I've making a big deal and possibly poking alot of fun at certain groups because of the record-breaking cold thats been so widespread lateley. Apart from one or two isolated records in Japan on single days, the only real "hottest ever" case being put forward for the last few years by the "hottest year ever" brigade is from the SE Australian summer 2018/2019. So we have one cut and dry case.
Or do we? What if we actually have nothing? What if there is no anomalous info anywhere? What if it is all normal being spun as doomsday? it is actually now near impossible to know which summer was the hottest ever summer – because of the extensive remodelling of our temperature history.
The hottest summer on record except for the ones that we’ve changed:
To open ended fear that can make a definative statement about the earth being doomed but not require itself to commit to any sort of short, medium or long term prediction whilst assuring us they know exactly whats in store in the short, medium and long terms. Now that, my friends, is an ART!
In 1798, there were about a billion people in the world and economist Thomas Malthuspredicted that overpopulation would lead to war and famine. In 1968, at 4 billion people, experts published The Population Bomb and The Limits to Growth and predicted the same thing.
Today, in 2014, there are over 7 billion people on the planet. Nevertheless, global poverty and violence are at all-time lows. Even carbon emissions are dropping (at least in the US). It seems the that experts were mistaken.
We've all looked carefully at the economic problems plaguing the planet, I have tied to in this blog over the years, and my conclusion is that the solution is being sold to us, yet again, in the form of two false choices. Just like the false choice in the partisan divide with Democrat or Republican, the establisment has already mobilised the globalisation of socialism and the globalisation of capitalism and participation in either in our current model would effectively yeild control to the same globalist cabal of banksters (the more capitalist face if the cabal) or globalists (the more socialist face of the cabal). The truth is they are interchangeable.
There is no reason why an all or nothing choice must be made. We can look at each element in either system and either regulate, embrace or dispose of whatever can be determined to be good, bad or ugly.
CAPITLISM
How socialists view capitalism.
I'm not too unhappy with the argument that Capitalism always works well builds wealth and prosperity when the pure, libertarian style environment is largely still recognisable as driven by something resembling a Free Market and not overly corrupted. However, for all its merits the Libertarian take on capitalism fails to adequately deal with the problems of monopoly, anti-trust and the rise of monopolistic robber-barons and powerful multinational corporations. For all the Libertarian talk against big government, the truth is that these behemoths use influence peddling to lobby for (and essentially decide for whichever party is in power) every bill passed in the capital, whereas taxpayers only vote every 5 years. Whoever the vote for is lobied issue by issue. Capital finance has captured the peoples reprentative goverment and left hollow plattitudes in its place. The subversive central banks have abandoned the free market guidance of monetary policy, they are communist and care only about the artificial policy that drives "price stability" and implement communist type "central command" style policy. These unaccountable central banks that dictate monetary policy by decree with no taxpayer oversight are NOT a good thing for you and I. The shadowy group should not brag about "independence" and should instead apologize for being "unaccountable" Crony capitalism is what late-stage capitalism turns into an An ideological seeming form of fake capitalism that seizes the people's representation in govt, the apparatus of the state and places elite globalists of capital finance at the helm and the citizens are condemned to wage slavery.
