#EpicFail

They are dropping like flies aren't they? In the wake of the biggest Western political establishment collective fails in living memory (BrExit and Trumps US Presidential Election Victory) the legacy of the globalist warmongers has been tossed into the trash heap of history. All the main players staked their reputation on their formula (painting their next conquest as a brutal dictator and seeking to overthrow their government) and almost all of them have fallen as society attempts to clean house and get rid of the layers of dirt and grime that have built up in the top levels of political power.

It strikes me how badly these so-called-leaders have misread the situation at home while weighing in on the domestic affairs of other nations.  The disconnect is staggering and incompetence is too kind a word for such aggressive mischief making posing as ignorance. It's also staggering how they could have bought into the nonsense they ascertain, it's almost a certainty that they don't care about the truth when pushing their imperialist agendas.
http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2015/10/assad-did-not-gas-his-own-people-ghouta.html

Cameron, Clinton, Obama, Hollande, Merkel, various leaders from Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar, Jordan and others are all gone or facing the end of their political careers or terms while the man they all underestimated has risen from the brink of defeat and (with the help of Russia) turned the tide of foreign funded terrorist insurgents posing as rebels fighting a civil war and is about to win a decisive victory in Aleppo.  This is the endgame for the internationals meddling in the domestic affairs of Syria.  All the instigators in foreign lands have instead disappeared in one of the sweetest victories in living memory for the lovers of irony & justice.

Enjoy.

Fake News Clamps Down On Fake News

After losing its grip on its ability to manipulate the public on BrExit and the US elections, the largest fake news industry in the world, the mainstream media, is calling for a clampdown on rival fake news. The irony is in your face, just like the proverbial egg is on the face of CNN, Bloomberg, Sky, Al Jazeera, The BBC and all the other usual suspects. The message is clear: Only our fake news is acceptable.

What is “fake news”?

This is the big question, because there is plenty of fake news out there, most of which is “Click-bait” designed to lure us into clicking onto platforms who want to maximize ad exposure and advertising revenues, but this is not actually a new problem and we can usually work out which are spam sites by looking at the other content on the sites. If the stories are packed with tales of alien abductions and zombies we can work it out fairly easily and we quickly learn to avoid these sites. We are not complete idiots (hopefully).

What else can be considered fake news?

This is more worrying because once major MSM sites like Google and Facebook start considering alternative news sites (see the right hand column of this blog for example) that carry a narrative different (or more truthful) than their own spin and propaganda, even if it is rival propaganda, we run into dangers of censorship. Censorship can take our ability to make up our own minds away from us and channel only one perspective into the public domain. This amounts to nothing less than mind-policing and places the Orwellian “Thought-Police” scenario squarely on the horizon. It's insulting and suspect behavior and ridiculous to assert that we are voting incorrectly because the MSM are losing the information wars. The real reason they are losing is precisely because people ARE making up their own minds and this is dangerous to the establishment.

I find it difficult to accept that this is not an attempt to squash the alternative news movement, which depends on the free availability of information and gives discretion to the end users to act like free thinking adults and make up their own minds. Over time we learn which sources are reputable and which are not, and I am absolutely sure that I do not want institutions that I already do not trust deciding what I should see and what I should not see. As it stands I already find the algorithms annoying and as far as I'm concerned the less filtering, profiling and censorship, the better we are for it.

A Trump Victory, Another Nail In The Globalist Establishments Coffin!

Get used to him...

Another major blow to establishment has just happened. The populists scored another victory over the elitist, the globalists, their puppets and political entrenched power. Populism is essentially pure democracy whichever way you slice it. The entire Obama presidency has just been repudiated. If the polls and the talking heads in media were to be believed, a Trump victory over the Wicked Witch of the West was nearly impossible, just as we were lead to believe similarly for #BrExit. In both cases I grew to believe it. It wasn't because I did not believe people had had enough, but rather because I thought that people would be persuaded otherwise.

