List of expanding glaciers

Glacier National Park Quietly Removes Its ‘Gone by 2020’ Signs:

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/06/06/glacier-national-park-quietly-removes-its-gone-by-2020-signs-2/?fbclid=IwAR2tCSKAVBsFAwrGl2TR4jfdSocJEjvmX0wirRI-Zpy3UTeBULs5gC339UU


The glacier cited as Greenland's fastest thinning glacier just registered its third year of constantly growing.
https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2882/jakobshavn-glacier-grows-for-third-straight-year/?fbclid=IwAR3rHJPtxIAXGgpbbHPpxOl8isSAAJKM9TXdsXeX-AF2whv_JaULj9NE1lg

• India - Record snowfall revives 2,000 glaciers  
  17 Feb 11 - Already more snowfall this month than
  1998 record for the entire month. Think you'll see
  this in the mainstream media?
  See India - Record snowfall revives 2,000 glaciers 
  
   
• NORWAY
        Ålfotbreen Glacier
        Briksdalsbreen Glacier
        Nigardsbreen Glacier
        Hardangerjøkulen Glacier
        Hansebreen Glacier
        Jostefonn Glacier
        Engabreen glacier (The Engabreen glacier
          is the second largest glacier in Norway. It is a
          part (a glacial tongue) of the Svartisen glacier,
          which has steadily increased in mass since the
          1960s when heavier winter precipitation set in.)
• Norway's glaciers growing at record pace.  The face of the Briksdal glacier,
  an off-shoot of the largest glacier in Norway and mainland Europe, is growing by an
  average 7.2 inches (18 cm) per day. (From the Norwegian daily Bergens Tidende.)
  
  Click here to see mass balance of Norwegian glaciers:http://www.nve.no/
        Choose "English" (at top of the page), choose "Water,"      then "Hydrology," then "Glaciers and Snow" from the menu.      You'll see a list of all significant glaciers in Norway.
                            (Thanks to Leif-K. Hansen for this info.)
• CANADA
        Helm Glacier
        Place Glacier      Glaciers growing on Canada’s tallest mountain
        17 Nov 08 – The ice-covered peak of Yukon's soaring Mount Logan
        may be due for an official re-measurement after readings that suggest
        this country's superlative summit has experienced a growth spurt.
        See Glaciers growing on Canada’s tallest mountain

• FRANCE
       Mt. Blanc - See Mont Blanc Glacier almost doubles in size
  
• ECUADOR
        Antizana 15 Alpha Glacier
   
• Italy
       Winter snows did not all melt on Italy’s Presena Glacier this summer
       10 Nov 09 - 'Their massive base depth last season meant it didn’t all melt
       over the summer so they have nearly a metre and a half of snow on the glacier
       ski area already." (The second story of this kind in two years.)
       See Winter snows did not all melt on Italy’s Presena Glacier this summer
  
   

  Glaciers growing in Italy 8 Feb 11 - Glaciers are growing on two different mountains in Italy - Mount Canin and Mount Montasio. Will you see this in the main-stream media? Glaciers growing in Italy

• SWITZERLAND
        Silvretta Glacier

• KIRGHIZTAN     Abramov

• RUSSIA
       Maali Glacier (This glacier is surging. See below)
   
  • GREENLAND See Greenland Icecap Growing Thicker  
    Greenland glacier advancing 7.2 miles per year! The BBC recently ran
    a documentary, The Big Chill, saying that we could be on the verge of an ice
    age. Britain could be heading towards an Alaskan-type climate within a decade,
    say scientists, because the Gulf Stream is being gradually cut off. The Gulf
    Stream keeps temperatures unusually high for such a northerly latitude.One of Greenland’s largest glaciers has already doubled its rate of advance,
    moving forward at the rate of 12 kilometers (7.2 miles) per year. To see a
    transcript of the documentary,
    go to http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2003/bigchilltrans.shtml
    
    Greenland Ice Sheet Growing Thicker4 Nov 05 - After gathering data for more than ten years, a team of
    Norwegian-led scientists has found that the Greenland Ice Sheet is
    actually growing thicker at its interior.
    See Greenland Ice Sheet Growing Thicker
    
