Sheep Science

I did a broadly cast takedown of the lie of consensus science recently where I unpack exactly what the so-called consensus is, why it's a fraud and include:

*Whistleblowers.
*The historical record of EXCLUSIVELY bad climate "science" that has never even made one single prediction of the calibre required for a true scientific model.
*That climate change is the same in all planets, they all heat and cool at the same time.
*How data is manipulated.
*WHY data is manipulated
*The obviously untrue stretch that each year is the hottest on record
*The political forces driving the lie and the misconception of who stands to gain and why.

Here is the post:
http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2018/03/scientific-consensus-is-that-consensus.html?m=1
The written post is rich with reputable sources, data libraries, links, references and interviews.

And the Audio file:
http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2018/03/audio-scientific-consensus-is-that.html?m=1
The audio file will suit you if you want to listen to the overview.

Atmospheric scientist professor Richard Lindtzen, lead IPCC scientist in the earlier years who resigned in disgust gives a talk outlining the problems and how the introduction of politics meant abandonment of all real science.

Here is a paper worth checking out showing the (gasp) crazy 'deniar logic that maybe, just maybe, nature has all along caused changes in climate?
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0170840612463317

And by now, after more than a decade long pause, the anticipated cooling period has kicked in:
https://m.accuweather.com/en/weather-blogs/weathermatrix/the-winter-that-wouldnt-end-cold-continues-sets-records/70004626

But despite this information being out there, it does not make it to people, usually because of the sort of problems we have with our media and special interests, which is well known. Here is the latest shocker:

The knee jerk talking heads in climate cult echo-chamber is no different. They keep championing their graphs of anomalies rather than data, usually truncated at the x-axis, all chanting in unison "no scientist worth his salt disagrees" before quoting non specialists like Bill Nye (twat) or MSM darlings that know nothing about Climatology but rely on the fortitude of integrity by colleagues, like Neil Degrasse Tyson, Brian Cox and David Attenborough (all 3 of whom I will continue to love and will always forgive for this one little mistake which is totally understandable when you consider the circles they move in and MSM programming they are doing)

So let's call them on it.

Let's be serious for s moment here. Real scientifically RELEVANT researchers, academics actually published IN THE REATED FIELD, don't play that game.

Here are a few:

David Bellamy, botanist.[19][20][21][22]
Lennart Bengtsson, meteorologist, Reading University.[23][24]
Judith Curry, Professor and former chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology.[25][26][27][28]
Freeman Dyson, professor emeritus of the School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study; Fellow of the Royal Society.[29][30]
Ivar Giaever, Norwegian–American physicist and Nobel laureate in physics (1973).[31]
Steven E. Koonin, theoretical physicist and director of the Center for Urban Science and Progress at New York University.[32][33]
Richard Lindzen, Alfred P. Sloan emeritus professor of atmospheric science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and member of the National Academy of Sciences.[30][34][35][36]
Craig Loehle, ecologist and chief scientist at the National Council for Air and Stream Improvement.[37][38][39][40][41][42][43]
Ross McKitrick, Professor of Economics and CBE Chair in Sustainable Commerce, University of Guelph.[44][45]
Patrick Moore, former president of Greenpeace Canada.[46][47][48]
Nils-Axel Mörner, retired head of the Paleogeophysics and Geodynamics Department at Stockholm University, former chairman of the INQUA Commission on Sea Level Changes and Coastal Evolution (1999–2003).[49][50]
Garth Paltridge, retired chief research scientist, CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research and retired director of the Institute of the Antarctic Cooperative Research Centre, visiting fellow Australian National University.[51][52]
Roger A. Pielke, Jr., professor of environmental studies at the Center for Science and Technology Policy Research at the University of Colorado at Boulder.[53][54]
Denis Rancourt, former professor of physics at University of Ottawa, research scientist in condensed matter physics, and in environmental and soil science.[55][56][57][58]
Harrison Schmitt, geologist, Apollo 17 Astronaut, former U.S. Senator.[59][60]
Peter Stilbs, professor of physical chemistry at Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.[61][62]
Philip Stott, professor emeritus of biogeography at the University of London.[63][64]
Hendrik Tennekes, retired director of research, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute.[65][66]
Anastasios Tsonis, distinguished professor of atmospheric science at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.[67][68]
Fritz Vahrenholt, German politician and energy executive with a doctorate in chemistry.[69][70]

Scientists arguing that global warming is primarily caused by natural processes

Graph showing the ability with which a global climate model is able to reconstruct the historical temperature record, and the degree to which those temperature changes can be decomposed into various forcing factors. It shows the effects of five forcing factors: greenhouse gases, man-made sulfate emissions, solar variability, ozone changes, and volcanic emissions.[71]
These scientists have said that the observed warming is more likely to be attributable to natural causes than to human activities. Their views on climate change are usually described in more detail in their biographical articles.

