Why all wars are banker wars

This outstanding synopsis was put out by Michael Rivero himself on his radio show a few years back and put to video by Zane Henry Productions for those that require some visual cues that are quite well done. Michaels website comes highly recomended: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/#axzz5hyle9j3Y

If I could make one video compulsary viewing it would be this one.

There are one or two minor points of contention I have factually, but this synopsis is so insightful, grasps the context of which fits into which so well, that it would feel like splitting hairs to bring them up now. I'll go over them on a later post.

Never before have I heard someone explain the true connection between central banks, war, the petrodollar, the national debt and climate change so brilliantly and so succintly before. He does this monumental task in 40 minutes and does it well.

Here it is: (click on bridge clip below)

If you find yourself incredulous to the claims on education here is the Dodd report to the Reece Commission at the highest level of congress proving it.
https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/02/what-you-are-about-to-discover-should.html?m=1

And some hystorical context to his claims.
https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2018/06/how-to-defeat-most-effective-social.html?m=1

https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2018/11/empires-only-collapse-for-one-reason.html?m=1

About the Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services (CO-OPS)

The Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services (CO-OPS) and its predecessors have gathered oceanographic data along our nation's coasts for over 200 years to protect life, property, and the environment. Serving both the public and other government agencies, CO-OPS is the authoritative source for accurate, reliable, and timely water-level and current measurements that support safe and efficient maritime commerce, sound coastal management, and recreation. The combined efforts, knowledge, and experience of CO-OPS's technicians, scientists, and engineers working to carry out a central mission has led to the development of a reliable center of expertise for coastal physical oceanography.
Read more about CO-OPS:
Mission & Initiatives
Organizational Chart
Contact Information
Strategic Plan 2019-2023

CO-OPS Divisions

NOAA's Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services (CO-OPS) is composed of four divisions:
Field Operations Division
Information Systems Division
Oceanographic Division
Engineering Division

National Ocean Service:

https://oceanservice.noaa.gov

Here is their extensive tide guage data:

https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_us.html

"30 years of NOAA tide gauge data debunk 1988 Senate hearing climate alarmist claims

Guest Blogger / 3 days ago March 5, 2019

Guest essay by Larry Hamlin

NOAA has updated its coastal tide gauge measurement data through year 2018 with this update now providing 30 years of actual data since the infamous 1988 Senate hearings that launched the U.S. climate alarmist political propaganda campaign.

In June of 1988 testimony was provided before Congress by various scientists, including NASA’s Dr. James Hansen, claiming that man made greenhouse gas emissions were responsible for increasing global temperatures with the New York Times reporting, “Global Warming Has Begun, Experts Tells Senate”.

The Times article noted that “The rise in global temperature is predicted to cause a thermal expansion of the oceans and to melt glaciers and polar ice, thus causing sea levels to rise by one to four feet by the middle of the next century. Scientists have already detected a slight rise in sea levels.”

NOAA has updated its extensive U.S. coastal tide gauge data measurement records to include data through year 2018. These measurements include tide gauge data coastal locations for 25 West Coast, Gulf Coast and East Coast states along the Pacific Ocean, Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Ocean. In addition 7 Pacific island groups and 6 Atlantic island groups also have coastal location tide gauge data measurements updated as well.

In all more than 200 coastal locations are included in these measurements with more than 100 of these coastal locations with recorded data periods in excess of 50 years in duration. None of these updated NOAA tide gauge measurement data records show coastal location sea level rise acceleration occurring anywhere on the U.S. coasts or Pacific or Atlantic island groups.

Three decades after the politically driven speculation and conjecture offered at these 1988 Senate hearings NOAA tide gauge data fails to confirm or otherwise support these alarmist claims.

The latest updated NOAA coastal tide gauge measurement data shows locations likely to experience only inches of sea level rise by mid century (not one to four feet as climate alarmists speculated to Congress in 1998) with that increase consistent with long standing and unchanging rates of sea level rise measured at these coastal locations.

The longest NOAA tide gauge data record is at the Battery, New York with a 162 year long measurement period. This location along with all other NOAA U.S. coastal locations show no sea level rise acceleration occurring over the past 30 years despite scientifically flawed assertions otherwise by climate alarmists.

Dr. Judith Curry recently conducted an interview presented here at WUWT where she addressed the political drivers behind the climate alarmism campaign which distinguish it from being a genuine scientific endeavor. She offerred the following comments:     

“Sea level is rising, but this has been gradually happening since the 1860s; we don’t yet observe any significant acceleration of this process in our time.” Here again, one must consider the possibility that the causes for rising sea levels are partly or mostly natural, which isn’t surprising, says Curry, for “climate change is a complex and poorly understood phenomenon, with so many processes involved.”

“Climatology is becoming an increasingly dubious science, serving a political project,” she complains. In other words, “the policy cart is leading the scientific horse”

NOAA’s coastal tide gauge measurement data are systematically ignored by climate alarmist propaganda campaign activists and media. That action represents a clear condemnation of any scientific validity regarding their efforts."