    
    Rebellious Greenland Glacier Keeps Growing26 July 10 - Berlingske Glacier has steadily grown for the past
    100 years. And yet, it's not counted in the glacier inventory. Why
    haven't we heard about this growing glacier?
    See Rebellious Greenland Glacier Keeps Growing
    .
    .
  • CHILEPio XI, the largest glacier in South America, grows
    50 meters in height, length and density every day.
    See Pio XI - Largest glacier in Chile - Growing every day
     
  • NEW ZEALANDAll 48 glaciers in the Southern Alps have been growing but only shrunk marginally in the last couple of years because they ARE COMING OFF PREVIOUS PEAKS grown during the past decade.
    The growth is at the head of the glaciers, high in the mountains, where they
    gained more ice than they lost. Noticeable growth was seen at the
    foot of the Fox and Franz Josef glaciers (27 May 2003, later 2007) but have pulled back since then,
    See New Zealand Glaciers Growing
    
          Fox, Franz Josef glaciers defy trend - New Zealand's
          two best-known glaciers are still on the march 
          31 Jan 07 - See Franz Josef Glacier still on the march
    
    See also Pesky New Zealand Glaciers Growing
    
    See also: Contrarian New Zealand Glaciers Keep Growing
  • ARGENTINAArgentina's Perito Moreno Glacier, the largest glacier in Patagonia,
    is advancing at the rate of 7 feet per day. The 250 km² ice formation,
    30 km long, is one of 48 glaciers fed by the Southern Patagonian Ice
    Field. This ice field, located in the Andes system shared with Chile,
    is the world's third largest reserve of fresh water.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perito_Moreno_Glacier
    
  • UNITED STATES
          - Colorado (scroll down to see AP article)
          - Washington (Mount St. Helens, Mt. Rainier* and Mt. Shuksan
          - California (Mount Shasta - scroll down for info)
          - Montana (scroll down for info)
          - Glacier Peak, WA (scroll down for info
          - Alaska (Mt. McKinley and Hubbard).
                   
    
  • SPAIN
    Glaciers growing in Spain (Pyrinees)10 Jan 11 - El glaciar del Infierno (glacier of Hell) has advanced.
    The mainstream media seems to have somehow missed this.
    See Glaciers growing in Spain (Pyrinees)
    
    
  • Antarctica growing colder - Ice expanding18 Apr 09 - "Ice is expanding in much of Antarctica," says this
    article. In addition, the South Pole has shown "significant cooling
    in recent decades".
    See Antarctica growing colder - Ice expanding
    
    
  • Antarctic ice grows to record levels
    13 Sep 07 - While the Antarctic Peninsula area has warmed
    in recent years and ice near it diminished during the Southern
    Hemisphere summer, the interior of Antarctica has been colder
    and ice elsewhere has been more extensive and longer lasting,
    See Antarctic ice grows to record levels
    
     

    Oops - West Antarctic Ice Sheet not losing ice as fast as we thought20 Oct 09 — New measurements by GPS Network suggest the rate of ice loss of the West Antarctic ice sheet has been slightly overestimated. See Oops - West Antarctic Ice Sheet not losing ice as fast as we thought

    .
  • Antarctica's Filchner-Ronne Ice Shelf is growing7 Dec 05 – Scientists Joughin and Bamber re-evaluated the mass balances
    of the ice in Antarctica. "It is clear from the results of this study that the
    Filchner-Ronne Ice Shelf is not rapidly, or even slowly, wasting away.
    Quite to the contrary, it is growing."
    See Antarctica's Filchner-Ronne Ice Shelf growing
    
    
  • Alaska's Hubbard Glacier advancing 7 feet per day!10 May 09 – This from climatologist Cliff Harris of the Coeur d’Alene Press.
    It's possible that the glacier could close the fjord by later this summer if the
    current rate speeds up, says Harris.
    See Alaska's Hubbard Glacier advancing 7 feet per day!
    
