Informal Science Rant

 

Apologies for the lighting. This was as load shedding hit and I forgot it was due. I had to vent after my Wi Fi cut out and my battery seemed destined soon to follow.

When was it first noticed that cosmology abandoned all reason?

 

This clip, the little gem above, is very old, although I don't exactly know which year saw it's creation or the context for which it was made. Its specific purpose is a bit mysterious.  It's general purpose is fortunately self evident.  

It seeks to portray Big Bang Cosmology as dogmatic, hastily concluded and flimsy. I would add tribal (Ive discovered that when trying to raise the issue for discussion people are divided along polar lines of one team vs another. Such division is a lot like faith based religion or cultural practices.) This portrayal is justified. The standard model needs a purposeful suspension of disbelief. It appears more and more like a political conviction.  Perhaps so, but the tribal aspect seems to have its origin in a social/psychological cause. 

Our personal sense of identity is increasingly based on some of these cultural norms. It follows logically that we would increasingly risk a self-image crises (or worse) accordingly. Linking our sense of who we are to any ideology or school of thought is the fastest way to lose clarity on an issue. Our psychological need to avoid a crises of identity will involve defending whatever issue is at hand as if it were our own personal standing. 

Lately, in the age of politicised science surrounding climate and vaccines, if we fundamentally do not attribute the implications of the ossification of various standard models to their own conduct then we are inviting trouble. By placing standard models beyond reproach we make a defacto declaration that we have stopped doing science, at least at institutional level. 

This ossification includes a monopoly on the public funding allocated to a rotten academic establishment. This in turn partly explains why the scientific method was abandoned for "consensus science". The other part is ostensibly also related to special interests financially, but outside the scientific establishment itself, but with a tangible need for the experts to lend legitimacy to whatever they have cooked up.  Within the consensus science establishment they always place their vote with themselves to positions of influence, this is human nature. Such positions invariably are the same ones that receive R&D or grant funding.  It goes without saying that they design their own course material for academic curriculums as well as public understanding of science.

"Public understanding of science" is an insidiously poised collection of academics or cultural influencers who the public respond well to, and usually this involves a high level of trust and credibility. This is no accident. When you effectively steal taxes you require a PR arm to create justifications for plundering societies to fund dead-end research. 

Don't lose sight of the framing of this critical issue raised by the satirical old clip I embedded at the start.  Then keep in mind that it is the insiders overseeing their own funding, and the big bang has held that monopoly for years, how interesting to see such old satire lamenting this!

Of course this site, the one you are currently reading, is loaded with gripes in that regard, and competing cosmolgies are as recurring theme here.

I had imagined that no true resistance of any substance was really in the public consciousness  before around, let's say the 1980's. That's a long time after the Big Bang itself started becoming more widely accepted perhaps in the 20s or 30s. What do I know apparently? There must have been alot more resistance and a lot earlier than I had imagined. I am aware of the resistance of Fred Hoyle, Hannes Alfven,  Kristian Birkeland, Immanuel Velikovsky, Halton Arp, Wallace Thornhill and Many Others right up to Eric Lerner (who has been in the news often recently in the fall out following the James Webb Space Telescope's failure to uncover the anticipated data predicted by the ^CDM establishment). Regarding the JWST, they had had to be creative to salvage the Big Bangs purely gravity centered dark universe from the widening crises in cosmology. This crises is as ominous as the aforementioned identity crises. It is poised to tear the establishment apart the way I remember "the nothing" tearing Fantasia apart in "The Never Ending Story" when watching it as a child in the 80's. 

How apt for a model which was itself 96% dark, this being the most dramatic and spectacular failure of predictive success since the predictive success of cosmology was put forward by many of those voices of descent at 4.6%. A predictive success rate of 4.6% cannot be seriously propsed to a public as a legitimate science that is in their interests to have the national budget in any nation provide for its tax support in R&D. That 4.6% is the paltry proportion of the universe that can be accounted for when the Friedman Equations are applied through layers of contrivance (like cosmic inflation). The equations require a variety of fudge factors such as dark matter and dark energy, and a "big bang" start. The very critical start date yielded by such equations 13.8 billion years ago. In their rampant unchecked hubris these cosmologists have resorted to describing the first nanosecond of creation while other lines of evidence are off by orders of magnitude.  S staggering state of affairs.