Originally appeared in the Whatsupwiththat.com website, here is the link:

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/03/05/30-years-of-noaa-tide-gauge-data-debunk-1988-senate-hearing-climate-alarmist-claims/

The UN issues a stern warning that we only have 12 years before its too late.....Again!

Does anyone still take these clowns seriously?

Climate Depot reports:

"The United Nations has once again issued another dire climate change report claiming we must act before it’s too late. 

The media has dutifully reportedthis latest round of climate “tipping points.”  The latest UN report has extended the climate deadline by which we must allegedly empower the UN bureaucrats to save the world until 2030 or just 12 more years!
Read more:"
https://www.climatedepot.com/2018/10/08/un-issues-yet-another-climate-tipping-point-earth-given-only-12-more-years-to-make-unprecedented-changes-in-all-aspects-of-society/?mc_cid=000aa5d663&mc_eid=6fa9e2f8c9

Find the 2030 date especially interesting (UN Agenda 2030).

Even more interesting is the embedded article:

"Climate Bombshell: Global Warming Scare Is Based on ‘Careless and Amateur’ Data, Finds Audit of UN IPCC"

Read here: 

https://www.climatedepot.com/2018/10/07/climate-bombshell-global-warming-scare-is-based-on-careless-and-amateur-data-finds-audit-of-un-ipcc/

But don't let me prejudice you with the real data:

Former President Jimmy Carter: Venezuela Electoral System "Best in the world".

“As a matter of fact, of the 92 elections that we’ve monitored, I would say the election process in Venezuela is the best in the world.” 

39th President of the United States JIMMY CARTER

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/oct/03/why-us-dcemonises-venezuelas-democracy

https://www.globalresearch.ca/former-us-president-carter-venezuelan-electoral-system-best-in-the-world/5305779

https://www.cartercenter.org/peace/democracy/press-releases.html

The Crises Of Science

An in-depth analysis of peer-reviewed papers published in the most prestigious publications has revealed that (depending on the category) the reproducibility of scientific finding ranges between 10 and 39 percent.  This is shocking. Reproducibility is a core tenant of the scientific method.  The reasons range from outright fraud to deliberately using small sample sizes measuring a large number of metrics (a guaranteed recipe for false positives).  The peer review process is also fundamentally flawed.  This explains much of the false predictions on everything from climate science and the vaccine industry to why on Monday "drinking 5 cups of coffee may lower the risk of heart disease" and on Tuesday "Coffee may increase the risk of heart disease" etc.

This report from the Corbett Report is a must watch!

Here is the follow up with ideas for solving the crises.

And here is a more detailed look at the problem of reproducible results in science currently.

Related posts:

Why most published research findings are false:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1182327/?fbclid=IwAR0hdSFPX_legQsdS4rNfzoPS95reZ_whTTJF-VmkB0u4oHQpU9W2U7VQ8I

Why is there corruption in Cosmology?
dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/05/explaining-motivation-for-corruption-in.html?m=1

Why is there corruption with climate change? (Trigger warning, NOT a pro-climate change propaganda post, DO NOT COMPLAIN I WILL NOT RESPOND unless you engage on the merits)
dwahts.blogspot.com/2019/05/climate-change-big-banking-big-oil-big.html?m=1

How Internationalists Captured the US Department of State and US education curriculum

What you are about to discover should rock you to your foundations, if you excuse the pun.  Anyone who has even casually read this blog is probably somewhat on my page regarding the extent of social engineering, but if you are not familiar with the topic of specifically the tax-exempt foundations (the non-profits, better known as "think tanks") I assure you even the most cynical of observers will find it hard not to be shocked. Not just by the chicanery of these entities but also by the limited investigation government has actually done into  trying to establish the nature and extent of influence of powerful globalist bankers, deep state bureaucrats and the many faces of concentrated capital finance in the content and tone of the United States education system. This actually prevails now in many parts of the neoliberal world order and extends beyond curriculum to identity politics and issues such as climate change.

In 1952 a little known Select Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations and Comparable Organizations was an investigative committee of the United States House of Representatives between 1952 and 1954.^[1] The committee was originally created by House Resolution 561 during the 82nd Congress. The committee investigated the use of funds by tax-exempt organizations (non-profit organizations)  The committee was known as the Reece Committee after its chairman,  B. Carroll Reece.


Here is the sanitized Wikipedia entry which I don't recommend 

United States House Select Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations and Comparable Organizations

The alarming conclusions of this shocking report were squashed.  Thank god for Edward Griffith, the highly regarded author of "The Creature from Jekyll Island" where he exposed the establishment of the Federal Reserve Bank.  In this interview, we finally find out.  The interview is with Director Of Research Norman Dodd who headed the commission and gave it its name "The Dodd Report" shortly before he died. Its a lengthy interview, if you are pressed for time listen to the introduction for the first minute and from 28 minutes where he explains how the education curriculum for schools and universities and colleges were set up and the facts changed to suit the agenda of elite globalist dynasties, "Robber Barons" and corporates but in the benevolent appearing guise of the Rockefeller Foundation, Guggenheim Foundation, the Carnegie Foundation and others of thata ilk. It definitively covers issues such as the capture of the apparatus of state in a way that will impart understanding of how it is done. It was done with intelligence agencies, foreign policy (war and Petrodollar) and monetary policy. Health-care and vaccinations targetted too, perhaps 2019 orwor nextsnext year, called Agenda 21 in broadest terms parading as "sustainable development" and climate change.