    
  • Global Warming? New Data Shows Ice Is Back
    19 Feb 08 - A Feb. 18 report in the London Daily Express showed that there is nearly
    a third more ice in Antarctica than usual, challenging the global warming crusaders and
     buttressing arguments of skeptics who deny that the world is undergoing global warming.
    See Most snow cover since 1966.
    .
  • Mount St. Helens’ Crater Glacier Advancing Three Feet Per Day25 Jun 07 - See Crater Glacier
     
  • Against odds, glacier grows in cauldron of Mt. St. Helens
    15 May 08 – See Glacier grows in cauldron of Mt. St. Helens
     
  • Mount St. Helens glacier (Crater Glacier) growing 50 feet per year
    September 20, 2004 - See Mount St. Helens
  • Glaciers growing on California's Mount Shasta!
    12 Oct 03 - See Mount Shasta Glaciers Growing
    9 Jul 08 - See also California Glaciers Growing
    28 Mar 11 - See also Glaciers growing on Mt. Shasta
     
  • Geologists Unexpectedly Find 100 Glaciers in Colorado  
    7 Oct 01 See Colorado Glaciers Growing  
     
  • Washington's Nisqually Glacier AdvancingBut headline says "State's shrinking glaciers: Going ... going ... gone?"
    1 Nov 06 - As far as I’m concerned, this Seattle Times article is another
    case of misleading - if not downright dishonest - reporting.
    See Nisqually Glacier Advancing
    See also Nisqually Glacier
  • Glaciers in Montana's Glacier Park on the verge of growing
    5 Oct 2002. See Glacier Park 
  • Antarctic Ice Sheet is growing thickerSee  Antarctic Icecap Growing Thicker
    See Construction crane buried in the Antarctic Ice Sheet
    
     

  Largest glacier in Argentina advancing15 Jun 09 – "Argentina's Perito Moreno glacier is (supposedly) one of only a few ice fields worldwide that have withstood rising global temperatures.” See Largest glacier in Argentina advancing

  
  Alaska's Hubbard Glacier advancing 7 feet per day!10 May 09 – This from climatologist Cliff Harris of the Coeur d’Alene Press.
  It's possible that the glacier could close the fjord by later this summer if the
  current rate speeds up, says Harris.
  See Alaska's Hubbard Glacier advancing 7 feet per day!
  
  Glaciers growing on Glacier Peak, WA16 Oct 08 – Email from reader
  Before I moved to CO in 2005 it was obvious that the glaciers and snow
  had receded and rock was visible in areas all the way to the peak. The glaciers
  and snow are back now ... completely covered in white from top to bottom,
  and this is after the "warm" summer months here in the PNW.
  See Glaciers growing on Glacier Peak, WA
  .

  Glaciers in Norway Growing Again Scandinavian nation reverses trend, mirrors results in Alaska, elsewhere, reports the Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate. See Glaciers in Norway Growing Again

  
  Glaciers in western Himalayas thickening and expanding
  Arctic ice cover above it’s 30-year average
  23 Nov 08 - A study published by the American Meteorological Society
  found that glaciers are only shrinking in the eastern Himalayas. Further
  west, in the Hindu Kush and the Karakoram, glaciers are "thickening
  and expanding".
  See Glaciers in western Himalayas thickening and expanding
  .
  .Alaskan Glaciers Grow for First Time in 250 years16 Oct 08 - High snowfall and cold weather to blame leading
  to the increase in glacial mass.
  See Alaskan Glaciers Grow for First Time in 250 years
  .
  .
  Growing Alaskan glaciers the start of a new Little Ice Age?14 Oct 08 – “Never before in the history of a research project dating back
  to 1946 had the Juneau Icefield witnessed the kind of snow buildup that
  came this year. It was similar on a lot of other glaciers too.
  See Growing Alaskan glaciers the start of a new Little Ice Age?
  .
  .
  Himalayan Glaciers: There is some shrinkage in Himalayan glaciers, but not all of them, here are the ones not Shrinking. Seasonal reports are being made in summer.
  Glacial Experts Question Theory of Global Warming
  15 Feb 07 - See Himalayan Glaciers Not Shrinking
  .
  .
  Many people have asked why some glaciers in South America are melting.
  I think it is perfectly understandable. Remember, we have had two of the
  strongest El Ninos on record during the past 21 years. During an El Nino,
  a narrow band of the Pacific Ocean warms by as much as 14 degrees. This
  band of warm water travels east essentially along the equator until it slams
  into South America.
  It seems logical that the increased rainfall caused by El Nino, plus the
  warmer winds blowing across the warmer water, could hasten glacial melt.
  But let me say it again. I do not believe that this is caused by humans, I think
  it is caused by the El Nino phenomenon, which is caused by underwater
  volcanism, which is increasing due to the ice-age cycle.
  With this said, let me point out many glaciers in South America remain
  stable, and some - including the Pio XI Glacier and the Perito Moreno
  Glacier - are growing. The Pio XI Glacier is the largest glacier in the
  southern hemisphere. The Moreno Glacier is the largest glacier in Patagonia.
  I find it curious that news reports do not mention these two glaciers.
  * * * 
  Contrary to previous reports, Arctic ice did not thin during the 1990s, say
  researchers at the Department of Oceanography at Göteborg University in
  Göteborg, Sweden. http://www.envirotruth.org/images/ice-in-90s.pdf
  .
  .
  Alaska Glacier Surges -17 Mar 06
  See McGinnis Glacier 
  .
  .
  Look at what's happening on Mt. Baker, in Washington State.(Mt. Baker is near Mt. Shukson, where glaciers are now growing.) 