SOCIALISM
Socialism is often mischeiviously characterised by East European and South American dictator ruled nations but those that do so never explain the role of the West or Internationalists in placing them there, they just blame the economic system. With the scandanavian model democratic socialist states, and for a while Canada and the UK had elements of this working well incorporated into their landscape, taxes were high but the standard of living remarkably high and social security remarkably succesful. Medical care and societies ability to deal with problems was very good and crime was low with social ills mamaged. If anything privatisation started putting an end to this run whereas in the eastern european states government corruption brought down their systems in tandem with external meddling from the West. Eventually the externally corrupted or sabotaged leadership or corrupt governance from within will show but its corruption, not socialism that fails in socialist states especially when forced or bribed to start conspiring with the corrupt financiers and governments of the capitalist West or face regime change and elites scratch each other back leading to dictatorships in Socialist states and again, globalism. At thisbpoint with the West watching its manufacturing outsourced to former socialist or communist countries which are now viewed as "low cost wage centres" Manufactured goods must be shipped back to the western markets with the globalist multinationals outcompeting the entrepreneurs that capitalism was so hopeful for, feudalising society with a wealth divide and ultimately leaving the people of socialist and capitalist nations in thw same feudalised state. Right now all roads lead to globalism. The only conclusions that can be drawn easily are that seeing the military, private prisons and private healthcare are working TERRIBLY under the profit motive. They are guided by powerful defence contractors or lobby, and big pharma lobby has been as disastrous as any other group. Another are that msking private is disaterous is to have private central banks. These should all be nationalised. Those are areas that must remain socialist.
That being said, govt run bureaucracies have their own issues and militaries can still end up just like the old Soviet Union if under government control unless the parliamentary, constitutional and congressional systems account for this.
I will give thoughts on how I believe this can be remedied in a later post combined with my thoughts on the remedy for the ills of democracy because the same globalist corruption is at the heart of both.
The popular perception is underneath. Differences Between Capitalism and Socialism
ROSEMARY PEAVLEUpdated November 20, 2018
Capitalism vs. socialism. Two different political, economic and social systems in use by countries around the world. The United States, for instance, is usually considered a prime example of a capitalist country. Sweden is often considered a strong example of a socialist society. Sweden is not socialist, however, in the true sense of the word. In practice, most countries have mixed economies with economic elements of both capitalism and socialism.
What is Capitalism?
Capitalism is an economic system where the means of production are owned by private individuals. "Means of production" refers to resources including money and other forms of capital. Under a capitalist economy, the economy runs through individuals who own and operate private companies. Decisions over the use of resources are made by the individual or individuals who own the company.
In a capitalist society, companies that incorporate are typically treated by the same laws as individuals. Corporations can sue and be sued. They can buy and sell property. They can perform many of the same actions as individuals.
A capitalist system is also called a free market economy or free enterprise.
Under capitalism, companies live by the profit motive. They exist to make money. All companies have owners and managers. Sometimes, especially in small businesses, the owners and managers are the same people. As the business gets larger, the owners may hire managers who may or may not have any ownership stake in the firm. In this case, the managers are called the owner's agents.
The job of the management is more complex than just making a profit. In a capitalist society, the goal of the corporation is maximizing shareholder wealth.
Under capitalism, it is the government's job by enforcing laws and regulations to make sure there is a level playing field for privately-run companies. The amount of governing laws and regulations in a particular industry generally depends on the potential for abuse in that industry.
What is Socialism?
Socialism is an economic system where the means of production, such as money and other forms of capital, are owned by the state or public. Under a socialist system, everyone works for wealth that is in turn distributed to everyone. Under capitalism, you work for your own wealth. A socialist economic system operates on the premise that what is good for one is good for all. Everyone works for their own good and for the good of everyone else. The government decides how wealth is distributed among the people.
In a pure socialist economy, there is no free market like we see in a capitalist nation. The government provides for the people. The taxes are usually higher than in a capitalist system. There may be government-run health care and a complete system of government-operated education. It is a misconception that people do not pay for these services. They do pay for them through higher taxes. Socialist systems emphasize equal distribution of wealth among the people.
Mixed Economies
Many countries have mixed economic systems with elements of both capitalism and socialism. In the U.S., predominantly a capitalist system, there are many government-run programs, notably Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare. In many socialist countries, as in Sweden, there are also still private businesses.