Khabibullo Abdusamatov, astrophysicist at Pulkovo Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences.[72][73]
Sallie Baliunas, retired astrophysicist,Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.[74][75][76]
Timothy Ball, historical climatologist, and retired professor of geography at the University of Winnipeg.[77][78][79]
Ian Clark, hydrogeologist, professor, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa.[80][81]
Vincent Courtillot, geophysicist, member of the French Academy of Sciences.[82]
Chris de Freitas, associate professor, School of Geography, Geology and Environmental Science, University of Auckland.[83][84]
David Douglass, solid-state physicist, professor, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester.[85][86]
Don Easterbrook, emeritus professor of geology, Western Washington University.[87][88]
William Happer, physicist specializing in optics and spectroscopy; emeritus professor, Princeton University.[30][89]
Ole Humlum, professor of geology at the University of Oslo.[90][91]
Wibjörn Karlén, professor emeritus of geography and geology at the University of Stockholm.[92][93]
William Kininmonth, meteorologist, former Australian delegate to World Meteorological Organization Commission for Climatology.[94][95]
David Legates, associate professor of geography and director of the Center for Climatic Research, University of Delaware.[96][97]
Anthony Lupo, professor of atmospheric science at the University of Missouri.[98][99]
Tad Murty, oceanographer; adjunct professor, Departments of Civil Engineering and Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa.[100][101]
Tim Patterson, paleoclimatologist and professor of geology at Carleton University in Canada.[102][103]
Ian Plimer, professor emeritus of mining geology, the University of Adelaide.[104][105]
Arthur B. Robinson, American politician, biochemist and former faculty member at the University of California, San Diego.[106][107]
Murry Salby, atmospheric scientist, former professor at Macquarie University and University of Colorado.[108][109]
Nicola Scafetta, research scientist in the physics department at Duke University.[110][111][112]
Tom Segalstad, geologist; associate professor at University of Oslo.[113][114]
Nir Shaviv, professor of physics focusing on astrophysics and climate science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.[115][116]
Fred Singer, professor emeritus of environmental sciences at the University of Virginia.[117][118][119][120]
Willie Soon, astrophysicist, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.[121][122]
Roy Spencer, meteorologist; principal research scientist, University of Alabama in Huntsville.[123][124]
Henrik Svensmark, physicist, Danish National Space Center.[125][126]
George H. Taylor, retired director of the Oregon Climate Service at Oregon State University.[127][128]
Jan Veizer, environmental geochemist, professor emeritus from University of Ottawa.[129][130]

Scientists arguing that the cause of global warming is unknown
These scientists have said that no principal cause can be ascribed to the observed rising temperatures, whether man-made or natural.

Syun-Ichi Akasofu, retired professor of geophysics and founding director of the International Arctic Research Center of the University of Alaska Fairbanks.[131][132]
Claude Allègre, French politician; geochemist, emeritus professor at Institute of Geophysics (Paris).[133][134]
Robert Balling, a professor of geography at Arizona State University.[135][136]
Pål Brekke, solar astrophycisist, senior advisor Norwegian Space Centre.[137][138]
John Christy, professor of atmospheric science and director of the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, contributor to several IPCC reports.[139][140][141]
Petr Chylek, space and remote sensing sciences researcher, Los Alamos National Laboratory.[142][143]
David Deming, geology professor at the University of Oklahoma.[144][145]
Stanley B. Goldenberg a meteorologist with NOAA/AOML's Hurricane Research Division.[146][147]
Vincent R. Gray, New Zealand physical chemist with expertise in coal ashes.[148][149]
Keith E. Idso, botanist, former adjunct professor of biology at Maricopa County Community College District and the vice president of the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change.[150][151]
Kary Mullis, 1993 Nobel Laureate in Chemistry, inventor of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method.[152][153][154]
Antonino Zichichi, emeritus professor of nuclear physics at the University of Bologna and president of the World Federation of Scientists.[155][156]

Scientists arguing that global warming will have few negative consequences
These scientists have said that projected rising temperatures will be of little impact or a net positive for society or the environment.