  This is a photo of my friend Jim Terrell taken on Mt. Baker, Washington. Jim is more than six feet tall. See the black line about six feet above his head? That's where the snow from the winter of 1998/99 stopped melting. Above that, is snow that never melted from the winter of 1999/2000. Why isn't the media reporting this sort of thing?	Photo by Mazz Terrell 19 July 2000

  ..

  Fast forward 11 years and we find...Snow still five stories deep on Mt. Baker road 13 Jul 11 - “Deepest snow I’ve seen since the world-record year 1999, when the highway didn’t open for the summer,” says maintenance supervisor.
  See Snow still five stories deep on Mount Baker road

  
  See also Growing_Glaciers
  See also Greenland Icecap Growing Thicker
  and Antarctic Icecap Growing Thicker
          .
• 
  

Banker links to the Climate Change Movement and Soros link to Greta Thunberg.

Well its a fantastic foray into shark infested waters for the Duran.
https://theduran.com/central-bankers-go-green-why/

I give full credit due to the position taken, but the article is excellent and is hosted from Strategic Culture, here it is:
https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/speech/2019/mark-carney-speech-at-jackson-hole-economic-symposium-wyoming

Note this embedded link:
https://www.politico.eu/article/bank-of-england-mark-carney-eco-warrior-climate-change-sustainable-finance-banks-investors/

Including this little nugget : For starters, Carney believes that a new global reserve currency must replace the U.S. Dollar.

Other notables recently in the broader media in the pushback against the climate propaganda assault include:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/goose-eggs-no-climate-doomsday-warning-has-come-true?fbclid=IwAR14IOPsks4q1LNGa97WVRvGSP_EznY--spLVzQJoGZvMBBxuqB5Gvl0gZs

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/pm-slap-for-un-in-new-world-order/news-story/b9e5a5f5058d69c7e2ae449275770154?fbclid=IwAR2HfkvVVn1QzXvB6h24a6UqvgOGcZx6PcR-wtgTAQ_6TTHLhMhUzv-WVYk

https://notrickszone.com/2019/07/27/us-justice-also-needs-to-focus-on-fabricated-nasa-climate-dossier-that-aims-to-frame-co2-citizens/?fbclid=IwAR2tV57D8NoV2To4_qHcZNzzQeguhl-I9OYZCqPeQEDTBw3T4VMTxvIIsOs

Political:
https://www.businessinsider.com/vladimir-putin-suggests-greta-thunberg-is-being-manipulated-2019-10?IR=T

And revealing the George Soros link to Greta Thunberg
https://climatechangedispatch.com/climate-change-civil-war-begins/?fbclid=IwAR0QEdy_kAwhupD176dzVvsmiOcpnxKibZJnjZ4ewVVMhKTqGa8-oAEmnWw

And Soros links to Climate Strikes
https://stillnessinthestorm.com/2019/12/george-soros-emerges-as-major-funder-of-global-climate-strike-groups/?fbclid=IwAR0VglzYD9BfKUnEJYndocYpdJwJ9eHPUEpJ2-xOPt_fImeoHqc_QKuLEYQ

I'm going to toss in an old post of mine making the far earlier connections of bankers and globalists to the climate movement because it frames the issue in a way that will give context to all the above.
https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2018/03/climate-banks-globalization-and-3rd.html