“No State or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the Commission’s regulations concerning such emissions.” Section 704 of The Telecommunications Act of 1996 Click the word "Act" for a pdf copy or visit this site which is one of the few vigilant sites tracking this potentially ominous outcome. https://www.telecompowergrab.org/legislation.html https://mdsafetech.org/telecommunications-act-of-1996/
Its time to accept major global media, cellular and satelite telecomunications monopolies are firmly under the control of powerful globalist capital finance interests and state/district level government will be powerless to act. This is the aim of the globalists, to control centralised power to render grass roots local power structures worthless. Telecommunications are almost as important as banking and war to their internationalist MO and where there are no suitable supra-national bodies like the UN or EU or IPCC, such as in the US, then they go federal. China should offer no resistance either unless the government intervenes, since the population is compliant. This is the MO and it has been for some time. This is a weakness for now to the globalists if people act swiftly, at least some sort of sovereign control can be imagined, meaning potentially there is taxpayer oversight but it wont last forever.. https://www.axios.com/nationalizing-5g-network-raises-a-number-of-concerns-1517168611-4c95d53f-7013-42b9-bcdf-9ef7bbdfde14.html
The Globalisation of Telecomunications is not about connecting the world, its about controlling the worlds communications...
5G sounds like increadable tech, but it appears its too soon and the public health impact is expected to be severe and its really just the latest nefarious development but hopefully will bring some needed attention to the issue. Because the public health concerns over 5G are so serious and the roll out so extensive people imagine there would have been a public consultation process of some sort. There has not been. The opposite has happened and its been planned by the globalist multinationals of Big Telecom years in advance.
This is not a profit driven move because isolated profit interests top globalists less than total control of the profit yeilding system as a whole, and they want it with no prospect of a challenge. The way these companies work is that those at the top first need control over the industry and the government legislation passed around their objectives. Only then can the R&D (they hold all important patents and intellextuall in be made available to other industry players and wall street CEOs who will try to make profit their goal but they are just employees compared to the very top.
It needs to be understood that in every country an effort like the YELLOW VEST Protests in France will probsbly be need on all these facist points of concern. If you value your self determination and health of your kids you will fight for it, but nobody fights when they think the situation is under control. We are all about to find how little control we really have.
Scientific Papers are suspiciously lacking. Here is one:
This may seem like a question of scientific detail, but actually its a fundamentally disputed scientific worldview. I say "worldview" because even when there is agreement on the scientific points which are often already proven, there is a vast gulf in interpretation between the two theories of a more established gravity dominated universe, and a universe dominated by electromagnetism. Walt Thornhill's website www.holoscience.com suggests that the term "Electric Universe" has already registered with a patent office so somebody has big plans. I will give his synopsis although there is some variation in some of the theories I've looked up, I'll give an assortment of links at the end which you can look up yourself. Introduction
In the wake of recent discoveries, a new way of seeing the physical universe is emerging. The new vantage point emphasizes the role of electricity in space and shows the negligible contribution of gravity in cosmic events.
Images returned by high-powered telescopes and recent space probes have challenged astronomers’ long-standing assumptions about galaxies and their constituent stars, about the evolution of our solar system, and about the nature and history of Earth.
The new discoveries also suggest that our early ancestors may have witnessed awe-inspiring electrical events in the heavens—the source of myths and symbols around the world.
Cosmology
Today, magnetic fields are detected everywhere, even in the “empty” depths of intergalactic space. Magnetic fields cannot exist without causative electric currents. The naked electric force is 39 orders of magnitude (a thousand billion billion billion billion times) stronger than gravity. The visible universe is constituted almost entirely of electrically active plasma.
In the twentieth century, the pioneers of plasma science inspired a new school of investigation called plasma cosmology. Plasma cosmologists suggest that electricity is the primary force organizing spiral galaxies and the astonishing galactic clusters now seen in deep space.
Plasma cosmology has achieved surprising success in predicting major discoveries of the space age. This new perspective does not require purely theoretical inventions based on mathematical assumptions like the Big Bang, dark matter, dark energy, neutron stars, or Black Holes.