The first surprise was BrExit as I wrote previously:

http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2016/06/what-does-brexit-really-mean-single.html

And now this surprise, a Trump win over Clinton. We have dodged a MAJOR bullet here. Don't get me wrong, I dislike Trump as much as anyone else but I won't be slut-shamed into being forced by the liberal Nazi's into forming a political decision based on pathetic political correctness issues, the mark of a small mind and a brain-washed sheep.

It's not about Trump, it's about any fresh approach not owned by the establishment, and if the the smaller independent parties don't get a fair shake I'd begrudgingly take my chances with an outsider in Trump over an Insider like Clinton anytime. Why don't we actually look at the issues and decide based on those what we can expect from Trump and how we can score him going forward?

GLOBALIZATION: The globalists and multinationals.

Outsourcing labor, manufacturing and jobs will be under the microscope with Trump, and the Clinton cronyism with their foundation and influence being an infamous globalist/oligarchy pillar. The Clinton Foundation, The Carnegie Foundation, the Open Society Foundation, the Council On Foreign Relations, the Tri-lateralists etc will all have something to think about as global meddling takes a back seat to the benefit of local industry.

The Economic Recession.

As any reader of this blog probably knows, I have always targeted the 2016 presidential election as the kick-off for events resembling some sort of financial collapse as the old globalist economy. I have no reason to change my view on this but how will Trump manage this without people blaming him? Will people understand this was always coming from well before Trump appeared on the scene? How will Trump handle the Fed?

War.

This is a question mark. Will Trump pander to Clintons backers from the Military Industrial Complex and Israel/Saudi Arabia and waste tragic amounts of money overthrowing governments like Libya, Syria and all the rest? Perhaps this is not certain but Trumps favorable perceived stance with Putin and his love for the bottom line suggest he will be much better in this department than Clinton who is an infamous warmonger.

The Media.

This should be fun. Trump is at war with the talking-head establishment media. This media functions as a mouthpiece and echo-chamber for special interests and Trump knows it. The battle here is not over, it's barely even begun!

The Pentagon.

Few people truly grasp how powerful the Pentagon really is and that Ash Carter essentially operates with impunity or accountability just like Rumsfeld did before him. I see Trumps ability to reign in the secretary of defense, whoever that may be, and the sprawling Military Industrial Complex with their powerful influence as the greatest challenge to his presidency.  The State Dept (the department of clowns) is basically just a PR office for the Pentagon. I wonder how much Trump could change this?

There are a lot of questions here, but at least things are shaken up from their stale and predictable path. We may have more extremes, more downs and more ups but mixing things up gives a small amount of hope at least for the people of the world who are engaged in a battle against the influential elite. I'll take it!

Mass African Exodus From The ICC A Massive Blow To Imperialism

The International Criminal Court, while ignoring the offenses of States such as Israel, has long been used to steer the influence carried out in Africa by imperialistic, bankster driven interests in the name of “justice” and lend legal legitimacy to their imperialistic goals. This so called justice follows the same lines of “justice” used to undermine national sovereignty in Ukraine, Syria, etc. Whether it is the direct influence of military interventions such as Iraq & Libya, armed and funded insurgency such as Syria, or more “soft power” influence of NGO's, Councils and Foundations such as in Ukraine, Egypt & Syria again, the ends always justify the means for those seeking hegemony and extending the uni-polar world which is so far quite firmly under the control of the powerful globalist cabal. That cabal features overlapping hands in the banking, military, food, media and military industries along with their lobbied stooges of the political establishment.

http://www.dwfed.org/news-analysis-gaza-war-crimes-and-the-international-criminal-court/

In Africa we see that Gambia, South Africa and Burundi have each already recognized this clear and present danger and signaled their intent to leave the ICC, with Kenya & Sudan set to follow suite. It is heartening to see resistance coming from the African continent who are increasingly becoming aware that there is a battle on for global influence and that they cannot remain neutral without the danger of becoming pawns in the way the nations of the Middle East have already fallen victims to. The reality is that if Africa wants to realize it's dream of an African Renaissance it will have to recognize this battle and align itself in a way that is more discerning. I feel that this is what is happening. With the overthrow of Libya and the CIA arming and funding Islamist terror groups all over Africa in a similar way it does in the Middle East, and building of a new drone base in Africa by the US, there is a renewed push by US to extend its influence in Africa and it is only set to increase as the declining West loses global influence. It is failing for the first time in the Middle East thanks to Russian involvement in Syria & strained relations with Turkey, and failing in the far East as China finds nations such the Philippines eager to cooperate for mutual benefit. The latter is terrible news for the US when one considers the impending stand-off in the South China Sea conflict.