And I've saved the best for last, some old fashioned investigative journalism from William Engdahl exploring the Climate Change money trail in the fullest way I've yet seen:
https://www.globalresearch.ca/climate-money-trail/5690209

CURRENCY: USD VS BTC VS CORPORATE VS BANK VS GOVT VS PEOPLE VS FIAT VS CRYPTO VS SOVEREIGN VS GLOBALIST

Facebook’s Libra Asset

I previously posted this in anticipation of these developments: 

https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/06/globalist-coin-would-globalists-use.html

Lets first turn to a globalist publication to see what we are meant to think.  we are meant to think that governments control their currency whereas in reality the various currencies are already captured.  Here is the false narrative: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/07/12/why-governments-around-world-are-afraid-libra-facebooks-cryptocurrency/?noredirect=on

And here are the multinationals behind the new Facebook cryptocurrency: https://libra.org/en-US/association/#goals_organization

Facebook’s audacious bid to create a global digital currency that supposedly promotes financial inclusion for the unbanked actually has more privacy and decentralization built in than many expected.  But Facebook will position itself as a competitor to Google and the Banks but they actually are more likely to be colluding to work in synch with fiat and each other against Bitcoin and the other cryptos.  Therefore, Instead of appearing as if trying to dominate Libra’s future or squeeze tons of cash out of it immediately, Facebook is instead playing the long-game by pulling payments into its online domain. 

The risk and reward of building the new PayPal

In cryptocurrencies, Facebooks backers in the shadows of DARPA and other psyops saw both a threat and an opportunity. They held the promise of disrupting the purely dynastic bankers and leverage influence more over to the deep state side billionaires shadow government which could now influence things are bought and sold by eliminating transaction fees common with credit cards, just as the cryptos have been threatening to do anyway. That comes dangerously close to Facebook’s ad business that influences what is bought and sold. If a "competitor" like Google or an upstart built a popular coin and could monitor the transactions, they’d learn what people buy and could muscle in on the billions spent on Facebook marketing. Meanwhile, the 1.7 billion people who lack a bank account might choose whoever offers them a financial services alternative as their online identity provider too. That’s another thing Facebook wants to be. How much is pure business and how much is psyop remains conjecture, but lets proceed with the benefit of the doubt to free enterprise, at least as free as it gets among the tech-giants...

Operating under the name Libra, Facebook’s digital asset will be used for global payments, according to its whitepaper released on June 18. “Libra’s mission is to enable a simple global currency and financial infrastructure that empowers billions of people,” the whitepaper states.

The whitepaper details the current problems facing global finance, including limited access for certain individuals and high fees. The paper also points out a few difficulties, such as the lack of adoption as well as volatility exhibited by cryptocurrency assets.

In the whitepaper, the Libra is ascribed three key components:

“It is built on a secure, scalable, and reliable blockchain […] It is backed by a reserve of assets designed to give it intrinsic value, and it is governed by the independent Libra Association tasked with evolving the ecosystem.”

Facebook’s asset runs on an open-source blockchain called the Libra blockchain, and operates in relation to a reserve, the whitepaper noted.

“Libra is fully backed by a reserve of real assets. A basket of bank deposits and short-term government securities will be held in the Libra Reserve for every Libra that is created, building trust in its intrinsic value. The Libra Reserve will be administered with the objective of preserving the value of Libra over time.”

The asset will be a stablecoin of sorts, the whitepaper stated. “Libra is designed to be a stable digital cryptocurrency that will be fully backed by a reserve of real assets — the Libra Reserve — and supported by a competitive network of exchanges buying and selling Libra.” The Libra Association will be in charge of the coin supply and its relation to the reserve.

According to the whitepaper, “The Libra Association is an independent, not-for-profit membership organization headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland. The association’s purpose is to coordinate and provide a framework for governance for the network and reserve and lead social impact grant-making in support of financial inclusion. The association’s membership is formed from the network of validator nodes that operate the Libra Blockchain.”

Comprised of various businesses, organizations and institutions located across the globe, the Libra Association’s list of “Founding Members” is quite substantial. The list includes the likes of PayPal, Mastercard, eBay, Lyft, Vodafone Group, Coinbase, Andreessen Horowitz and Union Square Ventures. The asset is expected to launch within the first six months of 2020, the whitepaper noted.