The supposed precisely calculated reverse engineered concoction they have utilised skirts around such contradictions by periodically making small adjustments or selecting which lines of evidence are most useful in preserving the entrenched narrative.  Descent is treated in the way one would usually reserve for treason or heresy and the price paid by such traitors is suitably dire, ensuring theirs is the ONLY set of variables anyone can ever use. This applies unless they prefer being fired and chased from their career by village mobs brandishing flaming pitchforks.

Those variables were only ever calculated by processing the dynamics through a single force, an unbalanced force of attraction that presented a problem. In absence of all other forces the problem was obvious.  It required a balancing force to explain why gravity didn't collapse the universe. In this case after misunderstanding evidence such as redshift and the CMB,  an explosion type outward force to exist throughout time and exist in precisely the fine balance needed to balance out the model. Contrived much?

There has never been a better example of pure fudge factor parading as evidence. Every line of evidence, every single one has been evidence against a big bang. An unbalanced dark universe where every new observation disproves the previous one unless new physics is invented with every new telescope.

Those who did not blow a trillion dollars of our money and who account for 100% of the observable universe, who have never has a single need for any of the 65 new physics inventions of theoretical physics (this goes far further than dark matter multiple dimensions of space or curved spacetime or the new matter required to hold together the preposterous, borderline supernatural spectacles these clowns have filled our skies with just to avoid using proven physics been put forward used by competing models to explain the universe with the same physics we use on earth to replicate in labs every single one of the observations we invented hypothetical physics for to keep Lambda CDM on life support. That's right. Models exist that account for 100% of the universe purely based on observable matter. In these models we never needed a single new theoretical physics principle to explain a single observation in 50 years. They pretty much got every prediction to match observation and only learned what was not predicted in observation.  Rather than predicting something wrong keeping and "tweaking" the model dozens of times, we should have taken another look at models that predicted all the emerging anomalies.  They behaved just like it was a climate model (ie just for show and to secure funding, doomed for perpetual overhaul) and that is telling.

  

If you didn't know there were models around for decades that performed so excellently, you are not alone. They will be around always, basically correct and unchanged as usual, you dont change a model with predictive success, you plump them out, with funding. 

But thats not going to happen. I've done a rough calculation, in around 20 years the current model will be the same as the models that worked all along, whose discoverers lost their jobs, were ridiculed and insulted by those whose junk model is slowly being tweaked to match the models they mock. With each new tweak they copy one more principle from the people whose potential jobs they unjustly occupy. In about 2 decades nobody will remember the mistakes, or who had a solution a century before that was (at the time) 180° opposed to theirs in this imagined future where I put forward it will end up as identical.  This happens slowly at the pace of new technology arriving and verifying findings. There are bookies that will offer odds on the cheats. If you want a good hint for the age of the universe by the time a new telescope is launched, increase 13.8 billion years to 26 Billion years. If you want good odds for 20 years in the future, I might suggest that new future telescope will offer data to concede that the age and size of the universe are not currently knowable, and every one of the goons in observatories today will claim they knew all along: "Nobody really believed dark matter existed" or that they never seriously considered  "the accelerating expansion rate of the universe.  

So why even bother to discover new science from such a protected position?

Where else have we seen disaster emerge out of lack of accountability? How about our politicians and diplomats?

Having useless wars is a great way to secure taxpayer cash, especially for military contractors or those invested in their stocks. In fact we could further by pointing out that decisively winning wars is less profitable that dragging them out for decades. Logic dictates that this would replace victory as the primary incentive for those who stand to profit.

Having a model that is useless is a great way to blow cash if results are not your only motive. The sooner you get results the sooner your need to have your research funded arrives. Besides, we don't need the money apparently. Our infrastructure is in too good a condition,  right? Families eat too much, blow far too much on luxuries like insulin and surgery, and in any case, why build roads and keep educating kids to high standards when we could keep blowing trillions on pointless wars and totally monopolize the arms dealing industry to support our western core of diplomats. How did that work out? We ended up with diplomats who are actually not working for taxpayers but instead as "market development specialists" for the MIC. They develop a global marketplace to create new business for our arms dealers at the MIC, ie conflict zones.  Even a gun given to a child soldiers must be secured with access to your hard work and tax. You will be plundered to keep building new NASA projects that never learn anthing and hogg the world's best engineers frm JPL. Why not  just keep blowing all the time and money, it's how you keep rivals from getting it who will learn from it. That way nobody can expose how bad the current "expert's" are until after they kick the bucket. 