If you want to know just how pathetic the understanding of global developments is in South Africa, consider this article from a so called progressive site like the Daily Maverick, which is typical of the line towed by ill-informed SA media:

http://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2016-10-27-op-ed-by-withdrawing-from-the-icc-south-africa-loses-much-more-than-just-the-argument/#.WBcj6mp961s

It will be very interesting to follow such developments in the future. Local media will always defend Western institutions, so it is always important to bear the bigger picture in mind and frame each story in the proper context unless you keen to flirt with danger of becoming just another pathetic media sheep, just another good dog barking for his biscuit.

The Battle For Mosul Is Cover To Shift US Military Asset, ISIS, From Iraq To Syria

Strategic Map Courtesy SouthFront

If you have been following this blog you may be familiar with a post I wrote early this year describing in great deal in the second half of the post how ISIS in Iraq is principally theater.  It's a show set up to protect the black market oil trade and service the needs of the key US partners at the time, Saudi Arabia, Israel and Turkey.  It explains how the US and it's allies, the Peshmerga, are protecting rather than fighting ISIS.  If you want the lowdown on the situation in Mosul, Erbil, Raqqa and other key strategic area's I highly recommend reading it now.

Here is the Link:
http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2016/03/fear-mongering-manufactured-consent-for.html

In the last few days while Western media ignores US funded terrorists shelling civilians in Western Aleppo, it's been kicking up a tremendous fuss and blaming Russia and Assad for anything that goes down in Eastern Aleppo.  This is principally because the US, after designing a plan post 9/11 to overthrow 7 countries, they have been thwarted in Syria for the first time while Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and Yemen lay in ruin.  The US will absolutely not back down from their "Assad must Go" goal, and fighting ISIS,Al Qaeda and Al Nusra (who they arm, fund and guide with intel) was from the beginning a cover in Syria, just as it is in Iraq. So suddenly the US decides to get it's puppets to move on Mosul, a city "taken by ISIS" (wink wink) in 2014.

This is all the more spiteful when one considers how embarrassed and defeated the US has been in  Aleppo, it's already a done deal:
http://theduran.com/us-gives-up-on-aleppo-pleads-russia-mercy-admits-syrians-will-win/

Regional Map

This is no coincidence, and the plan to take Mosul is highly mischievous.  ISIS commanders who are US and Israeli intelligence assets have already been flown out and the battle plan is to approach Mosul from 3 fronts, leaving one front open to drive the foot-soldiers of ISIS (who don't know they are US pawns) can be pushed into Syria to wreak havoc on civilians and, vindictively, to give Assad and Putin as many headaches as possible.

The US leaves a Front is left open to move it's terrorist assets into Syria 

Reports are already surfacing from reliable sources that the US is not attacking fleeing terrorists.
https://southfront.org/us-warplanes-ingore-isis-convoys-fleeing-mosul-report/

This is as predictable as it is sickening, and next time you tune into CNN's wall-to-wall coverage bear in mind how they continue to play with your mind, which they have little regard for.

Question Less?

RT's questions are clearly getting under somebody's skin

In a massive blow to free speech in the UK & 24 Hours after US Secretary of State, John Kerry, met with British Foreign Minister Boris Johnson  to discuss the situation in Syria, television station RT (Channel 407 in SA) received a letter from Natwest Bank to inform them that their bank account had been closed.  Natwest is a 73% state owned bank and their letter gives no reason and simply states that the decision is final and that the matter is not up for discussion.  This issue is much bigger than one broadcaster because the issue of free speech in general is addressed, as well as whether other institutions beyond broadcasting authorities are involved in enforcing censorship of non-establishment agenda's. This is very curious and of course the timing  is very interesting, but is this a surprise?