Indur M. Goklany, science and technology policy analyst for the United States Department of the Interior.[157][158][159]
Craig D. Idso, faculty researcher, Office of Climatology, Arizona State University and founder of the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change.[160][161]
Sherwood B. Idso, former research physicist, USDA Water Conservation Laboratory, and adjnct professor, Arizona State University.[162][163]
Patrick Michaels, senior fellow at the Cato Institute and retired research professor of environmental science at the University of Virginia.[164][165]

Apartheid South Africa, a nuclear state armed by Israel

Bomb casings at South Africa’s abandoned Circle nuclear bomb production facility near Pretoria (Source: Wikipedia)

Before reading this I would like to suggest watching the story of Mordecai Vanunu, the Israeli nuclear scientist that was kidnapped by Mossad and narrowly escaped the death penalty before his expose of Israel's worst kept secret (their nuclear weapons program). I assure you that this is no chore because this is a real life spy era story with more intrigue than an Ian Fleming spy novel. Espionage, honey traps, collusion with France & Britain, kidnapping, state secrets, secret agents and hush jobs, its all here!

Includes interviews with all of the people and journalists who were involved when it was going down. The one big take-away from all this is that there is one nation that absolutely is prepared to use its nuclear weapons if (like a petulant child it does not get it's way), and it's not Russia or the United States. It's Israel.

For where I sourced this article below, IE this article placed in the greater context of nuclear scandal involving South Africa, David Cameron, Intel regarding WMD's in Iraq, cover ups and political slush funds (and other surprises), you absolutely must read this full article:

https://www.globalresearch.ca/david-camerons-secret-nuclear-weapons-deal-raised-17-8m-for-conservative-party-funds-sets-pretext-for-war/5592009

South Africa – A nuclear state armed by Israel 

Although UN Security Council Resolution 418 of 4 November 1977 introduced a mandatory arms embargo against South Africa, requiring all states to refrain from “any co-operation with South Africa in the manufacture and development of nuclear weapons”, it was with the help of the Israelis that the apartheid regime designed and built a total of 10 fully operational nuclear weapons.[1]

One device was successfully tested in 1979, which left 9 nuclear weapons in South Africa’s stockpile.[2][3] In August 1988, foreign ministerPik Botha announced that South Africa had “the capability to make one [a nuclear weapon]” should it want to do so. A month later, in September 1988, South Africa sent a letter to IAEA Director-General Hans Blix expressing willingness to accede to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) if certain conditions were met, primarily that South Africa be allowed to market its uranium subject to IAEA safeguards. 

In summary, South Africa operated a covert nuclear ballistic missile program. The United Nations introduced a mandatory arms embargo against South Africa in the development and manufacture of such weapons. Israel assisted anyway. The result was that nine nuclear weapons were left after testing. The purpose was to prove to international markets it had that capability and was willing to sell that capability to willing buyers.

Audio: Podcast on perspective when criticizing capitalism.

Embedded Audio for the written article given at the link below. Sources are referenced as usual and links to those sources can be found in the original article here.

Link.
http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2017/08/you-dont-know-what-capitalism-is-so.html?m=1

Embedded Audio Podcast.

Audio: Scientific consensus is that consensus is overturned... 100% of the time.

Here is an embedded audio file for listening to this post. I was requested to generate this version for a third party. When I get time I'll link podcasts again but I'll use a speech engine and have it generated automatically when this not possible.

Click on the embedded file above

Due to the contentious nature of this topic I was forced to include over a dozen source links which are critical and reputable. The audio file loses this aspect. It's particularly important on this topic though so all the links, sources and references are on the transcribed version below (click link)

Written Article:
http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2018/03/scientific-consensus-is-that-consensus.html?m=1

A$$HOLE

The subtle attempt by MSM and asshole pseudo-whistleblower Christopher Wylie to deflect the Cambridge Analitica from being about Facebook and their ilk, to make it a Partisan issue is disingenuous.

Here is a list of the propaganda
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5WYCTqm6QUFRHJlbdS5gsgFGfEZAZD9E

Rather explore the themes this way:
http://acloserlookonsyria.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Cambridge_Analytica

Here is the real story
https://hendersonlefthook.wordpress.com/2018/03/20/cambridge-analyticas-facebook-mi6-psyop/

Documentary: A glitch in the matrix

David Fullers  'watershed moment'  documentary on Jordan Peterson,  the shifting Zeitgeist, Political Correctness &  mainstream media.

Privacies we've already lost but just don't know about yet

“Although people like to talk about ‘just’ metadata, metadata is extraordinarily intrusive. As an analyst, I’d prefer to be looking at metadata rather than content because it’s quicker and it’s easier and it doesn’t lie.”

Edward Snowden

https://easycrypt.co/email-privacy-crash-course-part-3-metadata-and-anonymity/

5 Privacies you didn't know you lost, Interesting video from The Corbett Report that manages this serious issue in his usual entertaining fashion. 

Fake News, Fake Wars, Fake Money, Fake Reality TV, Fake food, Fake Causes, Fake Celebrity & Fake Democracy. .