That is unavoidable and the space sciences scientific establishment already has a predictive success in line with the record Western diplomats have in avoiding wars. 

The solution seems clear to me: We fund them. We can cut them off. 

All that's missing is the public appetite for oversight. Going forward all funding should be commensurate with performance, this goes without saying. I guess what is revealed is the inherent lack of respect public servants have for our money and together with all the special interests they have a sense of entitlement to a free lunch on you and I.

Myths, assumptions & false premise surrounding the tension in Gaza

 

This is just a quick post absent of my usual geopolitical angles. To be honest it's about everything surrounding the topic, the sticking points that seem to sabotage a discussion capable of advancing the issue in civil discourse.  

In all honesty I personally almost consider much of what I choose to bring up irrelevant in understanding the geopolitics, but since (despite there being content out there parading as geopolitical analysis) I keep running into the same tired and totally ossified myths and mishevious (or misunderstood) synopses.  It's all weak, lacking in self consistent reasoning and based on a false premise, or two.. or ten. 

The case being made out there by the MSM doesn't impress me much.

                             ▪•○●☆●○•▪

Always keep in mind that Hamas was Israel's creation to effectively end Yasser Arafat's PLO.

Always keep in mind that Israel has nuclear weapons, and honestly I have zero doubt that they would sooner use them than ever allow their enemies inbthe region to defeat them. Broader all out war is a no win situation, Its vital this gets de-escalated.

Media lies about the Russia/NATO/Ukraine conflict

Compilation of media lies about Russia's SMO in Ukraine. 

Courtesy Matt Orfalea.

What is energy?

Matter is not "condensed energy". 

Energy is not a particle; it is not a material "thing".  It is a concept. It can be measured, sure, but in order to do so you cannot measure the energy since it is just a concept, you must measure THE MATTER THAT IS SAID TO BE ENERGETIC.  To measure the temperature of air you are taking a reading of the air.  Energy measurements are taken by measuring aspects of matter but not just in one SI unit, but in a great variety of them. Energy is a property of matter that has a different measurement for each way matter interacts with matter, energy is the description of those interactions at the point where energy is transferred from one to the other in the SI unit that describes the nature of the interaction.

At its core, regardless in which form it ultimately manifests, energy is matter in motion. The force and momentum of a moving cannon ball isn't much different to moving excited particles we sense as heat.

Each property of matter can be measured. In it's essence all of the ways energy manifests is as matter in motion acting or reacting with other matter. 

On all scales this can ultimately be measured as some form of energy. It is a general concept that motion of matter in blanket terms covers many forms of energy often described through other properties  of matter.  

We have given specific terms to each particular expression or manifestation of "energy" as well as potential energy (when the attributes are there but the interaction has not yet occurred so no direct measurement can be taken, and no SI unit exists yet to take a reading, we have very good equations that can predict what the SI units will be that approximate reality incredibly well in some cases). 

Each type of energy has a name, and each has units.

Such as:

• Temperature/heat/degrees°

• Pressure/Kilopascals

• Current/voltage

• Force/momentum/weight/Nmeters/Kg

• Calories/kilijoules

• Horsepower/Torque/kilowatts

• Etc

The rate at which power is delivered or energy is liberated plots each dynamic over time. Or in some cases, from the above list for example, time has already been factored in as a determing aspect of the energy delivery system or it is combination of properties of matter  to give a very precise concept of the type of energetic dynamics at play:

• Force = mass x acceleration (f=ma)

• SI unit is the Newton

• Acceleration (a) is the change in velocity (Δv) over the change in time (Δt), represented by the equation a = Δv/Δt. This allows you to measure how fast velocity changes in meters per second squared (m/s^2). Acceleration is also a vector quantity, so it includes both magnitude and direction.

Or

• Momentum = mass x velocity (p=mv)

• Current I =             I = 

You could make a case for weight simply being force, since the mutual attraction between two massive objects in a gravitational field is ultimately what is being described. On earth we use grams and kilograms to describe this force instead of Newtons.