No, of course not.

RT has been a massive spanner in the works for the establishment media and a key instrument in putting an alternative perspective into the public domain to break the war-machine’s propaganda instrument for selling the idea of war to a war-weary public.  RT has made it their mission to give the Russian perspective in Syria and other regime change hotpots and in doing so has undermined the rationale that a forced regime change via military means is a reasonable path to take.  I would take this a step further and propose that RT has introduced the element of debate itself into the public realm and this is very, very bad for the establishment because the more questions that are asked, the more likely lies are to be uncovered. To “Question More” is a terrible idea for the political and banking class because they do not want the average Joe running about asking all sorts of annoying “questions” about how their tax money is being spent.

Image Courtesy RT

I guess congratulations are in order, well done RT, this is yet another sign that your disruption in the media marketplace is worthy of intervention from above and a testament to your success.  Please, for all of our sake keep up the good work, this is a battle that transcends your station and Natwest Bank and gets to the heart of the very notion of free speech in Western society as a whole.

State Capture VS State Capture

The Latest Capture by the Gupta's is a fart in the wind against the banksters

Amid all the talk lately in the SA media about the Gupta's and State Capture (all valid mind you) it's sometimes easy to forget that the Gupta's are rank amateurs in the art, we are already in the midst of a state capture going back more than a century.  A State Capture happened in South Africa, just as it happened in the US and elsewhere, when the nations central banks were made unaccountable to voters.  This meant that no matter which party rules, whoever is elected, the central banks cannot be voted in or out and they will remain in power lending to the nation state at interest for no other reason other than the mandate they have to print the nations money supply.  They will always work with a finance minister who bank-affiliated  and compliant National Treasury. The nation will therefore always remain at fiscal deficits and known bankster agencies such as Moody's will always make lending even more expensive on each downgrade ,earning ever more interest for the banksters printing that same money out of thin air (in the form of Treasury Bonds guaranteed by taxation placing the nations children on the hook as debt surety). They then simply "lend" that currency (not money - this is important) simply and lending to the state. the risk is moot since they create the money from nothing there is essentially no risk to think of.

The commercial banks issue the balance of the nations currency from debt issued to consumers, out of thin air, and charge interest on that too as if it were loaned out from a capital or assets account, which it is not.  Real money is not Fiat currency debt created out of thin air, real money (like gold and silver) is a store of value and can only be loaned out from real reserves, justifying interest for risk.  This could become as much a Banks VS Gupta's issue as with either of them VS the State and the people.

Money VS Currency

http://ewn.co.za/2016/09/09/I-cant-fix-Gupta-problem-with-banks

http://www.financialmail.co.za/opinion/bruceslist/2016/09/02/bruce-s-list-zwane-and-the-zuptas-zoom-in-on-banks

http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2016/09/how-south-african-reserve-bank-steals.html

The banksters will always have (de facto) agents just like Pravin Gordhan who own shares in the banks and have a conflict of interest between the banks and the nation, they have since Trevor Manual and before.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-09-30/manuel-joins-rothschild-after-leaving-politics-in-may

This is for certain no reason to resist the State Capture the Gupta's are engaged in currently, it's simply a call to remember that for every cent the Gupta's steal, the bankers steal a Rand. The Nations national debt payments mostly go to servicing debt,at interest, lending from private bankers that create money from nothing, something the state could just as easily do for itself interest free, this is why we cannot afford movements like #FeesMustFall, something the ANC promised voters more than a decade ago!

http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2016/08/precisely-how-do-banksters-financially.html
http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2016/05/money-creation-for-dummies.html

So next time we get up in arms about the Gupta's, keep at it, it's great we are finally learning, but ask yourself why you suddenly care?

Watch This!

The above clip from Mike Maloney, episode four in his excellent "Hidden Secrets Money" series (Watch them all!) puts in a better way than I have yet seen it explained, it's essential viewing.