Liberal Snowflakes live in a world where all that ever drives anything is Climate Change,  Sexism,  Racism and various other PC issues where the way we solve issues is not uncovering their causes,  it's focusing on the window dressing and expanding upon the list of what the wrong offensive words are.  This is the manufactured consent generation with no real understanding of the world and such a strident lack of nuance and ability to explore the real underlying root causes of issues  that we are seeing a new phenomenon emerge.  The cause driven psychotic episode.

This psychological crises appears to stem from being in a state of conflict about strongly held beliefs clashing with clear evidence,  producing detachment from reality because,  just like with religion,   when your identity is tied into your beliefs,  and your beliefs are threatened,  the person you believe you are is threatened,  producing either crises or delusion.  Delusion is how our mind protects us against crises.

Let's look at a few issues of 'Snowflake Meltdown'

The title picture of the Syrian revolution being linked to climate change.  
This is perverse.  We know neither climate or the propaganda alleging government abuse drives the exodus. A complex story of human tragedy,  of a people pulling together under tremendous odds attacked by powerful external  forces,  being cheapened to a snowflake issue.

Here is the reality behind the refugees issue in Syria,  very few of whom are farmers .  Don't let them cheapen it.
Drive around Ghouta with President Bashar Al Assad and see destruction.  Or below get an aerial view of Homs by drone footage (courtesy AFP News Agency and RT) to utter see utter devastation.

Climate Change is sexism,  Hillary Clinton :
I don't even know where to start:

Text link:

https://www.dailywire.com/news/26800/hillary-clinton-now-says-climate-change-sexist-emily-zanotti

Stop using the word 'Man'  (Courtesy Fox News)  disingenuous balancing act between satire and the down right infuriating and entirely focally misplaced movement to crush 'gender bias'.  There surely is a better way to campaign for gender equality?

But more insidious is what's happening in Delaware where primarily schools can override parents with children's gender Identity or race and keep it secret from parents.

The BBC does not believe they should be holding power to account stopping their government selling arms to let the Saudis Butcher the Yemeni people,  but rather they have their finger on the pulse of the nation. MANSPLAINING., MANTERUPTING The real issues are given a shot in the arm with new vocabulary.  Clip courtesy BBC.  The BBC tries to strike an awkward balance with humour,  but fails as things always do when there is serious  contention proposed.

If you ask me,  this is yet more divide and conquer rhetoric,  only now the damage on the mental health of the Western society is being turned into some kind of perverse Borat satire.

But for all the Liberal Snowflakes out there,  don't fear,  can get yourself an experts Political Analysis Set for under $15.00
https://m.ebay.com/itm/7GG69-SNOWFLAKE-SURVIVAL-KIT-YOU-TOO-CAN-HELP-A-SNOWFLAKE-COPE-WITH-REALITY-/142294016056?_mwBanner=1

An unexpected victory against fluoride in drinking water is currently unfolding in the U. S.

Wow,  this really is unexpected.  Let's hope this is the start of a new trend.
Clip courtesy The Corbett Report. Follow the issue and support
Www.fluoridealert.org

Looking for Jews under every rock

Disney stereotypically producing a 3 little Pigs cartoon.

The idea of monolithic conspiracy where one entire group is working in unison to undermine and subvert the entire world falls short in intellectual fortitude.  Confirmation bias may have its place in detective work but when every inquiry is mounted around your innate prejudice it is nothing more than lazy and biggotted.

Here is what my research has uncovered about the real NWO, they are an assorted group of globalist, mostly not Jewish!

Nobody can accuse me of softball treatment of Israel or Zionism,  if you have then you haven't read anything I've written.  I'm well aware of all sorts of religious fundamentalist thinking and it always lets down humankind. That's a cross the board. 

above: Orthodox Jews protest Israel and the IDF

I think the way Divide et Impera, or 'Divide & Conquer'  works can just as easily be turned around with anti-semitism serving the elites rather than the prevailing thinking of an exclusively Jewish New World Order. History bears this out .

 It's naive to the point of stupidity to think ideology makes the world go round.  That's the conspiracy thinking that betrays the peasant minded activist trapped in identity politics.  My mission is to get WE THE PEASANTS (of all persuasions)  thinking like elites.  To do that we must accept that in fact,  it's money that drives power and ambition at those levels.  Ideology tribalism is the domain of the serf,  as they believe.  I agree with them so far,  but we are changing that.

This short 2 minute cartoon beautifully outlines how dynamics can outcomes of collective consequences by many aligned factions,  not everything nefarious in meticulously planned.