Mass is itself a property of matter, it gives the correct energy output in a gravitational system but  despite what you may have heard, it has not been shown definitively to be a universal constant in relation to the content of matter, or number of atoms of any given element. Regardless, it's correct in Newtons equations of motion but it should never have been directly linked instead of matter itself with energy In the statement of mass/energy equivalence described by Einsteins E=mc2)

Gravity and the electrostatic force

E=mc2

E=mc2 is not an equation in the way many people think of it. Many assume it has utilitarian use ie used as with Newtons equations of motion or Maxwell's equations used in electrical engineering. It is NOT used in the atomic bomb or anywhere like that, even broken down as above. 

It is simply a statement in the form of an equation that represents a principle  

That principle is the concept of mass energy equivalence. 

I feel that this principle even by itself a misunderstood concept. At best it's a stab at energy potential of matter when liberated not just at the electron level like with chemical reactions in chemistry (valency)and electricity, but by it's full potential by liberating it from the atoms core, the nuclear "Weak force" and "strong force". 

MATTER CANNOT TRANSFORM INTO ENERGY.  THERE ARE NO ENERGY PARTICLES, ENERGY ALWAYS DESCRIBES MATTER, THEREFORE ENERGY IS A PROPERTY OF MATTER, NOT ANY FORM OF MATTER. IE NOT A MATERIAL THING. 

How can we be sure?

In a universe without matter there can be no energy . There can be no mass either since each is a property of matter. 

Einstein's massless photons of light contradict his own equation/statement because the energy is measured in quanta that are wavelength spectrum specific, a property of wave delivered energy. More importantly Einstein was clear as daylight that without ether (some still say ether has not been definitively disproved) no wave propagated energy in the near vacuum of space was possible. There was "nothing to wave". It followed logically at the time that a photons energy was delivered through momentum.

But does it follow logically? Well, we know from the core fundamentals of Newtonian physics of motion that the only experimentally evidenced conceivable means of getting direct evidence (direct measurements) to confirm and quantify such energy through momentum are p=mv and I suppose f=ma. But what happens the momentum figure the instant you insert 0 in place of the m variable? You end up with no possible measurement of force or momentum! It's always zero. 

This solved nothing.  But science never let's that stand in it's way...

So they coughed up a field equation by reverse engineering a bit of algebra to correspond with the measurements they already had,  and they shat out a field equation. Not an equation based on predictions and then experimentally verified.  Instead this was acheived working backwards from the answer. Guess how many equations are theoretically possible using such a method? Infinite! There are infinite possible field equations that could describe relationships between the variables one decides to select, given freedom to choose the variables and in what manner they relate to each other. Arbitrary selection of the first equation they proposed is  not grounds to put forward the notion that anything "is"

My conclusion is the same as the good sense classical physics perspective would require:

We cannot be sure of mass energy equivalence, only matter energy equivalence. 

General Relativity

VIOLATES

 Special Relativity?

Beyond the supposed event horizon of a theoretical black hole we ultimately are told we reach the point mass singularity where the weak force of gravity somehow overpowers the electromagnetic and nuclear forces and matter supposedly becomes infinitely dense. 

This is of course pure speculation based on unsound reasoning. The consequence is that matter beyond the event horizon supposedly adopts infinite mass by virtue of its loss of its it's 3 physical spacial dimensions and adopting instead another alltogether different and meaningless property. 

This property is not one of matter or anything materially real in three dimensions, but instead a property of a concept. That property is geometry. 

So, we get infinite "curvature of spacetime". 

This "spacetime" presents a number of probems. Regarding the topic of energy the problem is serious, since by Einstein's mass/ energy equivalence principle the black hole's centre is not just a singularity in terms of being infinitely massive, it's also infinitely energetic. Again, this is according to mass/energy equivalence principle.

The precise impossibility of infinite energy is related to Einstein's universal speed limit c. 

The problem should be becoming obvious:

Nothing with mass would supposedly ever travel at c because nothing could be infinitely energetic.  

It's another intractable logical conflict, but more importantly it contradicts Einstein himself so there is no out-clause for those still pushing both principles that can conveniently be hidden behind.  