Here is the full report, I am very thankful for archives.org, they have helped me find rare official documents before.

https://archive.org/details/DoddReportToTheReeceCommitteeOnFoundations-1954-RobberBaron

Here is a link for PDF format download:

http://brynmawrcollections.org/traces/archive/files/552952f585af5ef916a246c55fcb7a76.pdf

You probably suffer from "Trump Derangement Syndrome" whether you support him or not. Here is a simple test.

When Donald J Trump was elected President I was somewhat blindsided and scrambled for information to try and work out if he was serious or not at taking on the Globalist order which he referred to as "The Swamp".  In that scramble, I heard candidate Trump say many promising things that would indicate he was serious and that I supposed that even though Sheldon Adelson was funding his campaign which meant he would fail on Israel.  He also said some worrying things regarding wasting even more taxpayer money on a military who they completely fund for the benefit of a fourway warmongering orgy (The Permanent security or "Deep State", The Pentagon, The Saudi backed Petrodollar System and Israel).  This appeared to go against saving money and fighting less (as it appeared to him) pointless wars.  Nevertheless, I recognised a significant threat to the globalist establishment that had destroyed US manufacturing outsourced to cheap labour zones (to globalist the world is zones not countries with their own culture and values, just zones with aspects favourable or unfavourable to the bottom line).  He also called the Climate Change hoax out for what it is.  He also took swipes at the media, the MSM who have been propping up the establishment and ruining everyone who tells the truth about war as far as their powers will allow.

So if you casually scroll through the topics of this blog you will see that my big 3 broad concerns are  (each with inter-relating subplots)


1) War: The MIC, Pentagon, Saudi Arabia and Israel

2) Economics, Globalist "Free" Trade for shipping your Chinese made goods back home for the people whose jobs they outsourced to somehow buy back.

3) Internationalisation of sovereign energy policies and carbon taxes using the Climate Change hoax. Open Borders for a one world govt, Tade and currency unions.

4) The MSM or legacy media.

So Trump failed my first criteria, the most important, and passed the other three.  That was pretty good going and, perhaps naively, I wrote this on Nov 9th 2016:
"A Trump Victory, another nail in the globalist coffin."
https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2016/11/a-trump-victory-another-nail-in.html

Time has passed and Trump has delivered on some and not delivered on others.  In his defence, he has been consistent on energy policies, Trade and his justified attacks on the presstitute media which he rightfully sees CNN as the worst of the worst.  I admired him for taking the heat on relations with Russia (who foiled the globalist complete control of the middle east by thwarting the US regime change in Syria)  and he has since flip-flopped which is understandable because he was facing a lot of heat, I just wish he would work out its the MIC that mainly was behind that because you can't sell weapons with no enemy.

Where he fails is category 1 which is a much more problematic topic and Trump does not realise one thing: HE HAS BECOME A GLOBALIST!  I don't mean what the MSM falsely accuse him of which is having international business interests everywhere, its a free world and people against globalization have no problem with that, you become a globalist ONLY WHEN YOU START USING FORCE TO INTERFERE/TAKE FROM/USURP/IDEOLOGICALLY NURTURE places and people of various parts of the world because you have an interest in either exploiting them as a market, covet their resources or strategic positioning or you have some sort of ideological belief system that they are not conforming to by practising their own religion/culture/self-determination.  The latest case in point is Venezuela, but I started souring on Trump before that, last year I wrote this in May:
https://dwahts.blogspot.com/2018/05/trump-is-swamp-so-he-wont-drain-himself.html


What I'm trying to demonstrate is fair and balanced coverage.  I regularly get challenged as a non-partisan by the left and the right, both of whom imply I have Trump Derangement Syndrome.  Logic tells me that both camps cant be right, unless Trump derangement syndrome affects BOTH SIDES, then logically either both sides suffer from it, or I suffer from it but am the first person to ever suffer from it where it reverses its polarity to cause alternating deranged unconditional support for Trump, then it Flips a while later to  manifest as deranged unconditional attack on Trump.....

Which would you say is the most likely?

My Facebook page is in the Public domain, all my posts are public and provocative.  This is not by accident, I want every post I make to be referenced if needed and every blog post where I state my position accessible since so many hacks accuse me of inconsistencies I can thereby refute.  This is not just because I'm a big wanker who always has to be right, but when issues are important to you, and it is ourselves that are furthering our own cause, our record of consistency and our credibility need to able to be established in cases where they are called into question.

I have posted 13 favourable posts regarding Trump this year and 29 criticisms. I refer to posts not comments.  If you are not on Facebook there are equivalencies on other platforms. Its only February, go back and do the same check on your own timeline.  How many times did you attack/defend Trump?  Trust the empirical data.  Psychological conditions are difficult to self-analyse so this is how we keep ourselves in check.