The Libra will begin as a permissioned blockchain, with the goal of becoming a permissionless network, the whitepaper said. Libra’s blockchain also differs from traditional blockchain technology with regards to its chain: “[T]he Libra Blockchain is a single data structure that records the history of transactions and states over time.”

Furthermore, the whitepaper stated that asset addresses will be pseudonymous, similar to what is currently seen in cryptocurrency.

Bitcoin and Libra: Vastly Different

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/18/what-is-libra-facebooks-new-cryptocurrency.html

Centralization

Bitcoin differs significantly from Facebook’s new asset in many ways. Perhaps the most notable difference lies in Bitcoin’s decentralization. No single entity controls Bitcoin. In contrast, Facebook and the Libra Association have a large amount of control over the Libra asset and its usage. The setup of Libra’s Association also appears to give sizeable entities (or chosen entities) power over what might become a top global asset – the Libra. Bitcoin does not give control to such businesses in the same fashion.

A Question of Value

Facebook’s digital asset is tied to national currencies and other assets. This means Libra’s value depends on the inflation and effects of the underlying currencies, as well as on governmental control. Bitcoin’s value is not dependent on any one government as with fiat currencies (such as the US dollar or the Australian dollar).

Deflationary

Bitcoin is also deflationary. There will only ever be 21 million bitcoin in existence. This prevents inflation. In contrast, the Libra Association, as stated above, will be in control of the Libra asset’s supply. In a way, this means that users must rely on the Libra Association and its actions.

Different Types of Blockchains

Facebook’s Libra will initially run on a permissioned blockchain, which means miners must seek approval before starting to mine. In contrast, Bitcoin’s blockchain is permissionless, so miners can simply begin mining at their discretion.

Now, before ending, let me remind you of what makes the best real cryptocurrency and why, find out at this post:

https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2018/05/the-best-cryptocurrencies.html

Solid findings emerging from the SAFIRE PROJECT, including confirmation of the electric sun model.

In May this year I did a blog posting on the SAFIRE project, which I asserted at the time is the most important experiment in physics, possibly in all of science in the world right now, at a fraction of the cost of the Large Hadron Collider or LIGO.  I do not regret my words, the ability to do scaled REAL experiments in a lab, not just mathematics on a page, and base findings on observations rather that formulae, will surely advance all of physics which has been in the doldrums.  While physics lately has been coming up with Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and Gravitational waves along with other gobbledegook, technology has been carrying mankind forward and cosmologists riding the coat-tails.

Here is the post:
https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/05/the-safire-project-re-imagining.html

Here is the special report that updates us on the important progress being made, all of which supports the Plasma Cosmology/Electrodynamics school of thought and in particular the electric sun model over the Thermonuclear fusion model.

This is an exciting project and the science is REAL! It may be that in 10 years we will not recognise cosmology and will surely look back in surprise at the scientism and sorcery parading as physics and cosmology.

The Thunderbolts Project synopsis of Safire.

Secrecy...

This is the most interesting aspect of the entire project, the circumstances surrounding the transmutation of element may even go right up to the heavy elements... right up to the heavy elements, you can imagine  the consequences of that..  and the business ethics and funding aspect.
Have a listen, there is a bit of cloak and dagger and if you think it through the imagination goes wild.

And the response by the SAFIRE PROJECT is even more interesting and reveals their limitations as well as the involvement and monitoring of the US department of  "defence" (which of course is the worlds most hostile military) possibly due to the energy implications and cleanup of Uranium.

Provisons:

Despite the apparent benefits we are looking at for the tech, there are some provisional concerns, principally those connected to the Climate Change movement which is a black mark against anyone's name for scientific integrity, but this seems to be more generic "clean energy" or even efficient energy  The other is involvement is with government departments and if you consider the transmutation of elements, I don't think we can even rule out heavy elements eventually. The above clip includes an hour long conversation with project director Monty Childs and details what elements they have transmuted, which signal strengths are strong enough to be conclusive and what information cannot be disclosed due to investors clauses on the contract which is understandable.

Update: 9 March 2020, Safire has attracted alot of investor interest and has rebranded, you can find their new website here. 
https://aureon.ca/

Assumptions In Science 3A) Redshift is evidence of a universe expanding from a "big bang"?