I don't  know how you feel, but I am no longer I keen on the possibility that we can be invited to put aside incredulity and marvel by invitation of astrophysicists at how wonderfully mysterious the universe is, and how it can be "counter-intuitive". 

You can decide for yourself about that. 

In this case, in this specific application, Einstein himself is off the hook since both he and Oppenheimer both wrote papers on how black holes cannot exist, citing such things as angular momentum, or because the asymptotic dilation of of time would never allow a singularity to form. Terrible reasons when it can easily be shown that gravity could never get to anywhere it needs to get to in order to overpower the EM force, but there it is. The papers exist and it must be pegged on the followers of Einstein instead. In terms of infinite energetic systems existing where "the laws of physics break down" I prefer to say, "where your theory breaks down since it requires breaking the laws of nature in order to be upheld". If you want an explanation for the bright X-ray spots in the sky that we call black holes, then here it is.

Regarding c requiring infinite energy and therefore being impossible, and infinite energy being possible inside black holes, I'm sorry but both statements cannot be right. One or the other is not necessarily correct either. No deductive or logical reasoning requires one or the other to be correct, since of course they can BOTH be wrong without any intractable logical conflicts....

What does E=mc2 solve?

I am not aware of anything that is specifically and uniquely solved by it. Same with the field equation yeilding momentum energy of a massless photon. The only scrutiny it faced was the confirmation of it balancing. What use is that if the actual selection of variables in play and why they are in play, is speculative. If they and they alone have not been experimentally evidenced in any exclusive way  demonstrating they uniquely yield the solution, or even a single of the infinite possible solutions. 

This immediately red flags the principle as being bankrupt of any scientific rigour or intellectual fortitude. 

With equations of motion available for energy put forward as delivered by momentum, and thermodynamics/chemistry/ electrostatics/ electrodynamics we can work from particles proposed at minimum WITH MASS and always in three spacial dimensions so that we have physically real means to directly measure whatever we are measuring, since now they yield MATERIAL PROPERTIES.  

With the property we call heat  we have means using the knowledge the movement of the excited particles moving faster, or however we describe what's going on. That energy is described as heat energy and it's SI unit is temperature in degrees. Electrical energy uses a combination of variables like current, voltage etc to describe the work done to such precise degrees our entire power grid is set up to power all manner of electrical machinery and electronic devices. Chemical reaction energy as with nitroglycerin, is obvious. Igniting a plasma state with chemical reactions, a catalyst, or a flashpoint bring reached, like the internal combustion engine for example when driven by petroleum or diesel, uses kilowatts. 

Nuclear energy has nuclear chemistry and nuclear physics for releasing energy in a fission reactor but no measurements are taken in any SI unit involving E= mc2. Nuclear weapons (atomic bombs) speak about kilotons.  Nuclear power stations (which ultimately heat water) ending up measured as kilowatt hours. 

So each means of yielding energy is ultimately quantified by the order of magnitude or by the way that matter in motion is assigned an SI unit, a number, as an output. Its an output of the process that matter interacts with other MATTER, or perhaps "reacts" can also be a word that describes it. 

It is in this way that energy is liberated, not through turning matter into energy. 

Formulas can be established for each. The particular character that energy adopts as it ultimately manifests as in our world of varied properties also assigns related numbers to each component involved in the measurements. Not just electrical like charge, amps, volts and resistance, and of course heat, a consequence of friction due to the resistance commensurate with current strength.

Causality and the speed of light (C).

Why is it stated that INFORMATION cannot travel faster than light?

This is an implicit fundamental contradiction demonstrating the lack of a basic critical scientific criterion: It must be self consistent. 

If two objects at the fartherest ends of the universe head towards each other at 99% of c, time is said to dilate since they would approach each other at almost 2 x c, supposedly impossible. 

However, by starting the journey accross the known universe from each objects start point (say 13.8 billion light years apart) at a given speed, the universe needs to know immediately so that the two objects moving towards each other don't violate c  by confounding their speed, which would happen immediately unless time were also dilated immediately.  The universe must "figure out" that time must be dilated. This involves receiving info about the speed of each and direction.  

The news of their respective approach speed cannot wait the supposed 13.8 billion years the c limit would put on information that far apart taking to reach the opposing object for the universe to understand it's own workings just so that time can dilate. How could it? otherwise they will reach nearly 2 x c in real time. 

