before we have no more time left to change the timeline again."

Climate scientists can't predict what will happen next year, but we trust them to predict 12 or 30 years ahead? That's why this complete and utter failure happened happened!   (Link)

The scientific consensus is that roughly 10-12 years from now, the world will be flooded with new doomsday predictions. This can all be avoided if we overhaul the economy and become socialists, according to non-political, unbiased sciencey type guys.

"Should we not change our ways, our old predictions will melt, dangerously raising the chance of us having to move the goalposts again," said Al Gore. "Do you really want me to write another book, film another movie, and go on another tour in my private jet just because you dingbats couldn't be bothered to alter your lifestyles? I don't think so. Let's all get on board with this 12-year figure, or we'll have to push back the date again." 

Keep reading at the link below

https://babylonbee.com/news/experts-warn-we-have-only-12-years-left-until-they-change-the-dates-on-global-warming-again?fbclid=IwAR0jGlodhnUuLBw3683e9ADC4TfYewFP2PHKdjuzIv-wINrPY21IjOgJL9g

More climate change satire? 

Click here

⏪ A stunning revision of the past which could be as unbelievable as any science fiction blockbuster (Part 1)

INTRODUCTION 

The requirement of a frame of reference.

"What if the defining catastrophe of the human part of world history has no observable equivalent occurrences today? Surely, we would entirely leave it out of our picture?"

According to Wikipedia, which represents the establishment view of most matters, the substance and starting point of our history is as follows:

Quote

"The history of the world, in common parlance, is the history of humanity (or human history), as determined from archaeology, anthropology, genetics, linguistics, and other disciplines; and, for periods since the invention of writing, from recorded history and from secondary sources and studies.

Humanity's written history was preceded by its prehistory, beginning with the Palaeolithic Era ("Early Stone Age"), followed by the Neolithic Era ("New Stone Age"). The Neolithic saw the Agricultural Revolution begin, between 8000 and 5000 BCE, in the Near East's Fertile Crescent. During this period, humans began the systematic husbandry of plants and animals.^[2] As agriculture advanced, most humans transitioned from a nomadic to a settled lifestyle as farmers in permanent settlements. The relative security and increased productivity provided by farming allowed communities to expand into increasingly larger units, fostered by advances in transportation."

End Quote

I don't think the untouchable status the above synopsis once had is given as much credence as it once had.  At the very least it would be fair to say it has lost its reverence. Academics and professionals (and amateurs for that matter) have found various anomalies which don't allow for the established view to stand up to scrutiny.  We may not have a specific nomination of a single "for certain" replacement theory but this is a very exciting time in the landscape. I'd like to give what I consider the leading contenders are for the disruption of the narrative. The clues about our real history.  They all come together in surprisingly supportive ways, although those telling these stories may not really fully understand this themselves.

Download the delightful and fascinating book  "Maps Of The Ancient Sea Kings: HERE

(I chose a link where you can view first before downloading because default downloads of large docs annoy me too)

What new evidence is at odds with current thinking?

The reason I have dedicated two full posts just to give the briefest possible outline of slow collapse of the narrative is because there is not one "slam-dunk" reason for it.  Much of the challenge is emerging from fresh thinking emerging out of the information era and sharing of ideas occurring a bit more outside of prevailing structures these days. Always reserve judgement and keep an open mind.  Be mindful of the tendency that the status quo has become ossified and reacts defensively in those instances where points of contention are raised by scientists, academics and engineers from outside of the structures of anthropology, archeology, Egyptology and conventional ancient history.  Even more so when amateurs, authors or journalists contest the prevailing story, and the challenges are never addressed or become lost in a sea of ad hominem attacks usually playing the man and not the ball.  This happens even in cases involving the most well-evidenced or well-made cases.  That is why it is vital that you do not get drawn in by such an approach.  It stems from a political mindset of individual agendas of no interest to you and I.  If you are curious about the subject matter as I am you will surely agree that the quest for an objective perspective can only be nurtured by the decision to always and only focus on the caliber and academic fortitude of whichever case is being subjected to scrutiny. 

1) Clandestine Cover Ups

We all enjoy scandal and intrigue. Conspiracy (especially ancient conspiracy) is interesting.   While there are surely and surprisingly many of these controversies in play, we must not lose perspective.  The damage done by those seeking to protect past interests have done incalculable damage to our ability to fully understand our own past.  This involves a cast of characters to broad to mention but just to give a sense of the problem it's worth noting how diverse they are in range.  From the Jesuits whose agenda is impossible to fully assess, to colonial agendas, the Catholic Church at the height of its power and even the ideologically motivated seemingly sober minded monks that rewrote so many historical texts (often by first destroying the original source documents).  Don't think of it as artifact of past power structures, I assure you it happens even today and is no less prevalent.  Players like ARCE and the Smithsonian immediately spring to mind with their endless mischief while they enjoy unquestioned admiration from institutions of the prevailing establishment.  That being said, these cover-ups still represent the minority of "things that don't add up" in ancient history, since so many things don't add up. Just ask any regular tour guide in Egypt and you will hear about how boring old history is surrounded by more drama, lying and politics than the US Department of State.

I think a good place to start would first be a quick mention of the corruption inherent in the protection of the standard narrative. There are a variety of motives and so many examples that in order to avoid that theme hijacking this post I have decided to make it the subject of its own upcoming post. Scandal is always interesting.  To give a few clues as to the scale of the known deceit and regular cover up going on, where Egyptology (very relevant here) is a serial worst offender. This tip off sent into a known YouTube channel is a great example out of many known to plague the field. I will focus on academic examples in my upcoming post, I've chosen an example that demonstrates that open-source contributions can be made by anyone willing to travel that is willing to wander from the beaten path. To save time (if you are in a hurry) skip the intro of this particular example and track to 5.20 .

The above example is an easy to post example of what I mean, but in reality these examples are everywhere. To see what I mean listen to the background discussion in most of the clips I include in this post, the reason I always add multimedia is that it can give an expanded sense of the atmosphere. There are often grumbles of secret digs, sealed off corridor's or missing archaeological artefact's and physical evidence that mysteriously goes missing, without the expected investigation following it.

2) Standard political or commercial cover-ups. 

Another form of cover up involves less mysterious motives and usually involves the prosaic fact that archeological digs take up lots of time and involve the zoning of land. That is to say that the prospect of land going to commercial or industrial interests for development starts to appear being out of the question. Either that or in some similar way interferes with some or other special interest group or government.  The below example involving the cover up of the great Labyrinth of Egypt.  This famous site is of no less historical status and reputation than the Pyramids on the Giza Plateau themselves and just like the Great Pyramid was part of the super prestigious list of wonders of the ancient world.  How could anyone believe that such a find was discovered and then covered up by Egypt's own government?  Believe it!  In fact, that site never stood a chance, and the reason is just as clear and obvious as it is frustrating.

Ben van Kerkwyk explains how the construction of the Aswan Dam, a modern-day mega-engineering project in Egypt, caused a rise in the water table of several meters, making the prospect of a dig costing billions loom large for the authorities, a gamble they were not prepared to take and a decision they were not prepared to admit they made. 

3) Denial, consensus cover-ups, protecting monopolies on public funding, public understanding of science, careers, tenure & nepotism

There is no single citation that does this cover up justice because 90% of all cover ups likely fall into this category.  Most of the rest of the post as well as the follow up post, part 2, falls into this category.  Although, between you and I, deep down inside I harbor suspicion that a fair bit more actually falls into category 1 above. However, since I cannot prove such a thing, I cannot state it categorically.