Contrary to popular belief there is no evidence that stands up to scrutiny to support the rate of expansion of the universe, or that it is even expanding at all. Space cannot be acted on, it cannot expand, it is a concept in three dimensions. Secondly the age of the universe is not currently knowable. All of the current astronomical standards and definitions are artifacts of base assumptions (leading inextricably to inflation, dark energy, the big bang and the 13.8 billion year old assigned age of the universe).

In this post I will give a very simple set of reasons why along with forgotten, hushed up or controversial evidence that serves to counter big bang cosmology. Evidence that conforms to Occam's Razor and adheres more strictly to the scientific method instead of just relying risky theoretical physics.

The entire premise of the big bang is centred around two (main) extremely shaky foundations. There are many smaller issues which I will touch on and link to, but on grounds of those principles being extraordinarily weak as evidence the main two will get the focus.

 The first is analysis of the so-called  Cosmic Microwave Background radiation (CMB) which is perhaps one of the most flawed and baseless conclusions ever reached from any data processing endeavor in science history, rivaling LiGO in its mischief but predating it by some time and managing to go unchallenged for its chicanery for much longer. 

FOR That reason it gets its own post as part B of this "Big Bang" and expanding  universe focussed segment in my "Assumptions in science" series, find it HERE.

The second and perhaps the main principle in obtaining comparable velocity in the universe and apparent magnitude is the idea of COSMOLOGICAL redshift. More specifically that red shift establishes that the universe is expanding at a 1:1 ratio where how redshifted the spectrum is directly proportional and commensurate with recessional velocity.

Its that 1:1  ratio and its consistency that I'm questioning because everything falls apart once that falls apart. I am not contesting that a form of almost "Doppler like" shifting of light exists, but whether its the only factor affecting electromagnetic wavelength, or whether it can be applied indiscriminately. The implications are very serious if this is not the case. 

There is a third reason which is very weak, the luminosity of supernovae, is dealt with HERE, along with some minor methods that won't be the focus of this post. Mainstream science has been forced to rely heavily on this method but mainstream itself is actively challenging its own conclusions, such as in this battle between  Nobel Prizewinners and Oxford professors.

Refer: 

https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2019/11/aa36373-19/aa36373-19.html

&

https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.04597

Public Resource worth noting for amateur research:
The redshift database used by NASA is on record at Caltech here:
http://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/forms/z.html

The mainstream view

To understand how widespread these myths are you only need to open YouTube and search for any space themed programs. There are literally tens of thousands of them, all spewing up the same bile. For a synopsis of the crap being funneled out to mainstraim science programming you only need watch the below video clip to see how completely and utterly confused they are. 

Above: Dating of stars or the universe with spectral analysis presuposes the standard solar model. Moreover, redshift and the CMB (or even principles stemming from the thermonuclear fusion model of stars) is riddled with intractable logical conflicts and self contradiction. 

Although it's heartening to see this in various forms all over the internet when you Google "Cosmology Statement". 

http://homepages.xnet.co.nz/~hardy/cosmologystatement.html

According to data the greater the redshift the faster galaxies and quasars moving away from us. Basically the recessional velocity is said to be comensurate with how redshifted they are. 

Because of this we hear the impact on the public understanding in science by hearing it in almost all science documentaries. I refer to how they speak about the big bang as if it were fact and our educational establishment even parrots this narrative.

How did it start?

Redshift was discovered by Edwin Hubble in the 1920's  as outlined in "Hubbles Law" but what is less well known is that later in life Hubble began expressing doubts about the certainty of the findings.  

Hubble's Law does not explain why perceived distant objects are travelling faster than perceived nearer object, that requires yet another layer of assumption of accelerating expansion, another artifact of assumption in conclusions deriving from our incomplete understanding of redshift.

Hubbles story is best told by Hubble himself since his disciples went on to ignore his reservations and that is what got us into this mess. 
Free Book 1:) Here is a free download site for his book:
https://archive.org/details/TheRealmOfTheNebulae/mode/2up

One of Hubble's proteges was Halton Arp . His bachelor's degree was awarded by Harvard (1949), and his PhD by Caltech (1953). Afterwards he became a Fellow of the Carnegie Institution of Washington in 1953, performing research at the Mount Wilson Observatory and Palomar Observatory. Arp became a Research Assistant at Indiana University in 1955, and then in 1957 became a staff member at Palomar Observatory, where he worked for 29 years. In 1983 he joined the staff of the Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics in Germany, the perfect place for the type of observations he was making. He died in Munich, Germany on December 28, 2013.