SO

The information that  each is moving, and what it's live time velocity is, must reach the other object INSTANTLY if matter is to be prevented from exceeding c. 

By such reasoning information MUST by far exceed c in each case. Or in other words, news must be instant so mass can have a speed limit. For Einstein to be correct about the universal speed limit of c, this cannot be possible unless information always and only violates c in every case. 

This entire problem is sidestepped simply by removing the nonsense concept of "time dilation" and have no relative universal speed limits, even if c does turn out to be limit a body possesing mass can accelerate to from a specific frame of reference. 

Two bodies across the universe need not to know about each other, they need the energy required from moving from one from speed in a frame of reference to another. Simple. 

I understand that reducing everything to matter and its properties sounds materialist in the philosophical sense. This need not be so.

 Other ways energy can be  misrepresented. 

The case for the materialist in physics:

Philosophically speaking I cannot with certainty advocate materialism.  But physics is very prosaic in terms of the simple cause/effect problems it solves. It is not designed for the "why" questions but more for the "what" or "how" questions. 

I have noticed that an esoteric or metaphysical adoption of the word "energy" is widespread. This is fine.  Language allows for many different contexts and much subtlety and nuance.

That being said, its worth noting that there is an attempt to bring the general use of the word "energy" into physics and with nonsense reasoning try to rubbish the materialist approach taken in classical physics, when real science was done before the nonsense of GR and Quantum Electrodynamics.

It is put forward that matter is not material at the end of the day, and that the universe is actually based on vibrations, energy, frequency and resonance....

Now it does not matter one iota if stuff actually is material, as long as it's material in measurable units relative to other matter, since we measure properties of matter in terms of its other properties, and magnetic, electric and gravitational fields are also properties of matter.  Matter and fields are two sides of the same coin.  

My only question to the emerging esoteric would-be physicist is the following:

Vibration, frequency or resonance ...OF WHAT?

BRICS+ Set to render the G7, OPEC and the Petrodollar obsolete in one devastating move.

 

Continued destruction of the G7 Globalist Tyranny and the Perodollar.

The blue countries will be members from 1 Jan 2024. Iran (who can now bypass US sanctions) and Saudi Arabia have put aside their differences after 70 years of US incited war. The UAE brings it's oil prospects too.

What does it mean? Well this part is the game changer.

From next year with RUSSIA (currently the world's largest oil and gas producer), Iran, Saudi Arabia (Second largest producer) and the UAE onboard, BRICS have not only cornered the world's oil market via consolidation of their OPEC membership to dictate the production output in response to demand, but in terms of the currency of sale as well bringing it into the BRICS alliance. 

In a devastatingly bold move they have IN ONE STROKE destroyed the Perodollar! 

Continued empowerment of the global South. 

The two biggest South American economies Brazil and Argentina will allow the whole region a way out of US neo-colonial exploitation. Ethiopia is there I suspect for strategic purposes, one of which (aside from Chinese economic prospects) could well be so that Russia can start planning strategically to build a gateway of access to aid the emerging African independence movement shed the shackles of French colonial legacy and US military bases. RUSSIA will surely get first option on the valuable resources that will become available to the open market as a reward. I'll make a bold prediction and suggest Ethiopia's reward will be on-the-house energy independence and a completed energy grid overhaul with Russian nuclear power probably, possibly supplied via a new power station but likely via the Russian nuclear power stations already running in Egypt, hence Egypts membership (Egypt also runs the Suez Canal, critical for global trade). This will be valued at untold billions worth over time that will kick start Ethiopias economy and save her 50 years of development time. That boost will spread benefit in the region and Niger can offer it Uranium at I'm sure fantastic rates and still triple the money it was making dealing with French oppression, and would gladly do it in exchange for Russian security guarantees but Russia would need to wrap up the Ukraine situation first. 

The geopolitical significance of this move cannot be understated. It means nothing short of the fact that the world has changed overnight.

What will save the citizens of the West, Revolution or RUSSIA?

 

The Western system is too sick to save from within.

Prospects for using captured domestic political systems for internal revolution look increasingly bleak and one could conclude they can no longer be counted on to rescue the West. By this reasoning, nor can its institutions. 