Stars
An Electric Universe extends the findings of plasma cosmology to the formation and evolution of stars and their planetary satellites. Stars are formed at the intersections of galactic current filaments in dusty space plasma. The size of a star and its colour are determined electrically and may change suddenly. Novae and supernovae are the explosive response of stars to a power surge in their galactic circuit.
Proponents of the Electric Universe suggest that there are no isolated islands in the universe. All objects in space, from subatomic particles to galactic clusters, are connected by manifestations of the electric force acting in real-time.
The Standard Model of the Sun proposes that pressure at the core of the Sun provokes a thermonuclear reaction. Proponents of this model say that this thermonuclear furnace causes the Sun to shine.
The Electric Sun Model, on the other hand, envisions thermonuclear reactions and neutrino production at or close to the surface of the Sun where the maximum exchange between the Sun and its external environment occurs.
It is electricity that energizes the stars, including the Sun, in a form of glow discharge. This external power source explains why the temperature of the Sun increases above the photosphere to coronal temperatures of 2 million degrees. Powerful plasma feedback effects maintain a steady output of visible solar radiation while variations in power input show up in the familiar sunspot cycle.
It is in the nature of a glow discharge that all stars possess a weak electric field beyond the corona. As charged particles of the solar wind move away from the Sun, they continue to be accelerated due to the Sun’s electric field, which extends to the heliopause.
Comets are electrically charged bodies moving on elliptical orbits through the Sun’s interplanetary electric field. As it approaches the Sun, the comet’s swift radial movement develops arcing on the nucleus. The arcs produce jets of dust and ions that form the coma and visible tails.
Many comets are solid rocks with dry surfaces. The sharply defined features of comet nuclei make clear that they are not “dirty snowballs” sublimating in the Sun. Due to the electric force, a comet can entrain a mass of hydrogen from the Sun greater than the mass of the comet’s nucleus. The unexpected X-rays of a cometary discharge can reach 2 million degrees.
Cometary nuclei reveal deeply cratered and blackened surfaces due to electric arcing. Since comet nuclei are eroded electrically, they could not survive across aeons of solar system history and may have been produced much more recently than proposed in the Standard Model.
For more information on the Electric Comet model click here.
One of the premiere sites dedicated to the Electric Universe and plasma cosmology. Developed and managed by Wallace Thornhill, the site contains all of his Holoscience articles over the past 12 years.
The nature of space plasma according to Anthony Peratt. A long-time proponent of plasma cosmology, Peratt is an associate director of Los Alamos National Laboratories and one of the leading experts on high-energy plasma discharge.
Mythopedia.info: “Our objective is to study historical information regarding the structure, workings and origins of nature, with special emphasis on transient events. As scientists now recognise plasma as the dominant state of matter in the universe, the subject is conveniently referred to as plasma mythology. This eye-catching term serves to distinguish the present approach from more traditional schools of ‘nature mythology’, that did not acknowledge the significant role of transient events in human traditions.”
Your one-stop-non-shop for exploring plasma cosmology, our electric universe and almost anything else even remotely related to the electrical nature of space, climatology and our Earth. Click on the below titles for links
A Wiki about the Plasma Universe, a model of the universe in which electromagnetic forces dominate since 99.999% of the universe is plasma (charged particles). Although the equal numbers of charged particles tend to cancel, the tendency results in “quasi-neutrality”, and charge separation may occur.
The Electric Universe theory highlights the importance of electricity throughout the Universe. It is based on the recognition of existing natural electrical phenomena (eg. lightning, St Elmo’s Fire), and the known properties of plasmas (ionized “gases”) which make up 99.999% of the visible universe, and react strongly to electro-magnetic fields.
The SIS was formed in 1974 to consider the role global cosmic catastrophes may have played in our history, and even recorded by cultures worldwide in their oral and written ancient traditions.
In times of universal deceit, truth is a crime. Censorship should be banned.
Who and what are you not able to openly criticise? Thats who Id like to hear about. Fact checking is propaganda by the very nature of the act.