Arp would go on to demonstrate that quasars were not the the gigantic objects in the sky as it appeared redshift indicated, but were in fact dwarf galaxies ejected from the centres of active host galaxies.

The ejections from misunderstood cosmic jets involve charged particles, mostly ions from one pole and electrons from the other (which is how we know it is not black holes doing it somehow but self contained plasma magnetic entities called plasmoids). The charge separation leading charge deficient new galaxies which charge equalise over time and become low redshift quasars and eventually galaxies introduces the age as one aspect, among others, that is surely a contender for what's causing the redshift but.  Arp never went that far. Later work would. He was primarily interested  in gathering together all the anomalous data. That is what lead to their cutting his telescope time. He refused on the basis it was far too important a line of research to knowingly turn away from. He tells his story in the documentary below, The Cosmology Quest, from around the 8 minute mark.

For his impudence at questioning the high priests of scientism we see an all too familiar pattern when consensus science tries to defend the status quo. His telescope time became more and more difficult to secure. 

Subrahmanyam Chandesakar personally rejected his first paper on the topic with "This exceeds my imagination" scribbled on it (the precise reason he should have allowed it to roll out). This is just one of many instances where someone of considerable influence, whose fate was tied to the consensus establishment of the time, used their power to squash interesting new data purely because it represented a clear and present danger to the status quo. A threat. 

The disillusioned Arp would ultimately be offered a position at the Max Planck Observatory, a place with all all the right Radio telescope equipment for his type of work, relatively new equipment at the time. He passed away in 2015

That's not all. It must never be forgotten that in-between he was publically humiliated by the scientific establishment and ridiculed.  Subsequently more evidence has been allowed to slip through the cracks which backs up his research.   High redshift quasars have indeed been found in front of or attached to low redshift galaxies which not only vindicates his findings but also imnediay tells us that recessional velocity is not the only component, or even the most important component of redshift. The best way the establishment deals with these issues is to ignore them as long as possible. Time has run out.

Free Book 2:) Here is a free download site for his book:
https://kupdf.net/download/halton-arp-seeing-red-red-shift-cosmology-and-academic-science-pdf_59f40d8ae2b6f5fa6e5225e9_pdf

An introduction to Arps cosmology (Above).

More recent corroboration of his findings in academic and scientific journals is easy to find, here are a couple highlighted below: 

E. Zackrisson, On quasar host galaxies as tests of non-cosmological redshifts, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 359, Issue 3, May 2005, Pages 1193–1200, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08989.x

Burbidge, Geoffrey. (2001). Noncosmological Redshifts. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 113. 899-902. 10.1086/322152. 

• DOI:10.1063/1.2189124
Corpus ID: 118195661

Research on candidates for non-cosmological redshifts

• M. López-Corredoira, C. Gutiérrez
• Published 2005
• Physics
• arXiv: Astrophysics

(Abridged:) The paradox of apparent optical associations of galaxies with very different redshifts, the so-called anomalous redshift problem, is around 35 years old, but is still without a clear solution and is surprisingly ignored by most of the astronomical community... MORE

On quasar host galaxies as tests of non-cosmological redshifts

Article

• May 2005
• Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 359(3):1193-1200

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08989.x

Authors:

E. ZackrissonAbstractDespite a general consensus in the astronomical 

community that all quasars are located at the distances implied by their 

redshifts, a number of observations still challenge this interpretation, 

possibly indicating that some subpopulation of quasars may harbour 

significant redshift components not related to the expansion of the Universe. 

It has been suggested that these objects may have been ejected from local 

galaxies and are likely to evolve into new galaxies themselves. 

Here, a test of such exotic scenarios is proposed

A study of absorption redshifts of quasars

• September 2005

Authors:

H. T. Liu

• Chinese Academy of Sciences

Study of Possible Local Quasars I: The First Sample

• March 2011
• The Open Astronomy Journal 411(1):14-26

DOI:10.2174/1874381101104010014

Authors:

K. P. Panov