By contrast its looking increasingly likely that prospects of escaping internationalist corporate capture lies in recognising that the true allies of the western people are those traditionally portrayed as it's enemies in the East.  Such a scenario may motivate western citizens to push for defeat from outside of what it's corrupted systems can no longer achieve from within.

Western State's appear to have had the very apparatus of a functioning state geared towards profit focused private industry (basic access to public utilities and basic upkeep of the same, notably in this case the upkeep of forrest and roadside growth etc). In other words geared away from taxpayer oversight and government accountablity and  where it fails the standard fallback is to pull a divide & rule tactic designed for control and blame.

Premise: Western goverments are in effect clearly and unavoidably guilty of treason, the most serious sovereign crime and a crime not recognised as even existing in principle in a supranational one-world world power structure. 

It must never be taken for granted that there is no such thing as government money, there is only the people's money.  The trust of managing it is the most supreme required. In fact it cannot be left to trust, which is why there was (once upon a time) and oversight structure at every level designed to maximise transparency, accountability and keep government small and focussed on such affairs of the civil servant, employed by the taxpayer and accountable to him. There is a contract too implicit in national constitutions. The representative government contract between the government and the governed requires strict oversight over public spending to ensure nepotism does not creep in. Misuse of public funds is a serious crime and a defacto dereliction of duty with tacit admission of treasonous theft in areas where neglect will result in massive loss of life.

I think it's clear that in this case the Government is already regarded as captured. The capture is to varying degreed understood as to be by:

• MIC contractors.
• Their Deep State shadow government.
• It's MSM syndicated media. 
• Wall Street capital finance globalists (such as Blackrock who are the real purchasers of post annihilated Ukraine).
• The clever shareholder arrangements hiding the big dynastic players in banking, big pharma, big oil, food, tech, agriculture, telecommunications and the umbrella tax-exempt offshore holding companies that the them all together in secret. 

 

These are all falling under the custodianship of the Permanent Security State military / Intelligence alliance of Washington.  American sovereign state capacity is exploited as is their driving force of global economic and military dominance, and it's funded by the US and international tax base instead of serving it's citizen's who fund it.

This means that when basic services are required the Government is usually caught with it's pants down and has already invested it in the Equities Markets, Futures derivative financial products (underwriting the collapse of global liquidity and responsible for plans of a "Great Reset"), the NASDAQ OR S&P 500 equities markets, etc. Beyond this they have simply peddled influence and sold access of their corruption to others in exchange for bribes and "pay to play" to the highest bidder. They have increasingly allocated funds or leverage through revolving door schemes to private industry. This guise is not in the form a paper trail or stock markets but instead takes the form of rebates or privatizing state owned assets or utilities ie as private dams or water sources, private prepaid "peak billing" power grids and "kickback" contractors of war that allows so much of domestic and military spending to end up back with those public policy legislators who, with each bill passed in Washington allow lobby groups to bid for the outcome as they remove all vestiges of taxpayer oversight, anti trust regulations or labour protection rights from the constitution, the legislative and criminal law and bylaws, property zoning, financial practice etc including civil liberties and what were considered inalienable human rights since (in some cases)  the Magna Carta. You cannot define the auction of legislative power over each bill or resolution, which makes a mockery of an election every 5 years, as anything other than state capture.

This was evident during the compulsory mandating of state medication during a lockdown of such massive intrusion on basic human rights it remains an as yet unresolved crime against humanity. This crime is still awaiting it's Geneva Convention so it can be decided who needs to hang by the neck until dead, and who must be forced to watch to make sure that fear and a sense of accountability is returned to a generation of increasingly untouchable elites who in turn increasingly see the taxpayer as a peasantry there for their exploitation. "Taxes are for the little people". 

To them we are a joke and simply an opportunity for theft of our money since they are the ones in power to compel collection of those taxes in the first place.  And, of course, if we we do not allow them to steal it we are jailed for tax evasion, yet we can no longer demand oversight for government spending as they burn the world with their wars creating death, destruction and poverty everywhere before sweeping in to steal the spoils.