So what is NWO really?  I suggest open your mind to find out. James Corbett already had a sense of this back in 2013

I draw important distinction between Zionism and Judaism,  wahabbism and Shia,  Catholic and Secular etc.  I'm also well aware of the agendas and reach of AIPAC and other subversive entities.  But I've got news for you.  It's not that simple.  Even if Israelis are politically mislead,  or biggotted,  or for that matter Americans in general about foreign policy,  it's a massive failing to not engage Jews,  Neocons,  Americans and Westerners about world affairs.  Some of best informed anti establishment thinkers and activists are Jews or even Israelis.  I'll put it to you that many of your alternatives media activist heroes are of Jewish backgrounds.  Do you really think they are all 'in on it'?

Give me a break.  People are emergent,  diverse and capable of engaging if properly approached.  It must be very difficult for a Jew to call out their Jewish heritage at times when Jewish special interests impose questionable agendas just like it has been for Americans to call BS on their foreign policy agenda,  but they do it.  I propose that the most important allies against Zionism are Jews,  and the most important allies against American Imperialism are US taxpayers.  Alienate them at your own peril.

Seriously? 

More Alternatives to group think and consensus reality

• 

Don't fall for the red herring that the Cambridge Analytica scandal is about that group,  THIS IS ABOUT FACEBOOK!  In fact,  let's be serious here,  this is a broader issue  than that actually,  but that's not the point of this post.

If you really want to get to the heart of it Dean Henderson does a better job of deconstructing it than I do on his blog:
https://hendersonlefthook.wordpress.com/2018/03/20/cambridge-analyticas-facebook-mi6-psyop/

At the foundation it can be broken down into two main categories.  1) Search Engines and 2) Social Media.

I've already dealt with search engines,  be sure to read that post before reading this.  Here it is:
http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2018/03/alternatives-to-group-think-and.html?m=1

Regarding social media,  here are two perspectives :
https://www.rt.com/news/421856-facebook-cambridge-analytica-zuckerberg/

And:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-03-20/ftc-said-to-be-probing-facebook-for-use-of-personal-data

Make no mistake,  this is not about Trump,  or the Dems or any trivial partisan issues the presstitute echoe chamber will no doubt cough up,  this is much more fundamental and serves as nothing more than a reminder that there is algorithmic prejudice,  leaking (for both commercial and intelligence marshaling)  along with a general attitude of profiling and reality manipulatation that has psychological,  geopolitical and otherwise generally Orwellian unease associated with it.

Rather than getting bogged down in it I'll focus on Alternatives that don't serve this sort of ethos as obediently,  as I did with part 1) above regarding search engines.

Alternatives to social media sites like Facebook,  Twitter,  YouTube and the like. 

STEEMIT.  This is the gold standard,  a blockchain solution!
https://steemit.com

Bitchute.
Bitchute is a torrent based platform  and all within your browser which is very valuable for those who see this as a viable solution :
https://www.bitchute.com

Minds.
Minds is considered a solid option because it's encrypted,  open source,  community owned and places a lot of value on free speech,  which is one of the most contentious aspects of all of this.  There is a caution with minds,  I've been told there are issues but since I've not tried it I'll let you decide.
https://www.minds.com

D tube. 
Any crypto-decentralized streaming platform gets my vote.  Comes recommended.
https://d.tube

VK.
For those of you disillusioned or suspicious of Western social media? Are you the sort of person who doesn't #BlamePutin every time you get a flat tyre?  VK was originally a Russian platform now gaining massive popularity worldwide.
Https://www.vk.com

As usual if you have suggestions or cautions,  I'm only too happy to hear them,  see the contact details for me in the non-mobile web version of this blog.

Global Warming finally goes on trial!

We can no longer,  in good conscience,  keep defending models we know are not only false,  but purposefully fraudulent.  There is a difference between an error and a crime. 

I recently did a broadly cast takedown of the whole phenomenon where I debunk the science,  the politics,  the business,  media and link all these elements together historically  in a way that should finally make sense to the casual reader.  At least this was my aim. I STRONGLY ADVISE FIRST READING THIS:
http://dwahts.blogspot.co.za/2018/03/scientific-consensus-is-that-consensus.html?m=1

The full article,  which gives great detail about the technical take down of these models,  can be found here:
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/03/19/global-warming-on-trial-and-the-elementary-error-of-physics-that-caused-the-global-warming-scare/

If you want to know more about the Rowan Atkinsonesque Lord Monitor (in appearance only)  Christopher Walter Monckton, the third Viscount Monckton of Brenchely, is a former British politician affiliated with the UK Independence Party.
Here is his blog: 
https://www.desmogblog.com/christopher-monckton