In 2009 Obama doubled the national dept from $11 Trillion to $22 Trillion in bank bailouts, which should have nationalised the banks and made the public the biggest shareholders entitled to their share of the yearly spoils. Instead they are having their bank accounts frozen if involved in protest or shut down all together if they have undesirable politics. A move to ban cash will consolidate this control. The public will never get their money back or the profitshare these banks, now back to record profits, are enjoying. The national debt never came back down, it surges with all the money printing during the pandemic as rebates subsidise large multinationals, paying their staff salaries so the entrepreneur can never compete while paying the salaries of his rival, turning business owners into employees.  What few are owned are franchises. 

Best practices are globalizing, mergers and acquisitions and share buybacks, along with other forms of monopoly increasing the wealth divide and creating centralized concentrations of wealth and power bring influence potential to almost everywhere.

Almost everywhere.

While this decline happens in the West India and China have lifted billions of their  people out of povery.  Domestic rights have a way to go, but in the West after it supposedly embraced democracy it still took hundreds of years to abolish slavery, ensure voting rights for women etc. The countries rising in the East have impeccable levels of respect for other nations in international trade and diplomacy, as we ourselves as individuals should have for our neighbours if our goal is a sense of community in the suburbs where we live. Unlike the Anglo American Judeo Christian Empire, those rising nations do not leave a trail of smoked ruin in the form of 47 destroyed countries post WW2, and 1000 international military bases scattered around the globe. Those bases are there as a mob protection racket, to consolidate its economic hit man neocolonial empire and such nightmares as its black ops paramilitary units in the nebulous forms of Isis, Al Quada and neo-Nazi fascists.

Russia was on the precipice of doom in the 1990's as western vulture capitalist internationalists picked her apart while notorious drunk Boris Yeltsin failed to imagine a solution to the vampire that was invited over the threshold.  Putin turned that around, that was his real crime. He did it by thwarting the oligarchs it created, kicking out multinationals that were engaging in unsafe food practices and by other similar means.  He changed laws, banned globalist agitators like Soros from continuing their crimes and rebuilt the Russian military to the best in the world. Opposite to the portrayal in the west he purged corruption from his ranks. 

The proof is in the pudding.  Who is uplifting the lives of citizens and who is degrading the lives of their citizens?

Putin devised and carried out the economic and geopolitical strategy I have written at great length about in this blog. Despite oppresive sanctions the Russian stategy has emerged victorius over the corprate security state West. Under crippling sanctions Russia has emerged back in into the worlds top 5 economies, its resurgent military has rescued Syria, the Donbass and Crimea from the march of the globalist new colonial feudalism. This should be characterised as heroic! Unless You are the colonised, you will characterise it as Empire.  Pure projection!

Once more the proof is in the pudding, what say the people living in those places?

 Russia is currently aiding eliminating threats in Africa after it was decided that the tragedy of Libya at the hands of the West must never be repeated. Russia as has been the central geopolitical strategy centre in the emerging multipolar world, as China has been the economic driver. China knows she is next, and will provide unwavering support to Russia until required to take front and centre role herself. It makes a lot of sense for China to see Russia strong for a variety of reasons and her background aid could be an important factor in the Russian success story.

Yet again let's ask what proof is in the pudding? Russia under Putin has increased domestic household annual income from $800.00 to over $30 000.00 during the same period of decline I have described in the West. The two have been moving in opposite directions. Why would one cast aside such leadership to embrace the corrupt cronyism of Western neoliberal globalism? 

Do you see why this cannot be allowed to continue. Do you see what mutual respect is achieving in the emerging BRICS alliance in comparison to the increasing alienation and fracturing emerging from the NWO's ailing global governance structures based on leveraging power and Bullying?

In addition, Agenda2030 and the Great Reset require Russia and China to have been brought to heel. This means before the year 2030, since a controlled demolition of Western economies cannot go ahead while it's rivals remain emboldened, it would hand over fatal leverage of advantage to them and in effect would amount to surrender of the real cold war that's raging, the war between the sovereign power structure and representative governments of the free people's of earth VS the theatre of sovereign apparatus of state by the capital finance security state globalists seeking to centralize their shadow power structure as a one world government before revealing their hand. 

It follows logically that any power seeking world domination is declaring war on the only nations with enough sovereignty and power remaining to stop them. 

The people of the West need to recognise these powerful allies and use them to defeat the common enemy, those that have captured the Western States.